Jer. 35 + 36 [double chapter] :
 the 144 vs the non-144 sons
 + the case of ‘our 9th month’ 
    [related to the eden-moon ,
 birth-sceptre and the Ennead]

           [2023-01jan.03]

 
we tried to phrase the tricky ‘9’ theme as clear as possible :
 
                                                                                           theme
 
           … because we need to know what is it with this ‘9th month’ [of Hag.2 and Zech.7]
           we looked for every “nine” in the scroll : but without luck because no instance is sure — 
           however , a validity of ‘the 9th month’ mentioned here [2x] may show through context ;
           another word used here is ‘winter’ linking to the possible “your flight will be in winter” ;  
          the 144 and non-144 :
           in several prophets two groups are juxtaposed against eachother : those as you and we
           who accept what God really said – as the restored scroll , and a group that is awáre of 
           the restored scroll yet rejects her themes :
           this second group is elsewhere also called “the priests” [=pastors] or “the (other-) sons” ,
           and though the term “non-144” is a bit poor , it is just to indicate this rejecting group ;
          the 9th month and the 144 :
           chapters 35 + 36 are about ‘500 BC’ but they certainly also show ‘a foreshadowing’ :
           here “a group of people that understood God’s words proclaim a fast in the 9th month” 
           while the other group of people have rejécted His words in the same 9th month :
           how much chance we have that it is the same ‘9th month’ theme as in Hag.2 and Zech.7 ?
           could God have added this 35 + 36 knowing Esau would forget to corrupt it [=he did !] .. ?
 
the weird number ‘9’ :
… before anything , we must know whether this number makes any Sense , alltogether ,
because the greatest problem is that she is definitely a non-biblical number ;
immediately raising the question “then why – IF true – is it connected with our departure” ?
origins
… the only thing we found is that a ‘9’ is described by Enoch relating to “moon phases” 
of the eden-binary as her sun and moon ; we must suppose that ‘weird’ numbers as this
are due to the fact that eden ruled the corrupted Behemoth- and Leviathan realm 
[=the ‘inbetween’ region between Heaven in the East and the evil West that came to be]
and therefore had to include some aspects óf that realm — perhaps like that number ‘9’ ;
           supporting this idea is the Spells mentioning their “Ennead” : a group of 9 gods that
           represent matrix-constructs like GEB (the matrix-land) , SHU (their atmosphere) , etc ;
           it *may* be that this created Ennead links to the occupied eden-moon because Thoth
           [‘the king of Mystery-Babylon’ in prophets and a fallen archangel per Enoch]
           has the attribute ‘moon’ in the Spells , as the occupied eden-moon
… actually that’s all we’ve got  —
so we now have “moon (-month)” and “nine” possibly linked ;
yet on top of that , in the SEKER spells (see page) “the birthright” is linked to ‘the Ennead’ 
[even the exact reading remains difficult] , perhaps as the moment they were created :
could that – in some way – relate to us being re-created (“in the ninth month”) ,
when Christ would remove the birth-sceptre FROM the Ennead … ?

 
                                             the buildup of both chapters 35 + 36
 
             … both chapters appéar obvious but that is not quite true : they are layered ,
             hence we need a short overview – also because of the important ‘9th month’ :
 
chapter 35 : 
… this chapter appears misplaced after the previous ones , as some 17 years later in time ;
while her theme and buildup are – at least – ‘unusual’ ;
situation :
… Nebuchadnessar is already underway with his army to Jerusalem ;
though playing in 500 BC , the ‘fall of Jerusalem’ is in prophets often linked to the endtimes ;
Joshiah (Joshua) :
… we must be alert when this root is used – compare ‘Joshua the high priest’ (-as the 144) 
in the Haggai chapter ; here it writes “in the days of … Josiah” which may point to a theme ;
‘the Rekabites’ (-as the 144 group) :
…  it is said that they originate from Moses’ father-in-law but the group is rather obscure
and in first instance it’s not clear from the context why God would invite this foreign group : 
until the connection with ‘Eden’ appeared – see below ; 
their name is unsure (from -rkb ‘riders , to ride’ – horsemen) , and them being Nomads 
could explain their name — but the question is whether “firstborns” [firstborn-right] (-bkr)
could be involved , namely by word-association [and would one name his son ‘the rider’..?] ; 
the spokesman of this group is called Jazaniah from (-azan) “to be attentive, to listen” 
and can indicate the náture of these people ;
that they are , as example , juxtaposed to the people (-as Jacob) reminds of the 144 ;   
hearken – and you shall dwell in the land which I have given to you and to your fathers :  
… as said to all the people in line 15 ,
which is definitely referring to Eden : the context of these lines is “because you did not listen
you will not dwell in Eden , and therefore Nebuchadnessar will attack Judah and Jerusalem” ;
now it also makes more sense why ‘the Rekabites’ were the example : as people that dwelt
to the south-east of the land Ishral , as if having a covenant with ‘the foreign land’ Eden ; 
‘but the sons of Rekab hearkened to their father’ :
… as said in line 18 , 
the link to the 144 is obvious – but the same time the line introduces next chapter 36 :
 
chapter 36 :
(in the days of-) Joshiah :

… it likely wrote “in the first year” instead of “the fourth” – because of next line 2 :
‘write my words on a book-roll’ :
… Jeremiah is asked to start to write down what God will say ; 
we can’t help seeing here a foreshadowing of ‘the restored scroll’ in the endtime  —
in line 3 the house Judah is addressed but read : all the possible candidates of the 144 ,
because it speaks about “forgiving their sin” which is elsewhere about “the definitive 144” 
as the ones represented by the Rekabites in previous chapter 35 ;
yet Baruk writes down the words :
… from (-brk) ‘to bless’ but note again the word-association with (-bkr) and (-rkb) above :
that “Baruk wrote down what Jeremiah dictated him as the words God spoke to Jeremiah” ,
transponded to our days , puts you and we very much in the position of ‘Baruk’ – is it not ? ;
and Baruk reads out loud all the words to [the house-] Judah :
… as said in line 6 ;
it’s unclear why but Jeremiah was “restrained” so Baruk had to do that job – now suppose 
we use “absent” instead , then once again it appears to refer to the endtimes ;
he cannot have spoken “to the people in general” (-as Jacob) since those rejected what
God said in previous chapter already : but the written down scroll is important here ,
read , ‘the restored scroll’ , which will not be read by Jacob but only by both 144-groups !
[line 9:]
‘in the fourth [=third?] year , in the ninth month’ :
                                                             <<<
… now it gets tricky – and we need to know what the text has said :
according to the pattern so far : the (restored-) scroll HAS been proclaimed by now 
(per the lines above) , and now “is called for a fast” – but it is unclear ‘by whom’ :
KJV has ” they proclaimed a fast before the LORD to all the people in Jerusalem, 
and to all the people that came from the cities of Judah unto Jerusalem.” ,
but it can have been :
“a fast before IEUE was proclaimed by the righteous (irshlm=tsdq) people” , namely as
the group of people having hearkened the words that had been read in front of them ,
and also óther people would come from the cities of Judah IN Jerusalem” — no ?
in óur situation , 
the ‘fast’ COULD refer to “preparing for the 9th month (-after the 3 years)” ,
not directly as a feast that God had ordained but more as “a date seeming proper to thém” ;
while “the other people” in the line could be those of the 144 we cannot know   —
                                                              part II
                                          the group rejecting the scroll
[line 10:]

… we think that it must refer báck to the time “when Baruk proclaimed the words”
and should read : “but when Baruk had read out loud the book of the words of Jeremiah 
in the house of the LORD” [..deleted 12x – not important..] “in the ears of all the people” ;
the addition (-in interlinear) “in the higher court in the new gate” works confusing , see next :
[line 11 + 12:]
…”and when Micaiah (etc) had heard the words” , “then he went down to the king’s house” ;
so there is no new situation here
but Micaiah had heard Baruk’s words before the fast had been proclaimed ;
it is important insofar this group will represent the non-144 that will reject the words   
and they do that befóre “the 9th month of the fourth [=third] year” ;     
[line 22:] the winter :
… is only important as likely confirming ‘the 9th month’ , because the whole scene
of ‘the scroll consumed in the hearth that burned because it was winter’ sounds solid ;
it can have written “sat in the winter house in this (-same) ninth month” referring to line 9 ;
[till end:] the judgment :
… the king and his servants (‘the princes’) will share the same fate as the people because
they have rejected the words and did not hearken ;
 
… what do you think — do the above chapters make a case for ‘our’ ninth month .. ?