[20 may :
context of this page has not changed ,
just an interesting adaption considered our Date :
we saw the connection between disciples + we + Originals  in Pentecost pages
and because “the ultimate restoration” was the subject during the goodbye dinner ,
He did not mention the Isaiah Jubilee quote “that morning at the Temple”
but “during that same goodbye dinner” ! for that makes much more sense !


[all Gospels] : the ‘Last Supper’
 is “the Heavenly Banquet” !

[NO ‘eat my flesh’ = Sorcery] 
why ‘the Western god’ is
Adam disguised as Christ

[version ; 2023-05may.03-7]

[just before Passover 2023] 
see also Daniel and Ptolemy II pages




older Roman Catholic crucifix
representing ‘the Western god’


‘the Last Supper’ is

‘the Heavenly Banquet’

or : the great Promise to the disciples (-and their people)

and why that ‘Last Supper’ supports Adam as ‘the Western god’


           … this page will ask much from you — yet we’re confident that you will understand it all ,
           and moreover even agree  with the concept put forward here ;
           as always please remember that we’re treading very , very carefully – but surely , okay :
           the Supper itself
           the point is not “to undo Christ having a dinner with his disciples” because it did happen ,
           but that dinner had another context and was not about “eat My flesh and drink my blood” ,
           since the official KJV story has a fundamental problem :
           in the OT God forbids consuming blood (-of animals) yet somehow Christ has gone
           agáinst that law by saying these things ? — impossible , whatever U-turns the ‘scholars’
           have invented to try justify this contradiction :
           therefore any ‘Holy Communion’ be it in Catholic or Protestant form is an abomination 
           because it is Egyptian Sorcery caused by a corrupted quote — and that has a reason :        
           from KJV’s ‘Last Supper’ to ‘the Western god’ 
           and as if that corruption wasn’t grave enough on itself already ,
           it directly links to the immense theme “the king of the North [=West]” as in Daniel 
           which is “the spiritual consciousness having ruled the West for the past 2000 years” :
           we have seen , see pages ,
           how Western spirituality and culture developed in a certain way as resúlt of Adam
           having corrupted the scroll — or better , having been the instigator of that ;
           but it’s worse : Adam disguised himself as Christ : as ‘the Western god’, the crucifix 
           … Adam first obfuscated what God has said
           so that the people had no proper context anymore concerning Christ’s mission on earth ,
           and after he corrupted what Christ has said , Adam himself filled that vacuum , 
           while KJV’s “Last Supper” theme has been a pillar to maintain this awful mixture …. 
           Western christianity : at best  “an awful mixture” 
           for this very reason Christ addresses the five Western (!) churches of Revelation ,
           consistently adding “… but there will be those that will NOT have confirmed to her” 
           because he ofcourse was aware of this huge problem !
           in the scroll , this ‘mixture’ is always Negative , and what Christ says is mirrored in 
           the prophets by God speaking about “the prostitution of endtime christianity” 
to create a buildup the page contents are
part 1 :
              the ‘Last Supper’ problem

              – impression of the KJV text
              – interpreting ‘a heavenly banquet’ : side-by-side text comparison
              – the Supper was a positive goodbye to His disciples                                   [sic] 
                  conclusion :
                  restoration of events at and around the ‘last supper’ — as “the farewell dinner” :
                        date :               last day of Unleavened (the 7th)
                        morning    :   Christ at the Temple square telling the Isaiah “acceptable day” theme
                        afternoon :   the last supper — as farewell dinner
                        evening :        the Ascension at the mount of Olives
                        restored text : will follow this part 1   [but still under construction] 
part 2 :
              the ‘Western god’ problem : the mixture of Adam and Christ

              – history :
                 from the Greek mindset to Alchemy as “the transubstantiation” (-of ‘bread and wine’)
              – early medieval christianity had nothing to hold on to
              – how the mimic-deity filled that gap
              – the ‘Holy Communion’ as continuous re-connection with Adam
part 3 :
              example : “drinking blood” in Egyptian Coffin Text spell 69

              – why the ‘Communion’ aberration keeps feeding the evil Mystery-Babylon realm



part 1

the ‘Last Supper’ problem

… her current form as KJV’s “eat my flesh and drink my blood” is not sustainable ,
—  God clearly forbids ‘drinking blood’ , Gen.9 , Lev.19 , Lev.3 , Deut.12 , Lev.7 and others ;
       He gives as reason “because the life is in the blood” and though we don’t (-yet) understand the
        workings of this the command sounds plausible      [-and see below] ;
             washed  by blood :
             instead , this is a proper and consistent pattern : in Isaiah “the 7 Torches” are being cleansed ,
             while the high-priest of the Tabernacle sprinkled blood across the altar or the ark   —
             intriguing is the possibility that the blood of Christ went down into the hill dripping upon the ark 
             of the covenant hidden there by Jeremiah (see page) ; 
— the Sorcery aspect :
     the “drinking blood” is literally so said in the Egyptian Spells – see examples down this page ,
     and this type sorcery has been ‘modernized’ in the West as “Alchemy” , the one substance
     transforming into another substance , so that Alchemy is the core of ‘the Holy Communion’ !     
— the timing :
      a more practical problem is ‘the timing’ of the alleged last supper :
      the common solution held by scholars is “that it was held the evening befóre Passover
      (so , the 13th instead of the evening of the 14th)” , arguing “that it was held in secret” while
       some even claim “that Christ was refreshingly not bound by OT laws” – which is Nonsense ;
              because it is easy to see what Esau did here :
              he simply inserted the “heavenly banquet” event into ‘the events at Passover’ ,
              while the complete inconsistency of the Last Supper version in all four gospels combined 
               with illogical and conflicting actions (-in the text) supprt that Esau doctored with the section 
                important for ús :
                — in the texts the timing is at ‘Unleavened’ ,
                     and though it writes “at the first day (-of Unleavened)”, who says it wasn’t “the last” ?
                — then appear phrases as “the covenant” and “until [..] the kingdom of the Father” 
                     that are Red flags to us – especially the latter because that must  be ‘Eden’  
interpreting ‘a heavenly banquet’ upon the text :
… knowing Esau’s tricks , while keeping the above in mind , we first must decide “which parts”
in the text can be valid in order to have a frame we can build upon :
the ‘preparing a room’ seems Valid :
… BUT : remember how in the alleged “triumphal entry” the “preparing (-a donkey)” was false ,
please see that page , as a concept likely stolen from hére ;
therefore this “preparing a room” can only be valid IF we can match that symbolism with any
palpable theme that would justify this event … true ? (and there is one !) ;
the ‘dining itself’ seems Valid :
… though Esau corrupted the reason  and the timing  of it ,
the ‘dining’ itself can be valid – IF we can find a satisfying theme in óther sentences :
and here the “until [….] the kingdom of the Father” comes into play ;
preceding Mt.25 : the endtime wedding-banquet parables !
… how much is the chance that those were an introduction to this banquet with His disciples ?
and why would Mt.26 “the last supper” be illogically placed at the end of the book … ? ;
the ‘betrayal by Judas’ is questionable :
… showing only in two versions ; the problem then is ofcourse “if not , what wás the theme” :  
(21) “And as they did eat, he said, Verily I say unto you, that one of you shall betray me.” ,
however , ‘betray’ is (-paradosei) [from 3860 paradidómi] but ‘paradise’ is (-paradeisos) !
you see how suspicious that is please …?
Mt.26:17-30 :
heavenly banquet

           the supper was ‘a goodbye’ to His disciples — but a pósitive one
           … you see that the overall buildup has not changed : just the context  has ,
           making it more easy to accept that the supper is true — just NOT as part of Passover ; 
           the promise to the twelve :
           we discovered the concept in Paul’s letters that “the first christians would be saved ,
           but that their restoration in their Original (-body) would only happen in the endtime”  ;
           therefore it is imaginable that they cóuld have felt a certain … disappointment , right 
           (suppose that WE would have to wait so long , as well , after all we found …?) ,
           and it makes absolute sense that He again would address this theme by this supper 
           as some final confirmation that everything would come alright ;
           [besides ,
           their disappointment must have been comforted when the Spirit came around them 
           after Pentecost , considered Paul’s words “because He speaks with us directly”]       
                        restoring the events at and around ‘the banquet’
a) timing : “the 7th day of Unleavened” (-see below)
      that morning : Christ speaks at the Temple square about “the acceptable day” 
      [mirror : John 7:37 “In the last day [..] of the feast [=Unleavened], Jesus stood, crying out :”
      [mirror : Lk.4:19 “To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.”
        in that same speech , “the endtime parables” (10 virgins)                         [Mt.25 , before this 26] 
      end of that morning : explaining the parables on the way tó the Upper room
      because He ALWAYS explained parables to his disciples in private ;
      an interesting fragment remained in line 31 (-of this Mt.26) ,
     “Then saith Jesus unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, 
      I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad.” 
      1) this allegedly happened after the supper – but it was ‘after the event at the Temple’ ;
      2) the quote comes from Zechariah 13 
            which is – very corrupted – about “the failed pastors now in the Tribulation”  
            because line 3 there is, restored , “the people hunting them , telling why did you not warn us”,
            line 5 , restored , “I should never have become a pastor” and line 7 a warning that if they do not
            hearken , “the pastor and the prophet will stumble together with the people” :
            conclusion : therefore , at this point He explained the parables of (previous-) Mt.25 ;
            just Esau glued the ‘3 times betrayal and the rooster’ after this ;
      that afternoon : ‘preparing the upper room’ (-for the banquet)‘                                  [this Mt.26] 
      Mt.26 writes “on the first [=last] day of Unleavened” , line 17 ,
      though Esau added that simply because it still wás ‘the last day of Unleavened’ ! ;
      the “preparing” symbolized ‘the 144 that will cause the heavenly banquet to happen’ :
            theme at the banquet : “how His friends will be restored at the heavenly banquet” ,     
            see the side-by-side comparison shown further above ,
            and note how this very logically fits after the Parables and their explanation ! ;
      that evening : the transformation [=Ascension] at the mount of Olives
      because it completely fits the buildup until now ;
      just Esau cut it up and placed it elsewhere , and made everyone ‘to go back into the city , afterwards’ 
      which does not make any Sense whatsoever : the original closing was “and He blessed them
      and was taken up” as a separate line which Esau glued at the end of the gospels ;
                    the ‘Holy Communion’ aberration :
                    2000 years the main Ritual serving “the god of the West”
                    who in reality is ‘Adam’ — disguised as Christ
            … this theme is so extensive and complicated that ‘giving a summary’ is not easy ,
            but below an attempt as condensed version – hoping it’s to the point and easy to read :     

# 1) 
the main cause : the corrupted scroll
… whatever the so-called ‘early church fathers’ may have thought
or written concerning the alleged “this is my flesh and blood” ,
all their reasonings came forth because of the corrupt scroll
combined with their type half-magical thinking which was a direct 
result of the new Greek worldview  presénting herself as ‘Reason’
but was in fact “a new consciousness projecting a subject-object  
relation upon this world”  : because it was the new consciousness 
implemented by Adam as weapon against (God’s-) other Reality ,
as the main theme of Daniel “the king of the North [=West]” ;
# 2)
the ‘transubstantiation’ (-of bread and wine) is ‘alchemy’
… the Greek Dualism caused “the realm of ideas” above and
“the realm of reality” below , with the Self (‘subject’) inbetween ,
trying to restore a workable (!) relation between both realms  —
namely as ‘appealing tó the Self’ , so that in fact the human  had
become the centre of everything that Is ;
many therefore pursued that relation in a mystic way through a
concept called “the Philosopher’s Stone”, attempting to turn
ordinary substances into gold , as the work of Alchemists  —
and the connection with “the Holy Communion” starts to show  :
in similar manner “the bread was thought to literally transform
into the flesh of Christ” at the very moment of blessing by the god

above : the moment that the host was
lifted up , “the god would be raised from
the dead for a moment” (shown by both 
angels holding the god) “to temporary
bless the now empty Western world” ;
in later times the priest would even be
held up by other priests to still can meet
the disappearing god – see text

# 3)
Western christianity revered ‘a crucified deity’ — in the guise of Christ                                                          [sic]
… this aspect is important and , frankly , incredible   — 
Western christianity had become nothing less as “a Death Cult” : the people were afraid to the bone ,
surrounded by symbols of death like the ominous sound of the church bells and crucifixes standing
at every corner of everyday life , while they focused upon the burial rite because that was the only
way that a soul could be reunited with her deceased deity represented by the crucifix : 
it was completely different from the notion of the first Christians  who celebrated that Christ had risen  ,
and He rightly describes this era as “the second church (-of the 7)” lasting for ’10 days’ – 1000 years ,
adding how “they have very little” compared to the first Christians ;
the main problem is that “at some point , the Western god took the place of Christ” so that outwardly
the people may have revered Christ but in fact all the Attributes and type Liturgies and symbolism revered
anóther deity : namely the deity that was responsible for their own (death cult-) thinking  ;
         the réason for this turning-point must be “a total lack of knowledge of the scroll”  , combined with that
         same half-magical thinking as that new consciousness that still confúsed souls :
         souls at that time still were , so to speak , “like little children” in behaviour and thought-life ,
         having an immediate relation with their surroundment instead of “an abstract one” (-like we have) ;
         but also théy felt that the spiritual realm had disconnected  from the earthly one

         because they understood that the Western god had brought his sacrifice ,
         and were thankful that they and their culture  had survived through it 
         (and this notion became even stronger when the year 1000 approached ,
         and the god was seen as the one also having averted the Apocalypse) ,
         but after his death they felt left alone by him as if they were orphans
         and the substitute ‘Maria the mother’ cult also started to gain ground ;
         yet ,
         though the people must have known it was the Gólgotha sacrifice ,
         somehow that sacrifice became connected with the Western god  ,   
         and because since his sacrifice the world had become empty and dark , 
         the only way to receive some light was to invoke the disappearing god
         so that he would bless the people and the world during a short moment ;
         the blessing of the god became crucial
         and therefore ‘the bread and wine made alive’ is THE pillar of Western
         christianity because through it “they were no longer orphans” since now 
         they had a repeated palpable relic that would make their god close , 
         as the proof of the constant renewal by the god
         [an even stronger relic as the venerated ‘bones of saints’ or other type 
         memorials of now gone piety , which comforted but could not renew]

         but the god more and more withdrew into the Heavenlies , abandoning the believers ,
         therefore these had to follow the god IN the heavenlies , so that monks had to hold 
         up the priest performing the raising of the host ; and for the same reason the Gothic
         style came up in the 11th century : as huge high churches that could contain the god
         … however , ‘following the god’ became virtually impossible — shown by the implosion 
         of several huge cathedrals while still being built , since the limit of constructional options 
         was reached — and christianity could no longer ‘hold down’ her Western god 
         the Reformation
         … again , “the bread and wine made alive” can be considered THE pillar of Western christianity 
         for the past 2000 years : ofcourse also Luther was a child of his time , but though he coined the
         so-called “Sola Scriptura” — but read : the KJV ! — he could not let go of the transubstantiation 
         concept , having embedded it in his theology ;
         and although Calvin (whom we suspect was cooperating with Esau !) suggested a more ‘sober’ 
         symbolism of the bread and wine in the form of “a sign” , neither he refuted the idea but hid it :
         this all because the root-corruption of it , in the scroll , was never erased ,
         as the very thing we now have annulled through this page !                  
# 4)
why ‘the Western god’ indirectly links to ‘Adam’                                                                                                          [sic]
… but only because of all that we learned ,
and the arguments below are no semantics :
— though the crucifix as “the body upon the cross” is supposed to represent Christ
      it was but ‘a moment in Time’ that this happened because the status quo is that He rose  ;
      therefore it is not a true representation of Christ ,
      but can (and DID) turn into an Occult Ritual “to keep (-the idea of) Him being dead” 
      namely by worshipping the crucifix (-idea) in combination with the related rites ,
— in fact ,
      what the crucifix really represents is ‘the human flesh’ 
      which is exactly the human flesh that Adam designed ,
      and by worshipping the crucifix indirectly the deity that MADE that flesh is being honoured ;
      moreover : the presumed deity upon the cross , considered a deity , is “the flesh itself” as well ,
      because God addresses it in Ezekiel as if she is “an own entity” , “a being” ;
— and here comes ‘the disguise’ ,
      though exoterically (‘outwardly’) the crucifix represents Christ , esoterically  it links to Adam 
      who is the proper adversary of Christ — many verses support this
      (Adam is not ‘in our league’ so to speak since ours are “the sons of Ammon”) ,
— the real problem starts when the scroll is connected to this
      and no other deity or demon has any Legal Right to connect to the scroll but Adam  ,
      since the entire “sealed scroll” theme is about him ,  
— therefore ,
      the “Holy Communion” is in fact a method of continuous re-connection with Adam                                [sic]
      because now the occult Ritual is “connecting the crucifix with the scroll” through that Liturgy
      which is in fact sanctioning this occult Ritual through His (-corrupted) words
      so that fáctually it is practicing Sorcery ,
                bluntly said : this Ritual keeps Adam alive :
                because the concealed deity is asked “to bless the flesh and the blood” , sic ,
                which Adam ofcourse , from his point of view , is more then willing to do ,
                but in fact Adam Ritually feeds his enemy – Christ – to believers , to be devoured                       [sic]
                [it is a terrible phrase Sir but telling as it is] 
                because in Ritual sense it. is. pure. cannibalism !
                we’ll get to this theme later , below ;
                the ‘light’ feeding [=nourishing] Adam :
                we saw in Ptolemy’s Egyptian tablet how “his gift to Adam” , namely the corrupted scroll ,
                would cause “a light” that would enter and nourish the evil region – Mystery-Babylon ;
                decades ago there was a book of a false prophetess Ana Mendez who described that she
                saw “black smoke coming from the hands of people who gave léss tithes as they could” 
                but “white light from the hands of those who gave accordingly” ,
                the example is poor but may help you to imagine what he meant with that (negative-) ‘light’
                in relation to the consciousness of the king of the North [=West]  ; 
part 3
: ‘drinking blood’ in Coffin Text spell 69
                   … even the ‘official translators’ have not misunderstood this phrase ,
                   however the question is always “what did it mean exactly” ;
                   first the quote , below , with a short explanation ;
                   the full text of that Spell (-segment) is at the end of this page , with link :

[and so] (matrix-) existence to make (‘as concept’).
[by means of] the (eden-) blood. [of] thou. (eden-) existence. to drink. ;

reading the column upwards you can see ‘the drinking figure’ SUR
and a bit below that SNF ‘blood’ with the “essence” determination ;
first , he is talking to you and we ,
and he drinks something as an aspect that is stolen from Eden 
for ‘blood’ reads as “the essence / of he [=eden]” 
which is like the alchemistic “Holy Communion” transformation !

… the context of the Spell shows that this “blood” exists of “light-particles of eden-life”  
which they first stole , then ‘purified’ in order to can use them (or it would kill them !) ,
and these particles are “as the perfume” namely “for their spirit-body” 
— as the one which Adam designed for their corrupt type (Esau-) soul — 
so that their soul will be nurtured by these particles of eden-life : or she would dry out !
you see ?
though they are “corrupt souls” they DO come forth from the eden-mother who birthed them
(see the several prophet pages about this theme) and therefore they need eden-aspects ,
so quite literally they vampire upon eden-life :
glyph “ânkh life” literally méans “to vampire” 
and there is no glyph for ‘eden-life’ , ofcourse , but “the altered eden-life” they call “blood” 
         (spells are extremely complicated but the above is a fair interpretation)
         … in other Spells “the blood is revolving in the (matrix-) atmosphere” 
         imagined as those particles that continuously support their soul via their spirit-body ,
         we also did Pyramid Text 535 which is about the same blood subject , 
         but in a setting of other themes which we don’t understand yet (is often a problem with spells) ;
the ‘Holy Communion’ gives THEM the right to continue
this is the real nasty aspect of the whole thing  —
sadly it is irrelevant that the souls on earth are unaware what they are maintaining because the
evil realm loves to work through deceit ; and because the parallel between the ‘Communion’ 
and their “drinking blood” is so close , indeed the Communion was the Ritualistic pillar of this ; 
PDF page 313     https://realpyramidtexts.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ct1.pdf#page=313 ,
read from bottom upwards – so first column k , then j , etc ; 
CT 69
I 239                   said to Eden – in casu : you and we – who is the ‘thou’ here

[but 1x ; is a kind of short version of this page] 
my (matrix-) words of (matrix-) ânkh-life.                                            
[are because of] (matrix-) existence. existence to make (‘as creational concept’).        +
[through] the (matrix-) speech [-of hail]. [by] thóu (=eden’s). existence. ,
[because] (this type of-) speech (‘to create’). thou. [to] (the matrix-) existence. to give. ;

[and therefore] ,
[by means of] the dead ones (‘eden words’). [of] (eden-) existence. (matrix-) existence to make. ,
[because?] the speech. [of?] thou. to end. [up in? , because of?] the (matrix-) hunting-net.
[and by] he (‘matrix net’). [are?] the divine doubled (matrix-) words.      +                             [unlikely : ‘brothers’] 
for. (matrix-) ânkh-life. ,     +                                                                                                                     [ânkh-life itself is ‘speech’] 
[namely for] Ôn (‘Mystery-Babylon’). as. he. the (dimensional-) side. above (‘matrix north’). ; 
[because by?] the opener                                                       (the divine matrix-word by the opened eden-root ; UPU) 
[as the hail by the real-adam-soul]  
the one to connect to. (matrix-) existence. ,      +

[empty]                                                                           [d: or : “the made (matrix-) existence continually drinks the blood”] 
[and so] (matrix-) existence to make. 
[by means of] the (eden-) blood. [of] thou. (eden-) existence. to drink. ;
[therewith] (matrix-) existence to make.       +
[of] the things to rejoice in.
                                                              [or ‘as the vessels in the (dimensional-) foreground] 
[for by] thou. (eden-) existence. (is) the (matrix-) unguent (BAS). ;
[by] the one (=eden) [for-] (matrix-) ânkh-life. (is) (matrix-) ânkh-life. ;                                                    [=vampirism] 
… now , 69 lists many concepts which they stole but only this page is about “blood” 
(so we’d need to find other spells concerning this theme in order to compare more aspects) ,
— “the net” (SEKH-T) :
      we think it is the same concept as in the [pre-hindu-] Rg-Veda
      where “(eden-) words are purified by going through a kind of filter made of wool” , a washing-place ;
      for us these concepts are Bizarre – but that’s what they say ;
      note how “the divine doubled words” come “fróm that Net” though we don’t know whether SENNU
      could better read “copied” or perhaps even “brotherly in the sense of dialect” ? ,
      either way their original eden-nature has changed ;

— “the blood” :
      glyph SENEF S-N-F+essence , to right , reading
     “the essence / (of) he (eden) /  (for) (matrix-) existence (N) /    +
      (of) the (corrupt-) adam-soul (S)” ;
      the bolt-glyph -S is likely no prefix here (as “to make…”) 
      for “the corrupt adm-soul” is ‘the Egyptian-Esau type soul” ,
      who NEEDS eden aspects or he would dry out , sic 
      [and that is such a huge theme , explaining so much …] ;            
     the nature of this ‘blood’ is “words” of “(ânkh-) life” ,
     and they are “ingested” as if ‘by drinking (-them)’ 
     resembling the phrases in the scroll about ‘drinking waters of life’ ;
     where the glyph ‘to drink’ is S-UR+passive-drink ,

     “to be drunk / (by) the great (matrix-) speech (UR) / óf the (corrupt-) adam-soul (-S)” ,
      again linking ‘words’ to ‘speech’ ;
— “the unguent” :
      as BAS , “the perfume / (of) the real-adam-soul (=you+we) / (for) the Ba-spirit-body (BA)” ,
      the latter is the spirit-body Adam made for the Esau-souls there ,
      and this addition of perfume shows more about the náture of the blood – namely “words” ;
… therefore it’s clear that “drinking blood” is practiced by the evil realm — NOT by God’s ,
because – per definition – it is an act of vampirism 
since even their term ‘ânkh-life’ itsélf means “vampiring life” and compare the text