Ez.40-48 the temple chapters :
only outlines and contents ,
several sections are corrupted

[in progress ; 2021-jun.9]

 

 
contents – as outlines :

Ez. 40 : description of the temple complex 
Ez. 41 : description of the temple sanctuary itself
Ez. 42 : inner court buildings and the park around the temple complex
Ez. 43 : see 44
Ez. 44 : see 43                                                             (one of these two is corrupt)
Ez. 45 : lines 1-9 may address the region around the temple ; rest is corrupt
Ez. 46 : apart from a few lines – again – about ‘gates’ ,
        the chapter is corrupt
Ez. 47 : the river from the temple ‘healing’ the south dimension
        (which supplies aspects ‘to create with’) ;
        the trees upon both riverbanks , as the trees supplying continuous harvest ;
        and – probably – a “second type people” which will co-exist with us in eden
        (chapter contains corrupt sections)

Ez. 48 : wholly corrupt – as Esau’s addition

 
the two nót-corrupted themes in 40-48 : the temple and the river
 

Ezekiel 40 , 41 and 42

plan of the temple in Eden
founded upon the cornerstone
(credit ucg org)
Ezekiel 47

the river of life streaming
into the southern dimension
(quora com)

 
observations of  theme [-of 40-48]
 
the reason for these temple chapters :
… we’re not quite sure –
likely as “to show that paradise will rule again in the centre (of the dualistic realm)” ,
of which the layout of the temple is a projection
(combined with “the river of water” in one of the last chapters) ;
because please remember that in prophets “the tried cornerstone”
as temple-foundation is a kind of “dimensional-anchor” ;
 
our problem : we opt that there will be NO ‘animal sacrifices’ again :
… you know that , when translating ,
we múst have “some idea about what the chapter content can be”
or it is virtually Impossible to interpret properly ;
this is a tough decision because we don’t ofcourse want to go heretic  —
but our instinct (though lame term) says that animal sacrifices don’t make Sense ,
because of both contextual reasons ánd Esau’s deflections ;
 

 
Ez. 40 : description of the temple complex

the text itself : contents :
… mostly okay ,
it isn’t so necessary to retranslate all the numbers and measures ; the overall picture :
 

(image : bible ucg org)

 
problems :
A)

… lines 39-43 , in KJV as

  • 39. “And in the porch of the gate [were] two tables on this side, and two tables
    on that side, to slay thereon the burnt offering and the trespass offering .
  • 40. and at the side without [=outside] , as one goes up to the entry of the north gate,
    [were] two tables; and on the other side, which was at the porch of the gate,
    [were] two tables.
  • 41. four tables [were] on this side, and four tables on that side; by the side of the gate,
    eight tables whereupon they slew [their offerings] .
  • 42. and the four tables [were] of hewn stone for the burnt offering, of a cubit and
    a half long, and a cubit and a half broad, and one cubit high ; whereupon they
    the instruments wherewith they slew the burnt offering and the sacrifice.”

 
… now , the “washing place” is shown in the diagram as A ,
and the four (or is it ‘eight’?) tables are outside the porch as BBBB ;
but does it all make Sense …?
a)
… why are the “slaughtering tables IN the gate”
and the ‘tables for instruments OUTside the gate’ , with a 7-step stairs inbetween ?
b)
why slay in the gate – then carry the bloody carcasses around ‘to a washing place’ .. ?
c)
from who are these offerings ? , because the four depicted ‘I’ (in the corners of diagram)
are said to be “cooking courtyards where temple servants cook the people’s sacrifices ,
per Ez.46:21-24”  (=according to the site where the depiction is taken from) :
but that Ez.46 looks very corrupted ;
d)
… why is there no further description of this ritual : how to sacrifice it at the altar ,
regulations , times : within a chapter that only describes the temple outlay ?
e)
… why are “four tables of each 75×75 cm. surface needed for instruments” ?
Why ‘at the northern gate’ ? ; it all just doesn’t make Sense …
c)
syntax of this section :
… we feel that Esau choked himself in his own addition :
he wanted to insert “the offering aspect” , chose ‘tables’ , then mistook the number
by repeating ‘4’ because he forgot to add the dimensions (-of the tables) . We bet ..? ;
B)
… line 46 ‘(sons of) Zadok’ (‘of the sons of Levi’) :
the ‘Zadok’ name is nowhere in prophets – but in these chapters = corrupt ;
maximum it can write “the sons of [eden-] Ishral” , since they are the priests  —
but the term “altar” is inserted , in 46 ,
so it is still unclear whát the sons of Ishral are supposed to do there ;

 

Ez. 41 : description of the temple sanctuary
 
the text itself : contents :
… mostly okay ,
it isn’t so necessary to retranslate all the numbers and measures ; the overall picture :

 

(idem)

 

observations :
… it appears that the only furniture is “an altar of wood” (wood ?) , (22a)
which is later said to be “the table before the Lord” in 22c ;
we don’t know what to make of that ,
neither how this relates to “the throne at the sea of glass” in Revelation ;

 

Ez. 42 : inner court buildings and the park around the temple
 
the text itself : contents :
… mostly okay ,
it isn’t so necessary to retranslate all the numbers and measures ; the overall picture :

 

 

observations :
… most is about ‘the dining chambers for the priests’  (if true) , as G in first depiction ,
while it is questionable whether “they eat holy offerings” (13) ;
the last few verses
describe the area surrounding the temple – see above ,
as a total of around 1,2 square miles having the temple complex in her midst ;

 

Ez. 43 and 44 : one of these is corrupt

 
problems with the text : overlappings / same theme
a)
both start with ‘the eastern gate’ :
Ez. 43:1 : “then he brought me to the gate facing east”
Ez. 44:1 : “then he brought me to the gate facing east , which was shut”
b)
God enters the temple :
Ez. 43: 2-4 : “and the glory of the Lord came from the east and entered the house”
Ez. 44: 2-4 : “and the glory of the Lord came from the east and entered the house”
c)
God starts to speak :
Ez. 43: line 5 and further
Ez. 44: line 5 and further

rest of contents :
Ez. 43 Ez. 44
   –   short dimensional theme
(=admissable)
–        the altar described  +
many animal sacrifices
by ‘the sons of zadok’
(=questionable)
–   corrupted discourse about the
sons of Ishral as the priests
(=admissable)
–  last few lines : animal sacrifices
(=questionable)

                                                                possible restoration :

  • a) Ez. 43: 7-9            the threshhold next to my threshold
    that the evil dimension will not oppress anymore
    but that “[=my house] will be in the centre [=of the seas]” , line 9 ;
  • b) Ez. 44: line 5 and further
    the sons of Ishral as priests
    … but we can impossibly know what are their duties
    because the entire section is way too corrupted :

line 6 :   ‘your abominations’, wut ?
line 7 :    idem
line 8 :    idem
line 9 :    idem
line 10 : ‘Levites who will bear their iniquity’
line 11 : ‘yet they will slay the burnt offering’        (=so how come ? , highly questionable)
line 12 : ‘therefore they [=Levites] will bear their iniquity’       (=where’s the logic here ?)
line 13 : ‘therefore they shall not come near to me because of their iniquities’
                    (=yet these are the priests preparing the sacrifice ? , where is the logic ?)
line 14 : ‘but I will put them in charge of the house’ (=sigh)
line 15 : ‘but the sons of zadok who képt the charge of my house will come near to me’
                    (=these were the ones having iniquity , previously : Esau confused his own theme)
line 16 : ‘they will keep my charge and come near to my table’
                     (=Esau’s excuse line as a spinoff of 15)
line 17 : ‘they will be clothed in linen garments’                                            (=unverifiable)
                    ‘when they will minister in the gates’                                                               (=why?)
line 18 :  ‘they will wear linen bonnets and breeches’                                             (=spinoff)
line 19 :  ‘they will change garments when going into the outer court’            (=why?)
line 20 :  ‘they won’t be bald nor have long hair but just normal’          
                     (=sounds like a very important regulation)
line 21 :   ‘neither they’ll drink wine in the inner court’            
                     (=excuse line : who will need ‘wine’ ?)
line 22 :  ‘they won’t take widows as wife but only maidens’   (=‘widows’ ?, in eden ?)
line 23 :  ‘they’ll teach my people the difference between the holy and the profane’
                     (=prophets : “they all will know me , from the greatest to the smallest”)
line 24 :   rather unique : a virtually non-corrupted line
line 25 :  ‘and they will not touch a dead person’                                                       (=in eden ?)
                     (rest of the line is nonsensical)
line 26 :  ‘because that will need 7 days quarantine after that’                            (=right …)
line 27 :  ‘and when he enters the temple again he’ll make a sin-offering for that’
                     (=spinoff)
line 28-31 : very unclear and nonsensical offering themes

conclusion :
… you see that it is undoable to reconstruct anything Sensible from this section

 

Ez. 45 :  the temple , the city and portions of the land

[45 may have belonged to 43 and 44]

A)  problems with the descriptions in the text (line 1-8) :

  to left :
the inset , as described in line 1-8 of this Ez. 45 ,
where ‘the apportioned land’ shows in Ez. 48
(image : the bookworm com)

 above :
the encampment around the old tabernacle ,
which SHOULD be a blueprint or foreshadowing
IF a region around the temple is described here

(image : pinterest)

the inconsistencies presented in line 1-8 :

see the inset of the above leftside depiction ;
IF lines 1-8 originally addressed a wider region around the temple ,
then ofcourse it has nothing to do with “the present earthly country”
because that is Esau’s hoax in the KJV text :

a)
… considered the encampment ,
it is not logical that the temple (depicted as ‘S’ here) is outside the city (C) ,
but instead , within it – and the latter within the centre of the land
b)
… the city is about 2 miles square here
(for comparison : greater NYCity is almost 5 miles square) ,
but who are her inhabitants ? , and what is the function – now – of the city ?
c)
… the two strips of land (P) to the right and left of the inset
are described in vers 7 as “the land of the Prince” – but what ‘prince’ , and why ?
d)
… the inset shows a square plot of land (with the temple a bit off-centre)
of 25,000 x 25,000 cubits , roughly 10 x 10 square miles ,
divided into two plots of 10,000 x 25,000 and one 5000 x 25,000 cubits :
we have no idea where the “25” comes from ,
and though it is possible that an upper and lower strip of land
could represent the north and south Dualistic realm
(separated by the temple and her plot of land in the centre , inbetween both) ,
that buildup does not match the encampment blueprint

considered the encampment :

+ the 12 gates of the city (in Ez. 48) can be added to this section ?
… as line 30-35 there , and compare Revelation ;
it is very possible that the city has ’12 gates’ as three on each side ,
but we can’t know whether they are given names , as presented in ch. 48 ,
while the mentioned ‘Dan’ there is obviously wrong ;

but what are the four camps surrounding the tabernacle ?
… inbetween the camps of the twelve tribes were four camps of Levites ,
and where three camps were in charge of different objects of the tabernacle ,
the “camp of the sons of Moses and Aaron” – at the eastside –
appears to relate to the concept of the 144,000 ,
because in this camp “sons of the other three camps were collected”
(the ‘thousand threehundred and three score and five’ in Numbers 3:50
must be wrong : verse 43 talks about ’22,000’ already)

… but we don’t know what these four may represent : perhaps ‘timeframes’ ? ,
and should or should they nót be represented by something in Ez. 45 ?

 
B)  the rest of Ez. 45 (lines 9-25) : ‘just balances’ and ‘animal offerings’ = corrupt

  • a)
    … lines 9-14 : “no corrupt balances” , “a bath, a shekel and an ephah” 
    (=we are in eden now :
    who will measure out (grain-) quantities ..? ,
    these measurements , see line 14 , including ‘flour and oil’ were part of OT directions
    because they represented “eden aspects in this ape body” : but we’re in eden now !)
  • b)
    … lines 15-20 : “animal offerings”
    (=who is ‘the prince’ these offerings are given to , line 16 ? ,
    while the 20 types offerings in line 17 looks like Esau’s overdrive again)
  • c)
    … line 21-23 : “… you will have the feast of passover”
        (=impossible !) ,
    besides – the only holiday which will remain is booths , see next ;
  • d)
    … line 25 : allusion to the festival of booths :
    but we can’t know what it said – IF it was addressed ;
    the maximum prophets write about this festival
    is that “the people will go up to the city”  (likely ‘once a year’)

 

 

Ez. 46

 
observations :
 
a)  again this ‘east gate’ (lines 1-3)
… third time now ,
and it is just unknowable what it could have said – or never has said ;
 
b)  again a series of offerings (4-7)
… out of place , no context
 
c)  re : the gates – now combined with offerings (8-12)
… though the concept of line 9 is póssible ,
There is so little context as to why this precedure is required that we can’t be sure –
While Esau agressively sought to add his animal offerings in every second paragraph ;
 
d)  offerings (13-15)
… yeah ; we saw already that ‘oil and flour’ offerings relate to our type body ;
 
e)  something vague about ‘inheritances’ (16-18)
… we’ve read it thrice , but could not tell you what it is about , nor why it’s here ;
 
f)  Esau’s favourite : more offerings (19-24 end)
… the four corners of the outer court are “places to boil the offerings of the people” :
considered the Ezekiel chapter “the cooking pot”
it is per definition impossible that any ‘cooking’ would be repeated ;
    
     postscript :
… though the lines about the gates may have been part of a previous chapter – IF so ,
the rest of the chapter is so senseless that we have to dismiss it ;

 

Ez. 47   [‘the river’]

 
a)  the widening river (lines 1-5)
… seems genuine ,
though we have not found any allusion to this river in other prophets ;

b)  the trees on both riverbanks (7)
… likely misplaced since ‘the trees’ theme properly continues in line 12 , see there ;

 
c)  the eastland , the ‘fish’ and the morasses (8-11)
… the river streams towards “the eastland (-qdm) which is before Heaven” ,
but , obviously , rather quickly cascades down into the south dimension
since the eastland itself will be filled with the carcasses of the spirits armies ;
the ‘fish’ (in 9) :
… we do not know whether that term was in the original text or not  —
it can be that Esau inserted “and they become fish many exceedingly” as stepup to (his) 10 ,
because the line reads even better withóut these four words ; because see next :
 
     the ‘every thing that liveth’ :
… to our understanding , “the south dimension provides aspects to create with” ,
which then manifest as creations in eden ;
in Zechariah is mentioned something like “pipes mounted upon Zerubbabel ,
conveying [the essence] towards the north , to the land” ,
but the whole theme is – as you understand – out of our reach ;
the ‘fishermen’ (in 10) :
… Esau added both proper names to suggest ‘the country on this earth’ as subject ,
rendering the rest of the verse as most likely a fraud ,
since it sounds weird “to go outside eden to catch fish” ;
the ‘morasses’ (in 11) :
… both ‘marsh’ and ‘cistern’ are very doubtful roots ,
while it can be that Esau (also-) added “salt” to support his ‘Dead Sea’ scam ;
if nót , then we have the question “what is it that living water cannot heal”,
but we’re left in the dark what this line could have addressed ;
 
c)  the trees (12) (continued from 7)
… in a prophets chapter is said
how “the the harvests will follow quickly upon oneanother” ,
implying that there will be several – or perhaps even continuous – harvests per year ,
and compare how here is said “according to their months” ;
problem :
… suspiciously absent here is “the (main-) tree of life” ;
it may be that this theme has been part of a previous , corrupted , chapter ; 
 
d)  the portioning of the land (13-23 end)
… lines 15-20
as a series of proper names are obviously a fraud – since we are in eden now ;
a second type people ? (21-23) :
… so far , in prophets ,
we found lines as “… they will work your vineyards and tend your cattle”,
or “… we will go up to the deity of Jacob” ,
suggesting that there will be ‘another type people’ as all the saved souls from here  —
especially line 12 apparently speaks about “a coexisting people” ,
but we found too little in prophets to can compose a workable theory about them ;

 

Ez. 48
 
observation :

… wholly corrupt ;
Esau wanted to make sure that this earthly country was understood as the subject ;

 

 

[2021.07jul.09-15.    —     submitted as first version]