… this is bordering Insanity .. – I’m telling you I’m trembling all over …
      after yesterday’s “there was NO ‘John the Baptist” renouncing the ‘baptism’ theme
      this John 5 “the Bethesda pool” came up    —
      learning that for a very dark reason Esau MUST have promoted the ‘baptism’ with
      water (instead of the scriptural ‘sprinkling with blood’) to support ‘the fish-soul’ theme
      that are the enemies of our type souls ; while in this John 5 he can have propagated
      the idea of “magical water as a GOOD thing” namely ‘by her healing power’ 
      yet therewith concealing that this water-baptism may be a Curse to us    —
      Tertullius can have been right , saying about the Mithras Cult : 
            “Well, but the nations, who are strangers to all understanding of spiritual powers, 
            ascribe to their idols the imbuing of waters with the self-same efficacy.” (So they do) 
            but they cheat themselves with waters which are widowed. For washing is the channel 
            through which they are initiated into some sacred rites—of some notorious Isis or Mithras. 
            The gods themselves likewise they honour by washings. Moreover, by carrying water around, 
            and sprinkling it, they everywhere expiate country-seats, houses, temples, and whole cities: 
            at all events, at the Apollinarian and Eleusinian games they are baptized; 
            and they presume that the effect of their doing that is their regeneration ,
            and the remission of the penalties due to their perjuries.” 
      please also remember Plato (!) ,
      who visited the evil other-Reality , writing how “he saw a long string of waiting souls in front
      of lady Fortune , who would decide in which type animal or human they would be incarnated” ,
      where these waiting ones are ‘fish-souls’ and the target is ‘on earth’    —
      we have addressed the ‘re-incarnation theme’ before :
      there is no doubt that both us Jacob souls ánd fish-souls (-as well as the Ammon son souls)
      incarnate upon this earth , inside this awful body , 
      but RE-incarnation (here) is not given for us type Jacob-souls : since we need to escape !
 
      and extending this further ,
      the corrupt concept of ‘baptism’ may very well be related to this ‘RE-incarnation concept’ ,
      mainly as “calling His name over the fish-souls in order for them to continue this cycle”   —
      in the form of “the Jacob-souls agreeing with that through the ritual of baptism”….
      please see that we’re still struggling to phrase this bizarre theme
 
      the ‘pool’ (‘fish’) theme : Nineveh
      … in prophets “the seven Torches” are imprisoned “in the matrix-pool called Nineveh” ,
      as the seven abducted (-eden) females that maintain the Eden reality ‘through singing’ 
      (which is a form of creating) , where in the Revelation chapters they are restored 
      and pictured as standing upon the sea of glass before God’s throne – the Gate ; 
      the point her is ‘that Nineveh typically is “the fish-tank” (‘pool’) also in the Spells ,
      where the seven torches “now support the matrix” as “if singing FALSE” 
      and because they are ‘females’ – the feminine concept which is “the Word” – 
      they must be fed with false words : ‘water’ !
      over and over again in the Spells ‘the word’ is equated with ‘water’ ,
      where indeed the abducted Torches create the environment for the fish-souls there !
 
      it may seem over the top ,
      but we really need a Solid concept whý this ‘water baptism’ is such a curse 
 
      this John 5 section   —
      … Christ goes up “during a feast” 
      and 99% chance that it was ‘during Tabernacles’ ;
      then there is “a five (fold) + portico” (-in line 2) but we saw this suspicious ‘portico’ also in
      the other John chapter which was not “of Solomon” but “the moon” (sólómon=selênê)
      meaning “Tabernacles + at the full + moon” ;
      where here “sick people” [‘you & we’]   + at the Gate (!) + are waiting (-for a miracle)” :
      what did this section réally say ?

4
(a) “For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, 
(b)  and troubled the water: 
(c)  whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in     +
(d)  was made whole of whatsoever disease he had.”
4
for=but – (an-) angel (?) – (had) come down – into – the – pool     +          [‘a FISH’ (aggelos=ichthos) ?] 
b
(at-) according=some (?) – time ,
c
and – (had) troubled=changed (?) (tarassó=allassô) – the – water :
      [G5014 (-tarassó) , very weird root , 1x , too close to (-allassô) ‘to change’]  
d
whosoever – then – (had been) embark=baptized (embainó=baptizô) – previously ,
      [1684 (-embainó) ‘to embark (-a ship) , to get into’ , also very weird] 
e
after – the – water – (had been) troubled=changed (‘as in c above’) ,    +                              [+ by him ?] 
f
(had) been – sound=put under a curse (h-uGiés=kakol-oGeô) ;
      g
      [now we need an explanation of e-f :] 
      to-which=as – bind ? + the besides (‘two words : dé + pote’) = his + soul (?) (poté=psuché)
      h
      (being) bound (G2722) – [+by]  (the-) diseease=fish (?) (noSÉma=opSArion) ;       [‘by that angel’ ?] 
 
      now please : this interpretation is most debatable ofcourse ,
      but do see the intent of this line : “sómething is happening with the water”
      [where the whole build-up does not , for example , suggests ‘the scroll’ theme] 
      and “combined with the waiting souls” ,
      could not be this water be NEGATIVE to those waiting souls — you & we ..?