Ez. 40 – 48 :
the so-called “Ezekiel temple”
is a concept devised by Esau

 
note please : this page is not intended to ridicule any genuine concept
                             but we knów Esau and deeply hate his lies


 

(achemenet com)
above :  Susa – model of the palace of king Darius (!) 
and compare several passages in the corrupted chapters ,
strongly suggesting the writer used these type buildings !

 
the context of this theme

– does this ’temple’ appear elsewhere in prophets (=crossreading) ? 
    No .
– would this type temple appear in the Eden paradise ?
    Hardly .
– would there still be “animal sacrifices” in Eden ?
    Blasphemy .
– the ‘present land Palestine divided up in 12 pieces of 25,000 stadia ?
    Right – after earth is destroyed ?
– and “the priests changing their clothes to wear holy garments” ?
    (that’s a trick question — apparently these guys haven’t their Original) ;
– etc. ; 
 
… so you see that the entire cóncept is False  —
the “precise measurements” are nothing but Deflection 
hiding the fact that the theme itsélf is but gaslighting , 
and certainly not something ‘which the 144 are asked to know’ :
it is all but Esau’s scheme to keep believers focused upon this earth

 
1 chapter survived
but got cut up in minimum 3 sections
and the – indeed correct – theme is the eden gate (see Gate Intro page) ,
probably to be filed somewhere after chapter 30 :
– chapter 43 1-9  : God enters the restored gate ; see Revelation ; 
                                         rest until 27 : corrupt ;
– chapter 44 1-3  : shut east gate : questionable , to modify after 43 ? ; 
                                         rest until 31 : deviously corrupted (!) ;
– chapter 47 1-12 : the river [but ‘measuring it’ ? see 40] , in other prophets ;
                                         but 13-23 corrupt – as ‘division of the land’ 
separate note : ’the 12 gates’ :
as in KJV’s chapter 48 , “the city having three gates at each side” :
one may say “well in Revelation 21 the New Jerusalem has 12 gates of gems”
but that line is álso corrupted (-sorry) :
prophets do not mention “a new Jerusalem” – because that would confuse ,
however God DID say “I will make your foundation of gemstones” 
however He addressed the eden land  —  and Rev. 21 should read the SAME ;

 

Ezekiel chapter 40-48
 
Ez. 40 
[1-4] : possible : as introduction to the restored eden Gate
1-2
“and [he] set me upon a very high mountain”
… as mt. tsiun in the other reality ;
if it added “brought me to the land” it was not “the land Ishral”
but a term as ‘(adm-) ground’ (-adme) which links to eden ;
 
3
“a man as bronze holding a measuring rod in his hand”
…. if a guide will show him things – allright ,
but the ‘measuring rod’ he added is suspicious : would we really
be asked to follow ‘measures’ as an absent theme in all prophets ? 
 
4
“declare all you see to the house of Ishral” (=144)
… so apparently we are to léarn something here — like in prophets
about the gate , the eden land , M-Babylon , the corrupted scroll , etc ; 
 
[5-49] : virtually IMpossible : 
5
“he showed a wall of 6 by 6 ft surrounding the house”
… weird but okay ;
 
6-16
“measuring the (east-) gate” which includes a type ‘guard-rooms’ 
… the entrance itself around 5 yards wide and 25 yards long ; 
the descriptions are bizarre and it’s more like he copied some
complex he saw in real life — and overdid it ;
 
17
“there were 30 chambers on the pavement”
… well only he knows ;
 
18-37
“measuring the north and south gate”
… lengthy descriptions are repeated — which in itself is suspicious
because it’s a favourite trick of Esau to fill space (to create ‘a chapter’)
now and then with slight differences , f.e. one has ‘7 steps’ instead of 8 ; 
 
38-43 
“next to the gate were slaughtering tables for the burnt offering”
… apart from the blasphemy that any ‘slaughtering’ will still happen
the 3 x 3 ft (!) surface of the tables don’t make sense in itself
and the constant repeat of lines – as space filling – works nauseous ;
 
44
“and there were the chambers of the singers”
… really – a hired choir ?
 
45
“the chamber for the priests, the keepers of the charge of the house”
… like a recreation lounge ? for 144,000 priests + their females ?
or just for 20 ? what does this mean ?
 
46
“that chamber is for the priests of Levi” 
… so the 144 have concurrence ? 
 
47
“the inner court , measuring 50 x 50 yards”
… roughly half the size of a soccer field ; but it’s absolutely TINY
compared with the massive and thick gates enclosing that square ;
 
48-49
“the entrance of the temple”
… why do the measurements have this occult connection ? 
 
conclusion of what we just read :
… does this sound to you as something “the house Ishral needs to know” ? ,

 

Ez. 41
[1-26] : virtually IMpossible :  
1-26
“description of the temple”
… well – what to say ; you can read it for yourself :
it all sounds nice but it’s completely Useless ;
while the furniture for IEUE is a table of 4 x 4 ft
 
conclusion of what we just read : 
… it’s pathetic really to want to enclose God in this bunker

 

Ez. 42
[1-20] : virtually IMpossible :  
1-12
“description of the court” 
… compare the used language with the depiction in top of page ;
 
13-14
“the chambers where the priests dine and leave met offerings ,
 and where they change their clothes for [holy-] garments”
… so these guys DON’T have their Gorgious yet ?
 
15-20
“measuring the size of the temple complex : 500 x 500 reeds”
… why again chose ‘5’ ? 
 
conclusion of what we just read : 
… you decide … – we think it’s outright Depressing

 

Ez. 43
[1-9] : possible : God returns to / restores the eden gate  
1-9
“God enters the sanctuary”
… so we need that followed upon chapter 40 (!) lines 1-4 ;
 
[10-27] : virtually IMpossible : 
10-27
“God enforcing the measurements”
… now that’s rather devious [-of Esau] : use a genuine section ,
then have God enforce his (=lower capitol) nonsense ; 

 

Ez. 44
[1-31] : virtually IMpossible :
1-3
“the closed east gate through which God passed”
… though sounding mysterious , it makes no sense whatsoever
and therefore we reject it ; seems a copied version of 46 : 1-3 ;
… though there indeed must be something like “four gates” in 
relation to the four cardinal points (as attribute of the 144) , 
‘a closed gate’ just does not hold any water ;
 
1-31
“laws decreed by God”
… the most hateful section we read so far , unpleasant to read —
Esau’s mask really dropped here showing the rat that he is ;

 

Ez. 45
[1-25] : virtually IMpossible :  
1-9
“dividing the land in plots for the different groups”
… in eden ? – such nonsense , it’s not even worth a comment ;
 
10-14
“you will have just balances and just money”
… in eden ? – such n … (nevermind)
 
15-25
“meat offerings for the prince”
… yeah ;

 

Ez. 46
[1-24] : virtually IMpossible :
1-3
“the east gate will be opened during sabbaths and new moons”
… wasn’t eden “the eternal sabbath” ?
 
4-8
“burnt offerings of bulls and rams”
… yes that’s always a winner ;
 
9-10
“the people entered the north gate will leave through the south gate”
… yes that’s required with such small inner court …
 
11-15
“bull and ram offerings” 
… he used similar description as in 4-8 ;
 
16-18
“about inheritances and the year of liberty” 
… c’mon – in eden ? really ?
 
19-24
“priests boiling the trespass offering in the corners of the court”
… you see us doing that ? and ’trespass’…? ;
note how the description matches the Susa palace type plan ;

 

Ez.47
[1-12] : possible : the river flowing eastward
1-12
“the river flowing eastward”
… should be Valid for it empties in the south dimension 
while another prophet chapter mentions the trees (-and river?) as well ;
however we’re not sure about the figure ‘measuring’ it but it ties to ch. 40
 
[13-23] : virtually IMpossible :  
13-23
“dividing up the land in plots”
… corrupt — and he should have let this follow after his 45 : 1-9 ;

 

Ez. 48
[1-35] : virtually IMpossible :  
1-29
“dividing up the land in plots”
… corrupt ;
 
30-35
“the city with twelve gates”
… though one could link this with Rev. 21 , the latter is álso corrupt :
God says in prophets to the EDEN LAND “I will found you on gemstones” ,
not any (new-) Jerusalem — though there definitely will be communities ;
Esau just used the Tabernacle encampment model – since he mentions ‘Dan’ ;
… this subject isn’t so important
were it not that Esau has done everything to hide eden with ’this Jerusalem’ ;
 

 
end of page