30 june
will be a bit longer log please
(while the John 6 section here will be posted as separate page , soon) ;
— selfdestroying does not help … there s no optIon but again another run …
upon waking the dream showed pages full of names and emails … hundreds ,
it would have been more but the dream stopped … names of all of you 144  
though they probably were not actual names .. the site was from one or some
of you who had collected all of them … which was sweet to see
— yes it was a mistake to go for “the 24th”…
it was a risk and turned out bad …
but the decision to follow it was because of that horrible silence ;
it may have just written “third year” because of
the thrice repeat of the ’take to heart’ line ,
and if anything , it again shows how any line can be corrupted 
            then please ,
the dream should imply that – apart from any date – the war to complete the
144 must still be going on … even in these days … today an article appeared
suggesting to us that we’re up against millions ,
related to ’the king of the North’ ,
see the breakdown below and the link at the end of this log
— as usual the language is long and flowery but it does address us
intending ’to disarm us by large numbers’
through a ritual called ’the last supper’
so the first and main question is : what is true of ’the last supper’ ?
and why the king is almost forcefully commanding this event to her millions ?
… 
asking these type questions is always dangerous
and certainly is not intended to steal away or disgrace an event
… but John 6 will prove to be interesting ;
that we have several Spells talk about ‘drinking blood‘ (see index)
and listed creatures as ‘a fiery blood-drinking serpent’ in them shows that
the whole ‘drinking of blood’ is foreign to anything of God and Christ, no ?
but not for the king
… — that three gospels show the last supper inclusive those lines is no proof :
you saw how Esau got his dirty hands on all the texts : every single one ;
but we get somewhere when God says in prophets “eat My words” 
because that is the same where Christ referred to in John 6
and this context must have been the same at ’the last supper’ : words !
John 6
… after the miracle of multiplying the bread (-and fish) the text is corrupt :
there is NO peekaboo here with “people rowing back and forth 25 stadia” :
the text stróngly suggests that the theme was “the return of Christ” —
(it looks like ‘Christ walking upon the sea’ , line 19 , was inserted here
because the bread story continues in line 23) ; neither it were “the people”
informing about His return (24-25) for He only discussed that with his 
disciples OR with the Pharisees : because these were afraid for that ! ;
while the ‘Rabbi’ (in 25) suggests that indeed Esau wanted to know !
(and hence furiously corrupted also THIS section !) :
(25) 
they said – to Him : Rabbi , when – [..] – (will) you become=return ?

… perhaps added “to this world” when ‘hither’ (-hode) was (-kosmos) ; 
and if indeed it were the Pharisees then the respond must have been : 
(26)
[+but] [..] Christ – answered – them , [..] saying : 
verily , verily , I say – unto you           +
b
you desire – Me=others – (to) not – [..] – see=find – the miracle of    +
[..2x..] – eating – the – bread of – [..] filled=life ;               +

… above – also in prophets that Esau does it because he hates Jacob ;
next (27) : the bread now equated with words :
(27)
[+because] you labour – (to make to) me=perish (mê=apollymênen !)
[..1x..] – [..] [+my] food=words (brosin=logos ; different as ‘bread’ !)        +
b
but=and – the – food=words of (brosin=logos) – [..2x..] – everlasting – life
which – the – son=Father of – [..] human=Me              +
c
(has) give=spoken – [+through] (the-) this=prophets
for=as – the – father=scroll – [+which] [+you] (have) sealed – [..2x..] ;   

… the term ’to seal’ here is a huge red flag ,
while the phrase ‘sealed scroll’ is almost universal in prophets , 
as is the dual “my words and those the father spoke through the prophets” ;
— next (28) is difficult : but they want to know the TIMING :
(28)
then – they say – to him : what=whén (!) – [=it] (will) do=happen         +
that – the works=words of – [..] God – (will be) work=understood ?  

… next (29) :
what can be a possible answer … ? in fact only this (see Parables) :
(29)
[+and] Jesus – answers – them , [..] saying – to them : 
this=that – (will be) the work of – [..] God ,
b
that=but – you=I (will) believe=return (pisteus=hypostrephô)        +
into=when        +
[+I] (will) whom=find – the (olden-) sent=belief (apesteilen=pisteus !)
[+on] (this-) that=world (eikenos=kosmos !) ; 

… next (30) ,
but they are not satisfied :
(problem is a short 30 here before ’the manna’ in 31) :
(30)
[=but] – they say – to him :
what – [..] example (‘sign’) – (will you) show – [=us] – forth
that – [=they] (will) see=find – [..] the (olden-) belief             + 
b
[likely :]
you=by – working=understanding – (the-) what=scroll (ti=biblos) ? ;    +  

… next (31) :
what they wánt to say is “the sons won’t see the difference” “because they
will judge the words / descriptions on face-value” : like literal ‘manna’ :
(31)
[+because] – our – [..] fathers – ate – manna – in – the – desert , 
b
as – (it-) is – written :   
he gave – them – bread (!) – out – of the – sky (‘heaven’) ;

… next (32) :
the bread WILL be given — future tense , since ’the fathers’ (Reformation)
will still eat ’the manna’ : see Revelation , Daniel 11 and other chapters ;   
(32)
then – Jesus – says – to them : verily , verily , I say – to you :
[..1x..] – Moses – gave – you – [=that] – bread – out – of the – sky (‘heaven’) 
b
but – my – Father       +
(will) give – [=them] – the – true – bread – out of – heaven ;

(33)
for=as – the – bread=word (artos=logos) of – [..] God
[+which] is=will – [..] descend – out of – [..] heaven
b
[probably , because see next section :]
and – (will) give=restore – the – world=souls (=sons?) – [+to] (eden-) life ;

above (33) : 
though in prophets is ‘my word will saturate the earth like dew’ given
as example , here it’s linked to “the endtime” (see 45) yet the entire
next section is destroyed :
[next section : corrupted / inserted / repeated :]
 — line (34-35) was either said by the people or the disciples :
      NOT by Pharisees 
 — while ‘bread’ (in 35) is a corrupt intro to next lines : it is “wáy and the life” ; 
 — compare (39) and (40) AND (44) , very similar ; corrupted ;
 — (41) and (42) are Esau’s joke (and see 61) ;
 — (45) is a red flag — has ‘written / prophets / taught’ and see the line :
 —  then line (48-49) again start about ‘manna’ almost as if Esau repeated it
       to make sure that Christ would be considered as the bread —
       NOT the word
 ; 
       hence Esau’s corruption shows now as ‘my flesh is the bread’ in (51) !     
      (besides Christ never died ‘for this world’) ; 
 — (52) corrupt (comp. 41-42) : an excuse-line to repeat the theme ; see next ;
 — (53-54-55-56-57-58) all corrupt : even MORE flesh , blood and manna ;  
 — (61) now the disciples ‘murmur’ — instead of the jews ; 
 — line (64) “the betray Him” must have been part of the ‘last supper’ event 
      so you see the connection of the corruptions here ? ; see also (70-71) ;
[conclusion of John 6 :]
… though we learned the buildups the second part of the chapter is lost
to restore – also because Esau probably added half of the lines there ;
Christ could have explained more about the conditions for his return
for example line 45 may have been :
“as it is written in the prophets , 
[..] (the-) all=sons – (will) be=understand – (the-) taught=words of – [..] God ,
[..] – then=when – [..] [+they] (will) listen – besides=to – the – Father ,
and [+they] (will) learn – [+when] – I (will be) coming – unto – me=them”  
 
(which is this 3d year thing…..)
but the corruptions blur the lines this one could be embedded in ;
therefore the ‘eat My flesh and drink My blood’ : is NOT maintainable .
… line (63) has “the flesh profits nothing” which matches the prophets
since the flesh is not even able to understand His WORDS ! That’s the point !
what then would “identifying with His physical flesh in death” then help ?
does it make the soul one ounce more humble ? no – the soul buys it off
and you can imagine ‘where’ that energy is going …
— speaking of witch (yes) ,
the king
(open link below for the numbering in the text ; just some examples) :
– the address already shows the goal : the ‘eating’ ;
– in (2) the phrase “(as) Guardians of the Tradition” is telling ;
– (3) is an attempt – smokescreen – to establish the ‘legality’ of the goal ; 
– last part of line (4) is nasty : read : so that it will NEVER happen ;
    while the quoted Rev. 5 is about the 144 – and note the added italics ;
– first line in (5) is a lie ; and be attent to the “we must not allow ourselves
    even a moment of rest (+rest of line)” : you see what they did there ? ;
– (6) and (7) describe the ritual ;
– (8) is a strawman : He was directly present in the souls of the believers
    and the reason for later ábsence is exactly what Esau worked ; 
– (9) ‘highest moment’ ? now starts the idolatry of the senses :
– (11) idolatry continued but to keep humans on this planet ;
– (12) ‘not magick’ ? the constant repeat of the eucharist is a constant 
    evoking conform the conditions óf that liturgy ;
– (15) creating ‘sons’ but in their way – through the Ritual ;
– (18) ‘cult’ – inside joke ; no we wouldn’t want that ; 
– (19) read : to prevént “individual exploration” – what you and we do ;
– (21) ’the liturgy needs to be effective’ (sic) , see 12 ; through “the senses” ;
– (24-25-26-27) so what is ’the power of a symbol’ else as magick ?
– (28-29-30-31) apparently ’the pinnacle – the liturgy’ is not powerful
   enough for the king ;
– (35) ‘reform the liturgy [..] to acquire [..] ritual dynamics’ sic ;
– and then finally , in (41) , the reason for all the longwindedness : 
 “Our participation in the Body and the Blood of Christ has no other end
  then to make us become that which we eat.”  
the rest we skipped for now , you can read it yourself ;
that last line is really chilling — it is Wrong in every single aspect and gives
connotations with that realm we are doing everything to escape from , right ;
and is totally different as to be washed by the blood of our Lord 
closing ;
Sir we approached this one so carefully … to be sure to not misunderstand ;
if this theme indeed was something bothering you or a yoke upon us
promise you somehow show that it’s out of the way ,
you please come quickly and get us out of this ape … and the SRA ones …
and promise you protect each and everyone of us in the mean time 
– you have to forgive us much but it won’t be allright until you take us
[1]
https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/
2022/06/29/0501/01027.html#ing