3 november
(posted : draft of Is. 40)
… more and more the concept seems true ,
that “when we identify the eden-sun , this sun of us will go dark” ;
eventhough Is.40 is the most corrupted chapter we’ve ever seen ,
the same context in chapter 41 + 42 must prove the concept is correct :

(..then..) (kl=ki) +
[=I] (will lift [+him] [=’eden-sun’] up – [=to] (kl=al) – (..the wilderness..) (er=mdbr) ,
and – [=he] (will) – (..not..) (gbo=la) – (be) the abased one – (..anymore..) (bqo=od) ,

5 and=but – [+his] glorious – (..light..) (ieue=or) – (will be) revealed ;             [=’north’]

(..then ?..) (u=ki) +
all – flesh [=’on earth’] – (..(will) be ?..) (amr=eie) – [+in] (..darkness ?..) (ichd=chshk) ,
that=when – the mouth of – IEUE – (will have) spoken ;                  [=’the sun lifted up’]

6 (..because ?..) (kl=ki) +
(..I (will) make..) (bshr=osh) – (..the land [=’earth’] ?..) (chtsr=arts) +
(..dark..) (chsd=chsk) – as=at – (..noontime..) (tsits=tshr) ;               [<< common theme]

no one knows that day or hour – but my father only (Matthew 24) :
… though we agree , do remember that Christ often included a second meaning
(compare the example of Luke 18 – see two logs ago) ,
while “God will not act without telling his servants (or: his servants tell)” ,
since in all prophets He asks the sons “to go declare (a range of things)” ! —
why would this sun-theme be different …?

speculation (!) :
… now if ‘our sun will go dark’, as attested in several chapters ,
what are the odds that only “his legal enemy can do that” : the eden sun ..?
Enoch lengthly describes something bizarre : how the eden-sun (as binary !)
completes his 365 days – and he even mentions the surplus days —
exact the same number of the (supposed !) circulation of earth around this sun !

further (!) speculation :
… so there must be some inverted connection going on here :
does ‘our sun’ like “feeds-off the eden-sun (or moon)” ? ;
compare depiction to right —
we know that images are often deceiving ,
and do NOT say the (supposed) object is the eden-sun
(it can be anything , from a lensflare to a piece of debris)
but the idea is intriguing —
you see our sun being the white circle in the centre ,
but he appears to react upon a (4-8 x larger) “type thing”
(Enoch wrote “the (eden) sun is very very large…) ;


(STEREO , 23 sept ’20)