original Mirror (‘crossreading’) of this page : see posted Luke 16 page

 
 
content of this page :
part I   :
                 background theme for this chapter  —
                 intro : the two Covenants
                 intro : the close link between “the tablet of the Covenant” and “the heavenly tablet”
                 intro : why NO “Cana wedding”
part II  :
                 complete fulltext (click) : the history and future of Eden
part III :
                  full restored text w/ many notes
 

 
the main theme in this chapter :
 

               above :
               Esau concealed God’s covenant by making it an event “where the law was given” 
               because Esau had to erase the notion of “restored Eden (-in the other Reality)” ;
               leaving Christians only the notion of “Christ’s covenant restored the soul to God” —
               and though that is certainly true , His covenant was not separate from God’s ;
               likewise ,
               God’s covenant comes into effect when the scroll is restored since THE major
               theme in all the prophets is “the restoration of the Eden paradise” :               
               the interlinking of these three in the text of  this John 1+2 we marked [A] , [B] and [C]
 
               considered us ,
               the (5th-) “feast of Trumpets” is “the appointed time” in prophets as the beginning  of
               the restoration of the scroll of prophets , 
               and because  God’s covenant comes into effect through the restored scroll , 
               our Date should immediately return to (the date of-) mt. Horeb , which is Unleavened ;
               considered ‘the 70th week’ :
               the ’70th week’ starts with “understanding the scroll” – so , some 3,5 years ago – and  
               the Daniel line must read “… in the middle of the week the sacrifice as the gift will stop” ,
               meaning “the covenant of Christ will cease” (-after 2000 years) 
               since the phrase “the sacrifice AS the gift” refers in prophets to what He did     —
               because at this time God’s covenant will come into effect , eventhough , ofcourse , 
               by the covenant of Christ all the millions of Jacob-souls will still be saved ;
               therefore ,
               at this moment we are “halfway the 70th week”  
               (also meaning that there will be no ‘7 years’ of ‘tribulation’ — but 3,5) ;

the (Eden-) Anzu bird trying to recover the Tablet they stole   breastplate of the High-priest

covenant and birth-sceptre   the “two tablets of Moses” = “the tablet of the Covenant” links to the “heavenly tablet” as “the (birth-) sceptre of Eden” : a) because of the above we can be SURE that it never wrote ‘the two tablets of the Law’ and probably there was just ‘one’ ; the reason  that it was “a stone (-tablet)” can only be because it had to link to the “heavenly tablet” : b) Enoch is shown “a heavenly tablet” containing all the people that will exist , into the far future – as a kind of ‘family-tree’ , so that this tablet is the sceptre of the Originals (Eden-people) ; c) the phrase “sceptre of Eden” is used in prophets where  ‘sceptre’ (-shbt) links to the root “tribes” (-shbt) – as in ’12’ ; d) Adam took this sceptre with him when he left Eden , but Christ will retrieve it when he comes to get us (so it is no ‘key on his shoulder’ but “the sceptre” , in Isaiah) ; e) becáuse it is a genealogical Attribute  of our Originals , this attribute is the “birth right” theme : and though Jacob had won back this attribute by Legal law , the retrieval will only come into effect when this theme is understood in prophets  (since the literal Sceptre is “(an object-) in the other Reality”) , because only then all of Eden will be restored ; f) the ‘heavenly tablet’ was represented by ‘the breast-plate’ (of 12 tribe stones !) of the High-priest of the old Tabernacle ; g) and , finally , the heavenly tablet may be “the book of Life”  because of the same genealogical aspect ; h)  other sources : in Sumerian lore the ME , “the tablet of destiny” was taken by the hero from Tiamat (‘Eden’) where the attribute was carried around the neck (see f !) of ‘Kingu’ — who either represented Adam or “our Originals , in general” for kingu means “tiller” ; i) in Egyptian Spells this sceptre also belonged to Eden (and we hunted what we could find – see index) where she was rebranded as A-MES “the sceptre / of birth / for vulture-rule” , where the -S in MES “birth” itself is “the real-adam-soul” , we ,  reading “the sceptre / of the real adam-soul / for the matrix” ;          also the aspect as “stone (-tablet)” shows in Spells in the          form of MES-KHENT , “tablet of destiny” (sic) ,           “the stone / (matrix-) existence / (by) the KH-house / to birth” ,    (we still need to make a separate theme page about this)

 
                John 2 :
                … it was inevitable that also “the wedding at Cana” had to go  —
                again , we immediately trust that He could  ‘have changed water into wine’ 
                but this story is yet another “plausible deniability” of Esau
 
– highly suspicious are the “six (or ‘two’) + stone + water pots” as a Bizarre detail 
    but not when compared with “two + stone + tablets” ;
– also ,
    a timeframe as “the third ……” immediately in line 1 is suspicious
    since over and over again we have seen the important “3d year” ,
– but
    because this ‘3d’ shows right at the start , it means that this section is “a second half” ,
    and the only possible theme is “the history of our Originals” ,
    where the first dozen lines of John 1 shows “a narrative of a history” ,
    implying that these sections have been cut & pasted by Esau ;
– and finally :
    the entire context of the first couple of chapters of John contain major themes
    and therefore it is justified to restore  also this ‘wedding’ section together with John 1  —
    eventhough it is not a nice job to (have to-) delete long-held convictions … right 
 
                John 1 :
                … the corrupted John 2 required a previous discourse — as a section of this John 1 ;
                part of John 1 was indeed “the original start of the book John” , as lines 19-42
                (which are therefore left out of the restoration , accordingly) ;
                method of restoring : working back towards what must have been the start
                namely “Adam having witnessed the murder of Cain” —
                because now the entire theme (-about our Originals) makes a congruent whole ;

 
corruptions : beyond Total
theme : context 100% restored
fulltext : below

 
John 1 (-but not the intro 19-42) + 2 (-section)

                                                       
                                                                fulltext closely follows the narrative in prophets 
 
fulltext :                                    [Christ continues his discourse to his disciples :] 
1
then Jesus says to them :                                        
b
after Adam had sinned , Cain slew his brother ,
and the killing was seen by Adam ,          +                      
2
and he understood how to become like a god ;
3
because he would rule his own people by doing the same to thém ,                                                           [slaying them] 
so that only he would rule ,       +
4
since only in him would have remained (eden-) life ;                                                                                              [large theme] 
b
and he went forth to the (matrix-) land of     +                                                                                              [‘Mystery-Babylon’] 
the nations of spirits ;                                                                                                                                    [or : ‘demons’? , see also 7] 
5
now , the Sin had effected the sacred ones (‘Originals’) also ,
b
so that their soul had become afraid of God ;                                                                       [but read : ‘our soul (-in them)’] 
6
therefore they left Eden and went forth to the North ,                                                                     [‘to Mystery-Babylon’] 
to ask for his (‘Adams’) help ;  
7
but when they (‘Originals’) had come to Adam , he betrayed them ,         +
b
and gave them to the nations of spirits (?)         +
as their enemies (?) ;                                                                                                                                  [possible addition , see next] 
8
and the nations tortured them ,                                                                                                        [‘M-Babylon drunk of blood’] 
b
to the extent that the soul went forth out from her sacred one (‘Original’) ; 
9
then Adam designed the mortal body ,
which imprisons every soul having come unto the world ;                                            [or : ‘that is born in the world’] 
10
because by being in the flesh ,        +
upon a world also devised by him (‘Adam’) ,
b
the soul would not be aware of God ;         +
11
so that she would forgét Eden and never search back her own land ;
12                                                                                                                                                                                                                [part I b :] 
but through the sacrifice by me ,        +
I will create the Legal right                 +                                                                                                                             [lit. ‘authority’] 
in order for the sons of Ishral to come into existence ,                                                                                                [‘the 144’] 
b
as the ones that will be raised up in the days of the end ;       +
13
who will not die ,
but instead , their soul will die to their flesh ,
b
so that she (‘soul’) will spot (‘see’) the words of God ,        +
14
because his words have been changed  , as the corrupted scroll ;     
b
but they will restore his scroll as the words which the Father has spoken ,
and they will see the great promise (-in her) ;
15
because the sons (‘144’) will be restored by Him in his sacred people (‘Originals’)      +
b
who are the vessel for their soul as it was in the beginning for her ;                                                            [see line 1-5] 
c
and they will be the first ones (or: ‘firstfruits’) of      +                                                                                               [cont. line :] 
16
out of the ones that will be restored by Him ,
because all  will receive their glorious body ;                                                                              [God’s (Eden-) covenant :] 
17
because this is what the covenant given to Moses is about :                                                      [see Jn.2 below]   [# A]
b
the condition for réalizing it        +
becomes through the (covenant of the-) Son of man ;     +                                                                                                    [# B]             
18
and the covenant (-of God) will come into effect         +                                                                                                           [# C]
when the sons of Ishral (‘144’)        +
will have understood the scroll of the Father which has been sealed (sic) ;                                                     [goto 43]
19-42
           [original intro of John 1 — skipped]
43
because in the olden time ,        +                                                                                                                                             [2-300 BC] 
Adam wanted to escape the judgment of God (-over him) ,
and he counseled Esau , and said to him :
cooperate with me ;
44
now , Esau hates Jacob ,                                                                                                                                      [all to-be-saved souls]  
and (hates-) God for loving his people ;
45
therefore Esau (de facto-) corrupted the scroll ,
saying to himself :
we will conceal what is written about the covenant (-of God) in the prophets ,                
b
so that Jacob will perish                                                                                                                           [‘by not returning to eden’] 
because the sons of Ishral (‘144’) will nót come into being ;
46-50
           [utterly corrupt — skipped] 
51
and he (‘Christ’) says to them (‘disciples’) :
but surely they (‘144’) will understand the prophets ,
and thereupon I will open the sealed scroll ;                                                                                                               [Revelation] 
d
and the sons of Ishral will wait eagerly for the return of the Son of man ;                                                       [John 2 :] 
1
but in the third year ,
when the sons of Ishral will háve understood (or: ‘restored’) the scroll ,
they will wait for the return of the Lord ,         +
3
for they will think  that they will have found all the themes in the scroll ,
b
but they will not have their birth right (-still) ;
4
and the sons will say to themselves :
b
whý does our Lord not come for us and our brothers ? ;                                                                              [‘complete 144’] 
5
there must be a theme in the scroll which we have nót understood ,                                                            [‘Dec.2022’] 
therefore we must search him (‘scroll’) again ;
6
then they will discover the birth right as the heavenly (?) stone (-tablet) of      +                                      [see Enoch] 
the sacred people Ishral (‘Originals’) ,         +                                                                                                                   [or: ‘of God’] 
b
which was represented by the two (stone-) tablets of moses ;                                                    [or : ‘of the covenant‘] 
7
and Jesus says to them :
when the sons will have found the birth right ,          +
and will have declared it unto me (or: ‘the Father’ ?) , 

John 1 (-but not the intro 19-42) + 2 (-section)

 
important :   KJV line 1 until at least  11 was incomprehensible anyway , already 
 
things to consider before starting line 1 :
– it is NOT ‘the start of the book John’ , because that is (probably-) line 19 here ;
– so that this first section 1-18
    was part of a discourse of Christ with his disciples – but was moved by Esau ;
    what we need :
– this section is obviously ‘narrating a history’ 
     and by context , we need a timeframe that started in Eden :  
     but the question is ‘where exactly’ ?
– if we go with “in the beginning God created the garden of eden” we may lose precious space
     in the sense that we have but a certain number of lines to reconstruct ‘a’ story ; while if we
     start with “after Adam had sinned” everyone immediately understands at what point we are ;
 
first palpable line :
– the first 5 are impossible : only in 6 is “someone either being sent , coming or going” ,
     and it may be about “Adam leaving to the north (-of eden)” , [=or : ‘the Originals’ ?]  ,
     meaning we’ve to try trace back what could have said the first five :
 
note : line 8 :
– KJV’s “… bear witness (-of that light)” derives from ‘to torture’ :
     Greek root (-martus) is closely linked to “martyrdom” which is torture-related ,
     but English chose to use the unrelated “torture” which however in Dutch is still “martelen” ;
     to hide that connection , Esau invented another root ‘torture’ as (-tympanizô) 5178 1x (!) ;
     but note how he swapped the dangerous phrase , in 8 ,
     yet the buildup DEMANDS that the phrase ‘torture’ was used inthere ; 
 
note áfter restoration :
… 1-5 were absolutely the most difficult , having restored them backwards from context  —
as indeed the theme described so in prophets ; do note the many similar roots ; 
 
1-2
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
“The same was in the beginning with God.”
1
[+then – Jesus – says – (to-) them (‘disciples’) :]                                                                      [‘continued discourse’] 
1
[..] beginning=after – [..] word=Adam – (had) was=sinned ,
b
[..] god=Cain – (had) was=slain (eimi=anaireô) – [..] [+his] word=brother (logos=adelphos !)
c
and – the – word=killing – (was) was=seen- (by-) Adam ,          +                                                         [2 : see note] 
2
[.. 1x ..] – [+he] was=understood – in=how – to beginning=become – with=like – (a-) – god ;
note :
… because it links to ‘killing’ it can not say “be like God” , ofcourse ,
this difference may be the result of the text-restoration
since any “be like God” could only relate to “rule An Sich” ;
 
3-4
“All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.”
“In him was life; and the life was the light of men.”
3
all=because – [+he] (would) became=rule (egeneto=archô) – his (-own) – through=people
b
and=by – became=doing – (the-) same (interl.) – (to-) apart=thém ,                                               [slaying them] 
c
not=so that – one=only (heis=monos) – that=he – (would) become=rule (as in 3a !) ,       +
4
(since-) (-only) in – him – (would have) was=remained – (eden-) life ;                                     [< large theme !] 
4
b
[w/ swapped 1x :] 
and – [+he] was=went forth – (to the-) (matrix-) life=land (zóé=gê) of       +                      [‘Mystery-Babylon’] 
c
the – light=nations (phós=ethnos ; see 7 below) of – [..] humans=spirits (or : ‘demons’? , see 7) ;  

 
                                                                      the Originals
 
[next 5 : some causal effect of light upon darkness :] 
5
“And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.”
5
[=now] ,the – light=Sin (?) – (had) appearing=effected (?) (phainó=energeia)       +
b
the – darkness=sacred ones (‘Originals’) (skotos=hagios) – in=also (?) ,
c
and=so that – [..] it=their – darkness=soul (skotos=psuché)        +                                           [but read : ‘our soul’] 
d
(had become) comprehended=afraid (katalambanó=eulabeomai !) – (of-) not=God (ou=theos) ;
note :
.. syntax as “that – the – soul – them – [for] [the] God – was afraid” ; 
 
6
“There was a man sent from God, whose name [was] John.”
6
(therefore-) [+they] became=left – human=Eden
b
(and-) sent=went forth (!) – beside=to – (the-) god=North (theos=borras) ,                    [‘Mystery-Babylon’] 
c
to john=ask (-for) (ióa-nnés=ai-teô) – his (‘Adams’) – name=help (onoma=boêtheia) ; 
 
7
(but-) – this=when – [+they] (‘Originals’) (had) come to witness=Adam (MArturian-adAM) , 
b
he testify=betrayed (martureó=paradidômi) – about=them
c
(and-) believe=gave – all=them – (to-) the – light=nations (phótos=ethnos) (see 8a)       +
d
[an addition as clarification ? :] 
(of) that=spirits (?)
e
[further addition as clarification ? :] 
(as-) him=their – through=enemies (?) (dia=echthros) ; 
 
8
“He was not that Light, but [was sent] to bear witness of that Light.”
8
and – the – light=nations – was=tortured – that=them ,                                        [‘M-Babylon drunk of blood’] 
b
[there is almost no room left for the “in order to make bodies for them [=nations]” :] 
–
(to the extent that-) [..] – the – light=soul (phótos=psuché)                                                               [8 : as in prophets] 
c
bear witness=went forth – but=out (from-) – [+her]  that=sacred one (‘Original’) (hina=hagios) ;
note :
… when syntax was “from – sacred one – her – she went forth – the – soul’ ;
 
9
“[That] was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.”
9
the=then – light=Adam – was=designed – (the-) true=mortal (alé-thinos=thnêtos !) – to=body (to=sôma)
b
which – enlightens=imprisons (phótizó=phylakizô !) – every – human=soul
c
(having) come (sic) – unto – the – world ;                                                                   [or : ‘that is born in the world’] 
 
10
“He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.”
10
(because by-) was=being – in – the – world=flesh                                                                       [10 : as in prophets] 
b
and=upon – (a-) – world – (also-) was=devised – by – him (‘Adam’) ,
c
[..] the – world=soul (kosmos=psuché) – (would) – not – (be) aware of – him=God (auton=theos) ;
 
11
into=so that – he=she (would) came=forgét (-about) – [..] own=Eden (idia=eden ; why not ?)
b
and – never (‘not’) – received=search (-back) – [..] his=her – (own-) own=land ;
note :
… b) can be “never search (-back)” or “never return” etc , 
but (-paralambanó) [parelabon] looks more like (-arounaô) ‘search’ (ar-a-no)
as it does to (-analyô) ‘to return’ ; besides , the “to return” is more usually said as “to God” ;
 
                                                             part I b
 
            … according to (the storyline in-) prophets , now Christ is introduced
             as the one volunteering (sic) to go to earth to make the sacrifice   —
             so what did it say here : ‘sons of God’ , ‘sons of Ishral’ (both 144) or ‘Son of man’ ? ;
             the question is “must the narrative of Christ coming to earth” be told
             or would He just have started direct from the 1st-person ? :
 
12
[=but] – as many=through – (the-) received=sacrifice (?) – (by-) him=me
b
he=I (will) gives=create – them=the – Legal right (‘authority’)
c
(in order for-) (the-) children=sons of – god=Ishral (‘144’) – to come into existence ,
d
(as-) the – ones (that will be-) believe=raised up      +
e
in – the – name=days (onoma=hêmera) of – (the-) him=end (autos=eschatos) ;       +

 
[next 13 : extremely difficult — what was this line about ? theme is still ‘the 144’ ;
a) the working theme could be “die + to flesh” , but then “the corrupt scroll” needs to appear ;
b) because previously it said “through my sacrifice” 
     the idea here must be ‘that the 144 will NOT die’ :] 
13
who – (will) not – [..] blood=die (haima-ton=thnêskô)
b
nor=but – out=instead ,
c
[+their] man=soul (andros=psuché) – (will) will=die (theléma=thnêskô)        +
d
will=to – nor=their – flesh [..] ,
e
but=so that – [+she] (‘soul’) (will) begotten=spot (‘see’) – (the-) out=words of – God ,        +
 
14
“And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, 
the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.”
14
and=because – [..] [+his] words – (have) been – flesh=changed (sarx=alassô)
b
and=as – (the-) booths=corrupted (skénó=aphanizô) – [..]  us=scroll (hem-in=bibli-on) ;                        [lineup] 
c
and=but – we=they (‘144’) (will) gaze=restore – his – glory=scroll (dox-an=bibli-on)        +
d
as – (the-) glory=words – (which-) beside=the – Father – (has) begotten=spoken ,
e
[unclear ; attempt :] 
(and-) [+they] (will) full=see (?) – [+the] [..] true=great – grace=promise (?) (-in her) ;
note :
… you see that the start of the subline in KJV , between (…) , was the end of previous line 14 ;
 
15 
“John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, 
He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me.”
15
(because-) (the-) john=sons (‘144’) – (will be) witness=restored – [=by] – Him
b
and=in – [+his] say=sacred (legon=hagios) – cried=people (‘Originals’)
c
[lineup 2x :] 
who – was=are – this=the – said=vessel – [..] (for-) me=their – after=soul (opisó=psuché)
d
(as-) it was – (in the-) coming=beginning (erchomai=arché) – before=for – me=her ;                [see line 1-5] 
e
that=and – he=they (will) be – (the-) before=first ones (or: ‘firstfruits’ prótos=aparchê) of [..]       +
note :
… Esau copied second half of line from 30 b – just being lazy ;
 
16
[..] out of – the (-ones) – (that will be) fullness=restored – (by-) Him (as in 15a) ,
b
we=because – all – (will) receive – [..] grace=their – grace=glorious – instead=body (anti=sôma) ;
note :
… last word in e) is “of-grace” showing it was “of-them” , (charitos=autous) ; 
 
17
“For the law was given by Moses, [but] grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.”
17
because [+this is] (what-) the – law=covenant – given – to – Moses (-is about) ,    [see part II]              [# A]
b
and – the – grace=condition – the=for – truth=realizing (-it)         +                                                                            [# B]
c
becomes – through – (the-) jesus=Son of – christ=man ;     +                                 [because Christ speaks here]
note :
… question is ‘how was a) phrased exactly’ , but mt. Horeb was intended
since this theme will return in the alleged “wedding story” of John 2 — see second half of this page ;
ultimately the covenant stárted already “with the promise to Abraham”
but that is too complicated to fit in here now ;
 
18
no=and – (the-) god=covenant (-of God) – (will) seen=become to be (‘come into effect’)     +                  [# C]
b
[w/ swapped 1x :] 
[=when] – the – sons of – begotten=Ishral (‘144’) – (will) the=have (ho=echô)
c
being=understood – the – bosom=scroll (kolpon=biblion) of – the – Father
d
[=which] – (had been) known=sealed (exégeomia=sphragizô) ;      [<< likely]                                              [goto 43]
 
               not used :
                19 :
               “And this is the record of John, 
               when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou?”  
              [probably the original opening-line of the book John] 
               20-42 :
               more or less a probable – though messy – introduction of John (-and Christ) in this book John ,
43-45 :
but the suspicion is in line 45 : “Moses + law [=covenant] + prophets” , which is our theme ;
– so that “Philip” is probably corrupt ,
– as is the entire story : clearly invented by Esau’s brain :
 
[next 43 : referring to start of this chapter :] 
43
“The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me.”
43
[+because] – (in-) the (!) – next day=olden time
b
[..] jesus=Adam – wanted – to go forth=escape – (the-) galilee=judgment of – into=God (eis=theos) ,
c
and – he found=counseled – Philip=Esau , and – said – (to-) him :
d
follow=cooperate – (with-) me ;
 
44
“Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.”
44
[=now] , [..] philip=Esau – was=hates – [..] bethsaida=Jacob (the ‘b’) [all to-be-saved souls] ,
b
out=and (?) – [..] city=God (polis=theos) – (for-) andrew=loving – [+his] peter=people ;
                                                                                    (andreou=agapê)        (petros=anthropos)
45
“Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, 
and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.”
45
[+therefore] philip=Esau – find=corrupted – the – nathaniel=scroll (nathan-aél=biblion)
b
[..] saying – (to-) himself :
c
[w/ swapped :] 
[+we] (will) moses=conceal – whom=what – (is) written        +
d
in=about – the – law=covenant (-of God) – and=in – the – prophets ,                     [‘the restoration of eden’] 
e
[tricky :] 
             [+so that] jesus=Jacob – (will) found=perish                                                        [‘by not returning to eden’] 
             f
             [+because] the – sons of – joseph=Ishral (‘144’) – (will) from=nót – nazareth=come into being ;
 
             next 46-50 : impossible :
             can be anything — or one big nothing burger ;
             the lines are so silly that Esau must have invented them as deflection ,
             though it’s possible that the “and the scroll will be given to the learned ones” showed here :
 
51
“And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, 
and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man.”
51
and – he (‘Christ’) says – (to-) them (‘disciples’) :
b
verily=but – surely – I=they (‘144’) (will) say=understand – (the-) you=prophets (?) (per 45d?) ,
c
(and-) thereupon – you=I (will) see=open – (the-) open=sealed – heaven=scroll ;                                       [sic] 
d
and – the – angels=sons (aggelos=yhios) of – [..] god=Ishral           +
e
(will) ascend=wait eagerly – and=for – (the-) descend=return of – the – Son of – [..] man ; 
 
                             [direct continued in the below John 2 , fitting perfectly :] 

 
required : the history of the originals , John 1 1-(about-)18

john 2

 
[1 : continued ! :] 
1
“And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there:”
1
[=but] – (in-) the – third – day=year ,
b
(when-) the – cana=sons of – [..] galilee=Ishral (‘144’) (‘name=name’)
c
(will have) was=understood (or: ‘restored’) – (the-) wedding=scroll (gamos=biblion) ,
d
and – [+they] (will) was=wait – (for-) the – mother=return of – the – jesus=Lord [.. 1x ..] ; 
note :
a) ‘marriage + cana’ is a 2-Tier and so is ‘mother + Jesus’ ;
 
[2 : likely added as excuse line :] 
2
“And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage.”
 
[KJV line colour : “something is lacking” :] 
3
“And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine.”
3
[=for] – [+they] (will) want=think – wine=that – [+they] (will have) say=found
b
(all-) the – mother=themes (mater=pragma) – (in-) the – jesus=scroll ,
c
[w/ swapped 1x :] 
unto=but – (will) not – have – him=their – wine=birth right (oinos=prôtotokia) ;
 
4
“Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come.”
4
[+and] the – jesus=sons – (will) say – (to-) her=themselves :
b
what=why – (does) me=our – [..] hour=Lord – not – come        +
c
(for-) me=us – and – [..] [+our] woman=brothers (?) ;                                                                                             [‘144’] 
 
5
“His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do [it].”  
(there-) say=must (be) – (a-) – mother=theme (3b) – (in-) the – servants=scroll (diakon-os=biblion)
b
which – [+we] (have) – any=not [..] ever=understood ,                                                    [or ‘seen’ or other similar] 
c
(so-) he=we say=must (as in a) – do=search – you=him (‘scroll’) (-again) ;
 
[colour of line : “a subject appears” ; suspicious : ‘stone’ and ‘two’ :] 
6
“And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, 
containing two or three firkins apiece.”
6
[=then] – there=they – (will) were=discover          +                                                                [or ‘will be shown to them’] 
b
(the-) waterpot=birth right – set=as – (the-) six=heavenly (?) – stone (-tablet) of      +                 [see Enoch] 
c
(the-)  purifying=sacred (sic) – manner=people – [..] jews=Ishral (sic) (‘Originals’) (or: ‘of God’) ,
d
[+which] (was) spacing=represented         +                                                                           [e: or ‘of the covenant’ ?] 
e
apiece=by – (the-) two – (stone-) measures=tablets of – or=the – three=moses (treis=môyses) ;
 
[colour of line : “an action (-upon the subject)” :] 
7
(and-) [..] Jesus – says – (to-) them :
b
(when-) – (the-) water=sons – (will have) filled=found – (the-) water pots=birth right
b
and (will have) filled=declared – him=it (‘her’) – till=unto – up=me (or: ‘the Father’ ?) ,       +
 
[theme returns to line 4 :] 
8
[=then] – [.. 1x ..] – [=I] (will) draw=come – (to-) them – now=quickly (sic) ,
b
and – bring – the=them              ………….