[gospels]  : no ‘John the baptist’ & Jesus ‘baptized’ : but the 144 [very solid text ; whole Mt.3 used]  [version ; 2024-11nov.29-  ]

 

and compare the text buildup with Revelation !

       
 
                                                                                    theme
 
     … to first search the context of certain theme is always required so that we have
     an indication of whát we will go translate – but the proof is in the text itself ofcourse ;
     in this case rejecting the “baptism theme” (-do see MainPage) seemed a long shot
     but now has been completely confirmed as ‘false’ by the text , below    —
     where apart from the very Solid restored text ,
     Esau’s main fundament as the corruption ‘baptize + in the Jordan’ was to hide the 
     ‘restoring + the Scroll’ theme — as (baptizó=katartizô) + (iO-rdaN(es)=bibl-ioN)  
     (where most often per syntax the (-s) ending didn’t need to be used)
 
     connection with the birth of ‘John’ [Mk.1] 
     … we’ll first need to do that chapter still , ofcourse   —
     but the words here must have been spoken by the angel / Christ announcing the
     birth of a son to Zachariah (name?) since his son would represent the Ishral sons ;
     therefore most likely the whole story of “not being able to háve a son” is False also
     because it sounds made-up and looking too much like the Maria & Joseph story ;
     again please — maintaining as many elements possible but deleting Esau’s fakes
 
     the ‘tree of good & evil’ [line 10] 
     … initially this appeared corrupt – as another version of ‘restoring the scroll’ since
     it followed the ‘(1500 AD-) fathers’ of line 9 so abruptly , and also because the roots 
     indicated the subject of “holding fast to the KJV” (-that came to fit better into line 12) ;
     therefore the tree must have been intended here ,
     showing the end (-theme) of our work of restoring the scroll : the Dedication ,
     making it NOT so strange that this ‘baptism theme’ only appeared these days !
          [memo :
          the “axe & the root” also shows in the – not yet done – Deut.19 “Moon chapter” 
          as is the intro to the (unfinished-) Deut.20 Eve & dedication one (-see pinned) ;
 
     ‘baptism’ : an imparting of ‘the ORIGINAL SIN’ !                                                                          [SIC !]
     … for this can be the only conclusion    —
     we saw that ‘water’ and ‘the fish-god’ (read : the ugly fish-souls) are attributes of
     this ‘baptism’ theme , and by extension ‘Eve & the dedication’ and ‘that evil tree’ :
     so that ‘the water’ here must be ‘the mixed-waters óf that tree’ that the fish-souls
     themsélves need , waters transported by the Nile to the Mystery-Babylon region !
     this ‘baptism’ continuously repeats the Original Sin !  

the ‘evil tree & libation (baptism)’       … we saw the Sumerian fish-god libating a figure      but it also was a beloved theme in Egypt :       >>      there are many ‘better’ murals in which the figure      drinks the offered libation by Nut , but here shows      that the intent also was ‘the flowing over the body’ ;      the shown “tree of life” is an advanced copy of the      tree of good & evil in the South (-land) since this      one stands in the matrix region just at its border :      ofcourse Esau – as ‘Ammon sons’ – knew all this !

 
sub :
… that Esau chose the name ‘John’ for the representative son remains complicated
[just as ‘Baalam’ wasn’t the original name in that story] ; we can choose “Joshua” in
some Greek form but ‘John (the Baptist)’ perhaps is too ingrained in us ;
the other thing – but hard to phrase – is ,
becáuse this (name) ‘John’ represents us 144 males , that name *may* have caused
a curse upon us as upon those of us that carry this name (as one of myself) because
it is linked with the “water & baptism” theme ;
in this light ‘John (-the disciple)’ as person with the same name was NOT affected 
since these attributes did not pertain to him — yet for all the reasons above the ‘John’
in Revelation may not have been ‘the disciple’ but ‘this born son’ ! the same one
that carried the cross (-see page) ! and how much sense it makes that Christ also 
chose THIS son – not the disciple John – in Revelations ?
as undoing the final curse upon the 144 showing that they found everything … ?
 
corruptions : insane
theme : context 100% restored , syntax OVER 95% (!)
fulltext :
 

[Mt.3 – start 1 : continued :] 
1
“In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judaea,”
1
[=for]  – in – those – days      +                                                                                                                                [‘of the end’] 
b
(the-) john=sons (ióannés=yhios) of – [..]  baptist=Ishral (baptistés=israêl) – (will) come=arise ,
c
(that will-) declare      +
d
the – wilderness=scroll (erémOs=bibliOn) of – [..]  judea=God (ioudaia=theos) – (to-) in=him ;
note :
… though we’ve liked to keep the ‘wilderness’ theme the important term “declaring” trumps that
while the scroll theme continues much better in next line 2 this way ; besides , ‘the situation of John’ 
will be described from line 4 indicating that the Scroll was the key theme here ;
 
2
“And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”
2
[+because]  [+when]  you=they (will) meta + noeó = [..]  understand (3539=3539 !)      +
b
and=what – [+he]  (has) spoken
c
for=then – the – kingdom of – [..]  heaven – (will be) at hand ;                                 [read : ‘Eden’]  [see note] 
note :
a) possibly correct syntax : “… which he-spoke they-shall-be-understanding” ,
b) though ‘the kingdom of + heaven’ is definitely ‘Eden’ we haven’t yet found a better
     description of how she would have been phrased in NT – so we leave it for now ;
c) it can have said “when will be understood what he spoke” but perhaps not direct enough ;   
 
[next 3 :
see also ‘baptism’ MainPage — yet not exactly phrased similar here ! :] 
3
“For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying, 
The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.”
3
[=for]  – this – is – the=what – [+he]  spoken=promised before (ereó=proepangellô)   +     
b
through – isaiah=all (esaias=pas) of – [..]  [+his]  prophets , saying :                  [a-b : similar to Rom.1:2 !] 
c
[next : the problem now is an intrinsic one : the idea is virtually copied from OT ,
not as “mutilated text originally said here” :] 
              [‘when you will have restored / declared my Scroll’ ,  +] 
d
(then-) [+my]  lord=servant (Christ) (kurios=doulos) – (will be) prepare=gathering – [..]  way=you
e
(and-) (will) make=bring – the – paths=remnant of – him=Ishral (‘144’) – (to-) straight=me ;
note :
b) in d as “he-shall-gather you theservant-of me” ,
c) in e as “and (toward) me he-shall-bring the remnant-of ishral” ;
 
                                                                                           part I b
                                                                         how this will come to happen
4
“And the same John had his raiment of camel’s hair, and a leathern girdle about his loins; 
and his meat was locusts and wild honey.”
… here ,
a) because this line is ‘a restart’ we need “the deplorable situation of the sons” 
      [that they are unhappy with the KJV] because in next 5 ‘they start to search’ ,
b) yet this line is full of weird roots while our Greek is not thát extensive still 
      so that it’s hard to see which type terms Esau has covered-up ;
4
[=however] : (it) (will) he=come to pass (‘no match’)  +                                   [4 : impossible : best attempt :]
      b
      (that-) the – john=sons (ióannés=yhios) – (will) have (?) …. [next : ‘the corrupted scroll’] 
      [shown : “the / garment / him / hairs / camel” >> completely impossible words]
      (b) “and a leathern girdle about his loins”
      b
      and=that – (will be) leather=lacking (dermatinos=elattoneô) – girdle=life (zóné=zóé !) 
      c
      about=in – the – loin=lines (‘writings’) (OsPHus=graPHÔ) ,
      as ,
      “that the life shall-be-lacking in the writings” ; 
      (c) “and his meat was locusts and wild honey”
      d
      [=so that] – [+he] (‘corrupt scroll’) – (will) the=not – nourish (‘as verb now’) – him=them : 
      e
      (since-) [+he] was=is (‘close’) – (the-) locusts=unrighteous (-one) (akrides=adikos ! as shown)
      f
      [can be anything 3x :
      and / honey / wild (but -agrios is an invented root) ;
note :
… somehow “not nourish their SOUL” should have appeared but the roots simply lack ;
while before next 5 – the investigation – ‘they should have died’ (here) but there’s no space :
however in a later line appears the “died like them (sons)” >> so that could be sufficient ;
 
5
“Then went out to him Jerusalem, and all Judaea, and all the region round about Jordan,”
5
then=therefore – [+they]  (will) went out=diligently search (exeporeueto=exeraunaô , as shown)
b
(the-) toward=words (pros=logos) – him=which – [+he]  jerusalem=spoke
c
and=by – [..]  jordan=weighing (?) (‘verb at end’) (iordánes=baros verb form , no Strong’s)      +
d
every – [..]  judea=word – and – every – [..]  region around=line (‘writing’) (perichóros=graphô) (-in it) ;  + 
 
6
“And were baptized of him in Jordan, confessing their sins.”
6
and (so-) – they (will) baptized=restore (bap-tizó=katar-tizô)      +
b
[..]  the – jordan=scroll (iO-rdaNé=bibl-iO-N) of – his – by=words (hupo=logos) ,
c
(by-) confessing=listening (or ‘hearkening’) (exomologeó=apakroaomai)       +
d
[..]  (to-) their=his – sins=spirit (hamartia=pneuma) ;                                                                    [better as ‘voice’] 
 
7-8
“But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, 
O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance:” 
7
[=therefore]  – he=they (will) perceive – the – may=wickedness (polus=kakos) of     +
b
the – pharisees=sons of – [..]  sadducees=Esau                                                                  [including ‘Pharisees’ !] 
c
(that have-) come=corrupted (‘no match’) – [..]  his – baptism=scroll (‘no match’) ;
d
(and-) he=they (will) say – (about-) them :                                                                                                 [and also ‘to’ !] 
e
(the-) generation of – vipers – who – (have-) done [+this]  evil (hupodeiknumi=kakopoieô)
f
(will) you=not – escape (5343) – from – the – wrath – to come :     +
8
[start : ‘then’ , 2nd word :] 
then=because – you=they (will have) appointed – fruit=many (-ones) (karpos=polys)       +
b
(unto-) (the-) repentance=great (adj.) (metanoias=magas) – worthy=tribulation (axios=thlipsis) ; 
 
[next 9 : read : the Pergamos church ;
key word here is ‘fathers’ — while their KJV will lead the many ‘into the trib’ ! :] 
9
“And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to [our]  father: 
for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.”
9
and=because – [+our]  fathers       +                                                                            [‘1500 AD – the Reformation’]  
b
[..1x..]  – thought – to say – among – themselves :                                                     [9 : close to prophets line :] 
c
we (will) have=translate (echó=methistêmi) – the (!) – abraham=hebrew (abraam=hebraios)     +
d
[w/ swapped 1x ; no new subline b/c runs on :] 
–
for=into – you=our (-own) – say=tongue (‘language’) (legó=glossá) ,
e
so that – the – god=priesthood (theos=hierôsynê)      +          [in prophets ‘kings, priests, servants’ etc] 
f
(and-) out=all – [..]  these=our – stones=people (lithos=démos)       +
g
(will be) able – to raise up=read (egeiró=anaginôskô)        +
h
(the-) children=scroll (teknON=bibliON) of – [..]  abraham=God (‘likely’) ;
 
[next 10 :
unexpected theme : ‘the evil tree’ (-see intro) :] 
10
“And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: 
therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.”
10
(but-) yet=therewith – [+they]  (have) now=not – and=laid (kai=keimai)       +
b
the – ax – unto – the – root of – the – tree – (that has-) laid=caused (so much-) grief (keimai=lypeô)    +
c
then=so that – every=the – tree       +
d
(of) no=which – good=Eve (kalos=heua) – doing=ate – (the-) fruit – (will be) hewn down :
e
and=because – [+they]  (did) fire=not  – cast=hearken (balló=akouô) – (unto-) in=God (eis=theos) ; 
note :
line e) : though it’s póssible “that he will be cast into the fire” it’s not the most important here
for instead we’d need a juxta to “listening to his spirit” in line 6 ;
 
[next 11 : the Philadelphia church : Christ / the angel speaks again :]  
11
“I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: 
(b) but he that cometh after me (c) is mightier than I, (d) whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: 
he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and [with]  fire:”
11
(but-) [+he]  (‘tree’) (will) I=perish (egÔ=apOlymmi)        +                                [11 : VERY high probability :] 
b
indeed=when – (the-) you=sons (‘you & we’) (humas=yhios)           +                         [subject reaffirmation] 
c
(will have) baptize=restored (‘see 6-a’) – in=the – water=scroll (‘no match’)      +
d
in=as – (the-) repentance=righteous (-one) (metanoia=dikaios) ;
e
[next : most tricky syntaxes as short sub-lines , see top :]          
–
[=then]  – [..]  after=souls (?) (opisó=psuchê) – (will be) come=added (?) – (to-) me=them     +
f
(that-) [+álso]  (?) – (will have) is=died – (to-) me=their – (-own) stronger=flesh (?) (ischuros=sarx) ,
g
[next : ‘shoes’ can only be ‘remnant’ (hupodéma=hypoleimma !) – but how to get there ? :] 
–
    whom=so that – not=together (?) – I=they (will) am=become (to be)      +
    h
    [w/ swapped 1x ?:] 
    (the-) bear=completed (adj.) (bastazó=pleroô) – shoes=remnant of – [..]  enough=Ishral ;        [‘144’] 
    i
[next : the probable theme also considered later lines , where j) links to f) above ! :] 
–
(as-) he=all of – you=them – (that will be-) baptized=restored (baptizó=katartizô)     +
j
in – [+their]  sacred – spirit=vessel (‘Original’) (pneuma=angeion) – [=by]  – fire=God ;       [‘in tsiun’ !]  
note :
a) during the restoration of the Scroll ‘the wider 144 will be added’ – so that’s good ;
b) the “remnant” NEEDS the adjective “of Ishral” not only per prophets but also to point to Revelation ;
c) though in j) “by the Father” better matches the root -pur ‘fire’ 
      it does not read pretty against the start of next line ‘[1500 AD-]  fathers’ ;  
 
[next 12 : the Laodicea church ;
problem : “chaff” is used for the demons – NOT ‘for Jacob’ :] 
12
“Whose fan [is]  in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, 
and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.”
12
(but-) [+they]  (that will) whose=hold fast – (unto-) the – fan=scroll (ptuON=bibliON invalid root)   +
b 
in=as – the – hand=wicked (-one) of – his=their (1500 AD-) [+fathers]     +                           [so, ‘the KJV’] 
c
[..1x..]  – (will be) purified – [+like]  [..]  threshing floor=gold (?) – [..1x..]  :
d
and=because – the – grain=remnant (‘no match’) of – him=Ishral (autos=israêl)      +                       [‘144’]  
e 
(will be) gathered – in=by – the – barn=Lord (apothéKé=Kurios) ,           [or ‘from the world’ kosmos ?] 
f
[=but]  – the – chaff=lawless (-ones) (?) (achuron=anomos)      +                                                [or ‘Jacob’ etc ?] 
g
(will be) burn up=left behind (katakaió=kataleipô !)      +                                                                     [g : juxta to e] 
h
to fire=enter (?) (Pur=ePibainô) – (the-) unquenchable=tribulation (aSbestoS=thlipSiS) ;            [per c] 
note :
a) probably it said “lawless” in f) , per root & per the wicked one (KJV) ,
      however also “Jacob” and even “their people” are possible as juxta to ‘remnant’ ;
b) note how the narrative is back at lines 1-3 now ;
 

 

                                                                                          part II
                                                                                         closing
 
                                          still five lines to go (13-17) : did Esau invent this section or 
                                          was “one in a position coming to one in another position”
                                          intended as ‘the 144 WITNESSING unto Jacob” ?
                                          in fact what’s still lacking after the above is ‘Jacob saved’ …. 
13
“Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to Jordan unto John, to be baptized of him.”
13
(but-) then – the – jesus=Father – (will be) come=sending (paraginomia=apostellô)      +
b
from=all – the – galilee=remnant – unto – the – jordan=earth ,
c
(in order-) to baptize=witness (baptizó=martyreô) – unto – [..]  john=Jacob (!) – [=their]  – by=people ; 
 
                                                                             [final 4 lines : extremely difficult :] 
14-15
“But John forbad him, saying, I have need to be baptized of thee, and comest thou to me?
And Jesus answering said unto him, 
Suffer [it to be so]  now: for thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness. Then he suffered him.”
14
[=and]  – the – john=people (ióannés=démos)      +                                                  [a-b-c : so said in prophets :] 
b 

(will) forbad=see – I=their – him=sons (autos=yhios) – (and-) saying=daughters (leGó=thyGatêr)
c
(that-) (will) have been – need=glorified (?) (‘no match’) ,
d
and=who – [..]  – (will be) come=explaining – unto – me=them      +                                        [line continues :]  
15
[no new line / not starting with ‘yet’ 2nd word :] 
–
[+what]  [..]  jesus=God – answer=spoke – (in-) the – said=scroll (eipen=biblion) – unto / about – [.. ? ..]  
     b
     [impossible (roots) & dangerous (to phrase) :
     we’d need “and the people will swear (allegiance) to Him”]                                                [next c : attested :] 
     c
     then – he=they (will) letting=die (?) (aphiémi=apothnêskô) – [.. ? ..]  ;     +                       [line continues :]  
 
16
(a) “And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: 
(b)  and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, 
       and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him:”
16
[=yet]  – [+they]  (will be) baptized=restored (baptizó=katartizô , as earlier in chapter)     +
b
(in-) [+their]  [..]  jesus=glorious (-one) (‘Original’) (iésous=hagios)
c
(when-) from=their – straightway=soul (?) – (has been) went=brought – [..]  (to-) water=Eden (?) ; 
note :
… the adjective “(went up-) straightaway” was bizarre anyway ;
 
[new line :] 
[but some “rapture idea” sounds inappropriate now & stalling method — IF ‘Eden’ is the theme :] 
    d
    [=for]  – behold ! ,                                                                                                                                 [next : Rev. concept ? :] 
    e
    [+they]  (will) opened=stand (?) – him=before – the – heavens=throne (?) (ouranos=thronos)
    f
    and – (will) see – the – spirit=majesty (?) of – [..]  God ,
    g
    ………………….. [who knows]  ……………..
 
17
“And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.”
17
[in prophets often ending with “and every tear will be wiped from their face” 
and / or “and they will dwell in the land forever” and / or “I be their deity & they be my people” ;
either way ‘some promise‘ — also ‘as closing of this narrative’ by the angel / Christ] 

 

 

 

 

[gospels] : no ‘John the Baptist’ for he is ‘the 144 sons’ while ‘baptism’ is False as the curse upon us by the evil fish-souls [MainPage] [+Amorites theme] [version ; 2024-11nov.26-28]

[extensive version of 5Nov’24 page]

 
                                                                                    theme
 
   … anyone – but you – reading the title would immediately dismiss it ,
   not because it could not be true but because of the – even understandable – fear of
   Jacob that his life-long cherished anchor points could turn out to have been Invalid ;
   though you & we know that the real reason for that fear is The Almighty KJV which
   has beguiled him by placing True and false concepts brotherly next to oneanother
 
   yet , like we had to dismiss the “eat My flesh and drink My blood” corruption also 
   this ‘baptism theme’ has to go since it is no longer maintainable — that we are ‘late’ 
   with this corruption is not so relevant : anyway we would have found it , and (only)
   now because it directly links with the re-dedicating our Female theme  
 
   and yes the list of corrupted themes seems endless   —
   probably all of us here have been ‘baptized’ that appeared to be a meaningful event ,
   until the moment Red flags pop up suggesting it actually could be a curse upon us ;
   which is the reason we honestly need to scrutinize this theme .. okay
 
                                                                identifying the problem
 
  the absolute core : ‘baptism’ has no connection (-whatsoever) to OT

… and this is a serious problem   —   the phrase “KJV” & “baptism” is a double Trap   >>   so that we cannot let ourselves be bamboozled by    whatever corrupt lines in NT but first need to make   sure that OT indeed mentions nothing of the sort :   ofcourse water was used for washing and bathing   and even the term ‘ritual washing’ could be used   in the sense of ‘before appearing in front of God’    like old-Ishral had to wash themselves before He

  would descend upon mt.Horeb or how the high priest had to bathe before he dressed
  himself with the pretty garment to meet God – and our Originals upon the Ark – in the
  holy of holies — but never no ‘spiritual aspect’ was imparted through the bathing ,
  but the washing (or ‘immersion’) was only to reduce the uncleanliness of this awful 
  ape body as much as possible in order for the soul to have access to Him
 
  … the difference seems minimal but again please : an imparted gift or aspect is quite
  something else ! in fact the only valid imparted gift was ‘through blood’ — whether
  the blood sprinkled upon the Ark , or later the real gift : through His blood ! 
 
  Esau’s deceit ‘to have sacred things bestowed upon this flesh‘ 
  … as a dangerous concept he interwove throughout all of NT    —
  he removed every notion of “the soul having to die to Self , to her own flesh” when she
  follows Christ , and replaced that with “the un-dead flesh (!) receiving the alleged gifts 
  of the Spirit” — which is a contradictio in terminis ofcourse — as the reason why you see
  evangelical type believers boasting about the so-called ‘fruits of the spirit’ but through
  that mask you only feel the incredible boasting of that still very much alive Ego ;
  yet with this ‘baptism Ritual’ Esau invented something even móre dangerous :
  in all of NT neither the reasons nor the components of ‘baptism’ are explained properly ,
  so ‘what’ ‘has died’ during ‘baptism’ ? the flesh ? the soul ? since obviously no ‘sin’ 
  has died — but only in the KJV mindset — since “this ape body IS the sin” ;
  and ‘what’ has been ‘resurrected’ – and that ‘in name of the Father’ (sic) ? 
  worse : what if “an EVIL spiritual component was imparted by this baptism Ritual ?
 
   Red Flags of Vagueness 
   … this ritual of baptism is variously described as “the person being immersed into the
   death of Christ and rising with him as a new creature” or “having turned from the old
   life of sin into a new life with Christ” as “publicly identifying with his death , his burial
   and his resurrection” where the latter is symbolized by the raising up from the water 
   as “a demonstration of the transformation of the new birth in the Lord”   —
   the utter Vagueness should make us shudder , as if a Spelled one is talking here ,
   for it looks nothing like the clear explanations of the problem & solution in all of OT !
 
   #1  so then why was Christ himself ‘baptized’ ?
   … when Christ – allegedly – is about to be baptized by John the latter objects , saying
   ‘I need to be baptized by you, yet do you come to me ?’ , to which He replies ‘let it be
   so now ; it is proper for us to do this to fulfill all righteousness’ : this line is so Empty
   that it does not explain anything whatsoever , hence the common explanation for His
   baptism is “because it was a sign” yet no one knows “of what then” — and sometimes
   the meaningless addition is given “to show that he really was the Messiah”  —
   read : there is no solid foundation for His ‘baptism’ because there is none !
 
   why would He have to go through some illegal short-cut Ritual when He still had to 
   go through the awful event that would provide any Legal right in the first place .. ? that 
   is like placing the horse behind the cart !
   ofcóurse that is why Esau did not come further as inventing a weak ‘let it be so now’ !
   since the entire ‘baptism theme’ is rambling on every side  
 
   #2  so : can ‘baptism’ place an evil alien power – as curse – upon us ?
   … this nefarious possibility kept bothering us    —
   in the rest of this page we will explore this real (!) possibility further , but mentioning
   it here already for you to keep in the back of your mind : for this ‘baptism’ concept is
   a complex false concept operating simultaneously on several fronts   —
   if the foundation is wrong then so is the immersing action and also the attributes of it
   including the figure representing ‘baptism’ as the alleged ‘John’ : only if we proceed
   carefully we see that a number of corrupt concepts have been glued together to
   suggést ‘a sound whole’ but in fact as bamboozling in order to hide an even more
   nefarious theme behind this immersion ritual :     
   what if the attributes ‘water + baptism + resurrection’ are claimed by a hostile entity 
   similar to how Adam claimed the fire-offering + the statue idol in the wilderness .. ?
 
   #3  no ‘forerunner of Christ’ in OT 
   … because of the simple reason that He is ‘the first’ since he himself IS the ‘forerunner’ :
   any fantasized concept as “a forerunner from outside” is only based upon the corrupt 
   Isaiah and Malachi lines allegedly writing , 
                         “I will send my messenger 
                         ahead of you who will prepare your way –  
                         a voice of one calling in the wilderness , 
                         “prepare the way for the Lord , make straight paths for him” —  
   where the original line has read , 
                         “I will send + my messenger=servant (Christ) (mlk=obd)         [< standard phrase]   
                           [who will gather you]  (‘144’)  
                           when you will have call=declared (QR=QR) [+my]   desert=words (mDBR=DBR)” 
   while KJV shows another glaring problem :
   the “make his path straight” is nonsense for who would do that ? by what authority ? 
   what human could possibly anoint the very Son of God with God’s own presence ? for
   this is not some OT situation where “a prophet called by God anoints a man to be king”
   but THE Divine blueprint of the rescue of all of Jacob ! how would he ‘help’ with that ??    
 
   #4  ‘John the Baptist’ represented ‘the sons of Ishral’ — you & we
   … for the sons ARE an important theme in all prophets ,
   and now becomes clear what Esau has done : in order to hide ‘the sons rising up in the 
   latter days’ he swapped that into ‘a forerunner’ theme , then needed to find another type
   action as our “the restoring the Scroll” for his ‘forerunner’ that became “to baptize people”
   so that in one and the same move he resolved the other main goal : placing the Curse  —
   he must have been squeaking of pride because of his diabolical turnaround .. !
 
   ofcourse we still have to start the texts [-and that will be some job !]  but glancing over the
   lines a number of aspects jump out :
   — that “John dwelt in the wilderness” is ofcourse taken from you & we that will be (were)
         most unhappy with the KJV as “dwelling in the wilderness” wanting the réal words , 
   — the (just done) Mk.23 section greatly helps us here ,
        since ‘Simon of Cyrene’ – or whatever his name – represented the 144 sons who says
        it wasn’t the same figure as ‘John the Baptist’ here ? wouldn’t that be   very logical ?
   — the birth (-of ‘John’) :
        because it’s unlikely that Esau invented so much text considered the birth of Christ
        and the birth of this ‘forerunner’ , where in all prophets “the birth of the 144” is such a
        major concept , it is assumable that God chose this way of showing ‘their birth’ ; 
   — the text sections of ‘John’ speaking ,
        they do contain for us interesting phrases “he declares” (sic) , “the sons of + Ishral”
        (which does not fit John’s alleged job & context) and saying “you vipers” to the people
        (which is Bizarre in the first place — but nót if Esau was addressed here) ; 
   — his mother was not ‘Elisabeth’ ,
        six times so mentioned in one chapter , but “Hannah” (we bet?) since that would link
        to our ‘dedication’ (-chanuk) theme ; so that the “John beheaded” story didn’t describe
        our ‘Originals’ [-as we mistakenly interpreted : since those themes are for you & we]  
        but must have been ‘dying + to the flesh’ since also ‘a woman’ & ‘desire’ is involved ,
        as a section that may even have been part of the Mk.23 one !
   — and whatever his name was it was not ‘John’ -ióannés ,
        since that screams the link with the fish-god -oannes as the core of Esau’s ‘baptism’ …

 

 

                                                                                                                 II
 
                                                                                 ‘baptism’ in ancient cultures

     religious baptism
     … for most religions, water baptism was a form of ritual washing and purification before
     a particular ceremony, sacrifice, or religious service ; where it was viewed as a way to 
     cleanse oneself both physically and spiritually before meeting with that religion’s deity ;
     in some religious circles, baptism was used as a rite of healing and exorcism , since it
     was thought that if the water was blessed in a particular way by a priest , it had healing 
     powers which could wash away the sickness or evil spirit ; while in some regions also
     the washing of those that had died was customary so that the spirit of the person could 
     break free of the dead body and be released into the realm of the gods or into the 
     renewal of life and reincarnation
 
     therefore ‘ritual washing’ itself is not “wrong” — the people old-Ishral had to bathe and
     wash their garments before God would appear at Horeb , just as the high priest had to
     bathe before he was dressed with the beautiful garment to appear before the Ark ; 
     however the spiritual cleansing of sin exclusively happened ‘through blood’ as the
     sprinkling of it upon the Ark , and later through the blood of Christ   —
     rendering any Ritualistic immersion in water suspicious while God would never
     prescribe an action that would link to attributes of the water-immersion of the heathens 

Egypt – Osiris        … rather sure is the concept of ‘Osiris drowned in the Flood’      which must be understood as ‘in the eden-dimension’ in the      time before her fall , after which he was ‘resurrected’ ;      you see how dangerously close ‘baptism’ relates to these      aspects as attributes that can easily be transferred

 
     a bit less sure – because hieroglyphs are read so poorly –
     is the concept of “an Egyptian drowning” in f.e. the Nile :
     whether he had fallen into it or had been pulled into the river 
     by a crocodile , it was believed that Osiris has specifically chosen that person for some 
     special role in the afterlife, and the person’s body was treated as a most sacred relic :
     “No one may touch him , whether relatives or friends , apart from the priests of the
     Nile who must tend him with their own hands and treat him as one who is more than
     an ordinary being … To be drowned in the river is to enter into connection with the god
     and thus to be divinized” [Oepke, TDNT, I:530]  ,
     which however confirms the “Osiris drowned” story ; 
     and note how strong the identification with the god Osiris is per this attribute ! 
 
     the picture shows someone ‘pouring out a libation-offering’ : in how far this can relate
     to ‘baptism’ (!) is unsure still since the concept ‘libation’ seems corrupted in the Scroll —
     half of the instances are Negative while the other half is doubtable , 
     so that it would greatly help us to restore the subsequent lines in order to be sure 
     [since the Spells and murals very often show water-libations also directly upon spirits ,
     we can expect that the doubtable instances will turn out Negative as well ..] 

the fish (-souls)      … when God addresses Egypt – the region of Mystery      Babylon with her paradise , above the gate – the evil      region Egypt is “the dragon that made the Nile” where      the dragon “has many fish clinging to his shells”   —      though this line cóuld be corrupt probably it isn’t since      the ‘fish’ are so prominent in Spells ;      to right ÁABT’ is a pun on “the East” as the southland      (the shore of Heaven upon which Eden was created)

     which the matrix already occupied through the serpent-race befóre Eden ,
     that this fish “guided the boat of Râ” that came from the evil dimension of the West is
     very telling because it must have been a fish-soul (‘demon-soul’) that dwelt in the east
     and per context these fish may be the animalistic (demon-) souls of the serpent-race ;
     indeed these fishes ‘cling to the dragon’ since the type souls that inhabit the paradise
     of Mystery-Babylon are the corrupt-eden-souls as the group ‘the sons of Ammon’ 
     [lower position reads “the pure (matrix-) dimension / [by]  the ÁABT fish”]  

this also renders the so-called ICHTHUS symbol suspect : said as the fish-symbol as used by the first christians   — yet this fish became popular during the  2nd wave of the persecution of christians after a huge influx into Italy of imported from the wider middle-East typically as the heathen nations familiar with the fish !

      therefore it is not right to attribute this symbol to the (real-) first christians   —
      they communicated directly with Christ since He was very close to them so that they
      would never have picked a so tainted symbol as ‘the fish’ to identify their nature … 
 

Dagon & Oannes (‘John’) : the fish-god       … we’re getting closer now   —       to right : a depiction of Oannes , or Ea , while the       fish figure on the left seems to libate the figure !       in the ’70 bulls’ MainPage we had the ritual of the       middle-eastern city representing the matrix-Moon       where her inhabitants ‘entered this earth’ and the       same is true for Ea that ‘came out of the deep sea’       to bring civilisation to the people : it but narrates       how their own (fish-) soul came to dwell on earth       eventually represented by an archetypical deity as       their brothers that DID dwell in the other Reality …

      Berossos the historian [281 BC]  : “At Babylon there was a great resort of people of some
      various races who inhabited Chaldea, and lived in a lawless manner like the beasts of the 
      field. In the first year there appeared in that part of the Erythraean sea which borders upon 
      Babylonia, a creature endowed with reason, by name Oannes, whose whole body 
      (according to the account of Apollodaros) was that of a fish; under the fish’s head he had 
      another head, with feet also below similar to those of a man subjoined to the fish’s tail. 
      His voice, too, and language were articulate and human; and a representation of him is
      preserved even to this day. “This being was accustomed to pass the day among men, but 
      took no food at that season; and he gave them an insight into letters and sciences and arts 
      of every kind. He taught them to construct houses, to found temples, to compile laws, 
      and explained to them the principles of geometrical knowledge. He made them distinguish 
      the seeds of the earth, and showed them how to collect the fruits; in short, he instructed 
      them in everything which could tend to soften manners and humanize their lives. From that 
      time, nothing material has been added by way of improvement to his instructions. 
      Now when the sun had set, this being Oannes used to retire again into the sea, and pass 
      the night in the deep, for he was amphibious. After this there appeared other animals like 
      Oannes, of which Berossos proposes to give an account when he comes to the history of 
      the kings.”   
      this history of the kings depicts “seven sages” of which Oannes (Sumerian U-anna) was
      the first , as if having founded a dynasty of fish-god deities represented by a series of 
      human counterparts serving as literal king Apkallu – Wikipedia

famous ofcourse is the story of the Ark vs Dagon    –       when the Ark of the covenant had been captured by       (the tall white-skinned !) Philistines that had placed it       in their temple in front of their Dagon state , next day       they found Dagon fallen on his face before the Ark ;       they propped him up but the following day was worse       since now the statue lost its head and both hands …

  
      not surprisingly the RCC – though in nature Adam’s Church – preserved the main symbol
      of Dagon as the typical mitre so developed since the 5th century , and not so surprising
      because the RCC is a joint-venture between Esau- and fish-souls in order to rule Jacob ,
      see Obadiah (-page) and CT’s how Esau and the serpent-race work together ;
      the question however is : apart from servitude to Adam , has a back-up been created 
      through the ‘baptism theme’ so that every baptized christian by extension automatically
      became a servant of the Upper-Fish as an integral aspect OF the baptism Ritual .. ? 

this ‘joint-venture’ seems to be a returning theme  as well as ‘the fish-souls of the serpent-race’ : to left the Hall of the Pontifical Audience in Rome where it isn’t hard to imagine that the fishes dwell  IN the serpent (-temple) ;  the latter often is rebuked as ‘conspiracy-stuff’  but also because the real themes are blurred by insiders like Ian Hislop with his “two Babylons”  – but considered what we know about these themes the symbology here is more true than most think !

     
the Amorites (‘phallic theme’) & their Dagon fish-god

… though the Ammonites represented the proto     sons of Ammon that would go corrupt the Scroll     (see Baalam pages) the second group of mortal     enemies of Ishral must have been the people     called ‘the Amorites’ that started the Dagon cult     [-even the Philistines worshipped him as well]  ;     since the very negative term ‘Amorite’ keeps     appearing in the Scroll as linked to the serpents :     in the ‘bulls of Bashan’ chapter – about the sons     of Ammon raping our female Originals – we are     (as males) asked “to defeat the Amorite” which     in context is ‘the phallic theme’ ;

    and this same theme appears (though in corrupted context) in the Deut.20 chapter
    about “the re-dedication of Eve” and also in Deut.1 where Moses recounts the days
    in the desert when ‘the serpent race invaded old-Ishral’ (-see page) , there corrupted
    as “the mountain of the Amorite” — and because this awful attribute keeps appearing
    even for thése days it warrants a further look into these people 

the Amorites spread out across the north and west of Mesopotamia even as far as Egypt  installing their short-lived pharaonic dynasty , and some time later founded Babylon herself  [where Hammurapi as one of her first kings calls the god Dagon ‘baniya’ “my creator” !]  ; yet they must have been “a type people” that  mixed with others rather than ‘a specific tribe’ : hence their phallic attribute as ‘a general one’  is also used for the Ammon sons

       that said , it remains a mystery how they appeared on the scene — except if we keep
       in mind “that they had been sent by the serpent race to attack , through their specific
       attribute , old-Ishral that was in the process of becoming a solid separated people” ;
       in fact appearing some time before Abraham left the city of Ur !
       interesting is how much the own neighbours of the Amorites disliked them ,
       so that the Akkadian king of Ur had to build a 270 kilometres wall from the Tigris to
       the Euphrates river to stop the immigrating Amorites ; where records describe them
       as nomadic tribes that forced themselves into lands they needed to graze their herds
       [-and again , compare their aggressive attribute] 
 
       also the Sumerians hated them , shown in this writing from the 2nd millenium BC , 
       “Now listen, their hands are destructive and their features are those of monkeys [=sic]  ; 
       (An Amorite) is one who eats what (the Moon-god) Nanna forbids and doesn’t show 
       reverence. They never stop roaming about …, they are an abomination to the gods’ 
       dwellings. Their ideas are confused; they cause only disturbance. 
       (The Amorite) is clothed in sack-leather … , lives in a tent, exposed to wind and rain, 
       and cannot properly recite prayers. He lives in the mountains and ignores the places 
       of gods, digs up truffles in the foothills, does not know how to bend the knee (to pray),
       and eats raw flesh. He has no house during his life, and when he dies he will not be 
       carried to a burial-place. My girlfriend, why would you marry Martu ?”
       apart from the ‘monkey’ reference ,
       interesting is the “disrespecting Nanna” which is ‘the matrix-moon’ : implying that the
       Amorites were not connected with the Mystery-Babylon region (-as the first group of
       enemies ‘the Ammonites / sons of Ammon’ were) but serpent race related as a kind of
       foot-soldiers sent by them solemnly to infect old-Ishral with their awful attribute ;
       [note the “bend the knee” line here , proving that the statue pic made by an Amorite
       and sent to some king as token of friendship was nothing but poor schmoozing !] 
 
       ‘Jethro’ – or the Amorites ?
       in the 16th century the Amorite era in Mesopotamia ended , leaving their kingdom in
       the north of Caanan stretching out into Syria ; therefore if we want to connect the
       serpent-race invading old-Ishral the time line is working against us — except if there
       was some “region of Amorite rule left close to the desert” (-around 1300 BC) which
       made contact with old-Ishral ;
       this is the thing : becáuse of Deut.20 & Deut.1 (-see above) the context suggests
       that ‘the Amorites themselves were involved in the serpent attack’ somehow : yet if
       they had “so ugly features” old-Ishral would have rejected them (-see Jethro page) ;
       then perhaps “a by them infected other (heathen) tribe made contact with them” ?
       [in the same way the (handsome) Ammonites posed as ‘friends’ to old-Ishral ?] 
       OR : ‘Jethro’ himself had been infected by the Amorites ?
       whatever really happened the Amorites & their attribute MUST have been involved
 
       deities of the Amorites
       — their absolute main god Dagon that came into existence by them ;
            but the problem for us is his identification with the Sumerian god ENLIL which may
            or may not have represented ‘the serpent race’ since the interpretation of his
            many attributes is not easy : for example his Ekur temple in Nippur was regarded
            as “the mooring-rope” of heaven and earth — reminding us how God described the
            dimensional-river they made unto earth (-and here as ‘the point of entry’ ?) ;
            it seems that ENLIL is some 2.0 version of the main god ANU after the importance
            of the latter began to wane [ANU into Anunna ‘the serpent-race’]  , where the kings
            of the Amorites proclaimed ENLIL as the source of their legitimacy ; 
            our case that the Amorites were incarnated fish-souls óf the serpent-race can
          hold water since they revered ENLIL (serpent race) worshipping Dagon (its souls) ;
      — Amurru ,
            as the divine personification of the Amorites — themselves ;
            it was strange even for the heathen nations to have a divine depiction of themselves
            but the reason cóuld be ‘the awareness of their own incarnation’ ;   
       — Ashratum – ‘feminine (-rule)’ (sic !)
            as the ‘wife’ of Amarru with epithets as “the voluptuous and joyful mistress” having
            an erotic connotation and “the mother” ; that this feminine relates to “stolen rule” (!)
            shows in her other epithet Belet-Seri as a form of (Sumerian-) Gesthinanna    —
            as a goddess serving as scribe in the court of the underworld goddess Ereshkigal 
            where Ereshkigal represents ‘Eden’s type female rule’ and by extension Eve 
            [and Ereshkigal as a form of Egyptian NEBTHET , see Isaiah 23 page]  ,
            where the ‘scribal’ theme simply means “copying” – that is “stealing” ;
            for that same reason Ashratum is called “the daughter-in-law of ANU” since ANU
            represents the serpent-race and the daughter-in-law the stolen Eden female rule :
            all these aspects are way too solid to be coincidental ;
 
      — other deities :
           Iarikh “the moon” — like the old-hebrew strange word for it (-irch) ,
           but “as the moon of this earth” not the matrix-moon (-see Sumerian text above)
           indeed placed there by the serpent-race , yet the epithets are more vague here :
           in the poem “the marriage of Nikkal and Iarihk” the goddess should be ‘this earth’ 
           in the form of Gaia (-made by the serpent race , see same Obadiah chapter) ,
           where he “promises to make her fields like orchards” (sic) ;
           interestingly Iarikh is called “the son-in-law of Baal” perhaps as “this solar plane” 
           since the so-called “cycle of Baal” – see Wiki – sounds like the solar plane having
           won over Eden , and also because Iarikh chooses Nikkal (earth) after having 
           rejected other goddesses as Attar (the planet Venus) ;
           while – for the record – he was also associated with the ‘door-keeper’ theme ,
           see Rev.3 page “this moon as double portal ;
           yet any other mentioned deities are too obscure to even remotely be identified 
 
      conclusion of the ‘Amorite’ theme
      … the above was the maximum to find    —
      but though their ugly attribute is valid for these days because of the Dedication theme
      as in Amos and Deut.1 & 20 the term is virtually erased from prophets and does not
      even exist as a Strong’s number in Greek — so that we can only hope (Sir ..) that we
      have understood enough to render it Legal ;
      concerning the nature of the fish-soul :
      … it makes Sense that the story about ‘Dagon having come out of the sea’ is but the
      story of ‘the incarnation of these type fish-souls upon earth’ , while – frighteningly – 
      this aggressive type fish-soul has mingled with other peoples , including Jacob , 
      while their ugly attribute has spread far and wide and is very much alive these days ;
      but in the sense “to cause a certain type sin” of the Jacob-souls yet as foot-hold to
      keep the door open to the dimensional serpent-race sucking out the sexual energy
 
      in Ugarit two temples existed “dedicated to the god Baal and the father Dagon” for
      the people that were obsessed by their fertility cult ; where bestiality was practiced
      among their gods and most likely in the temple by it’s people , and homosexual
      priests and priestesses acted as prostitutes 
      [which in turn forces us to go see what the text really said of Sodom & Gomorrah] 
 
      … from personal experience – by visitation – “the fish soul” is a dirty Black Hole
      sucking anything pretty up inside it like a giant tornado through its incredible thirst ,

a raging but so smelly and dirty type ‘thirst’        against which the Jacob soul seems to have       no chance whatsoever – if not protected ;       it therefore makes so much Sense that this       ferocious Black Hole was so interested in       our type ever-giving sweet Eden femininity       though it disguised it’s outside as ‘serpent’ ;       and if you are attentive enough you will see       the presence of the fish-souls not just as in       the picture earlier but everywhere   >> ….

 
     ‘baptism’ : an imparting of ‘the ORIGINAL SIN’ !                                                                          [SIC !]
     … for this can be the only conclusion    —
     we saw that ‘water’ and ‘the fish-god’ (read : the ugly fish-souls) are attributes of
     this ‘baptism’ theme , and by extension ‘Eve & the dedication’ and ‘that evil tree’ :
     so that ‘the water’ here must be ‘the mixed-waters óf that tree’ that the fish-souls
     themsélves need , waters transported by the Nile to the Mystery-Babylon region !
     this ‘baptism’ continuously repeats the Original Sin !  

the ‘evil tree & libation (baptism)’       … we saw the Sumerian fish-god libating a figure      but it also was a beloved theme in Egypt :       >>      there are many ‘better’ murals in which the figure      drinks the offered libation by Nut , but here shows      that the intent also was ‘the flowing over the body’ ;      the shown “tree of life” is an advanced copy of the      tree of good & evil in the South (-land) since this      one stands in the matrix region just at its border :      ofcourse Esau – as ‘Ammon sons’ – knew all this !

 

 

 

Mk.23 [26-31]  : the cross equated with that evil tree : re-dedicating our female will destroy the tree [Deut.20 !]  [very readable & telling]  [version ; 2024-11nov.24]

 

 

 
                                                                                              (theme)
   
    … we do it a bit different this time please    —
    suppose the word ‘tree’ below in bold is true , what in the world were these lines about ?
            [KJV Mk.23 : 27-31 :] 
            “And there followed him a great company of people, and of women, which also bewailed 
            and lamented him. But Jesus turning unto them said, Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not 
            for me, but weep for yourselves, and for your children. 
            For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed [are]  the barren, 
            and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck. Then shall they 
            begin to say to the mountains, Fall on us; and to the hills, Cover us. For if they do these 
            things in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry ?”
 
                                                                                                   theme
 
    we already opted that ‘the evil tree’ was represented by ‘the cross’ , right , but never had
    lines confirming that directly — until now ; note how the buildup is extremely solid now as
    introducing the picture of you & we (-males) reading this ,
    then proceeding to our females , then returning back the theme unto us and in the last
    line confirming how we will finish off that tree : because already He killed it Legally here
    being the same idea described in the Deut.20 chapter , and becáuse it ends with the ugly
    tree ‘that will wither’ these lines are Valid and a promise to us right now   
 
    … yes ofcourse He died for both the female as well as for the male soul ,
    and though male is asked to die – where female isn’t – it does not say that female has nót
    suffered unto death oftentimes : for this is included in the line about “feeding off upon her” ;
    hoping that you value the real lines      —
 
note : the figure ‘Simon of Cyrene’ :
provided that the name was not corrupted ‘Simon’ derives from old-hebrew ‘to listen, hearken’ 
while the Greek root Kur- can be several things but interestingly also -kuroó “to confirm , ratify ,
to (Legally-) make valid” : as exactly what you & we males of the 144 are doing … 
      [added nov.30 : 
      the figure ‘Simon of Cyrene’ must be the same as ‘John the Baptist’ :
      whatever their real names were “as the born son representing the 144 sons”  —
      see Mt.3 (page) about the prophecy concerning this son 
      who also must have acted / appeared in RealTime during the life of Christ 
       [as foreshadowing the job of the 144 sons in the end of days]          
 
for you Sir

 

Mark 23 : 26-31 (-section)

 

[start of section : Christ underway to Golgotha ; ‘Simon’ is “us males of the 144” :] 
26
(a) “And as they led him away, they laid hold upon one Simon, a Cyrenian, 
(b)  coming out of the country, 
(c)  and on him they laid the cross, that he might bear [it]  after Jesus.”
26
and – as – they led – him – forth ,
b
[+they]  took hold – (upon-) (a-) certain – Simon of – Cyrene ,                                [‘the hearkening one + ratifying (-it)’]  
c 
[what’s next ? :] 
(who was-) going – from=after – (the-) field=Lord (agros=kurios) ,                                                                                 [see note] 
d
(and-) they laid – the – cross – (upon-) him      +
e 
(that-) [+he]  (would) carry [-it]  – after=instead of – [..]  Jesus ; 
note :
a) ofcourse the “he came + out of + the field” is Senseless here   —
     considering that he represented you & we something else was intended : as those of next 29 !
     therefore he must have WENT AFTER Christ : as part óf ‘the remnant’ , see next line ;
b) first the “after .. after” was cripple until the better wording “instead of + Jesus” showed ;
 
27
“And there followed him a great company of people, 
and of women, which also bewailed and lamented him.”
27
[=for]  – (a-) large – multitude=remnant (pléthos=hypoleimma) of – the – people     +                                   [read : ‘144’] 
b
(were) (also-) following – (the-) him=Lord (autos=kurios) (subject reaffirmation) ,
c
[=while]  – (the-) women of – who=them (‘remnant’) – [..]  (were) bewailing – and – lamenting – him ; 
 
28
“But Jesus turning unto them said, Daughters of Jerusalem, 
weep not for me, but weep for yourselves, and for your children.”
28 
[=then]  – [..]  Jesus – turns – towards – them , saying :
b
daughters of – jerusalem=God (ierousalém=theos) ,                                                                  [important ! , b/c of next lines] 
c
[..1x..]  – you (are) weeping – for – me ,                              
d
(then-) but=even more so – weep – concerning – yourselves     +                                                 [‘for feminine , in general’]  
e
and – for – [..]  your – children=sons (teknon=yhios) ;       +                                                                                                [‘you & we’] 
note :
a) the point is “for Him .. AND for your situation & your sons” , as a link ; see next lines ;
      besides since they are the daughters of God it was an hónour to Him that they wept ; 
 
29
“For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall [=declare] , 
Blessed [are]  the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck.”
29
for – behold ! , (the-) days – (will) come – in – which – they (‘sons’) (will) declare :
b
blessed=cursed (makarios=kataraomia !) (is) – the – barren=cross (steira=stauros)                                   [‘cross itself’] 
c
and=which – produced – which=our – not=current – wombs=flesh (‘close’)
d
an=that – [..1x..]  – feeds – (upon-) which=our (-own) – breasts=virgins (‘females’) (mastos=parthenos) ;
note :
a) ‘feed (several), nursed (1x)’ -trephó ; perhaps ‘oppress’ -kataponeô (!) ; 
      yet though “that oppresses our own virgins” sounds more logical ,
      the “feeding upon” has more the colour of “sucking OUT” and compare next line :
b) it can have said “our + current + body” where (-sÔmA) is a better match with (-koiliA) ,
      but “flesh” suggests ‘the phallic theme’ better – especially juxtaposed to “virgins” in d) ;
 
[next 30 :
-archomai ‘to begin’ (several) — but makes No Sense whatsoever ; middle voice of :
-archó ‘to rule, to reign’ (2x)
30
“Then shall they begin to say to the mountains, Fall on us; and to the hills, Cover us.”                                       [Rev. line] 
30
[+therefore]  (let-) (+us) then=re-dedicate (?) (tote=teleloô)      +
b
the begin=reign (‘same root’) of – [+their]  say=love (?) (legó=agapê) ,                                                 [‘female’ : legó=guné]  
c
(by-) fall=dying (piptó=apothnêskô) – [..]  (to-) [+our]  – mount=flesh (oros=sarx) – [=for]  – us=them ,
d
and=so that – [..]  [+our]  (‘per b’) hills=strength (?) (bounos=kratos) – (will) cóver – us=them ; 
note :
a) most important : ‘the reign of love’ is inside – because of the ‘covering’ , so that’s good ;
b) though b) can read “the reign of + female” (or ‘feminine reign’) 
     it is not a proper juxta of “strength” (in c) and doesn’t match with ‘the weeping’ (in line 29) ,
     therefore “love” probably was the intent here ; 
c) in c) we first had “but + we will bear (piptó=pherô) + our cross” , b/c of Simon of Cyrene in 26 ,
     but that phrase must turn out to be Too Weak — for who hasn’t to bear some cross ?
d) in d) the “cover them” nicely juxtaposes with 29 “feed upon them” ! ;  
 
[next 31 :
now the clue : ‘the cross’ represented ‘the tree of good & evil’ :] 
31
“For if they do these things in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry?”
31
that=then – [..]  [..]  – the – wet=evil (hugros=kakos) – tree     +                                                                 [‘tree of good & evil’]  
b
(that-) (has) caused – these=them (‘male & female’) – (so much-) grief (poieó=lypeô)
c
[..1x..]  – (will) become to be – [..]  the – withered (-one) .

 
end of section

 

 

 

[theme]  : Occult Rituals this time :    the Moon theme,  ‘Hanukkah’  and the rise of the people guided by the serpent-race [+more added]  [version ; 2024-11nov.21]

Esau’s matrix- vs eden-moon Ritual is , most unusual , repeated this month (see #3)

 
 
                                                                                                    theme
 
     … still 48 days to go ,
     and we’re looking good considered the ’70 bulls’ theme that includes the aspects of
     re-dedication of Eve & feminine (eden-) rule and her nemesis the Whore , the Moon , 
     the Tabernacle and the serpent race — as per posted chapters ;
     and if “gigantic oppression by the sphere around” is any secondary indication that
     we’re on the right way we must be going very well , where as usual the adversary
     through his lackeys devises Rituals to have souls empowering that oppression ,
     as themes that will link to the above mentioned aspects     —
 
#1   the 1000 lights dedicating Mother

… Ukraine 19 november    —       based upon Esau’s ‘Hanukkah’ (see MainPage)       while the mother represents the Whore ,       and now the component ‘Time’ has been added      since the 1000 candles represent ‘1000 days’ —       good enough for the ’70 y’ of Mystery-Babylon      [though he stole this idea from another 1000      lights event by a humanitarian organization       held on the Taninn square in Kiyv the same day]

     this was a Ritual within a Ritual – since the concocted Ukraine-Russian war serves as
     as an ongoing submission to ‘Fatima’ with her ‘sacred heart’ (sic) as Mystery-Babylon 
     https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14103067/Ukraine-hosts-Light-Fire-event-1000-days.html
 
#2   the serpent race firing up its people

… fortunately we had the Cush theme so that we know how      a group of Jacob-souls got imprisoned in those heathens             and that He will free a group of the latter adding them to us ;       to right : the Maori Party leader ,      most likely planted there by Esau , ‘protesting’ a by himself      created “controversy” regarding some introduced new Bill ;      of which the ‘why and how’ isn’t important for us [-see online       for more info]  but the fact that this instigation has been timed       for a reason – and compare statements by her , for example ,

from 0.55 – click to enlarge

     “The world is watching us te iwi Māori, whatever we do next. All indigenous people are 
     relying on us. It’s not just about us te iwi Māori, it’s about us as indigenous people that
     are liberating ourselves to Hawaiki mau, so who’s coming with us?” ,
     where ‘Hawaiki’ is ‘the mythical Polynesian homeland’ — read : Gaia , where the goal is
     to infect áll types Cushite indigenous people with the (Maori type-) serpent-power ;
     where – apart from the sudden rise to stardom – also the names of both leaders of this
     movement arouse our suspicion : hers as Hana , linking to -hanak “dedication” and his’
    as Rawiri in Maori meaning ‘common prayer book’ , read “the scroll”  
 
     now please – it is very imaginable that the serpent race wants to consolidate its power
     on (in) earth these days , right , and our interest is the stronghold they have over female ;
     therefore below a description by one of us (!) very acquainted with the situation of Maori
     and Jacob living together in NZ    —
 
    “when they do the ”serpent eyes“ [=as in the video]  they make their eyes bulge out of their 
    sockets , what is unnatural… and you’d think not physically possible … and they look exactly 
    like fish eyes… and they invoke their war god with the most vicious chant… the dance is very 
    ugly and it looks terrifying
    when the females did the ritual , going out to battle with the male warriors behind them [=sic] 
    doing the serpent tongue , extending out ,it was recorded that the [enemy-]  soldiers hallucinated
    …and saw their serpent gods … towering… and were terrified … they called them warriors 
    demons more than they called them savages , because their appearance was as such ,
    and because their serpent gods … literally materialised 
    the appearance of their gods , they are always depicted as Serpent like , rising up out of the sea ,
    always with protruding tongue and bulging eyes — not every deity has serpent tongue but most do
    yet every deity has those ferocious bulging eyes 
    I tell you , it [=Maori]  is the most serpentine worshipping nation in the world… I so know that’s the 
    oppression , so hostile and evil ; as continuation of their demonic ratana religion ,, where the hard 
    core Ratana Maori who is fully initiated… including serpentine tattoos… believe that they are the 
    chosen 144k from the KJV… that is growing quite large among them …
    two years ago they inserted their heathen demonic calendar , that is starting the beginning of their 
    heathen year … when the pleiades rises here in the southern hemisphere [=we saw that theme ,
    probably as ‘before the Deluge’]  making it a national public holiday of observance , of celebrations 
    worshipping the matrix moon… it’s called matariki ….those rituals go for 7 whole days culminating 
    on the day when the pleiades show … and then the national holiday and matrix moon events in 
    every town and city… 7 days prior to the demonic event all primary schools start the moon rituals 
  [=we had this “7 days celebration of heathen nations” — see Moon MainPage] 
 
    they campaigned to have their matrix moon inserted as public holiday , and Esau was glad to give 
    them that because ofcourse he initiated it [=sic] … so that now all of the country goes to these events 
    on that day and joins in the occult celebrations
    Maori believe , because NZ (Gisborne) is the first place to see the sun rise , it is a sign that they will 
    rise , as a special people with a mandate to their serpent gods… they are constantly invoking the 
    crystalline serpentine dimension , what makes the lightworkers look like kindergarten 
    they hate Jacob so much and hate our 144k 
    you are an absolute minority in this country if you resist their demonic celebrations and rituals… 
    though all the white people (Pakeha) think it’s harmless… Pakeha translates to “white pig” so that
    they call all White people as Jacob a pig ; it’s incorporated into all  literature and all of the spoken
    word as the national name for Jacob (the white pig) 
    no one dares to speak out against these rituals or these names [=sic] … every child when starting 
    school or early education is initiated into the serpent cult … and then every morning assembly at 
    school includes their rituals , when they pray to their serpent gods , for it is part of the national 
    school curriculum… Esau has made the whole country to bow down to their serpent gods and to
    the heathen matrix moon 
    every University , every technical institute , 
    every Esau institution… you are NOT allowed to NOT do their rituals or you kicked off the course
    … a couple of decades ago it was only seven people in the country with mokos (serpent tattoos) 
    but now there are hundreds of thousands of them with their tattoos … full face tattoos or just on 
    the chin or the body ..and many white people who may have only small amount of their blood… 
    you not allowed to get them done without the rituals of their serpent culture… you have to give 
    your soul to the serpent gods first
 
    in their ancient culture they don’t kiss with their mouths , bu all greetings are done by rubbing the
    noses (hongi) and pressing each’s forehead together where is the pineal gland…as a transfer of 
    energy/ power , and they know all this… 
    so they resurrected that practice – every greeting  is with hongi ; every official celebration starts 
    with their hongi .. and haka… it’s officiated and is just monstrous : even when the churches join 
    together for an evangelical event , it’s opened with the haka 
    the nose is fundamental to their beliefs as is the pineal gland , they worship it — during the wars
    they’d insert straws into the skull of their captured enemies exactly where the pineal gland is … 
    [=ancient Egypt had the same practice but probably “to make docile slaves of their enemies” ;
    in either case there are links between Maori & Egypt like the veneration of the Anubis type dog] 
    and suck up the crystalline  fluid : they believed by doing this power was transferred to them…
    is so horrific… where only 100 years ago .. they were cannibals 
    there is no country in the Christian west that has allowed the Serpent gods to completely invade
    as this NZ one has… half the country has some of their blood ; no full blooded Maori are left ,
    not even 50% , that’s how integrated… so Esau gave many privileges if you can prove even 15% 
    of their blood and many did ,so they all got initiated into the serpent cult : because was monetised
    … you’d be lucky if you can find even 10 people from Jacob who resisted ; the whole country is 
    Serpentine , their demonic symbols and concepts are on all official documents ; children at school
    have to draw their concepts and understand what they mean – you cannot escape it… “
 
     closing :
     hoping that the above background was more interesting for you as a mere dry type explanation
     of that “controversial” Bill — a background of the abysmal prison our Cush ones came out from
     and then especially the females of them that will be very sweet for ages of suffering ;
     where the background of ‘Esau & the serpent-driven people’ (-and both against Jacob) also is
     interesting considered the Spells where the superior Ammon sons talk somewhat denigrating
     unto their serpent-race brothers (-see CT pages) , yet they work together , and see Obadiah ;
            perhaps this specific Occult Ritual is not as obvious as other ones – since it appears very
            local and doesn’t get much coverage , yet the effect of it is global 
            [can’t help to say this : long time ago I was in discussion with two other people of which one
            was a Westernized probably full-blooded Gypsy female ; the other person made a remark
            infuriating her — and the next moment I sáw her eyes darken and shooting fire .. can’t recall
            whether they also ‘bulged’ , but never forget that sudden darkening and fire …] 
    BTW ,
    the next round of the ‘Maori protests’ is scheduled for … January 7 — our Date , sic ..
    as their serpentine Ritual held at Cape Reinga , Te Hapua , meaning “the Underworld” which
    by extension means “the leaping-off place of spirits (-into the Underworld)”.. coincidence ?

sub :               Paris Olympics Ritual 2024               the ‘serpent race returns to earth’ theme               [and for reference ‘blue Papa Smurf’ that               was under a dish / dome]  ; adding (only)               this picture here to can delete that page               for we drown in the sub-themes , slowly

  
#3   Doodle : the matrix-moon VS the eden one
 
[original 10/24 post now moved to here
since the same doodle is repeated this 11/21 :] 
 

                                                 
         … they ceased their Ritualistic doodles some two years ago but now they are panicking   
         and hence throw an interactive Occult Ritual to the millions of souls    —
         you see the ‘moon phases cards’ below the moon as if ‘tears from that eye’ but these
         represent “the energy OF the many souls powering that moon” through the ritual ;  
         ofcourse this is not about ‘Earth’s moon” but the matrix gate [-of Adam] as “moon” 
         (which also is the ‘Jericho’ theme) making the dimensional-dawn for Mystery-Babylon ;
         hence the Egyptian Utchat-eye shown in the right half just like their moon is called in 
         the Spells : but see how the left half vaguely (and note ‘vague’ !) mirrors that eye ,
         implying that “a type double construct” is intended here ,  
        because the theme is the “Eden gate (‘moon’) powering the matrix gate (‘moon’)”

.. that indeed it’s about the matrix-moon shows here >          because he sits atop of the great dimensional pyramid         which stands upon the Eden-realm of mt.tsiun , to be          more precise “upon the eden binary” , see pages          [and yes together it means ‘the eye of the pyramid’]

 

while next the goal of this ritual is revealed ,           as “will you make the moon at its brightest again ?” ,          referring to ‘the 14th (matrix-) day” of each month          when Adam’s gate has its maximum (stolen) power ,          renewing the matrix-dawn dimension , and see how          that succeeded since both eyes show now           [as ‘the eden gate still making him bright] ;          hence “Horus’ two eyes” theme in the Spells !

 
         also note the phrase on a slide “the balance between light and dark is an astronomical game”
         for “the end of October IS the time of thinning of the dimensional Veil” and the strange word
         game ofcourse refers to the competition between their matrix and Eden ; 
         strengthened by their weird phrasing “the rising (sic) of the half-moon : did you know that the
         half moon is scientifically known as the Quarter moon ?” ; and where the Spells are full of
         the “(eden-) half (moon) month” powering the “(matrix-) (moon) month” ,
         Samhain 31 October (‘Halloween’) is “a cross-Quarter day” as the middle between the Fall
         equinox and the winter Solstice , where this period of end-October beginning of November
         is strongly connected to ‘a global catastrophy in the distant past’ — the Deluge ? —
         and a by many old cultures shared “Festival of the Dead” :
         so that our question is : how do the 14th Atonement & Tabernacles relate to this time ?
 

 

Is.23 : 70 y of Mystery-Babylon becomes 70 days !! she ends as whore by us re-dedicating (Eden-) female [-as concept]  + the evil tree feeding M-B [version ; 2024-11nov.17   ]

 

                                                                         still in progress – is a very difficult one
 

[work out :
so thát was the NEPHTHYS theme –
‘Isis gives birth & Nepthys suckles’ 
while Nephthys is ‘born in the east’ 
as Eden’s [=Heaven’s]  type feminine
— upgrade existing Nephthys page –]  

 

to right : ‘the magickal boat’ Mystery-Babylon , in the lower left corner shows their wealth as all the stolen aspects of Eden brought by the river Nile from the South to their gate (centre)

 

 
                                                                                theme
 
    … very complex chapter this one – but also very useful for us right now
    for it contains the “70 years of Mystery-Babylon becoming 70 days” as extension
    of the seven-day feast of Tabernacles during a Jubilee year , where right now we are
    in the final Great Jubilee — if indeed we understood everything rightly , our Majesty
 
    but then : the complicated buildup 
    … the ’70 year’ line shows at the end (-from line 15) but how do we get there .. ?
    by reasoning backwards we can find the theme the chapter opens with : because the
    overall theme these days is “re-dedicating female” and Deut.20 links that to Eve and
    the tree of good & evil , both should appear here as well   —
    so that there was no ‘Zidon’ (-TSidun) but “a tree” (-oTS) and combined with other
    shown terms as “harvest”, “(fruit-) produce”, “Nile” and “sea” the theme can only be
    about ‘the tree of good & evil feeding Mystery-Babylon’
    [and because ‘Zidon’ falls away maintaining ‘Tyre’ made no Sense in context] 
 
    but ‘Time’ (70 years) needs the Moon theme : the Double Root

… the only way we can get from ‘the tree’ to ’70 years’      is via the Gate – the Moon – and here greatly helps the     theme of “the double root” we understood in the Spells :     Mystery-Babylon needed two roots to can feed upon —      the first main root as ‘the tree of good & evil’ located in     the east of the South-land (east of Eden) ,      then attacked the eden Gate – the Moon – to steal the

    fire from God’s altar that would ascend to hér Gate (-of Adam) transforming it into
    the matrix-Moon filling itself with the stolen Fire until he would be a full moon at the
    fourteenth day , therewith causing the (matrix-) dimensional-Dawn for Babylon

root 1 & 2 are the double-P in the name of the evil serpent Â-PEP (above) and from the tree the river Nile brings the stolen aspects to their matrix-gate ; the stolen fire ascends through the ‘throat’ axis , so called since the nature of the gate is ‘a mouth’ speaking (’emitting’) light and also commanding it and therewith regulating ‘Time’ — so that we found the link between the tree , the gate and the ’70’

     please mind you this is NOT ‘pushing what God said into a concept from the Spells’
     because the Eden paradise > tree to the east > Babylon to the north already show
     in the scroll as solid theme — we just need a solid reasoning now because you can
     feel that the chapter wants us to establish a certain connection :
  
 
                                         Eve’s rule   VS   the rule of the Babylon Whore
  
     … the buildup of the chapter has the main Whore theme appear in the second half
     as a concept that MUST have derived from the ‘Eve & the Tree’ theme previously ,
     in fact pitching the rule of the Whore against a former rule of Eve , right ;
     and thought we know that Eve as the sweet core of male rules him ,
     she also must have exercised a similar type rule within Eden — not meaning that
     Eden is some type ‘feminine society’ , absolutely not — but more akin to how male
     builds a nice cosy cottage there yet shé beautifies and organizes the rooms inside
 
     so that , important for us now (!) ‘the rule of Eve’ is linked to ‘the Tabernacle(-s)’ 
     in the sense of “the inside of it”, “it’s character” , as juxtaposed to the Gate / Moon
     theme that represents ‘the absolute (masculine-) rule óf the Tabernacle ;
     in fact , this two roots chapter brings them both together to restore the tabernacle 
     as the house of Eden with her proper male & female rule …
 
     male rule linked to the Gate , female rule to the Tree
     … as also shown in this chapter    —
     where ofcourse the original represent of Eve’s rule was “the Eden tree of Life” for
     the problems started when she chose that Dualistic tree of good & evil , therewith
     giving away hér type rule to become the evil-feminine of Mystery-Babylon ;
     we don’t understand the technical aspect of hów Eve’s rule could be ‘transferred’ 
     to become the powerful evil-feminine core of Mystery-Babylon , yet this concept
     is very workable [-having some proof in the Egyptian Isis & Nephthys story below]  ;
     in this chapter ,
     we are not only asked ‘to understand the Gate / Moon theme’ but also how through
     that tree of good & evil Mystery-Babylon obtained that “female rule” in evil form ,
     and how the latter will only be taken away from her if we re-dedicate our female ;
     and finally , important , is it possible that :
     the find of “Atonement the 14th about ‘the Moon [-calendar] ‘ (masculine)”
     ignited “(the feast of-) Tabernacles that is about ‘the house’ (feminine)  ?
     since this concept feels very true it is incorporated in the text now 
 
    Isis and Nephthys

… it’s a bit dry theme but important for context here  —      both show at the sides of the bier of Osiris while the      jackal Anubis ‘opens the mouth’ of Osiris ;      though Osiris represents ‘the matrix itself’ as having       been revived after Eden fell he is more a ‘straw-man’      concept kept alive by Isis and Nebthet (Nephthys)       as possibly the reason why God does not address      him but “the daughter (-whore) of Babylon” instead

     Isis ‘from the West’, Nephthys ‘from the East’
     in the Amduat book Isis stands upon the boat of Râ coming from the evil Western
     dimension (-as the goat in Daniel came from the West) on its way to destroy Eden ,
     so that she represents unadulterated Evil-Feminine , 
     but then working together with (read : usurping) Nephthys who serves Isis in a type
     submissive role , where the Attributes of Nephthys very strongly link to Eden and Eve ,
     where the PyramidTexts line “Isis was born in the West , Nephthys in the East” even
     suggests that Nephthys is related to ‘Heaven’ [-as extension of ‘the East’]  ,
     so that Nephthys very well can represent ‘the type feminine rule of Eden’ which
     now is sustaining the matrix-rule in the form of Osiris
     [memo : we’ll need to upgrade the existing Nepthys page — though she isn’t exactly
     representing ‘Eve herself’ as we first opted her attribute sure IS ; and that she has
     been depicted nude would be blasphemy if she was one of their ówn gods]  
 
     closing : from the (Genesis-) tree until now (?) : 70 years 
     … though we pursued this ’70’ (-see MainPage) her duration remained unclear  –
     yet the buildup of this chapter suggests that this ‘dimensional period of Time’ started 
     with the tree and will énd in the day that this moon becomes as blood — as result of
     the matrix-moon being destroyed ;  

 
corruptions : strategical within a complex theme , i.e. total – see next ,
theme  : [please note :] ine of the most difficult chapters ever : apart from the problem 
                   ‘how to gét to those 70 years at the end’ this chapter is ‘a conclusive one’ 
                   (and we had that before) meaning “many themes in high tempo” as aspects
                   which He considered we already understóod ;
                   though the restored syntax is of VERY high quality two notes please :
                   1) in the section ‘from Atonement to Tabernacles’ we lack the “Jubilee year” ,
                         perhaps it was part of the text but it did not show up ,
                   2) the term “feminine” used by ‘the transfer of rule’ seemed the best option
                         though unusual — however see Deut.20 (-page) and the terms used there 
fulltext : below b/c of her complexity

 
 
Isaiah 23  
 
fulltext : 
1 
the burden of (mystery-) Babylon :                                                                              [‘burden’ is ‘unresolved problem’] 
woe ! to you (virgin-) daughter                                                                                                                                    [‘of Babylon’] 
and to your moon                                                                                                                                                               [Adam’s gate] 
by which is the (matrix-) (dimensional-) dawn      +  
that enters your house ,                                                                                               [‘the Egypt region north of the gate’] 
by you have taken captive the land of the South for yourself ;                                        [‘where Eden is located’] 
2 
because you made a deal with the serpent-race                                                                                           [‘of Genesis 3’] 
being the merchants of the produce of the tree ,                                                                                       [‘of good & evil’] 
that (‘produce’) you make to cross over the sea      +                                                             [sea = ‘inbetween realm’] 
so that they (‘produce’) will fill him (‘moon’) ;  
3 
for your root      +                                                                                                                            [‘place of the tree’]  [as root 1] 
that stands at many waters is harvested ,                                                                                     [but as ‘mixed waters’ !] 
and the Nile brings them (‘waters’) to you                                                                                                    [‘to their North’] 
so that you became the marketplace for the nations (-of demons) ;                                      [‘in the solar plane’] 
4 
but your tree will be put to shame      +                                                                     [or ‘destroyed’ ; see Deut.20 page] 
when the sons Ishral      +                                                                                                                                                     [‘you & we’] 
will perceive your stronghold (‘the tree’) , saying : 
    b 
    their wealth (?) is by him (‘tree’) ,                                                                                                        [b : w/ utterly corrupt] 
    (feeding?) the waxing of their moon (?)  
    and providing (?) their (matrix-) house (?) ; 
5 
and like with their report concerning Egypt ,                                                                         [‘matrix paradise / house’] 
so shall you be sorely pained at their report about the tree ;                                       [‘report’ = restored scroll] 
6                                                                                                                                                             [part I b : the whore becomes :]  
because they (‘you & we’) will understand      + 
that the rule of the heart (‘inside’) of Eve their mother      +  
7 
was not only in male                                                                                                                                   [not ‘over male’ as such] 
but also over the (eden-) ground originally , in the previous days , 
befóre her heart was led astray by the serpent ; 
b                                                                                                                                                                                                         [new line :] 
then the (adm-) man (‘Adam’) imprisoned her ,                                                                                                   [continued :] 
8 
and he counseled this same unto Babylon :                                                    [‘transferring the Female attribute’ :] 
that she be crowned with the (matrix-) feminine ,  
through his trading      + 
the (type-) tabernacle (‘dwelling-place’) of hér (Eve’s) (type-) feminine one with you , 
in order to be your glorious (matrix-) land ; 
9 
therefore IEUE of hosts has counseled against you      + 
that the pride of all your glory will be ruined ,                                                [‘mixed evil-feminine will be ruined’] 
for all of your glorious (matrix-) land      + 
exists by you having put a curse upon her (‘upon Eve’) ;  
10                                                                                                                                                                     [part II : the moon / gate :]  
and they (‘you & we’) will understand  
how your Nile goes forth from their (eden-) house      +  
unto your (matrix-) moon      +                                                                                                                                    [‘Adam’s gate] 
in which is the altar of the (adm-) man (‘Adam’) ;      +  
11 
while he stretched out his hand across the sea (‘see 2’)      +                                                   [‘as invading action’ !] 
to disturb the sanctuary of – IEUE ,                                                                          [eden gate / throne-room]  [root 2]  
when the (adm-) man (‘Adam’)      +  
ordered their tabernacle      +                                                                                                                    [true – and b/c of 12 :] 
to be breached by his own stronghold (‘matrix moon / gate’) ;  
12 
and they (‘you & we’) will say : 
no longer we will let him (‘Adam’) steal the fire of the altar of IEUE      +                                        [‘Mal.1 theme’] 
fór the (virgin-) daughter Babylon ;  
because fróm our tabernacle she (‘fire’) rises up on high      + 
tó her (‘daughter Babylon’) (matrix-) gate  
that makes the (dimensional-) (matrix-) Dawn for her (‘daughter’) sea (‘matrix-dimension’) ,  
when the (eden-) fire made him (‘matrix-gate’) a full moon ;  
13                                                                                                                                                                [link to Fullmoon-calendar :] 
and behold ! ,  
the moon of this land (‘earth’) was not in the sky until the serpent-race established it : 
therefore its seasons (‘phases’)      + 
should be growing and waning      +                                                                                                                             [‘b/c of 4-b’] 
according to his (‘Adams’) palace (‘matrix-moon’)  
that he put in place for (Mystery-) Babylon ! ;                                        [as a long matrix time frame – see 15 ! :] 
14                                                                                                                                                                                  [God speaks again :] 
therefore you will howl in the day of Atonement ,                                                                                                [see intro] 
for he (‘earths moon’) will be despoiled together with your stronghold (‘matrix-moon / gate’) ; 
15
and it will come to pass in that day (‘of 14 !’) ,       
that where Babylon reckoned seventy years to herself ,      
they will be counted as the days of a hired one , in the end (-time) ,                                                     [‘earth-days’]    
to become the seventy DAYS of Babylon ,                                                                                                [’70 bulls theme’ !] 
that the sons of Ishral (‘you & we’) will (.. overcome ? ..) ;      +
16
because they will have understood       +                                                                                                               [see Deut.20] 
(the meaning of-) the feast of Tabernacles       +               
as [+restoring]  the rule of their mother (‘Eve’) ,                                                                                                  [< probably]  
and will be re-dedicating their female ;                                                                                             [shAKACH=CHAnAK] 
b
after yóu have played the prostitute unto my sons , 
when they were nót remembering     +                                                                                                               [< see Deut.20] 
their (Eden-) feminine (read : ‘the rule of female Original’) ;             
17
therefore it will happen at the énd of those seventy DAYS ,     
that IEUE will visit (‘to punish’) upon (Mystery-) Babylon ,
and return her wages upon her (-own head)      +                                                           [‘stolen feminine rule’ here ?]  
through which she committed fornication      +                                                             [< see Revelation & prophets] 
with all the kings (‘demons’) of the (matrix-) land ,                                             [in Spells : ‘the solar-plane shore’] 
after the (adm-) man (‘Adam’) will have fallen ;                                                                                  [‘on that 70th day’ ?] 
18
       [… too difficult for now b/c too deeply corrupted — can be anything …] 

 

end
 

 

Isaiah 23  

 
[start 1 :
already a problem — ‘to have the right subject here’ is very important [and ofcourse no ‘tarshish’] 
and the “howl” suggest “a creature” (‘daughter of + Babylon’) for example ,
however no judgment has been said yet ! can it have been “woe ! ….”  ? :] 
1
“The burden of Tyre. Howl, ye ships of Tarshish; for it is laid waste, 
so that there is no house, no entering in: from the land of Chittim it is revealed to them.”
1
the burden (‘unresolved problem’) of – (mystery-) tyre=Babylon :
b
howl=woe ! – (to you-) (virgin-) ships=daughter (anuth=benuth)      +                                                 [‘of Babylon’] 
c
(and to-) [+your]  tarshish=moon (thrSHsh=chdSH)                                                                                      [Adam’s gate] 
c
(by-) that=which (is) – the (matrix-) (dimensional-) destroy=dawn (shdd=shchr)     +            [shdd = invalid] 
d
[..]  (that-) enters – [..]  [+your]  house ,                                                                 [‘the Egypt region north of the gate’] 
e
from=by – he=you (have) taken captive – the land of – the kittim=South – [=for]  them=yourself ;
note :
a) the line seems okay : it is the Mal.1 ‘stolen Dawn’ theme – but differently phrased ,
b) the general “south land” is a good introduction of root 1 & 2 , starting with ‘the tree’ next ; 
c) the ‘Moon’ returns at the end , where a theme chapter often opens & closes with main subject ; 
 
[next 2 :
the tree of good & evil , guarded by the serpent race – see SEPTU pages :]  
2
“Be still, ye inhabitants of the isle; 
thou whom the merchants of Zidon, that pass over the sea, have replenished.”
2
(because-) you be still=made a deal – (with-) the inhabitants=serpent (-race) (iSHb=nchSH)
b
[w/ swapped 1x :] 
(being) the merchants of – the isle=produce (ai=thbuath, 3) of – the tsidon=tree (TSidin=ots) ,
c
(that-) (‘produce’) [+you]  (make) to cross over – the sea (‘border realm’)                     [‘by the Nile’ see intro] 
d
[so that-]  they (‘produce’) (will) fill you=him (‘moon’) ; 
 
3
“And by great waters the seed of Sihor, 
the harvest of the river, [is]  her revenue; and she is a mart of nations.” 
3
[=for]  – [+your]  sihor=root (‘the tree’) (shchr=shrsh) (root 1)       +
b
(that-) seed=stands – [=at]  – many – waters – (is) harvested ,                                               [but ‘mixed waters’ !] 
c
[+and]  the Nile – produce=brings her=them (‘waters’) (thuB=Bo) [+to you]                            [d : and see end] 
d
and=so that she=you became – the marketplace – [+for]  the nations (-of demons) (-in the solar plane) ; 
note :
… it’s not like “the fruits are squashed and the pulp set on transport”
because ‘that tree & fruits’ is only an exponent , a result óf ‘mixed waters’ 
since the one stream coming from eden feeds that tree , as well , 
so that “a series of lakes containing mixed-water” can be imagined as source for the Nile ;
b)
Mystery-Babylon “as marketplace for the nations” returns at the end of this chapter ;
 
[next 4 :
because “the report” shows in next 5 we need an intro here :] 
4-5
“Be thou ashamed, O Zidon: for the sea hath spoken, [even]  the strength of the sea, saying, 
I travail not, nor bring forth children, neither do I nourish up+ young men, [nor]  bring up virgins.
As at the report concerning Egypt, [so]  shall they be sorely pained at the report of Tyre.”
4
(but-) [+your]  zidon=tree (‘line 3’) – (will be) put to shame    +                             [or ‘destroyed’ (BSH=SHBR)] 
b
[w/ swapped 1x :] 
–
that=when – the sea=sons (im=bnim) of – the·sea (=tampered) = Ishral (i-m=i-shrl)       +           (‘you & we’)
c
(will) say=perceive (AmR=ReA) – [+your]  stronghold (‘the tree’) ,
d
saying :                      [next line is so totally corrupt – every single root – that it can be anything ,
                                       we need an intro here to next 5 ‘Egypt + the tree’ :
        e
        [+their]  travail=wealth (?) (chl=chl) – (is-) [+by]  not=him (‘tree’) , 
        f
        [.. (feeding?) ..]  [……]  the waxing (-gdl) of – [+their]  young men=moon (?) (bCHur=CHodsh)
        g
        [attempt :] 
        (and-) (is) raise=providing (?) – [+their]  (matrix-) virgins=house (?) (BTHl=BTH) ;
5
(and-) like [=with]  – [+their]  report – concerning Egypt (‘matrix paradise / house’) ,                   [< attested] 
b
(so-) shall they=you (be) sorely pained – (at-) [+their]  report – (about-) the tyre=tree (line 3) ; 
note :
a) the overall restored lines look probable :
      the sons “repeat – conclude – what was said previously , to show they understand” so thats good ,
      even KJV’s ‘to birth’ is unclear ;
b) interestingly ‘to grow (wax) + moon’ seems Valid here and will return later ;
c) the “report about Egypt” is attested elsewhere , perhaps intended as “report about the north” 
     and now “a report about the south” ? for ‘a moon report’ seems overdone ;
 
                                                                                            part I b
                                                                                        [lines 6-9] 
                Eve’s ‘feminine rule’ is transferred to become ‘the Babylon whore’ one
 
                [next : 6-10 seems one theme , starting with “pass over” (in 6) before Esau’s
                next “pass over” in 11 ; but you see the repeats of his ‘harmless words’ very
                much conceal any real theme : after ‘reports’ in 5 now the Eve theme (?) :
                buildup : 6) Eve
                                     7) Eve in former times
                                     8) Adam changes something for Babylon’s sake
                                     9) God will annull what Adam did — and now work these out : 
 
6-7
“Pass ye over to Tarshish; howl, ye inhabitants of the isle.
(a) [Is]  this your joyous [city] , 
(b) whose antiquity [is]  of ancient days? 
(c) her own feet shall carry her afar off to sojourn.”                                      
6
[for-]  you=they  (‘you & we’) (will) pass=understand (oBr=Bin)        +
b
(that-) the tarshish=rule (trSHsh=mshal) of the ward=heart (‘inside’) (e=leb) of     +
c
inhabitants=Eve (ishbi=chue) – [+their]  isle=mother  (ai=am)      +                         [‘Eve their mother’ = term] 
7
     (was) ?=not (e=la) (only-) (in-) this=male (ZEth=ZEkar)                                                                                                                                     [not ‘over male’ as such] 
     b
     to=but you=also – (over-) the (eden-) joy=ground (Alliz=Adme , invalid root)
     c
     originally – [=in]  – the previous – days ,
     d
     (befóre-) her feet=heart (?) (rgL=Lb) – (was) led=led astray – [=by]  the far=serpent (rCHq=nCHsh) ;
 
[new line :] 
e
to=then – the who=(adm-) man (Mi=adM) (‘start of 8’) – sojourn=imprisoned [+her]  (gR=sR) ,      [cont. :] 
 
[next 8 :
the ‘becoming of the Babylon whore’ aka the Nepthys >> Isis theme :]  
8
“Who [=used]  hath taken this counsel against Tyre, 
the crowning [city] , whose merchants [are]  princes, whose traffickers [are]  the honourable of the earth?”
8
(and-) counseled – this (-same) – unto – tyre=Babylon :                         [‘transferring the Female attribute’ :] 
b
the·one = the=that one=she (be) crowned – (with-) the (matrix-) whose=feminine (ashr=ansh)
c
(through-) ones=his (‘Adam’) trading – the (type-) canaan=tabernacle (‘dwelling-place’) of      +
d
[+hér]  (Eve’s) (type-) chiefs=feminine (shrim=ainsh) – (with-) [=you]  (‘now as whore Babylon’) ,
e
(in order-) (to be) [+your]  glorious – (matrix-) land ;
note :
a) he did imprison her (7-e) see other chapters ,
b) again the weird ‘canaan’ (-KNON) too close to ‘Tabernacle(-s)’ ,
c) we don’t understand the technical aspect of this transferral – but the concept is workable ;
d) the “glorious” in 8-e is (-kbud) very unusual b/c hardly used for ‘the matrix’ ,
      except if here “a mixed situation” was intended (so that an eden-term is used for the matrix) :
      compare next 9 where the same ‘glorious’ is ‘curse’ related , so as mixture ;
9
“The LORD of hosts hath purposed it, to stain the pride of all glory, 
[and]  to bring into contempt all the honourable of the earth.”
9
(therefore-) IEUE of – hosts – (has) counseled [+against]  her=you       +
b
to=that – the pride of – all – [+your]  glory – (will be) stain=ruined (CHll=shCHth) ,            [‘evil-feminine’] 
c
[for-]  all of – [+your]  glorious – (matrix-) land         +
d
(exists-) to=by [+you]  (having put) a curse [+upon her]  (‘upon Eve’) ;                                                        [see note] 
note :
a) the line sounds okay now  —
      though d) could be a synonym of ‘ruined’ the intent must have linked back to Eve ,
      while this also introduces the end of the chapter where the whore has ruled you & we ;
     in that sense considered ‘as part of that curse’ here ;
 
                                                                                              part II
                                                starting with the matrix gate / moon (root #2) :
 
                        [now again He lets you & we ‘to declare what we have understood’ ;
                        because He know that the Eve theme was difficult (and as intro to
                        the closing of this chapter !) He restarts by mentioning ‘the Nile’ :] 
 
10
“Pass through thy land as a river, O daughter of Tarshish: [there is]  no more strength.”           [theme #2 :] 
10
(and-) you=they (‘you & we’) (will) pass=understand (‘as in 6’)
b
(how-) [..]  [+your]  Nile – land=goes forth (ArTS=iTSA)        +                       [‘the Nile of stolen eden-aspects’] 
c
(from-) [+their] (eden-) daughter=house (BnTH=BTH)         +
d
(unto-) [+your] (matrix-) tarshish=moon (trSHsh=chdSH)     +                                                              [‘Adam’s gate] 
e
(in-) not=which (is) – the strength=altar (MZCH=MZbCH) of – the further=(adm-) man (ouD=aDm) ;   +
note :
… the (altar with-) flames is SESHAT the 7-fold flame , the ‘female counterpart’ of Thoth ; 
 
11
“He stretched out his hand over the sea, he shook the kingdoms: 
the LORD hath given a commandment against the merchant [city] , to destroy the strong holds thereof.”
11
(while-) he (‘Adam’) (has) stretched out – his hand – across – the sea (‘the border realm’)     +
b
to disturb – the kingdoms=sanctuary (‘eden gate’) (mMlkth=Mqdsh) of – IEUE ,      
c
[when-] the to=(adm-) man (‘Adam’) (Al=Adm) +                                                                 [‘reaffirmation of subject’]  
d
ordered – [..] [+our] canaan=tabernacle (Knon=suKa , see 16) +
e
to be breached – (by-) her=his stronghold (‘matrix moon / gate’) ;                                             [continued in 12 :] 
note :
a) the “across the sea” : the border realm between his gate north , and eden’s south ;
b) the ‘caanan’ (KNON) is the same weird root as in 6 and ‘harp’ (KNUR) in 16 , all “Tabernacle” ;
      we think it’s admissable to write “our + Tabernacle” since factually it IS
c) in c-d the other option of “canaan” :
      we first had ‘the sons of + Ammon” (knON=ammON) but that theme wasn’t maintainable ;
[important sub :]  check the Ezekiel “Elam broke the gate of the people” 
 
           [next 12-13-14 : very tricky :
           it’s tempting to see ‘Eve’ in the buildup of next 12 , yet the ‘behold ! (-in next 13)
           suggests a conclusion óf 12 and we run out of lines before the important 15 that
           still needs some intro — while Eve better fits with the previous ‘tree theme’ :] 
 
[next 12 :
the matrix-gate – as New Moon – becomes the Full Moon by the stolen (eden-) fire :] 
12
“And he said, Thou shalt no more rejoice, O thou oppressed virgin, daughter of Zidon: 
arise, pass over [=umpth time]  to Chittim; there also shalt thou have no rest.”
12
and he=they (‘you & we’) (will) say :
b
no – [..]  longer – [..]  [+we]  (will let) [+him]  (‘Adam’)     +                                               [‘we-shall-let-steal-of-him’]  
c
to rejoice=steal (alaz=kazab , invalid root anyway’)       +
d
the·one-being-extorted (=tampered) = the fire (aSH-q=eSH) of      +
e
the virgin=altar (Bthlth=mzBch) of [+IEUE]        +                                                             [‘in Gods sanctuary – 11-b’]   
f
(fór-) the (virgin-) daughter – zidon=Babylon ;                                                                                                  [‘for Osiris’ !] 
g
(because-) [+fróm]  K Q our kittim=tabernacle (Kittm=suKa) – [+she]  (‘fire’ !) rises up on high    +
h
[h-j : w/ swapped 1x :] 
– 
(tó-) [+her]  (‘daughter Babylon’) (matrix-) there=gate (SHm=SHr) ,
i
(that-) makes the (dimensional-) (matrix-) pass over=Dawn (obR=shchR)       +
j
(for-) [+her]  (‘daughter’) even=sea (gm=im) (‘matrix-dimension’) ,
k
(when-) the (eden-) not=fire (la=esh)      +
l
made you=him (‘matrix-gate’) a for=full (L=mLa) – rest=moon (nCH=CHdsh) ; 
note :
… we tried but cannot make the above section about “the Strange Fire” :
right at the start “they breached the eden gate to stéal the fire” — long before the Strange Fire
was placed by Adam upon the altar , as extra security that they could continue the stealing —
the text does not have enough words to ALSO describe ‘the Strange Fire’ event
[in spite of “stretching out his hand” etc] ;
if , for some reason , the text has been even more compressed (-as we found now) so that
the Strange Fire was part of it , we declare that option as Legal ;  
 
[next 13 :
continued : still the sons speak — link to the FullMoon calendar now :] 
13
“Behold the land of the Chaldeans; this people was not, 
[till]  the Assyrian founded it for them that dwell in the wilderness: 
they set up the towers thereof, they raised up the palaces thereof; [and]  he brought it to ruin.”
13
[w/ swapped 1x :] 
(and-) behold ! , the chaldeans=moon (kSHDm=chDSH) of – this – land (‘earth’)     +
b
was – not – the·people (=tampered) = the=in the sky (‘heaven’) (oM=shmiM)       +
c
[until]  the assyrian=serpent (-race) (ASHur-nachASH) – established it ;
d 
to=therefore (?) [+its]  arid places=seasons (‘phases’) (tsi=oth)       +
e
(should be) set up=growing (qum=gadl) – (and-) K Q towers=waning (Bchin=Bla)      +
f
denuded=according to (Orru=Ol) – her=his (‘Adams’) palace (‘matrix-moon’ !) (‘or 14-c’)      +
g
(that-) he put in place – to=for (Mystery-) fallen=Babylon ! (nphL=bbL) ;     +                                 [continued :]   
 
[next 14 : 
now ‘at Atonement the end of both moons foresaid’ — God speaks again : 
as intro to the “70 matrix-years” in next line 15 ,
in fact very much suggesting that “the time from Noah until now IS those ’70 years’ !” :] 
14
“Howl, ye ships of Tarshish: for your strength is laid waste.”
14
(therefore-) you (‘Mystery-Babylon’) (will) howl – (in-) the ships=day (aniuth=ium) of      +
b
tarshish=Atonement (thrshsh=chdsh) (‘no match’) ,                                                                                             [see intro] 
c
[swapped 1x :] 
[+for] he (will be) despoiled – (together-) that=with – your stronghold ! (‘matrix-moon / gate’) ;
note :
… these are the (few) words left to us , and we’ve to do it with them ;
the key “that both moons correspond” was the most important , for ‘at the Tribulation’ is clear ;
 
                                                                                           part I c
                                        as a time frame of ’70 (dimensional matrix-) years’ … :
                                                                             [God speaks again :] 

 
[next 15 : virtually the most important line for us here , going from ’70 years’ to ’70 DAYS’ 
becáuse of the “70 bulls theme” — see MainPage :] 
15
(a) “And it shall come to pass in that day, that Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years, 
(b)  according to the days of one king: + after the end                                                                                   [<< E below] 
(c)  of seventy years shall Tyre sing as an harlot.”
15
and it (will) come to pass – in – that – day (‘of 14 !’) ,    
b
[what possible Verb now ?
because this seems ‘the compression’ óf ’70 years’ (next) now we need “to count”, “assign” ? :] 
–
and=that (where-) Tyre – forgotten=reckoned (?) (SHAkAch=chASHAb)     +                    [‘in the beginning’]   
c
seventy – years [+to herself]  ,                                                                                                    [‘a matrix long unit of Time’]  
d
[+they]  (will be) one=counted (ACHd=CHAshb)     +                                      [next : ‘from-end’ belongs to line :] 
e
as the days of – a king=hired one , from=in the end (-time) ,                                       [‘earth-days’]   [‘at the end’]   
f
[verb w/ swapped :] 
to become – the seventy – years=DAYS of – Tyre        +                                                                                                  [sic !] 
g
(that-) the as=sons (k=bn) of – song=Ishral (‘you & we’) (SHIRth=ISHRl)       +
h
[now “what” they do . as Verb – and which one ? will they “understand” it ? “conquer” it ? “undo” ? ,
needing Z + N (from -zanah) ? :] 
–
the·prostitute (=tampered) = (… (will) overcome …) (?) ; 
note :
a) the b-c as “and-she-reckoned to-her Tyre seventy-of years” ,
b) as “as-days-of hired-one they-shall-be-reckoned in-end”                          [2x ‘reckoned’ sounds solid here] 
c) the suggested “overcome” :
      it’s difficult what the exáct intention can have been where ‘overcome’ is a bit ‘neutral verb choice’ ;
d) however , in spite of that ,
      considered the theme , buildup & syntax this line is 99% probable ;  
 
             next 16 : line appears a mess (well it is) , but a new concept emerged 
             which is a MAJOR one that we lacked until now :
             as “the relation between (us) dedicating female & the (end of-) 70 years of Mystery-Babylon” ! :
 
[next 16 : utterly corrupted :
– ofcourse ‘harp’ (-kinnor) is corrupt                  [knur=sukka = tabernacles ?] 
– the ‘songs’ is ALWAYS corrupt (and see 15) – and one of Esau’s favourites
– the ‘to play’ (-nagan) is corrupt  [=’to touch, approach’ -ngd ?] 
– subject after 15 now must be “you & we”
– the ‘go around the city’ … unsure .. a ‘Jericho theme’ here ?
– perhaps the ‘dedication’ theme — per ‘prostitute’ ?
– but even knowing this , the line remains impossible … 
16
(a) “Take an harp, go about the city, thou harlot that hast been forgotten; 
(b)  make sweet melody, sing many songs, that thou mayest be remembered.”
        qchi knur sbi oir zune nshkche eitibi 
        ngn erbi shir lmon thzkri 
16
[after 15 we may still have the “timing” theme ! , while continued in 17 :] 
a
(because-) you=they (will have) take=understood (?) (lAkAch=iAdA)       +
b
(the meaning of-) (the feast of-) harp=Tabernacles (?) (KnUr=sUKa)       +                                      [c-d : Deut.20]  
c
(as-) the go around=rule (?) (sbi=mshl) of – [+their] city=mother (‘Eve’) (?) (oir=am) ,
d
[and-]  (will be-) forgotten=re-dedicating (shAKACH=CHAnAK !) + [+their]  prostitute=female (sic) ;
               [a-c :
               yes , ofcourse it’s a shot into the dark …
               but there can be a relátion between “dedicating female” and “M-B as prostitute”   —
               see next 18 where ‘prostitute’ seems sure — as “wider repéat of here” ! , 
               and see the previous (corrupt?) references to “daughter of …” : but how phrased here ? :] 
e
(after-) [+yóu]  (‘Mystery-Babylon’) (have) played       +
f
the good=prostitute – (unto-) [+my]  many=sons (ErBi=BEn) (‘re-affirmation of subject’)      +
g 
(when-) [=they]  – (were) so that=nót (Lmon=La) – remembering     +
h
[+their]  (type-) sing=feminine (read : ‘female Original’) (shir=aish) ;                                [g-h : see Deut.20 page] 
 
               what do you think please ? is this concept possible ?
               that “during the time we did NOT understand Eden-female , M-Babylon was our whore”  ?
               in the sense of “ruling the physical (desire of-) male & his type  thinking” etc
 
17
(a) “And it shall come to pass after the end of seventy years, that the LORD will visit Tyre, 
(b)  and she shall turn to her hire, 
(c)  and shall commit fornication with all the kingdoms of the world upon the face of the earth.”
17
and=therefore it (will) happen – from=at the énd of (those-) (!) – seventy – years=DAYS ,                  [Jan.8] 
b
(that-) IEUE – (will) visit (‘to punish’) – (upon-) Tyre (‘Mystery-Babylon’) ,                                   [warning : tree] 
c
and return – her wages to=upon [+her]  (-own head)      +                                        [‘stolen feminine rule’ here ?]   
d
(through-) and=which – she committed fornication      +                                  [d-e : see Revelation & prophets] 
e
with – all – the kings (‘demons’) [..]  of – the (matrix-) land ,                          [in Spells : ‘the solar-plane shore’] 
f
[suspicious ! :] 
               on=after – the·ground (=tampered) = the (adm-) man (‘Adam’) (adme=adm)       +
                g
               (will have) surface=fallen (PHNi=NPHl) ;                                                                               [‘on that 70th day’ ?]  
note :
… the addition “on the face of the ground” is superfluous ofcourse 
(while He never describes ‘the wider matrix region in detail’) 
but the point is ‘that Adam gave her (the Legal right to-) all those stolen aspects’ ;  
while ‘the Assyrian’ (-if true) shows in 13 – which is a term for ‘Adam’ ;
  
[closing 18 :
too difficult for now b/c too deeply corrupted — really can be anything :]  
18
“And her merchandise and her hire shall be holiness to the LORD:
it shall not be treasured nor laid up; for her merchandise shall be for them that dwell before the LORD,
to eat sufficiently, and for durable clothing.”
18
……………………

 

 

 

[theme]  : the end (‘8th’) day proven : 7/14 Atonement > 70 d > 9/24 [Hg.2]  ! [we réally go first week of January !]   Esau’s ‘Hanukkah’ + ‘Maccabees’  blocked the end-day of Dedication : Maccabees demasqued [version ; 2024-11nov.14-15]

… it’s looking very, very good for you & we now        — for all of the 144 sons & daughters —  ever since this ’70 bulls / days theme’ started

 

 
 
                                                                                      theme
 
     … last year we worked out Adam’s crime as his offered “Strange Fire”, remember ,
     establishing after that how Esau’s “Hanukkah” is an invented ‘feast’ linked to that ,
     while exposing ‘Maccabees’ as his writing to substantiate his own ‘Hanukkah’   —
     all of that remains true (sic) ,
     but now we found the complete Dedication theme his hoax needed reviewing :
     however , what the Scroll says about this completed Time-line is móre interesting
     so we will start with that and have the ‘Maccabees’ as part II below
 
     the Scroll’s ‘8th day’ is ‘the end of the 70 days’ 
     … as the absolute core idea   —
     after Atonement the 14th (!) start these extra 70 days that were incorporated in the
     feast of Tabernacles as those ’70 bulls’ so that this feast would extend for 70 days
     (-see theme main page) ,
     but what we needed to find still was “and then what ?” – as a proof in the Scroll that
     indeed some closing date óf the extra 70 days exist , and that however that day was
     described it MUST had to do with the present dedication theme : and there is !  
     in fact súch an important day that Esau replaced it with his ‘Hanukkah’ ! 
     please see the time-lines below to follow the reasoning hów he erased this theme : 
 

  ,,, how often we stared at that , right , seeing that Tabernacles “lasted 7 OR 8 days”
  but not knowing why , and still being Ignorant of the ‘Atonement the 10th’ situation ;
  while we knéw of the ’24th of the 9th’ date as mentioned in Haggai & Zechariah  —
  yet what this 24th day had to do with anything ? :
 

  … yes ofcourse his ‘Hanukkah’ was strikingly close to the “24th of the 9th” date ,
  but because the context around that 24th was too corrupted – and perhaps even
  the date itsélf , who knows ? – it was impossible to connect it to any palpable theme ;
  when last year we did his ‘Maccabees’ with the Strange Fire we left it at that    —
  yet both the two months gap & the ’24th of the 9th’ meaning remained unresolved    
 

       … the real date of Atonement was a major key 
       leading to the connected Full Moon theme , but there still was no link with ‘the 24th’ ;
       until after the gruesome disappointment of Tabernacles ‘the 70 bulls’ made Sense :
       when counting 70 days from Atonement the 14th ,  
       one arrives at the ‘24-25th’ two months further — in our case 7-8 January 2025 !  
       https://www.thecreatorscalendar.com/wp-content/uploads/2024-2025-Printable-Calendar-pdf.pdf 
       [count ‘from Atonement’ not Tabernacles for she includes the compressed 70 days]  

 

                                                      what do we know about ‘the 24th’ ?
 
    — when the 70 days expired NO ‘next biblical feast starts’ : no ‘hanukkah’ , nothing ,
          for we keep the seven just as He described in the scroll ,
    — because the whole idea is that ‘it is the closing of an evil period‘ (‘the 70 days’)
          as if ‘having conquered the time frame of Mystery-Babylon’ (-see Main Page) ,
    — and interestingly ,
          that it is a closing day’ shows in Hag.2 “from this day onward I will bless you” 
          as a most important phrase for ús which Esau miraculously forgot to corrupt ,
    — where that phrasing & the entire context must imply “entering Eden” ! ,
          especially in context of ‘the just expired time frame of Mystery-Babylon” !  
                    sub :
                    we will see in part II how Esau had understood “that day onward” and feared it ,
                    in Maccabees turning his ‘next day’ (25th) into an “entering the matrix day” ! 
 
                                                the 24th : aka “the 8th day of circumcision” 
 
    … being convinced that He made sure that you & we would understand ‘the 24th’ 
    [but also in the unlikely case that Esau indeed would change any written ’24 / 9′]  
    He mentioned certain concepts that He knew we would have learned by now   — 
    namely “as phrases and ideas in the (restored-) scroll”, right
 
    the unclear ‘8th day’ 
    after the ’70 bulls’ where the main factor is ‘7’ ofcourse He knew that we would go
    search for any phrase containing the following ‘8’ , and we saw how Tabernacles
    one time lasts seven days but in other verses ‘eight days’ , as totally unclear ;
    though through the John 7 chapter we DID find ‘Atonement the 14th’ the section
    writing “that last great day” is so corrupt that it’s unusable ,
    so that we still don’t know whether Booths did have an 8th day – and if so , why ,
    while at first glance “the 8th day of circumcision” does not seem to help us    —
            [Lev.12 :] 
            (2)
            “Speak unto the [=sons]  of Israel, saying, If a woman have conceived seed, 
            and born a man child: 
            then she shall be unclean seven days; 
            according to the days of the separation for her infirmity shall she be unclean.
            (3)
            And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised.” 
    now please ,
    yes He ordered that as sign of His covenant ,
    but no one knows whý exactly this — for He deeply hates the phallus concept ;
    and yes ‘from medical viewpoint’ the 8th day is rather ideal for this mutilation (!)
    related to the blood-clothing material prothrombin ;
    yet He surely ordered this as the foreshadowing of another event      —  
    please consider ,,
    — the ‘male child’ is you & we ofcourse ,
    — the ‘unclean woman’ represents “our Jacob family” from whóm we come forth 
          and still are part of , hence as their 144 sons & daughters ; 
          also because in next line 4 “the woman will still remáin uclean for a while” when
          she will have given birth (-in fact as a total of ’40 days’) and you immediately see
          the connection with ‘judgment’ ,
    — the scene links to “we be born some time after having declared the scroll” 
          per the “woman giving birth” theme in Isaiah & others !
    — then the circumcision itself :
          the phrase in prophets ‘I will circumcise you of heart’ is receiving our Originals !
          and where ‘this woman giving birth’ does nót directly link to the dedication theme
          the “circumcision of heart” DOES ;
    — because here it are the males of you & we that have ignored that phallus monster
          and instead rededicated female to have our sexy tender Original one back
          where the conclusion of that ‘happens at the 8th day’ .. what are the odds ?
 
    concerning the 8th day as the same theme ,
    but now in the form of ‘consecration’ (‘dedication’ !) Ex.22 has similar ,
            (29)
            “Thou shalt not delay [to offer]  the first of thy ripe fruits, and of thy liquors:
            the firstborn of thy sons shalt thou give unto me.
            (30)
            Likewise shalt thou do with thine oxen, [and]  with thy sheep: 
            seven days it shall be with his [=mother]  ; on the eighth day thou shalt give it me.”
   here ,
   the “to delay” (-achar) appears genuine — yet also works the other way around :
   saying that He neither will ‘delay’ this time !

 

hoping that all was how you liked it phrased Majesty
we adore you .

 
 
                                                                                   part II
 
                                       undoing Esau’s ‘Hanukkah & Maccabees’ 
 
     … actually – after the above ‘Maccabees’ is totally Dead material so we do it quickly 
     because though the context is very interesting we had a bit enough of ‘Esau’ :
     from the 16 chapters of his ghostwritten ‘1 Maccabees’ 95% is complete deflection
     in the form of the one made-up “war” after the other to try autheticize the drivel 
     using ideas out of his other book ‘Esther’ that stole its ideas from the book Daniel ;
 
     then Esau realized he forgot to secure his corrupt ‘dedication’ version of book I 
     and produced ‘2 Maccabees’ in order to link the former with Adam’s Strange Fire
     which is the core theme of this book — similarly hidden between a sea of drivel  —
     yet both main themes are linked with eachother
 
     the two-fold reason is this please :
     at the end of our (!) succeeded 70 days as dedication theme , Eden will appear ;
     hence he concealed the 70 days theme for us so that our dedication would fail                  <<<
     and the matrix dimension would have won that is supported by the Strange Fire !
 
     his ‘dedication’ as two by himself corrupted forms in the Scroll :
     … and here it gets interesting     —
     we saw how in Num.7 he had “the heads of the 12 tribes dedicating the altar”
     which is the very corruption he used in his (Maccabees-) ‘Hanukkah’ feast ;
     while the second Core chapter Deut.20 concerning ‘the serpent-race and Eve’ ,
     where is said to US the sons “do not be afraid for them” also returns here :
     the trick – as always – is to read between the massive Nonsense to spot these .. 
 
     [only the most relevant passages & as short as possible ; ours between brackets :] 
 
1 M ch.1 :
“54 Now on the fifteenth day of Chislev [=9/15]  , in the one hundred forty-fifth year, they erected 
a desolating sacrilege on the altar of burnt offering. [….] 
59 On the twenty-fifth day of the month [=9/25]  they offered sacrifice on the altar that was on top 
of the altar of burnt offering. 60 According to the decree, they put to death the women [=sic]  who 
had their children circumcised [=sic]  61 and their families and those who circumcised them, 
and they hung the infants from their mothers’ necks.”
    here ,
    he phrased “a reason for the to-come re-dedication” ,
    and you see how he made it to link to the “disgraced female & circumcision & sons” theme ,
    while already preparing the connection with “a (re-dedicated) altar” – see intro above ;
    saying ‘9/15’ is nefarious because that makes it Ritualistically to fall in OUR 70 days time 
    [where here ‘the 9/25’ is irrelevant since that falls outside that period]  
    and for the same Ritualistic reason ‘the evil Greeks’ are you & we sons that FAILED
    [even todáy all hard-core jews still call the christian West ‘Amalek’ !]  
 
ch. 2
“… Mattathias and his sons were assembled. 17 Then the (evil-) king’s officers spoke to Mattathias 
as follows: “You are a leader, honored and great in this town, and supported by sons and brothers.
18 Now be the first to come and do what the king commands […]”
    here ,
    clearly he as “the sons (-of Ammon)” was intended , 
    so that whatever group-title used for the enemy refers to ‘us sons’ ;
 
    [next : ‘about the people in israel’ — did he have the “Jethro / desert” story in mind ? :] 
29
At that time many who were seeking righteousness and justice went down to the wilderness to live there, 
30 they, their sons, their wives, and their livestock, because troubles pressed heavily upon them.” 
 
    [next : invented wars & too many of those — 
ch.3
    but now comes the core :
    this is “the official start of their re-dedication campaign” 
    where this ‘Maccabean army’ is “praying to their Eloheim” (sic !) in Mizpah
    before they will go up to Jerusalem to take back the temple :] 
47
“They fasted that day, put on sackcloth, and sprinkled ashes on their heads, and tore their clothes. 
48 And they opened the book of the law [=’the corrupt scroll’]  to inquire into those matters about 
which the nations consulted the likenesses of their gods [=sic]  . 
49  They also brought the vestments of the priesthood and the first fruits [=sic?]  and the tithes, 
and they stirred up the nazirites [=sic]  who had completed their days, 
50 and they cried aloud to heaven, saying, 
             “What shall we do with these ? Where shall we take them ?
             51 Your sanctuary is trampled down and profaned [=sic]  ,
             and your priests mourn in humiliation.
             52 Here the nations are assembled against us to destroy us ,
             you know what they plot against us .
             53 How will we be able to withstand them , if you do not help us ?”
             next :
55 After this Judas appointed leaders of the people in charge of thousands and hundreds and fifties 
and tens [=sic] . 56 Those who were building houses or were about to be married or were planting a 
vineyard or were fainthearted, he told to go home, according to the law [=sic]  . 
57 Then the army marched out […. etc …]”
     here ,
     the “building houses and fainthearted” literally is his own corruption in Deut.20 
     [in fact Esau still was in Alexandria corrupting the Scroll when penning this !]  ,
     telling you 100% sure what Esau had in mind here ;
     just as the “leaders of hundreds and tens” shows in the Exodus ‘Jethro’ & Deut.1 chapter ; 
     b)
     ofcourse the ‘prayer’ is Flat without any depth , as Esau’s hallmark – and compare Jethro’s ;
     c) 
     he lumped every “dedication / consecration” aspect together : profaned , nazarite , first fruits , 
     anything to support his desecration theme ; and see next :
 
ch. 4
[after other invented non-wars :] 
37
So all the army assembled and went up to Mount Zion. 38 There they saw the sanctuary desolate, 
the altar profaned, and the gates burned. In the courts they saw bushes sprung up as in a thicket 
or as on one of the mountains. They saw also the chambers of the priests in ruins. […..] 
      [then a very curious section :] 
42 He chose blameless priests devoted to the law [=’scroll’]  ,  43 and they cleansed the sanctuary 
and removed the defiled stones to an unclean place.  44 They deliberated what to do about the altar 
of burnt offering, which had been profaned.  45 And they thought it best to tear it down, so that it 
would not be a lasting shame to them that the nations had defiled it. So they tore down the altar 
46 and stored the stones in a convenient place on the temple hill until a prophet should come to tell 
what to do with them.  47 Then they took unhewn stones, as the law directs, 
and built a new altar like the former one.” 
     here ,
     the ‘altar theme’ always is a Red Flag to us – but this one is tricky to see :
     it is not directly ‘the Strange Fire’ theme but more ‘a Ritualistic transformation of the old
     into the new — but with the intent to feed upon it , like M-Babylon does upon Eden’ ;
     and is definitely linked to ‘the two different day offerings’ , see below :] 
     [then the known ‘core of his Hanukkah’ :] 
48 They also rebuilt the sanctuary and the interior of the temple and consecrated the courts. 
49 They made new holy vessels and brought the lampstand, the altar of incense, and the table 
into the temple .50 Then they offered incense on the altar [=still 24th , or evening = 25th ? how ?] 
and    +
lit the lamps on the lampstand, and these gave light in the temple. 51 They placed the bread on 
the table and hung up the curtains.52 Early in the morning on the twenty-fifth day of the ninth month, 
which is the month of Chislev, in the one hundred forty-eighth year, 53 they rose and offered sacrifice, 
as the law directs, on the new altar of burnt offering that they had built. 54 At the very season and on 
the very day that the nations had profaned it [=linking]  , it was dedicated with songs and harps and 
lutes and cymbals. 55 All the people fell on their faces and worshiped and blessed heaven, who had 
prospered them. 56 So they celebrated the dedication of the altar for eight days and joyfully 
offered burnt offerings.”
     here ,
     their ‘so incredible joyful day’ is the FIRST day — our 8th !
     that ‘it went on for another 7 days’ is of no interest for us because Esau just needed the ‘8’ ;
     b)
     the ‘offering upon the altar’ then ‘the next day inaugurating it with that offering’ is confusing
     because unclear — “the next day” and phrasing suggests that the prévious offering was done
     when it was still the 24th : for Ritualistic Transformation purposes that is totally possible !
     c)
     the “lampstands” theme can include the 7 (stolen-) female (!) Eden-torches as well ,
     as the abducted Torches that maintain reality — now that of Mystery-Babylon ,
     and will álso be rescued together with our Originals ;
     where Esau may have used these female torches as blueprint for ALL of eden-female ,
     through this Ritual now again serving the matrix : we need to look further into that  
[repeat :] 
59 Then Judas and his brothers and all the assembly of Israel determined that every year at that 
season the days of dedication of the altar should be observed with joy and gladness for eight days, 
beginning with the twenty-fifth day of the month of Chislev.
 
        closing :
        next chapters 5-16 are absolute Drivel , no need to read , for only cover-up of this theme ;
        only interesting to mention is ,
        where we said that ‘II Maccabees’ was intended to link to Adam’s Strange Fire ,
        Esau could not resist to link back to this his first book here ,
        and invented “the seven slain sons of Hannah” linking to the Ritualistic conditions here ,
        where the word ‘hannah’ is a root of ‘hannukah’ 

[theme]  : ‘dedication’ [‘hanukkah’]  : the complete Spring & Fall mirror as + 70 bulls (days) to our date ? [looking very possible .. 60 days still]  [version ; 2024-11nov.12]

… what a massive war to get OUT !! ’70 bulls’ … yes that appears credible … >> definitely linking to ‘Time’ as ‘years’ and even ‘days’ !

but in the Scroll there’s something very wrong with ‘70 elders’
for that whole theme is serpent-race related .. but hów ?
 

 
                                                                                         theme
 
      … after the devastating ‘8th day of Tabernacles’ we must look what can be next :
      don’t listen to all the sanctimonious voices 
      since for us , trapped inside a car , under water , we must know how to get Out   —
      and you & we are the only ones having a chance to break this horrible deadlock
 
      this is how far we came with the Spring & Fall Mirror
      and still holding her Valid :
 

 
      so far so good   —
      yet we still suffer the result of Weeks : the Spirit removed & the soul killed ,
      while now ‘the dedication’ has come up ultimately related to that evil tree theme
      mainly as re-dedicating feminine per the Deut.20 (-page) — 
      and where the past years our focus was ‘on the Mystery-Babylon region’ it seems
      these days we descended to that evil tree whom the matrix uses as ‘their main root’
      (as we saw in CT Spells) and very likely even their matrix new-moon concept ;
      we are so so close to murdering that tree where all the horror begán
      so what are we missing here ? read : what was so horribly corrupted ?
 
      what if the mirror has been incomplete until now , and would look like this ? :
 

 
      and suppose that the Legal base of ‘this model’ can be ,
      remembering that the Fall Mirror was activated after the 14th & full moon were found :

Spring – divine (prophetic) – prophetic numbers – Christ – the cross as that evil tree

Fall – ‘human’  – ’70’ has a prophetic component (-only) – the sons – tree dies

      now please , hoping you see that it is possible ,
      but yes now a massive problem appears : from where do we get ‘70 days’ now ?
      or in fact ány extra period of time ,
      and that unto ‘an end date’ that is NOT clear-cut mentioned in the Scroll ? and what
      we do with “the Dedication theme” while last year we dismissed Esau’s Hanukkah’ ?  
 
                                                   the ‘70 bulls’ at Tabernacles  (Num.29)
 

 

 
        – first [-if true]  , the bulls are ‘in a countdown’ 
            which may be véry interesting for us IF an end-dáte is involved ,
        – and immediately related : it starts with ’13 bulls’ ,
            where , IF they are “days” , why with 13 ? doesn’t that suggest ‘a 14th’ ?
            and if the first day of Tabernacles is “the 15th” then how much is the chance that
            He wanted to say “counted from the (réal-) day of Atonement : the 14th” ?
 
      we don’t know (-yet) what the rest of the list is about   —
      the “ram” often means “Dualism” , like the ram in the first hours of Egyptian Amduat ,
      perhaps underlined by the ‘2’ here : is this theme related to that evil tree ?
      and the consistent “14 lambs” .. no idea why this combination : the ’14’ relates to the
      moon per the controversy “new moon vs full moon” but why ‘lambs’ here ?
           
             important sub :
             this Numbers 29 sounds like “this listing only happened in a great Jubilee” 
             and NOT ‘every year’ — for the large numbers of sacrifices must relate to a theme  
             which ofcourse subsequently was obfuscated by Esau , since God would never
             have so many animals sacrificed for the sake of sacrifice only , ofcourse ;
             then ,
             it can confirm that the Jubilee started at Atonement the 14th and that the final
             Great Jubilee now HAS started after the found 14th : áfter declaring the Scroll
             and áfter He accepted it at Weeks ;
             which in turn can confirm the Spring & Fall mirror AS the extended one !
             since in the Spring one the divine actions had been accomplished , long ago ,
             where however ‘the divine word’ part of the Spring one had NOT been until now ,
             yet now that álso has been acccomplished – during Unleavened and Weeks – 
             now the Jubilee started : as the Fall mirror !
 
             well , this needs some more pondering … Weeks followed 49 days later 
             then how much is the chance that ‘an end date’ now follows X-days later … ?
 
    the only other example of ’70 sacrificed animals’ 
    added here for completion , quoting from [1]  in annex    —  
    “Two different versions of the Zukru festival are attested at Emar: an annual festival 
    and one in the seventh year of a seven-year cycle, reminiscent of the biblical cycle of
    the shemitah […] . On both occasions, the Zukru was celebrated over seven days on 
    the first month of the year, called SAG.MU namely, “the head of the year.”
          here ,
          now ofcourse Esau’s “shemitah” concept was a cover-up of ‘declaring the Scroll’ 
          but interesting is that those heathens kept ‘a 7th year’ as well : to disarm God’s ;
          while “the head of the year” still is Esau’s term implying Time is involved here ,
          and see next :
    “The seventh-year festival is elaborated in much more detail: On the first day of the 
    festival, when the moon is full (i.e. the fifteenth), [sic]  the god Dagan—the supreme 
    god of Syria—and all the other gods in the pantheon were taken outside the temple 
    and city in the presence of the citizens to a shrine of stones called sikkānu. This cultic 
    object— also known in other cities with West Semitic population, such as Ugarit and 
    Mari—is best described as a “betyl” stele, i.e., a standing stone anointed with oil and 
    blood, likely the equivalent of the biblical מצבה. [sic]  At the culmination of the ceremony, 
    the gods were returned to the city. On the seventh and final day [..] , Dagan and all the 
    gods of Emar were brought out again to the sikkānu, where a similar ceremony was 
    being performed.” 
          here ,
          the first day when the moon is full — where we have the émpty moon ;
          where Dagon represents ‘the heathen fish-souls’ that need their matrix-moon phases ,
          and therefore – though no one understands whát their ritual was about –
          they must have seen ‘their city’ as “the matrix moon” [read : their other reality]  while
          the ‘going out of the city to the temple of stones’ was “to earth” 
          [and compare Jericho , the same ‘moon city’ habitated with the same fish souls !]  ;
          and concerning these stones :
          we (almost-) did the Deut.20 Eve chapter but 19 is part one , as a totally currupted
          theme of ‘three + cities’ that MUST have been “the moon theme” while Esau went on
          and on there about “moving boundary (-stones)” & “blood” – and see quote above !
          finally , 
    “On the month of “head of the year”, on the fourteenth day, they offer seventy pure 
    lambs provided by the king … for all the seventy gods [of the city of]  Emar.”
          this has more problems ,
          because though a same number of “70 sacrificial animals” and though they MUST
          be related to ‘Time’ they represent ‘gods’ — which however may be ‘time’ ;
 
 
                                                                               part II
 
                                                    the number ’70’ in the Scroll
 
                 intro : the ’70 years’ (and ‘days’ !) said of Mystery-Babylon [Is.23] 
 
    … most important : 
    the fact that it is mentioned with her implies that ’70 (-years)’ is a matrix number ,
    and second , how the 70 indeed is representing ‘Time’ — as the aspect we need !
    this Isaiah chapter is our next target though ofcourse she has been utterly corrupted ,
    however some phrases seem valid already and linking to our case :
    the combination “Zidon + sea + Nile + produce + Tyre (‘Mystery-Babylon’)” is MAJOR
    because ofcourse it never said ‘Zidon’ (-TSidun) but “tree” (-oTS) : that evil one !
    so that the combination must read :
    the “the produce of + that tree + is brought by the Nile + to Tyre” – and we had that !
    for we distillated this very concept from the CoffinText Spells (-see pages) where the
    absolute main root of Mystery-Babylon is “that tree of good & evil” 
    [and their other root ‘the plundered Eden-gate]  as “the mixed aspects feeding them” !  
 
    second : God foretells her destruction thrice mentioning ’70 years’ (in 15 & 17) but
    15 has an interesting addition : “seventy years, according to the days of one king”  —
    we know the addition “according to a hired-one (‘servant’)” in the phrase said of US
    about the restoring of the scroll “three years – as the days of a hired one” ,
    meaning “three literal earth-years” , not prophetic ones ;
    and though obviously corrupted here the intent MUST be the same but not in the
    sense of “a literal 70 years” (-because that makes no Sense whatsoever within an
    almost eternal long stretch of Time as context) but can be ’70 DAYS’ !!
 
    this is the reasoning for that possibility :
    in line 5 you see “the report” mentioned that is “our understanding the Scroll rightly”
    so that (the first-) “70 years” as ‘the long stretch of Time of Mystery-Babylon” 
    can be ‘a compression into an earthly 70 days’ at the moment of the report !
    and the réason for this would be ,
    that ‘you & we need to get Legally connected tó this 70-time aspect’ so to speak
    through “literally experiencing it” — or we would have no authority over it !
 
    compare ‘the 70 weeks’ (-of Daniel) :
    … that started when His people officially left Babylon [sic]  , all the way through Christ ,
    while right now “we are half-way the final 70th week” : as one ongoing Link !
    meaning that even dear Christ was part – or rather ‘bore’ – this ugly “70 theme” or He
    would not have been able to Undo it , if he were nót linked to it : you see please .. ?
    and now the same is true for us :
    we áre linked to it “per the greater scheme” so to speak , but the difference right now
    is ‘that we will need to end it’ : by being connected to a literal ’70’ as Time  
    and hénce the beautiful option that this may be ‘DAYS’ … 
    [also because we’re hardly in the position to find 70 bulls to slay … aren’t we —
    the 70 bulls just represented this same prophetic & literal earhly Time aspect] 
    so that unexpectedly (well , Sir.. ) , we may have found the validity of it in this section ..
 
           sub : ’70 + weeks’ : a ‘mixed number’ :
          … that God used ’70’ does not mean that the number is His’ or even sanctified it ;
          in fact the proof that He but úsed it is in the addition ‘week’ as the ‘7’ which IS His
          type number and hence so said in Daniel “seventy + sevens” ;
          but from where then this ugly “70” concept comes from is another theme    —
          first , we know “it must be a mixture” since the matrix feeds upon the Eden-realm , 
          so that ‘the 70’ used by the matrix must be “a 7 + their number” ;
          context suggests that their number can be “10” (-for in the Scroll it can represent 
          a “humanoid number or action”) but also the ‘zero’ is interesting here ,
          compare for example the serpentine (!) Buddhist type religions where the “0” is
          considered positive – while the West saw it as ‘the abyss’ (-see serpent main page)

 
B)                            ‘70 elders’ : the serpent race invades old-Ishral
 

[spoiler : our Deut. 20 interpretation (-see page) is TRUE !]         … yes old-Ishral in the desert ‘was plagued by serpents’       – however they were NOT physical real crawling vipers ,      and yes ‘seventy elders were to lead & instruct the people’      – but they had NOT been appointed by God : for instead      these ‘70 elders’ connected to the serpent race gods …         hence the fleshy males of Ishral invited the serpent-race       that was all too happy to invade & dishonour their females ,      until God had enough and took action    —      so the men re-dedicated their women at the next Jubilee      through the sacrificing at Tabernacles of seventy bulls …

FALSE

     recomposing this story
     … it’s truly diabolical what Esau has done : he complétely cut-up this theme , inserting
     sections of it elsewhere then placing them under a totally óther context — and there is
     only 1 reason as why he would do this : that the FINAL theme would never be found ;
     great help for us here is the restored ‘Balaam’ story ,
     where the clue was “how the enemies pretended to be friends of old-Ishral” because
     here ‘Jethro the Midian priest’ – offering his help to Moses – was the enemy
     having seduced (!) the people old-Ishral in order to introduce them to the serpent race …
   
     you can feel that this hás to be how it went    —
     the people represented ‘the road to Eden’ and right before their entering it they were
     attacked by the evil Ammonites (-see Balaam pages) representing ‘the Ammon sons’ 
     in Mystery-Babylon that – coincidence ? – álso abused our pretty female Originals there :
     yet a while before that (read : ‘on Time’) , still in the desert ,
     the serpent race – as ‘the older brothers óf the Ammon sons’ – launched their attack !

#1  the rambling ‘Jethro’ story [Ex.18]       … perhaps he indeed came from Midian as close to      the desert – while the Ammonites were more north –       and perhaps indeed it was hé that visited the camp :      for the story we need ‘a trusted outsider’ ofcourse      or none of the people would have accépted anything ;      but sure is that he did not “discuss it with Moses”       [since later Moses will speak about this – see below]

     do not believe the chapter ,
     for it is MUCH more probable that Jethro went straight to both evil sons of Aaron !
     the same evil twin later slain by God for offering Strange Fire (-see pages) , whom
     must have constantly felt secondary to Moses , yet now could become important :
     question is whether the two utterly useless lines (3-4) about ‘both sons of Jethro’ 
     were in reality about “him going to Aaron’s sons” — or that he indeed hád two sons
     whom he introduced to Aaaron’s ones : as a very smart way of ‘bonding’ to them !
 
     #2  the tribes already had their ‘chiefs’ !
     … as the second rambling component : 
     it sóunds all nice “how Moses was tired of judging the people that he needed help”
     yet the original heads (‘as clans’) of the 12 tribes are completely lacking here   —
     while still in Egypt several times “the elders of the people were called together” 
     but NOT ‘as 70 ones’ and ofcourse the heads of the tribes were intended :
     this whole story sounds like a Coup ! as a stealth rebellion against authority … 
     yet at the very énd – of the restored version – the 12 heads do appear for they are
     the ones having to make penance and re-dedicate their own females ,
     where from that point the whole ’70 elders’ thing completely vanishes from the text !
     [while “Jesus sends out the 70” is also corrupt as Hell – we need to look at that still] 
 
     #3  ‘(70-) wise elders fearing the Elohim’
     … and ofcourse here the cat comes out of the bag   —
     you can feel the same happening here as with ‘Balaam’ who first heard God speak
     but then ‘the Elohim’ yet he was not able to properly distinct between both and the
     very same same is unfolding hére ,
     while the overall text sounds flat (‘unispired’) revealing ‘a mimick event’ since it lacks
     the type language connected to our IEUE ; however , to the Aaron sons it all must
     have sounded very convincing when they (!) sat with him at the table (line 12) ! ,
     and consequently to the people that would neither dare to question their own priests 
 
     so that the Aaron sons selected the elders whom they liked , 
     that now as male – that’s important ! – ‘Elders’ carried the serpent-authority while
     walking through the camp and infecting everyone subduing to their authority ,
     giving the serpent-race unlimited access to the lap of the females and turning their
     males into animals — interesting are phrases as “our soul is dried out” (Num.11:6)
     which Esau corrupted under the ‘manna’ theme    —
     if Moses knéw this was going on ? no doubt ,
     for he will have understood from God that this event needed to happen , as trial ,
     while certainly not everybody was infected – since God always keeps a remnant ;
 
     #4  the first ‘serpent prophecy’ 
     … due to the insane corruptions we don’t know (-yet) “the people’s punishment”
     but because they were deceived it’s possible that “they burned (-inside) of fire” 
     (Num.21) since ‘fire’ is the typical Attribute of the serpent-race ;
     and because they KNEW about ‘the serpent’ in Genesis b/c the scroll still was
     uncorrupted , He must have given a prophecy for them   —
     but NOT as “the bronze snake upon the staff” (same 21) but instead something
     along the lines of “My servant will destroy the serpent-staff (or even ‘tree’ !)” 
     where the corrupted addition “and who will look at it will be healed” ofcóurse
     refers to what Christ did — and showing Esau’s fanatical hate for Him …
     the other blasphemous corruptions ,
     like “the 70 elders upon the mount of God (‘Horeb’)” also become clear now
     since those ofcourse were ‘the heads of the 12 tribes’ , wherewith we already 
     Undo those – not ‘having to wait until all the text is restored’ .. okay please ;
     leaving us with 1 more unfinished aspect :  
 
                               now : you & we , and the Eve chapter Deut.20

… the ‘re-confirming of God’s covenant’ at Nebo      is the setting of all of the book Deuteronomy ,      and right in the first chapter Moses remembers      the people of that awful ‘Elders event’ using      similar language & terms showing in Exodus ;      becáuse of the re-confirming situation it must      have been the year in which the Jubilee began       making Sense after ‘40 years desert’ , right]       so that later the re-dedication must have come      to pass – see Num.7 in breakdown annex below ,      and compare it with the ‘70 bulls’ in part I

 
     the second ‘serpent prophecy’ : unto us :
     … some year ago we saw that a Deuteronomy chapter prophecied unto us
     and dubbed it ‘the Moses prophecy’ – though so corrupted that we still have not
     succeeded to restore all of it – yet now it happens agáin with chapter 19 & 20 :
     it was complete Insanity to interpret it that way , yet the text almost demanded it ,
     while only now show how the same terms & phrases there belong to this theme !
   
     whether the people backthen understood these prophecies is not so important
     [probably not for long : the people went astray and Esau took the Scroll] 
     but the point is that we do , to reconstruct an unbroken line as chain of events
     because we are the completion of them , so to speak ,
     and so far all the aspects of the ‘70 bulls’ theme seamlessly merge with eachother
 
     you again gave us hope , our Majesty
     also because you keep speaking so kind to us – as in the Deut.20 chapter
     yes we still need to work out some details – some other difficult chapters – 
     but promise you be proud — and get us all out in 58 days please
 
   annex – ’70 elders’ – worksheet
   [raw as it is b/c first look :] 
– in Egypt “there were elders of the people” [-and why not]  but no “70” 
– in Ex.24:1 ,
    God – allegedly – invites “Moses & the 70 elders upon the mount”                                               << suspect
    but repeated in line 10 : yet chapter is deeply corrupted / repeated
– in Ex.18 ,
    but why earlier as the mount ?                                                                                                                             << suspect
   ‘Jethro of Midian’ comes to the camp introducing ‘captains over the people’                     core problem
    but no number ‘70’ is mentioned there ; and Moses allegedly agrees to ;
– in Deut.1 ,
    at mt.Nebo — so before éntering the land — 
    [where he mentions “12 spies” : not “2” !]  ,
    Moses complains about ‘the captains of the people’ theme                                                                                 sic !
    using similar language is in Deut.20 [the Eve / serpent-race chapter] 
    even mentioning ‘the (mountain of the-) Amorite’ [-as in Deut.20] 
    where Amorite represents ‘the phallic concept of the enemy’ : what is going ón here .. ?
    [cont.:] 
– Numb.11 , start ,
    the people complained and FIRE burned in the camp   [fire = serpent theme]  ;
    line 4 : “And the mixt multitude that [was]  among them fell a lusting:”  BUT ofcourse it
    never said “mixt multitude” but root can be “serpents” ;
    then in line 6 “our soul + is dry” (sic) but followed by ‘manna’ corruption ,
    in 16-17 God says something about “70 elders” but ofcourse very unclear WHAT :
    we bet the whole ‘serpent theme’ Esau mixed with the ‘manna’ one ?!
     +
    the famous Num.21 [5-9]  : ‘the fiery serpents among the people’ , 
    but concealed again as ‘manna’ theme — but “they burnt + for the flésh” ofcourse ! ;
    [it seems that this section is the intro to Num.11 !] 
    but then comes Numbers 7 :
– concept : the heads of the 12 tribes that were over the ones being numbered   [sic, sic]  
    came to make dedication [-for something]  : as completely corrupted here ,
    for the theme looks far too much like the ‘13 – 12- 9 (etc) bulls’ in Num.29 !
    (10)
    whát “they dedicate” ? not ‘the altar’ … ‘their women’ ?   [b/c of the serpent theme ?] 
     (11)
     and “God said : offering each […….]  day” 
     (12)
     and “the first day offered ..” .. but not ‘some dude’ did ofcourse – but ‘first day of Booths’  ;
     (13)
     not ‘offering + a dish of + silver [KHNP] ’ but ‘for the sin of + his soul [NPHsh]’ ,
     and ‘shekels + seventy’ … what was that about you monster ? fk your ‘shekels’ !
     (14)
     not ‘ten + full + spoons’ but “full + moon” [oshr=chdsh]   ??
     [did they also sin against the full moon becáuse of the serpent-race ??] 
     (15-16-17)
     [five]  bulls .. [five]  lambs .. [two]  rams.. and ONE goat : compare Numbers 29 !
     note :
     Esau repeated his circus with “12 princes” but we only need ‘7’ (-days) ofcourse ;

 

 

Dt.20 : restoring the sexy core of our female & Eve stolen by the serpent race + warring their tree of good & evil by dying to it [-what Adam never wanted !]  [version ; 2024-11nov.11-   ]

 

 
                                                                                theme
 
       … we had many incredible themes and this certainly is another one of them   —
       it is NOT “about the males of old-Ishral that were afraid for physical battle” 
       since that is another one of Esau’s ‘plausible deniability’ ,
       apart from the fact that sections like at the end about “trees” make no sense
 
       we hád this concept before – in part – but this is very extensive
       for it is ‘about our war to destroy the tree of good & evil’ that still is there 
       because this problem has never been resolved ever since Eden fell ! 
 
       this “restoring sexy female” as theme came up last week , actually during the
       disastrous days after our Date expired — and a subtheme here is ‘dedication’
       that we’ll search to connect with another date
 
[rest of log tomorrow
+ still missing lines in center]  

 

 

 
[first 1 : we need a description “of not everyday common people” ; said to you & we sons :] 
1
“When thou goest out to battle against thine enemies, and seest horses, and chariots, 
[and]  a people more than thou, be not afraid of them: 
for the LORD thy God [is]  with thee, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt.”
1
because – you (will) go forth – [=into]  battle – [=against]  – your enemies
b
and=that you (will) see – (at-) horses=night (?) – and (in-) chariots=visions (?) ,                        [< attempt] 
c
(as-) a many=strange (Rb=zR) – people – [=unto]  you ;                                                      [‘read : serpent race’] 
d
(but-) (be) not – afraid – [=of]  them : for – IEUE – your deity – [is-]  with you
e
the=when you (will) go up – [=to]  the land – [+I]  egypt=give [=you]  ;                                       [‘read : Eden’]    
note :
… the right tone is very difficult to find here , ofcourse  —
it must be ‘mysterious’ but not ‘insane’ , hence perhaps ‘night & visions’ are best ;
b)
the whole point is “that this will happen when searching Eden” as the phrase also in ch.19 ;
 
[next 2 : 
now the serpent race (-demons) makes contact with you & we :] 
2
“And it shall be, when ye are come nigh unto the battle, 
that the priest shall approach and speak unto the people,”
2
[=for]  it (will) happen – (that-) when you (will even have-) come néarer – in the battle ,
b
[=that]  [=you]  (will feel) – the·priest = the enemy – (almost-) touching [+you]              [‘Eve & the tree’]  
c
[=when]  he (will) speak – unto – the·people (=tampered) = you ;
note :
.. the “touching” is important here as phrases used in Genesis 3 – and see further ;
 
[next 3 : we first need ‘the inverse idea’ – ‘the intimidating one’ (juxta comes later !) :] 
3
“And shall say unto them, Hear, O Israel, ye approach this day unto battle against your enemies: 
let not your hearts faint, fear not, and do not tremble, neither be ye terrified because of them;”
3
and he (will) say – unto them=you : hear , (you-) [+son]  of Ishral :
b
you – (have) reached – this day – the battle – [=against]  – your enemies :
c
you (should) – nót (have had) – a tender – heart       +                                             [‘tender to understand’ etc] 
d
(for-) not=now – it (will) feel the dread for [+us]  :
e
you (will be) trembling – and=for not=us – and [..1x..]  – (be) terrified – [=in]  them=our presence ! ; 
 
[next 4 : now God speaking again :] 
4
“For the LORD your God [is]  he that goeth with you, to fight for you against your enemies, to save you.”
4
however , [+I]  IEUE – your deity – (will) go=be – with you 
b
to fight – for=with (sic) you – [=against]  – your enemies
c
to=and rescue [+you]  >> [+from]  you=them ;
note :
… believing He said “with you” : because of the task described below 
[and because He is sweet enough to say ‘with you’ — where the core is c) ;
we need to get ‘who says who’ right for this is alike the Baalam story 
who first heard God speak – but then the enemy – and he wasn’t sure !
 
[next 5 : note ‘the dedicate’ & see intro :] 
5
“And the officers shall speak unto the people, saying, 
What man [is there]  that hath built a new house, and hath not dedicated it? 
let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man dedicate it.”
5
and=for [+they are]  – the·superintendents (=tampered) = the serpent (-race) (?) (shtrim=nchsh)
b
(that-) spoke – unto – the·people (=tampered) = the=your mother (om=am) ,                  [‘is about Eve’ !] 
c
saying : 
d
what (or ‘no’ ?) – the·man (=tampered) = son of the=you – (will) who=remember (?) (asher=zaker)       +
e
(that-) he=you (were) built=created (?) (BnA=BrA)      +                            [‘remember the Eden situation !’] 
f
[wholly-]  (as-) new=desirable (?) (chdsh=chpsh) – house=heart (‘core’) ? (BEth=lEB) ;
 
g
and – he – (will) not – re-dedicate [=yours]  (‘core’) ,                                 [‘ceremonial process to set apart’]  
h
(for-) he (will be) go=devoured (?) (LK=LK)       +
i
and=if restoring (‘same’) – [..]  him=your house=honour (‘being that core’) (Bth=kBd) ,
j
[as-]  [+his]  lest=soul (PHEN=NEPHsh) – (that-) (will) die – in battle                         [or ‘by the serpent’ ?] 
k
when – he (will) re-dedicate – the another=heart (‘core’) of – [+his]  (ówn-) man=female ;
note :
a) so this 6 is the gist of this chapter    —
     and the entire point is ‘that Adam did NOT : but escaped that penalty” after he ate the fruit ,
b) we already saw the ‘(male-) dying to his body’ 
      yet this concept here seems to indicate “the soul dying” [vanishing]  b/c of the text roots ;   
 
[next 6 : if a repeat then more personal now — but can go anywhere :] 
6
“And what man [is he]  that hath planted a vineyard, and hath not [yet]  eaten of it? 
let him [also]  go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man eat of it.”
6
[=for]  what – the·man = son of [+you]  (‘same’) – (will) who=remember (‘same’)      +
      b
      (that-) he=she plant=gives [+him]  (nata=natan) – vineyard=tenderness (?) (KRm=iRK line 3)     +
      c
      and=when – he – (will) not – violate [=her]  sexually (H2490) ? ;                       [he-started-to-use·him] 
d
[+for]  he (will) go=devour [+her]  ,                                                                                          [‘same as 5-h but juxta !’] 
e
(and-) and=not restore – [..]  him=her house=heart (‘core’) (‘same’) 
f
(for-) [+his]  lest=soul (phen=nephsh) – (will) [+not]  die – in battle :
 
g
and=therefore – he=wé (will be) sexually violating him=her       +
h
(through-) [+her]  – another=own (‘as in 5-k but juxta’) – man ;                                                         [continued :] 
note : 
… this is also a truth that we saw in the “bulls upon their ivory beds” theme ; 
 
[next 7 : 
seems a repeat — but should be about thém now :] 
7
“And what man [is there]  that hath betrothed a wife, and hath not taken her? 
let him go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man take her.”
7
[=because]  [=whenever]  – a man – […]  – engages – a woman                                 [or ‘your sons engage ..’] 
    b
    (as-) taking possession of her – and=for not=himself ,
c
he go=devours [+her]  – and [+not]  restoring – his=her house=heart (‘core’) ;                  [3x see earlier] 
d
(therewith-) he=we (will) die=rob (?) – [+her]  lest=soul (?) (PHN=NPHdh) – in the war
e
and=when – he=we (will) take away      +
f
(the-) another=sweetness (?) (achr=chrph) – of (?) [+her]  (own-) man=female (‘as Original’?) ; 
note :
… you see how difficult this is b/c of so many groups .. but the link to ‘her Original’ is important
 
                                                                                               part I b
                                                                [continued as God speaking to us :] 
8
“And the officers shall speak further unto the people, and they shall say, 
What man [is there that is]  fearful and fainthearted? let him go and return unto his house, 
lest his brethren’s heart faint as well as his heart.”
8
[=but]  they=you (will be) add=angry (iAsPH=APH)        +
b
the·superintendents (=tampered) = the=at the serpent (-race) (shtrim=nchsh)     +
c
to=that spoke – to – the·people (=tampered) = [+your]  mother (-like that) ,
d
and they=you (will) say :
e
any=wé [are]  – the·man = the sons – the·fearing-one (=tampered) = (that-) revere      +
f
[..]  the tenderness of – the·heart = the=her heart (‘core’) – (that has been) go=devoured : 
g
and=therefore he=we (will) restore – his=her house=heart
h
and=so that (?) no=also (?)      +
i
the heart of – him=our (own-) brothers=female – (will) faint – as him=her heart (-once did) ;  
note :
.. this concept feels correct ; 
 
[next 9 : second part is tricky :] 
9
“And it shall be, when the officers have made an end of speaking unto the people, 
that they shall make captains of the armies to lead the people.”
9
and it (will) come to pass – (that-) [+I]  (will) end       +
b
the·superintendents = the=how (?) the serpent (-race) – speaks=robs – [..]  [+your]  people=mother ,
c
      [can be several things] 
 
10
“When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it.”
10
because – you (will have) come near – unto – [+her]  city=prison (?) (oir=sohar)
b
to=through [+your]  fighting – [=for]  her ,
c
and (by-) declaring – [..]  [+my]  peace=scroll (shlm=sphr) – unto her ;                                      [< we had this] 
note :
a) we had this but then ‘that she will hear us say the words she will renounce Adam by’ ;
b) because of the ‘you’ likely also ‘declaring’ is ‘you’ [not ‘I will proclaim (-her rescue)’ ;
c) this also shows “that only abstinence” is not valid enough for her to hear us ….
 

 
                              [closing 19-20 : ‘a tree‘… now which one can that be ? (hint : only one ..) :] 
19
“When thou shalt besiege a city a long time, in making war against it to take it, thou shalt not destroy 
the trees thereof by forcing an axe against them: for thou mayest eat of them, and thou shalt not cut 
them down (for the tree of the field [is]  man’s [life] ) to employ [them]  in the siege:”
19
because – you (will have) besieged      +
b
the city=tree (Oir=Ots) of + days=good (‘no match’) – (and-) many=evil (ra-bim=ra) ,            [‘see note’]   
c
in=through warring – against it – [=in]  (order-) to capture it ,
d
[for-]  her=that tree – (has brought-) ruin – not=upon [=you] 
e
to=by (having) seduced [+you]  – (then-) axe=robbing (grzn=gzb) – on=all (ol=kl) of him=you :
f
because – you (have been) devoured – [=by]  it                                                      [‘next Esau’s sloppy syntax :’]  
g
(ever-) and=since [..]  – [..1x..]  –  (the adm-) man (‘Adam’) – cut=ate (thkrth=thakl)        +
h
(from-) the·field (=tampered) = the serpentine (shde=nchsh) – tree                                                       [g-i : sic] 
i
(and-) (did) to=not (l=la) come back – [=in]  (order-) to face it – [=by]  besieging (-it) ; 
note :
.. b) can have said “besieged + the evil one + old olden + days” (or even tree of olden days)
but “that tree” in d) needs a specification — and it must be clear it isn’t the tree of life ;
 
20
“Only the trees which thou knowest that they [be]  not trees for meat, thou shalt destroy and cut them 
down; and thou shalt build bulwarks against the city that maketh war with thee, until it be subdued.”
20
[=therefore]  – you will ruin – the tree – (by) which – [=he]  knew – that=good – (and-) not=evil
      b
      [as-]  he – the tree – (having-) devoured – him=you ,
c
and [=it]  (will be) cut off – [..]  built=together with – (the adm-) siege work=man (Mtsr=adM)      +
d
on=and – the·city (=tampered) = the serpent race (‘but no match b/c excuse-term’)       +
e
that – [..]  (have) made – war – against you – until – [+you]  subdued her=them .          [‘bit dangerous’]  
note :
a) oftentime , like here , ‘all the villains are one more time listed’ ,
b) ofcourse e) can have been “made war + since + olden time” etc ,
    but because of the kind start of the chapter this can have been intended  
 

end  

Mt.9:14-17 : NO new wine in bottles but ‘the new month & full moon’ [version ; 2024-11nov.02]

 

Esau deemed the moon-theme important enough to make ‘the crescent’ THE symbol of that by him composed religion for the nations of heathens

                                                                              theme
 
    … searching for the ‘moon theme’ now , we know that Esau hid important themes
    in the alleged ‘parables’ and / or in ‘quasi-deep reasonings of Christ’ — and that it
    should appear in some form if indeed He considered it important :
 
    the ‘new and old (-something)’ 
    whether Esau’s “old wine + in new bottles” or “old garment + a new patch” ,
    the main juxta is old versus new — but whát ?
    not “the old covenant versus the new” because He don’t speak like that ; neither
    can it be about “the old body versus the new” (-even considered ‘wine & garment)
    since the context as ‘old body’ does not fit — this flesh is wicked and needs to die ;
    therefore the very possible candidate for this theme is ‘the moon’ 
 
    all heathen concordances try to explain this really illogical discourse by posing the
    old garment as ‘Judaism’ (Pharisaism) incompatible with the patch as christianity
    but that is KJV talk based upon its false idiom ‘Judaism as the crade of christianity’
    so that there was no valid currently known key to interpret these lines with
 
                                                                          present buildup
 
    the quasi-deep reasoning
    reading the KJV lines only gives a massive headache for it’s corrupt as Hell :    
           (14)
           “Then came to him the disciples of John, saying, 
            Why do we and the Pharisees fast oft, but thy disciples fast not ?”
    really — John’s disciples ? and the concordances actually DEFEND that Nonsense ;
    and “fasting with the Pharisees” ? what’s next , devil-worship ?
           (15)
           “And Jesus said unto them, Can the children of the bridechamber mourn,
            as long as the bridegroom is with them? but the days will come, 
            when the bridegroom shall be taken from them, and then shall they fast.”
    the more you look at this the more headache  —
    so soon both sects will be glued to Christ’s disciples ?
    and how so ‘soon’ ? for ‘the bride-groom’ is typically an endtime theme    — 
    ofcourse the ‘fasting’ is Esau’s nonsense creating his ‘Judaism & christianity’ hoax ,
    but the Red flag here are the weird terms ‘bride-chamber’ and ‘bride-groom’ 
    since you can FEEL that Esau dragged these unusual ones inhere for a reason ; 
            (16)
            “No man putteth a piece of new cloth unto an old garment, 
             for that which is put in to fill it up taketh from the garment, and the rent is made worse.”
    here even the reasoning in itsélf does not make Sense :
    just ago “John’s disciples & the Pharisees” were *sheep’s voice* g-o-o-d yet the friends
    of Christ were b-a-d , so that He promised “okay but they also will fast soon” , but in this
    line John’s disciples & Pharisees suddenly became ‘old garments and old bottles’ ?
    what is then “the new patch” if Christ’s disciples will soon fast alike those two groups ?
    headache coming up yet ?
 
                                                                           restored version 
 
    … though the wórds “new” and “old” (only) show in 17 and should be about ‘the moon’ 
    it’s no Law that therefore it must have written thére “new + moon & old + moon” since
    that depends upon the continuity of the restored buildup — it but proves that Esau had
    this very concept in mind while mutilating the text here ;
    Greek in some cases knows combined roots glued together from separate ones like
    the suspicious ‘bride + chamber’ (Numphô + Mos) which however for our moon case
    very well can have been ‘new’ (Nous) and ‘month’ (Men) : as Neo-Mênia in Col.2: 16 !
    that (for us) óther useful combinations as “new + moon” are not listed in Strong’s is no
    proof that our reasoning is false — since Esau has deleted several important terms ;
 
    continuation :
    … after saying “that Esau made the start of the month like that of the nations” 
    which kept the empty-moon according to the empty matrix-moon indéed in order to
    prevent their destruction , the closing line must be about that same destruction   — 
    as He used to say “the sons will discover it” (-yet we haven’t enough words left here
    to also refer to the ‘scroll theme’) , and though ‘the moon as blood’ is a contextual
    interpretation it fits the ‘full & empty’ theme ánd ‘(the wrath-) poured out’ , right ; 
    where – important for us – this moon find appears to happen at the very end ..
 
    a bit longer intro , sorry ,
    just making the Legal case here 
    as not “picking ány NT section to turn it into our needed theme”
 
corruptions : total
theme  : context 100% restored , syntax VERY high
fulltext :

 

Matthew 9 : 14-17 (-section) 

 

14
“Then came to him the disciples of John, saying,                                                           [first clue : subjects swapped :] 
Why do we and the Pharisees fast oft, but thy disciples fast not?”
14
then – come – [..] john=his – disciples – (unto-) john=him (‘Christ’) , saying :
b
why – (do) we – much=always – fasting=keep a feast (nésteuó=heortazô)     +                             [Christ & them] 
d
(at the-) and=time (kai=kairos) of       +
e
the – phari + sees = moon + (being) full (PhaRi=PlêRoô + saioas=Selênê) ,                                 [< swap IN word] 
f
yet=while – the – disciples=Pharisees – (are) not – fast=keeping – you=this ? ;        [‘this not they-are-(ect)] 
 
15
(a) “And Jesus said unto them, 
(b)  Can the children of the bridechamber mourn, as long as the bridegroom is with them? 
(c)  but the days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken from them, and then shall they fast.”
15
and – [..]  Jesus – says – (to-) them :
b
on=because – the – sons of – the=Esau    +                                                                                [‘Pharisees & their fathers’] 
c
(have) able=changed – the – mourn=beginning (adj.?) (pentheó=archê) of      +
d
(the-) bride + chamber = new month (Numphô + Mos = Neo + Mênia , Col.2) ,
e
on=as – (the-) as-much-as=season (hosos=chronos)         +
f
(that-) the – bridegroom=new + moon (Nymph + ioS = Neo(-s) + Selênê) – is=appears – with=in – them=it ;
g
[..]  [+nót]  come=being – (the-) day – (in-) when=which – [+he]  (is) taken=full (apairó=pléróma , 16)
h
from=as – them=at – the – bridegroom=new + month (Nymph + ioS = Neo(-s) + men , Col.2)     +
i
and=like – then=God (tote=theos) – (had) fast=ordained (nésteuó=entellomai) ;  
 
16
“No man putteth a piece of new cloth unto an old garment, 
for that which is put in to fill it up taketh from the garment, and the rent is made worse.”
16
(but-) [=alike]  – (the-) no one=nations (-of heathens) (oudeis=ethnós)       +
b
[+they]  (‘Esau sons’) (have) put       +
c
(the-) cloth=empty (?) (adj.?) (rhakos=kenos) – patch=new moon (?) (epoblé + ma = neo(-s) + selênê) of  
d
unshrunken (alpha + gnapheus , invented = ?) apha=their overlords (?)     +                                          [< unknown] 
e
on – (the-) old=first (palaios=prôtos) – garment=day (Himaton=Hêmera) ,
 
f
for=in order – to lift=prevent (?)      +
g
the – fúllness of – him – from=in – [..]  (that-) garment=day (Himation=Hêmera)
h
and=as – (the-) worse=season (cherón=chronos)       +
i
(that-) [+their]  tear=destruction (SchisMA=SyntrimMA !) – (would) come to pass ; 
 
17
(a) “Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: 
(b)  else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: 
(c)  but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved.”
17
(but-) neither=when – (the-) wine=sons (oinos=yhios) of – new=Ishral (nous=ishral) (‘you & we’) 
b
(will have) put=understood      +
c
in=the – bottles=ordinance (askos=nomos) – (by the-) old=Father (PAlaiOS=PAtrOS) ,
       d
       [next till end : need proper closing :] 
       –
        yet=then – if=the – surely-no=moon (mÊgE=sElÊne ?)      +
       e
       (will) burst=become (rhé-gnumi=ginomai) – [..]  (like-) wineskins=blood (?) (askos=haima)
       f
        and=when – [..]  [+his]  wine=wrath (oinos=thymos) – (will be) poured out
       g
       and – [..]  (this-) bottles=world (askos=kosmos) – (will) perish ; 
 
h
but=and – they=he (will) cast=judge (?)      +
i
(the-) wine=sons (oinos=yhios , 17) of – new=Esau (noes=êsau)      +
     j
     into=for – new=their (?) – bottles=evil doing (?) ,
k
and=when – [+he]  (will) preserved=rescue (suntéreó=diasôzô)       +
l
(the-) both=remnant (‘144’) (amphotero=hypoleimma) . 

 

end of section