fulltext in progress
please see restored text below

 
      … after Hebrews 8 , similar (-theme) chapters become increasingly corrupted ofcourse
      and we really have no other chance as scraping the barrel   —
      key words used here are : (in 24) ‘allegory’ [=like the “pattern” in Hebrews 8 !] ,
                                                               ‘two’, ‘one’, [=’two descends of Moses] , ‘mount (+Sinai)’,
      whereby we had to work back to the first half of this chapter ;
      all in all (the theological issues in-) the restored text came out surprisingly well
 
context falsification :
Gal. 1 :
1-9       :  address ; then “telling that the gospel [=scroll] will be corrupted” ;
10-24 :  [utterly corrupted] 
                  expected : people in the endtime won’t know anything original about the scroll ,
                  and because the section is so long : the 144 raised up ?
Gal. 2 :
1-7       :   [utterly and totally corrupted] 
                  suspected theme : the story of our Originals
                  [only in line 7 is “they saw” — “the demons envied the beauty of the Originals” ?
8-21    :   [utterly and totally corrupted] 
                   [the creep did such a good job that not even WE can recognize any key terms …] 
                   maximum “some strife” shows which should be about Adam ,
Gal. 3  :
1-29      :   the eden-covenant and Christ’s covenant
                     [but will be a very tough job to restore that one] 
Gal. 4   :
1-31      :   the eden sceptre restored [this chapter] 
Gal. 5   :
1-26      :   [utterly corrupt] 
                      required theme : Jacob saved — but will be almost impossible ,
Gal. 6   :
1-            :   [utterly corrupt] 
                      required theme : a short closing (-but may have been part of 5)
                      suggestion : only the first few lines are genuine ? ,
                      in 1 : “restore + in spirit=people + meekness=Ishral (‘Originals’)” 
                      or even “(they will dwell in the restored + garden of + Eden” ;
 
meaning that
a) this chapter 100% refers back to the events at mt. Horeb (‘Sinai”) 
      [see Heb.8 and Is.66] ,
b) in 24 it mentions “the two covenants”  —
      but first : the “both covenants” were already addressed in chapter 3 , see above ,
      neither it refers to “two stone (-tablets)” 
      so that the only “two” and “one” mentioned here can be ‘the descents of Moses’ ,
so that
we have a 95% chance that the context of this section was about the +1 month , right
 
subnote :
if the other chapters are so utterly corrupted – why would this one run ?
… good question : only because we know where to look for , in the second half ;
how many NT chapters have this theme ?
… as far we see three , so far : a Romans chapter also appears to be a candidate ;
while we suspect that the so-called “Road to Emmaus” in Luke also was this theme :
we trust nothing of the ‘both guys’ story because if you compare the buildup to a section
of this chapter the similarity just is Too Coincidental
 

(1-5)
the problem : Adam took the sceptre
(6-10)
at mt. Horeb : the (1300 BC-) fathers and the calf : they sustained Adam 
       interesting : (6) was Esau’s corruption because of the running (1300 BC-) FATHERS theme 
(11-14)
about the curse
(15-20)
about the 144 investigating the scroll , finding everything then suffering a large blow
(21-end)
about how they need to know the date of His return , then remember Moses’ descents ;
rest of context converged according to Heb. 8 and Is. 66
 

 
6
“And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.”   
6
    [unknown still 3x] 
b
[..] God – (made) – the – spirit=people – [..]  son=Ishral – to sent=go (!) forth      +
c
him=out – into=from – the – hearts=land of – you=Egypt
d
(when-) the=our (?) – (1300BC-) abba=fathers (‘same hebrew’) – cried out – (to-) father=him ;
 
7
” Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.
7
therefore – you=they (would) – no longer – be – slaves – but – sons ,
b
[what was ‘the theological intent’ now ? :] 
IF – (the-) sons – (would) yet=become (?) – and=the – heir of – God      +    [namely “at Horeb”] 
c
through – (the-) (eden-) christ=sceptre (or : ‘birth right’) (christos=rhabdos) ;        +    (!) 
 
8
“Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods.”
8 
[what was ‘the theological intent’ now ? :]
[w/ swapped 1x +corrupt :] 
but=because – then – indeed – [+they] (would have) understood      +
b
(the-) not=covenant (ouK=diathêKe) of – God ,                                                             [< birth right related !]     
c
[w/ garbled + corrupt :] 
[+since] [+their] náture [or: ‘(their-) heart’ (phusis=kardias)’]       +
d
(would) – no [+longer] – (be) enslaved – (by-) being=other – gods ;          [8 makes Sense no ?] 
 
9
“But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again 
to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage?”
9
now=therefore – God (-himself) – known=spoke – (to-) yet=them ,                                 [at Horeb] 
b
rather=in order that – [+they] (would) – yet=surely – know – by=him ;
c
(-yet) god=immediately – you=they turned back – (from-) how=him – again
d
[now : needs buildup to next subject ! , so ‘speeding up’ the line :]                              [e: and see line 23] 
on=by – weak=worshipping       +
e
[=the] – poor+elements= calf + (that) [+they] made (ptóchos + stoicheion = moschopoieô ! G3447) ,
f
[w/ corrupt + lineup :] 
(by-) which – you=they – willing=gave – [+their] slaving=birth right (‘no match’)         +
g
(to-) anew=Adam (anóthen=adam) – again ! ;  
 
10
(and-) (in that-) day ,                                                                      [how much we’d need “month” in 24 …] 
b
[+they] years=caused (?) – [..] month=Adam (?) (MenAs=AdM) – to observe=put (?)        +
c
and=a – seasons=curse (?) (KAiRos=KAtaRa !! , and see 24 !) – (upon-) and=us (?) ;
 
         11-12  [unknown yet – but very corrupt , ofcourse ;
                       probably ‘scroll corruption’ theme :] 
          “I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain.”
          “Brethren, I beseech you, be as I [am]; for I [am] as ye [are]: ye have not injured me at all.”
 
13
[=now] , you=he (‘Adam’) knew – that – through=without – (the-) infirmity=sceptre
b
I=we (would) [+not] (be) bring message=restored – (by-) you=God
c
(in-) the – [..] former – flesh (‘of our Originals’) ;
 
14
and (-that) (-in) – the – trial=time of – (the-) me=end
b
the – in=people – [+also?] (would) scorn=love – [..] me=their – (-own) flesh ,      [comp/ Is. 66 !] 
c
(and therefore-) (would) not – loathe=care about – [..] as=the – angel=words of – God ,
d
(and would-) [+not] receive=gain (?) – as=the – christ=sceptre of – jesus=eden – (for-) me=us ;
note :
… in Isaiah was “they (1300 AD fathers) loved their own grievous image (‘body’)” ;
 
15
what=therefore – the – blessed state – (for-) you=us – (would) then=not – happen ,
b
for=however (or : ‘if not’) , I=He witness=promised – (to-) you=us     +
c
that – [..] [+he] (will) able=raise up – the – eyes=sons of – you=Ishral
d
(that will) dig out=investigate (‘dig into’ !)– (the-) ever=scroll (aN=biblioN)
e
(and-) give=find – me=it (‘sceptre’) ;       +      
16
so that=though – your=our – enemy – (will have) become=concealed       +
b
(the-) truth=sceptre – (in-) you=him (‘scroll’) ; 
 
[next 17-20 (needs to fill the gap until restored 21 vv.) :
strange ‘simple’ lines , many repeats (17-18) , 
needed : “the 144 try and understand much — but also fail ; then they find the sceptre” :]  
 
17  [perhaps corrupt — added (invented) , several roots as in 18 , 
        and frankly we can’t think of a theme needed between restored 16 and next 18] 
 
18
(and-) [=because] – the=by (?) – (having been) zealous
b
[+they] (will have) right=found – (the-) right (-things) – every time ,        [c: birthright = sceptre] 
c
only – not – in=still – [..] my=our – present=birth right (pareimi=protôtokos) – with=for – you=us ; 
 
19
[old syntax ? :] 
me=then – [+they] (will be) children=smitten (?) (TEknia=Typtô)       +
b
(by-) whom=God (?) (hous=theos) ,                                                                                                      [attempt] 
c
(and) again – I=they (will) travail          +                                                                           [< so said in Is. 66] 
d
until – [..] [+they] (will have) formed=declared       +
e
(the-) christ=sceptre of – in=eden (en=eden) – (to-) you=him ;                              [eden : no Strong’s] 
 
20
[=therefore] – I=they (will) desire=expect – (that-) (the-) toward=Lord (pros=kurios)
b
(would have) present=come – (for-) you=them – at a certain time at present ,             [6/26/23] 
c
and=but      +
you=that – [..] voice=day (‘read : ‘of high watch’) – (will have) changed=passed (but sic !) ,
d
that=and – I=they (will be) perplexed – in=by – you=it ; 
 
                                                                           part III
                                                            – important section – 
21
(for-) (the-) me=sons (‘144’) (moi=yhios) – (will) say :
b
[+we] desire – to be=know – the – under=the – law=day [+of His return] (‘as elsewhere’) ,
c
(but-) you=it (is) hear=concealed (?) – (in-) the – law=scroll (nomon=biblion) ; 
 
22
for=but (-then) – it=they (will) written=remember       +               [usually ‘written’ is corrupted ..] 
b
that – Abraham=Moses (sic)     +
had=descended – two (-times) – (from-) (the-) sons=mount (yhios=oros) ,
c
the – one=first (G1520) (-time)       +
d
out=at – [..] bondwoman=Weeks (?) (paidiskês=sabbatos)                            [49 days after Passover] 
e
and – the – one (‘other’) (-time) – [..] [..] free=afterwards (eleutheros=epakoloutheô !) ;
note :
… question ofcourse is whether it wrote ‘Weeks’ , but why NOT add this important point 
when anyway telling about the descents ? – and see Is. 66 and Hebrews 8 ;
 
23
but – the (-one) – (that-) indeed=happened – [=at] – [..] first                                   [a-b: Hebrews 8]  
b
born=went wrong (?) – according to=because of – (the-) flesh=calf (?) (Sarx=moSchos) ,
     b #2 :
     born=went wrong – [=because] – [+they] flesh=made a calf (G3447 , 1x , Acts = corrupt) ,
c
[=but] – the (-one) – [..] free=afterwards – (would) through=carry (?) – the – promise ;        +
 
24
which – is=was  – (an-) allegory ,      +                                                                   [< “a pattern” : see Hebrews 8] 
b
because – the – two=Lord – (will) are=return – (to-) these=them       
c
covenants=after (?) (diathéké=katadiôkô !!) – one – indeed=month (?) (men=mên !!)
d
from – (the-) mount=feast (?) (ORos=heÔRte) of – sinia=weeks (?) (sinai=sabbat) ;
e
[now really a guess — and to link back to everything previously :]      into=as – generating=returning – (the-) slavery=second time (?) (DoUleian=DeUteros ?)
     f
     which=because     +
     (the-) hagar=curse (?) (hagar=katar-a ?)     +                                                     [‘Hagar’ just was Weird] 
     (will have been) is=undone (?) ; 
note :
a) the sudden weird ‘Sinai’ now seems like another substitution for ‘Sabbatos’ in 22 
    since Esau obviously HAD to progress his theme (and couldn’t use the same phrase) ,
b) in a similar “smart” way the ‘month’ theme was disguised in Hebrews 8 ,
c) the ‘two covenants’ : it cannot be ‘two stone (-tablets)’ ; it may have been “the eden covenant
    and the covenant of Christ” yet the buildup (-context) so far doesn’t allow that ;
d) phonetically ‘hagar’ could indicate ‘curse’ ;
 
25
[=because] (-then) – the – hagar=curse (‘evil’) (?) – (will have been) is=undone
b
[upon-] (-upon) (the-) mount=people (‘Originals’) of – sinai=God 
b
(that-) in=was (en=esti) – (through-) arabia=Adam ,                                      [‘Arabia’ was also Weird] 
c
[=since] – the – new=Lord – (will) correspond=hold – (the-) jerusalem=sceptre      [“key”, Rev.3] 
d
(which-) the – children=sons of – her=Ishral (‘144’)         +
e
(will have) slavery=declared – (to-) yet=him – [..] ;         
        e #2 :
        (will have) slavery=found – yet=in – (the-) with=scroll (‘no match’) ; 
 
                                                   [next 26 : can be several things :]
 
26                                                                                                                   [a : the Jubilee / Day of Acceptance] 
[=then]      +
the – [..] jerusalem=day (?) (jershlEM=hEMra) of – free=acceptance (euletheros=euarestos)
b
(will have) come to pass ,
c
who=when – mother=God – (will) is=restore – all of – us (-in the Originals) ; 
 
 
                   closing : KJV has 4 lines still — but virtually impossible ,
                   required : 144 and Paul & his people restored in tsiun
                   showing :
                                     1 prophet’s quote (27) – but one irrelevant here
                                     1 scroll quote (30) – but not of prophets , so irrelevant