| themes : | the Remphan star |
| notes : | for each subsequent paragraph ; below main text ; perhaps open new tab for side-by-side comparison |
VII 354
b) thou. essences of the [eden-] mountain. [for] speech. ,
[being] the prisoner [=essences?]. to rise up by the support (thes). [and to] this N. to give. ;
a) [and sof or] this N. the word. to connect to. the praised T’ua-star [Remphan, likely]. ;
VII 354
e) Osiris. , [by] thou. speech and nature [matrix] (khr). +
[for] this N.’s. existence. to come the advanced beautified-soul [spirit-blueprint]. ;
d) [through] he. the [eden-] light to make to aquire (sshp). +
to make (ár). divine great speech. [as] existence of speech. [for] this N [=candidate]. ;
c) the locality of r-stha-u [word to drag to the mouth]. of [=for]. existence to become new (unn). ,
[being] the existence [=matrix]. [by] the mouth [=gate]. ;
| context : the t’ua star as Remphan , Scripture mentions “… the star as your god”; to right the NETER T’UA , Literally as “the t’ua star [as] the deity” ; where the ‘lasso’ is “the imprisoned eden-word” (watercourse glyph) and in front the -T’ as hand glyph – the executive region as new-hand . |
 rpt |
| the ‘dawn’, to right , shows this star was originally eden’s , shown by “the doubled light” glyph (either with = or II) ; and that the star is situated at “place-T of the most-b-soul-adam”, IT , where previously it was at place-T of the adamite-throne (S-T) ; we will need to look again at the “son of the dawn” chapter , because either hebrew-house-H or/and this star was intended there (see Ark paragraphs below , as both ‘a star and a chest’) ; …the problem is ofcourse that we don’t know “what this star” is ; |
 rpt |
| Supportive for this concept is the stepdown glyph T’U , “5” , where the same T’U glyph is often used as “evil mountain” (tsiun) , and note how that concept appears in the first line of this spell ! Moreover , we found a concept in (old-vedic) Ramayana , describing a concept of “the fifth light given by four” , but we will need to dig back in the chapters we did , so far . inversed star : to right T’UA SA , left blank by Budge , “to be [=passive-glyph]. the inverted [=SA]. praised T’ua star” ; |
 rpt |
| the Ark … if we came this far , we need to suggest the Ark , as well : we just had the line “neither will they remember it (the Ark)”, in Jer. 3 ; and though nowhere it writes that “a star appeared” , as in pic to right , it does say “that God spoke to Moses from between the cherubim” ; and note how the T’ua-star is related to divine great speech . |
 |
| The Ark represents an eden construct (in the other reality) , for several reasons likely situated upon the core pillar of the lampstand . The chest as ‘square’ relates to the 4 lights , glyphs have ÃFT’ as ‘chest’ [chest of the hand of he-eden for willpower] or chest+Ã “the chest for willpower” to right , in line 2, 4 and 5 ( and see CT 1087) ; the cluster stepping down into FT’T “the four of the hand of he (eden)” , into a concept termed NEMES crown , into NEM-ÁST , shown as 4 bowls , “the four of the adamite-throne to go dissect” . Scripture is not clear what happened with the Ark ; the book Maccabees tells Jeremiah hid it at mt. Nebo [the Thoth-perch-standard in spells] , while it is seen in heaven in the book of Revelation . |
 rpt |
| The many references in the spells must show that they copied the construct , likely represented by the ark-like shrine in Tutãnkhámen’s tomb (to right) ; now as the dog Anubis (ÁNPU) upon his shrine , being a form of Anubis of Thebes , where the latter city , above eden, represents their root -P , as in ÁNPU ; and in the first textglyph to right (where it writes ‘later forms are….’) , the -P , as square , shows in front of the NETER T’UA . (we will get there , still : the whole theme of Upper and Lower ancient Egypt |
 |
| the almond tree and the Ark Jeremiah 1, 2 and 3 are a sequel ; in the first chapter Jeremiah is shown ‘a rod of an almond (tree)’, H8247 shaqed . This term appears three more times , once in connection with Aaron , so the term should be valid . Like the Ark returns in Jer. 3 , showing the almond branch in Jer. 1 múst relate to the ‘branch, vine’ in jeremiah 2 . The term used there is H8321 shoreq , 3 times , and our instinct tells that the term was miswritten – on purpose or by accident . |
 hr |
| Aaron and Moses both represented a twin-aspect , where Aaron was “the mouth”, since he delivered the words to Pharaoh (and compare this to ‘speaking from the ark’ and the great-speech mentioned in the spell) . The almond branch was Aaron’s staff , and was placed into the Ark , later on . That Jeremiah was shown the almond branch , where chapter two mentions this vine , and chapter three the Ark , is too coincidental ; therefore the words shRq and shqD must have been originally the same . Moreover – in chapter two the donkey [eden’s] óf that vine is ‘in their north’ ; how much is the chance that they copied the ark-construct in their north , as well ? The problem is that we’re not sure which was the original term – when -shrq then the -shor cluster is involved [gate, also as ‘mouth’] ; when -shqd then it’s linked to ‘to watch, sight’ , and could link to the sickle-glyph MA , emending in ‘sight’ MAA (‘by reaping it’) , hence the branch within the Ark ? the two stones (places-T?) in the Ark If we made some progress ? | |
02.26.19 submitted — 2nd version of original — het-report
