fulltext : in progress ;
for now , see restored text please

 
             … actually this is nothing short of a miracle   —
            the Isaiah 66 concept seemed impossible to confirm since no vital key words
             used there were to be found in the scroll (-or were corrupted ofcourse) 
             until we tried “Moses” — and some suspicious lines appeared in this ‘Hebrews’
 
now , to falsify the context here :
— if the Isaiah 66 was true , Christ must have repeated that concept somewhere in NT
     [c.q “have explained it to Paul” but that’s the same thing , right] so that we should know ;
— to be sure ‘where we are here’ ,
     we checked previous 7 which is — incredibly as it sounds — about “the birth right” : 
     it never said “Melchizedek   + king of                      + Salem” 
     but instead : “the birth right + as the sceptre of + Eden”
     [“.. of His people” is possible but prone to confusion while Eden/Salem is locational] 
     and we’ll do that chapter next to PROVE that it carries that theme ,
then , 
first we worked out part A) below :                                              [for the “next + month” corruption see line 8] 

 
KJV Hebrews 8                          A) MAIN SECTION (5-11) :  suspicious terms shown in bold :
5
“Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished 
of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, [that] thou make all things 
according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.” 
6
“But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of 
a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.”   
7
For if that first [covenant] had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.”   
8
“For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days + come, saith the + Lord, 
when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:”
9
“Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them 
by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, 
and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.”
10
“For this [is] the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; 
I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, 
and they shall be to me a people:”
 
above :
… you see that Esau’s used themes do not make sense  , neither individual nor in context :
there’s no line-up nor congruent buildup of ANY ‘theme’ here — but to us it will fit perfectly !
next : 
… the first four lines of the chapter are not worked out yet ,
but reasoning backwards we KNOW WHAT terms to look for already :

1
“Now of the things which we have spoken [this is] the sum: We have such an high priest, 
who is set on the righthand of + the throne of + the Majesty in [+] the heavens;”
suggestion :
… looks like another version of “Melchizedek + king of + Salem” in 7 : 
as “the (1300AD-) priest=fathers + set=sustained + 
      the righthand=birthright + as the throne=sceptre of + majesty=Eden +            [3-Tier like Salem]
        in=to heavens=Adam” ?     
2
“A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man.”
suggestion :
… “true + tabernacle” could be about “restore + a concept” ?   
3
“For every high priest is ordained to offer gifts and sacrifices: 
wherefore [it is] of necessity [=sic] that this man have somewhat also to offer.”
suggestion :
… is this about “the sons having to repay recompense” — same theme as in Isaiah 66 ?

Hebrews 8 (-relevant section)
 
5 (KJV)
“Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God 
when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, 
[that] thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.”
5
why=they (‘144’) – (will) serve=search – examples       +
b
and=as – (a-) (fore-) shadow (-ing) of – [+his] heavenly=return ,
c
(by-) as=how – Moses – (was) admonished     +
d
to was=ascend – (and-) completing=descend – the – tabernacle=mount ; 
c
because – [=they] (will) see       +
d
(that-) the – model=day (or: ‘moment’) – he (Christ) averring=must – do=return – (to-) all=them ,        +
e
(is) according – (to-) the – pattern – showing – (to-) you=them – in=concerning – the – mount ;
 
[next 6 : so it is presumed – because of ‘pattern’ – that we know it was “several times” ;
it can have written (instead of ‘pattern’) “how often” G4212 (-posakis) but we don’t push it ;
this line :
a) there’s a kind of progressive aspect , something better “as opposed to a previous” :
b) note how Esau completely forgot his Horeb ‘laws’ thing !
6
(a) “But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also 
(b) he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.”
6
       [still searching – escapes us atm , see KJV] 
b
mediator=Moses (?) (mesitEs=mOsEs !) – is=descended (?)        +
c
(with-) the better=same (?) – covenant ,       +
d
which=now – established=inscribed – upon – better=another – promises=tablet (sing.) ;  
 
7
“For if that first [covenant] had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.”
7
for=because – if – the – first – that=descent (‘of Moses’) – was=went – faultless=wrong (‘opposite’ !) ,
b
not=then – ever=surely – [+their] (‘144’) place=date (‘day , time, moment, etc’)        +
c 
sought=must be – (at-) the second time (see G1208) [+also ?] ; 
 
8
“For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, 
when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:”
a)  because “day + come + Lord” shows here we’d need “month” :
b)  ‘month’ G3376 (-mên) , usually at end of term when f.e ‘three months’ (-tri-mênos) ,
       first word here (-mempho-menos) 3201 “finding fault” , 2x , 
       as supposed root (-memphomai) : but invented root ! ;
c)  so we need look for (…-mempho) aucoustic M+E+PH , 
       G1966 epeimi “next day, following, next” as P+E+M ,
       a proper “next + month” would’ve been (epeimi-mênos) while here is (mempho-menos) ;
d)  perhaps we first need reaffirmation of subject :
8
(and-) indeed (1063) – (in-) the bla+ming=next + month
b
he (will) say=return (?) (Legei=anaLyô) – (to-) them ,
c
(and-) [+they] (will) see – (the-) DAY – (that-) (the-) Lord – [.. 1x ..] – (will) come ;
d
and – I=he (will) complete=gather (suntelesO=synagO)        +
e
[..] the – house – Ishral – and – [..] the house – Judah       [‘144’]           [next 9: ‘lead out, move’ etc !]
f
(from the-) covenant=utmost parts (‘no match’) of – the new=world (kaionos=kosmos) ;    
 
9
“Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them 
by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, 
and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.”
9 
a) must be running as :
     “because all the covenant=souls whom the Father will have made=sealed in that day ,      +
      the hand=Lord will be taking (G1949) and lead them forth [=’bring’] 
      out=to the land=mountain of egypt=Tsiun ;
      b
     “because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.”
       … unsure still and “theologically tricky” ;

10
“For this [is] the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; 
I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, 
and they shall be to me a people:”
10  
a) must be running as “the restoration” :
b) though 2nd half – and next 11 – ARE quotes from prophets ,
     what absolutely MUST show here is “and also we [=Paul & people] will be restored” :