book Romans : breakdown :
10 : lawlessness in endtime
11 : 144 restore the scroll
12 : corrupt  [written by Esau] 
13 : corrupt  [written by Esau] 
14 : corrupt  [written by Esau]


Romans 10 :                                   
                                                                                how the people in the endtime will only have a corrupt scroll :
(line)                                                                                               [probability of correct context interpretation : 100% ]
“they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.”
= but the people will NOT have zeal for God , for they will have no knowledge
“For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness ,
and going about to establish their own righteousness, [….]”

= as they will be ignorant of the scroll of God
and will have become righteousness=lawless

“For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, 
That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.”
= for the scroll writes about the purpose (?) of his covenant
that he will restore eden and that they will dwell in it

“But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, 
Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven?”
= but the wicked scroll (?) will tell them other things ,
so that they will say in their heart : He is the one who made this heaven=earth ;

“But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart: 
that is, the word of faith, which we preach;”
= because He said these words to us in the scroll of thy=our (1500 AD-) mouth=fathers [..]
as the words of the belief that we preach ;

“That [=just like] if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart 
that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.”
……[is okay] …..
“For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.”
= but the scroll says that everyone=only believing in him is not ashamed=sufficient
             note :
             see how several lines séem to repeat and confirm the ‘being saved’ : but now comes a juxta ;
“For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek:
for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.”
= for there is a distinction (1293) in the jew=covenant of greek=Christ ,
because the Lord the same +time rich=serves the call=covenant (epikalió=diathêke) of him=God 

               [12 explained “how people do NOT make that distinction”] 
” So then faith [cometh] by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.”
= therefore they will hearken to the gospel
but will not be hear=interested in the words of God

“But I say, Have they not heard? […]”
= yet God says, because they do not hearken to me ,
“But I say, Did not Israel know?
First Moses saith, I will provoke you to jealousy by [them that are] no people, 
[and] by a foolish nation I will anger you.”
= and do not want to know what the david=scroll (?) says ,
therefore Jacob provokes me to jealousy=anger                                            [provoke to jealousy ? wut ?]  
as the foolish people that will perish                                       [<< a genuine possibility acc. to prophets !]

“But Esaias is very bold, and saith, I was found of them that sought me not […]”
= but the Isaiah=remnant (‘144’) will bold=understand what He said
for he will found=raise up the sons that will seek him

——– end of 10

Romans 11 :
                                                                                                          now “understanding the scroll” must follow :
“Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, 
of the seed of Abraham, [of] the tribe of Benjamin.”
= but God will not cast away his people                                                                                [see end of ch.10]
for he will am=raise up the I=sons of Ishral (‘144’)
as the seed=remnant of abraham=Jacob being the benjamin=twelve tribes ;

“God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? […]” 
= for God will search the sons whom he foreknew
that will see=understand the elias=words which he said in the scroll

“Lord, they have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life.”
= because lord=Esau has killed=corrupted the prophets
by having digged=changed His altars=words
because he left=hated alone=Jacob
and did not want him   — to return to eden / find God — other option

“But what saith the answer of God unto him? I have reserved to myself seven thousand men, 
who have not bowed the knee to [the image of] Baal.”
= but God says in it (‘scroll’) :
I have reserved to myself 7000=144,000 as the remnant                             [or : two houses of Ishral]
that will bow=return to knee=me with their baal=heart 
             note :
             in prophets is no ‘144,000’ yet these are ‘the two houses’ ;
             but it’s possible that Paul’s people were aware of [-the contents of] Revelation 
             instead of him explaining the link between the 144 and 2 houses here ;
            [explaining “why now the remnant (-as 144) will become”]
“(According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, 
and ears that they should not hear;) unto this day.”   
= because it is written :
the slumber=sealed spirit=scroll will be given to the god=learned ones
but they will see=say : I am not able to hear=read it ;

            note :
            see restored Luke 5: 11-13 (the weird “friend + 3 breads”) which is the same theme
“And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a 
recompence unto them: Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back alway.”
= then it will be given to the david=sons ,
[….unknown/corrupt….] and they will see=say :                                                                                   [<< as in 8] 
I can back=read it for it is not bow=sealed (sugkampson=sphragizô) ; 

             [why the sons will understand it  – and see next 
             (but it all feels a bit strange , no – as if we are being exposed to them ….. :] 
“Now if the fall of them [be] the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches 
of the Gentiles; how much more their fulness?”
= though they (‘sons’) will fall=believe in the riches=covenant of world=Christ
the riches of the gentiles=gospel (-only) will be lacking to them
because it does not fill them 

“If by any means I may provoke to emulation [them which are] my flesh, and might save some of them.”
= because their own flesh (‘body’) will provoke to jealousy=be their enemy
from which they need to be saved

“For if the casting away of them [be] the reconciling of the world, what [shall] the receiving [of them be], 
but life from the dead?”
= therefore they will casting=search what world=God has reconcile=said
how he can receive=restore them so that their life=soul will have dead=life (w/ swapped)

“For if the firstfruit [be] holy, the lump [is] also [holy]: [……….]”  
= therefore the holy=sons (hagios=yhios) will if=become the firstfruits of their lump=people

Romans 12
                                                                                                                                                    [completely corrupt — invented]
… incredibly , no single word resounds in all 21 lines ,
NO key phrase jumps out , it’s all an uninspired and flat text ,
portraying a weird kind of “social Democracy” which is foreign to the main storyline itself ;
heralding and defending complacency
as if advocating a situation where believers “set up camp upon earth” instead of desiring Eden ,
which is exactly the model that later modern christianity would adapt ! 
        conclusion :
       1)  this one takes the speed OUT of the buildup
       2)  what we need after 11 is a solid closing as the “therefore , pray for the 144…..” 
              because we need “the promise of receiving the Original for Paul’s people” 
       3)  there is NO theme we can think of
              that can be “read between the lines” here – because not. one. single. theme. fits ;  
       4)  keeping in mind that 2/3d of chapter 16 is false
              we have a great chance that also this one is false   —
subnote :
… we posed before “that minimum 50% of the book of Acts was ghostwritten by Esau” , right ,
and this chapter very much confirms that indeed this was his practice in the NT  !

Romans 13
                                                                                                                                                     [completely corrupt — invented]
… same problem as previous 12 ;
these 16 strange lines continue the same simplified “evil verses good” theme : in overdrive ,
since they now even sanctify “subordination to government” 
which – especially in the past during Nazi Germany – has caused great sorrow ;
line 1 :
– we tried starting out with ‘Adam’ but that fails ,
line 9 :
– the ‘covenant theme’ also fails ,
while in the final lines Esau’s fantasy dried up , and he returned to the phrasing as in chapter 12 ;
            conclusion :
            like 11 also Romans 12 was ghostwritten by Esau
            mainly with the goal to solidify “christianity setting up camp in this world” 

Romans 14
                                                                                                                                                     [completely corrupt — invented]
… the same flat text of 12 and 13 continues  —
to be sure that he has not hidden valueable lines inbetween his monologue :
lines 1-8 :
– now his fantasy réally ran out , starting about “what and what not can be eaten” ,
  and yes we’ve serious questions whether the “sheet with food coming down to Peter” is true ;
line 11 :
– the “every knee shall bow” was his corruption in chapter 11 already ;
line 12-23 :
– continuing the “eating theme” ;
sub :
… one can ask “but why he was making all that trouble to go ghostwrite so many lines”   —
mainly to obfuscate the réal story ; second “to insert untruths” ,
but we strongly suspect he also did it out of a form of self-pride and superiority : because he cóuld ,
mocking Jacob who would be convinced that his God spoke to him (-this type nonsense) ..