|4 – [..] the 37 (=the number of Jacob’s family , likely , as the foreign ÂAM-people).
[of?] the speech [R]. [of?] he (=who?) [S]. the things to know [?, REKH]. +
(=read : the 37 of he [Joseph] who has the speech of knowing things..?)
3 – as (?). the double plume (=part of both worlds?). (of Egyptian-) existence. ;
[for?] the ÂAM-people. the [..unreadable ; TCHÂT?, see below]. to birth. ,
[and] the (ânkh-) life. [of] the things of peace. to establish [KHNUM-ram?]. ;
2 – the (will-) power of the foremost (-one) (=God?).
the son (=Josef?). [to] (Egyptian-) existence. to bring. ,
[and?] the ÂAM-people. [in?] existence. the ones [UÂ?]. to know. ,
1 – ‘some royal name’. who was. [+of?] the pharaoh (-of the north).
them (=the 37) [?, SN?]. to guide. to. (Egyptian-) existence.
[in] the staff (‘rule’). [of] the sixth year (=of the pharaoh).”
we can chisel the above when we would know móre depicted texts –
like for example at 20.07 it writes above the people ,
“the 37. ÂAM-people. [of] he. existence. [to] (Egyptian-) existence. to come.”
(so they definitely are ARRIVING in Egypt here !) ;
next TCHAT writing is unknown but could be TCHT ‘self’ , “for their selves to rebirth”
since they left for Egypt because of the famine : interestingly before the first gazelle
is written “rule [HEQ] of the foreign-land” and below that ÁB “thirsty” ;
likely intended as one line : “thirst rules the foreign land” ;
there is listed a hieroglyph pertaining to Joseph it is unsure if he is named here –
below at 20.21 mins you see SER “prince” which would be very appropriate for him ,
and per buildup of the scene he may be even the figure who hólds the sign – at 20.45 :
his name is NUU-NES , “(having-) the words inside of the tongue (or: language)”
for he explained the immediate future of Egypt – and compare line 4 above ,
while in front of him shows “design” (or: scroll) and “peace” ,
not unlikely referring to the plan he made to have food in Egypt ,
and compare how he himsélf is portrayed as designer – and as Egyptian
imagine what we could have done when we’d have had access to everything ,
the funds , the energy and all that ! Most of the miles of hieroglyphs are mere
‘theological treaties about the other reality’ and are – per definition – tricky ,
but examples like this show again WHY we went from glyphs to the Prophets ;
exactly like God said “.. I will make the tombs of the pharaohs to be opened” …
they remained ‘Egyptians’ (corrupt-adam-souls) who always hated old-Ishral ,
hence the term ÂAM (-people) as a deflection of root ÂM ‘to devour (-them)’ ;
we never said we agreed with many of Esau’s (!) claims in the video —
then the 100,000 Assyrian soldiers wanting to destroy Jerusalem
were also killed by a gasleak instead of an angel ?
(let alone the type disasters in Revelation …) ;
there’s nothing wrong with looking for possible earthly influences
but ‘the staffs becoming snakes’ at the start already indicated other factors at play