very readable and uplifting – enjoy !

 
note : 
the entire original theme was cut up by Esau into three sections , first as
– Lk.6 , this page , “Christ shows that Weeks is our date”, then                       [see ‘theme intro’ next] 
– Lk.4 , this page , as “the alleged 40 day temptation” , and finally as            [as part B below intro]
– Lk.13 , see other page , about “the 7th and 49th year” ;
or go directly to restored text (here)
 

 
                                                                                             theme
 
        …  and the miracles just keep on coming   —
        after the rather solid 1 Cor.16 and Luke 15 there wasn’t much hope to find another
        chapter confirming this double-Pentecost theme , when this one showed as perhaps
        important because she appears in three gospels [Mt.12 , Mk.2 continued in 3 , this 
        Lk.6 and in cut-up sections also in Jn.5 and 7]  ,
        where the first clue is that the Greek ‘sabbath (-day)’ also means ‘a week’ ,
        and the next one “that the Pharisees are involved and even get fúrious” where we 
        saw in every case that ‘Pharisees’ = ‘an endtime theme’ —
        but what was the “He and his disciples gleaning ears of grain” about here ?
 
        the key is in Leviticus 23 where ‘all the feasts are listed’ , and under Weeks :
        “When you reap the harvest of your land, do not reap all the way to the edges of your 
        field or gather the gleanings of your harvest. Leave them for the poor” , in line 22 ,  
        leaving but one conclusion : He did that to show US what would be the theme here !
 
        reaping + gleaning : a type double-harvest :
        … the analogy here is good enough — from the same field first the grain is harvested
        leaving the stalks standing at the edges for to be gleaned as ‘second harvest’ ,
        where the field is “the feast” , the harvest “our brothers the first christians” and after
        that a round of gleaning follows ;
        that in Lev. 23 at the day of Pentecost also “a heave-offering must exist of two loaves”
        should represent the same ‘double-aspect’ , but since those type phrasings can very
        easily have been corrupted by Esau , the ‘gleaning’ example is the strongest 
                      [sub : before we forget  —
                       the main theme of the alleged “book Ruth” must have been the feast of Weeks ,
                       since the explanation of ‘the gleaning’ subject is lacking there — or it may have
                       followed ‘the Jubilee theme’ in Lev.25 — because at this moment it is 90% sure
                       that also ‘Ruth’ was penned down by Esau , we look at it next week] 
 
       declaring (-the scroll) at Unleavened — accepting (-it) at Weeks :
       .. even at May 1st just ago , at Unleavened , this was not quite clear to us still , 
       having assumed “that the acceptance would be the direct answer to the declaring” 
       instead of “the acceptance only coming to pass a full 40 days later”   —
       however , if we maintain that starting at Passover seven weeks were ordained as a 
       kind of Total Time (-until the end) where Christ ascended at the end of the first one ,
       while the first confirmation (acceptance) by God was given to the first christians who 
       factually have been our caretakers , followed by the second confirmation – now – 
       concerning the restoration of the Scroll and therewith “ending the Total Time” :
       so that ‘the 50th day’ as Pentecost now turns into ‘the 50th year as the Jubilee’ ,
       as “the day of acceptance to IEUE” , namely ‘the scroll’ , and freeing the prisoners  –
       is that phrased correctly please ?
 

                                                                     this chapter (lines 1-11)
 
       … interestingly the restored text indicates that this was the first half of Luke 15 
       since this chapter starts with an introducing theme (-compare ‘the temple’ in Mt.24)
       and after the spat with the Pharisees here , in the Luke 15 section Christ explains 
       the background of what was said here ,
       and especially the reason why they themselves cannot be taken up yet (-see page) :  
 
       part I
       (line 1)    right away a Red flag : why say “the sabbath (-day) + the second-first” ?
       (line 2)    the “on this specific day” ,
                          that is why Esau had to cover up line 1 ,
       (line 3)    the “when the sons of Ishral will search for the day that I gather them” :
                          remember Christ was incredibly straighforward to them 
                          (and we had to learn to very boldly restore what he said !) ,
                           turning all three lines into a solid section now ;
       (line 4)    retelling the Lev.23 verse ,
                           important is the addition “why” , also as intro to next ,
       (line 5)    the clue : ‘for they will understand that I get them at Weeks’ ;
                          after this line Esau went haywire   —                                                                     [1-5a : probability : 99%]  
                           the Mt.12 text has two extra lines 7-8 ,
                           and in order to properly close the juxta between “the first harvest”
                           (the disciples & first christians) and “the still standing stalks” (144)
                           a possible intended line can have been – as attempt :
                           “since their brothers had been the harvest of the field in the former time ,
                           having received the comforter (Spirit) from the Father in that day ;”
       (line 5-b)
                            as ‘and they will rejoice when they see me standing upon the clouds’ ;
 
       part II 
       [utterly corrupted] 
       … this section must have been the proper continuation , first because it shows
       next in three gospels but also because of the term “another (sabbath)” here ;
       we have only 5 lines untill the Pharisees get furious – therefore Christ can
       not have turned back to the upcoming Pentecost but our one at the end of time ,
       and “after the return on the clouds , now it must have said that we slay them” 
       conform the closing in many prophets chapters ;
       though the buildup is rather solid question is how things were phrased exactly ,
       and we chose for “the sons of Ammon” [-even the disciples may not have 
       understood that properly]  because now the scene is “the other Reality”   —
       you judge please how the section succeeded
 
                                                                     intro part B : Luke 4
 
            continued : the alleged ’40 day temptation’ >> as ‘Adam placing the false fire
 
       … Luke 4 was the original mid-section of this theme but mutilated by Esau and spun out
       into a very lengthy 28 (!) lines — where we need a maximum of 10-15 or so ;
       a number of key phrases and concepts show as the Red flag here :
       – the “40” (line 2) which is our time frame from Unleavened unto Weeks ,
       – the “Satan” which can only be ‘Adam’ (-since he was THE adversary of Christ !) ,
       – the terms “sanctuary” and “casting (-out)” in the alleged second temptation , 
       – the Isaiah “day of acceptance” (in 17-19) ,
       – and very likely “the 3 years” (in 25) which can only be our “third year theme” ;
 
       giving us the following buildup of all three sections in sequence :
       – Christ showing ‘Weeks’ through gleaning ,                                                                                                 [this Luke 6 :] 
       – to have you & we remember Leviticus 25 ,
       – because then I will appear upon the clouds
       – and my Father will restore them (-as his army)                                            [we’re in the other Reality now !] 
       – to slay you and your fathers that corrupted the scroll
       – Pharisees storm away in fury 
 
       – [unknown intro still — some explanation]                                                                                                            [Luke 4 :] 
 
       – Adam places the false fire in ‘the sanctuary’ of God                                                 [still in the other Reality !] 
       – expected :
           our Originals are freed ?
       – because of ‘the day of acceptance’ – the Isaiah quote                                            [2nd half of original page :] 
 
       – and all this will happen 
           when the sons will (?) restore the scroll during 3 years (?) (‘the Elias section’)
           [perhaps invented / moved : cannot conflict with Lk.13 see next :] 
 
       – how the 1200 BC fathers offered strange fire                                                                                                [Luke 13 :] 
       – but how the sons will have restored the scroll in the 3d year (line 7)
       – the tricky “.. but in the néxt year…” (?) 
       – explanation of ‘the 7th and 49th year’ 
       – closing : the tricky “… and they will know that they still have to wait 40 days…” 
 
       now please  —
       the overall buildup is sublime here , PROVING that these sections followed like this ,
       just “whether the 40 days was in the same year — and eventually this one” was not 100% ,
       hence searching for prophet chapters (-see pinned log) ; 
 
       concerning the ’40 days temptation’ text itsélf :
       … will be very hard to restore   —
       most likely the three (alleged-) temptations were swapped : “Adam and his fire” seems first ,
       and ofcourse there never was any “change + stones + into bread” since THE operative verb
       here is “to change” which can only be “the words of the scroll (-after doing that” , right ;
       leaving us with the unclear “.. showed Him all the kingdoms” which can be anything
 
       after the ‘change the scroll’ we indeed could restore a bridge unto the Isaiah quote ,
       yet the entire section would remain cripple — therefore best to keep the overview only for now
 
remark :
… we keep being fascinated about just how straightforward He was ,
hoping we got all the colours right this one is for you Sir
 
corruptions : impossible
theme : context part I & II 100% restored , syntax of part I >95% 
fulltext :

 

Luke 6 (1-11)  

1
“And it came to pass on the second sabbath after the first, that he went through the corn fields; 
and his disciples plucked the ears of corn, and did eat, rubbing [them]  in [their]  hands.”
1
[=then]  – in=the – sabbath (-day) of       +
b
(the-) second=feast (deutero=heorté) of first=Weeks (prôtos=sabbatos) – came to pass ,
c
(and-) him=Jesus – passed – through – the – grainfields
d
[=while]  – [+he]  – (and-) [..]  his – disciples – plucked – the – ears of grain
e
and ate (-them) – (after-) rubbing [+them]  – in – [+their]  hands ; 
note : 
a) in b) , the ‘biblehub’ site deviously changed the second-first into -diaporeuesthai 
    therewith concealing the mistakes Esau made (you decide ‘on purpose or not’) ;
b) the phrase “came to pass” did not refer “to what they did” but “to the sabbath day” ;
 
[next 2 :
the Pharisees always watched him as hawks , suspicious that it would be another endtime clue ;
remember the line was not about ‘working on a sabbath’ :] 
2
“And certain of the Pharisees said unto them, Why do ye that which is not lawful to do on the sabbath days?
2
[=and]  – the – Pharisees – (that-) certain=watched (-it) – say – (to-) them=him :
b
[line w/ garbled :] 
[…]  (will) you do=tell – which=us      +
c 
[.. 1x ..]  – allowed=why – [+you]  (are) doing [+that]  – [=on]  – [..]  [+this]  (-specific) sabbath (day-) ? ; 
 
3  
“And Jesus answering them said, Have ye not read so much as this, what David did, 
when himself was an hungred, and they which were with him;”
… here , 
a) the ‘Jesus’ appears to be added to cover up something ; question is the syntax ,
b) the “reading” is meant for US , namely “to understand something in OT” ; 
3
[=then]  – said=Jesus – answering=says – (to-) them :
b
the – jesus=sons (iésous=yhios) of – [.. 1x ..]  – this=Ishral (‘you & we’)      +
c
(will) read=remember (anaginóskó=anamimnêskô !)      +
c
(that-) [+this] which=is did=written – (in-) (the-) david=scroll (daBi-d=Bi-blion) ,
d
when – he=they (will) hunger=search (peinaó=eraunaô) – he=for – and=the – the=time (or ‘day’)     +
e
with=that – [+I]  (will) being=gather – him=them ;                                                [‘when them I-will-be-gathering’]  
 
[next 4 : 
the “allowed” in this line was original : ‘what’ was not ‘allowed’ ? – to harvest the edges of the field :] 
4
[used : mirror Mt.12:4:]  
“How he entered into the house of God, and did eat the shewbread, which was not lawful for him to eat, 
neither for them which were with him, but only for the priests ?” 
4
how=for – he=they (will) entered=ponder (?)      +
b
the – house=instruction (?) of – [..]  God – into=there (?) , 
b
and [+whý]  – [..]  the – beforestanding=ready – breads=ears of grain (‘close’)     +             [important : ‘why’] 
c
[..]  (were) took=allowed (elaben=existin , see next) – (to be) ate=reaped ,       
d
and=but – and=the – the ones=ears of grain (tois=stachuas)       +
e
with=at – (the-) him=corners (autou=gônia) of – (the-) whom=field (hous=agros)     +
f
(were) to be give=left (-alone) – (and-) nót – allowed – him=for – (to be) eat=reaped ,
e
if=because – [+they]  not=were (to be)      +
f
(for-) the – priests=humble ones (‘poor’) (hiereis=penichros) – only ;                               [‘humble ones’ in Lev.]  
 
[next 5 : 
now the versions vary — using Mt.12:5 here :] 
5
“Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, 
(b) and are blameless?”
5
or=and – not=indeed – you=they (will) read=understand – [..]  the – law=promise (?) ,
b
[w/ probably swapped because of similarity :] 
–
that – (on-) [..]  the – priests=feast (hiereis=heorté) of – Weeks (‘sabbath’ is also ‘week’)      +
c
[+I]  (will) profane=gather (bebéloó=syllegô)     +                        [‘hence the ‘gleaning ears of grain’ start !] 
d
the – sanctuary=remnant (HIE-ron=HY-poleimma) of – [..]  sabbath=Ishral (sabbaton=israel) ;         [‘144’]

 
               next , a problem : Mt.12 has two extra lines here :
                … it’s very difficult to see what is going on now but in order to properly close
               the comparison between ‘the already reaped stalks’ and ‘the still standing ones’ 
               as “the first christians” and “the 144” we would need 1 more sub-line   —
               the extra two in Mt.12 7-8 read
               “But I say unto you, That in this place is [one]  greater than the temple. 
               But if ye had known what [this]  meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, 
               ye would not have condemned the guiltless.”
               now , their buildup ánd syntax is a Mess , the only thing they do is ‘refer back’ 
               which is the aspect we need here , however we can only restore the possible
               intent as closing part of previous 5 ,
               since their brothers had been the harvest of the field in the former time ,
               having received the comforter (Spirit) from the Father in that day ;
               … please – it is but an attempt ,
               yet containing all the still remaining aspects that had been mentioned before ,
               also closing the entire section before the confirmation follows , next :   
                  
e + Lk.5 :
(a) “and they are + blameless ;         
(b) “And he said + unto them, 
(c)  That the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath.” 
e
and – they (will) – [=greatly]  – [=rejoice]         +
5
and=when – he=they (will) said=see – [.. 1x ..]  – that=the – Lord ,
b
(as-) the – son of – [..]  man – is=standing – and=upon – the – sabbath=clouds (‘no match’) ; 
note :
… now it’s also clear why Esau had to corrupt the absolute confirmation
phrased as the – for everyone understandable – “return upon the clouds” phrase ,
having added 2 extra lines in Matthew to bury that connection ;   
 
                                                                                                     part II
                                                                                              more difficult :
 
6
“And it came to pass also on another sabbath, that he entered into the synagogue [and taught]  : 
and there was a man whose right hand was withered.”
6
and=because – it (will) happen – on – and=this (?) – another=feast (heterô=heorté-) of = Weeks , 
 
                                    … until this far — next section is very corrupted :
                                    though Esau turned it into some nonsense story ,
                                    the term ‘another’ showed that it was a continuation
                                    while indeed in all three gospels this section follows ;
                                    please see Annex for the 2nd option we had of line 6 :
 
[restart of 6 :] 
6
and=because – it (will) happen – on – and=the – another=feast (heterô=heorté-) of = Weeks , 
b
(that-) him=God (auton=theos) – (will) entered=accept (eiserchomai=apodechomai)       +
c
and=the – synagogue=scroll (‘no match’)      +                                                                                                      [no ‘learning’]  
d
and=that – [+they]  (will have) was=restored (see line 10 !)     +
e
(as-) there=the one of – [+his]  human=words (anthrópos=logos) ,
f
and=which – [..]  his=your – hand=fathers – the=in – right=former times (dexios=prôtos)     +
g
was=have – withered=altered (‘close theme !’) (xéros=allassô) ;   
 
7
[used : mirror line Mk.3:2 :] 
“And they watched him, whether he would heal him on the sabbath day; that they might accuse him.
“And the scribes and Pharisees watched him, whether he would heal on the sabbath day; 
that they might find an accusation against him.” 
7
[=and]  – (as-) the – scribes=sons of – [..]  [..]  pharisees=Ammon      +                                                       [? ; see note] 
b
[+they]  (will) watch – [=me]        + 
c
[..]  – heal=gathering – [=them]  – on=unto – [..]  [+my]  sabbath=Father     +                    [‘so a-c they will see’] 
d
that=who – [.. not in Mk.2 ..]  – (will) might accuse=restore – him=them ;                          [‘but d they will not’] 
 
8
“But he knew their thoughts, and said to the man which had the withered hand, 
Rise up, and stand forth in the midst. And he arose and stood forth.”
8
[=and]  – he (God) – (will) knew=make – the=them – their=his – thoughts=army (‘no match’) ,
b
[..]  saying :
c
rise up=cross over – (to-) the – human=enemies (?) (anthrópos=echthros)             +
d
(that-) have – withered=corrupted – [..]  [+my]  hand=scroll ,                                                                                [‘as in 6’] 
e
and – stand=slay (his-témi=apok-teinô) – into=all of – the – the=evil – midst=seed
f
[=so that]  – he=they (will have) stood=perished – rising=forever ;    
 
9
“Then said Jesus unto them, I will ask you one thing; 
Is it lawful on the sabbath days to do good, or to do evil? to save life, or to destroy [it] ?”
9
[=then]  – [..]  Jesus – says – unto – them : 
b
(and-) I=he (will) ask=judge – you ,
c
[attempt :] 
you=since – [+you]  (were) – any=not – allowed – to do good=destroy (?) – [+his]  sabbath=people (?) ,
d
or=by – doing evil – (to-) (the-) souls – or=and – ruining – or=their – save=sacred ones (‘Originals’) ;
 
10
[used : mirror Mark 3:5 :] 
“And when he had looked round about on them with anger, 
(b) being grieved for the hardness of their hearts, 
(c) he saith unto the man, Stretch forth thine hand. And he stretched [it]  out: 
(d) and his hand was restored whole as the other.”
10
[=and]  – looking around – (at-) all of – them – [=in]  – anger ,
b
grieved=knowing – [..]  the hardness of – [..]  their – heart , he says – (to-) the=them :
c
[..]  he=you (will) stretch=dread – (the-) human=appointed time (an-thrópos=prothes-mia)       +
d 
(that-) the – hand=sons of – you=Ishral – (will have) stretch=risen up      +
e
and – (will have) restored – the – hand=scroll of – you=God (autou=theos) ,
f
[w/ swapped 1x :] 
as – the – other=day – (that-) [+you]  (will) sound=perish (‘no match ofcourse’) ; 
 
11
“And they were filled with madness; and communed one with another what they might do to Jesus.”
11
[=then]  – [+they]  they=depart , filled – (with-) rage , 
b
and – [=plotting]  – [=with]  – eachother – what – [..]  they (might do – [..]  (to-) Jesus . 

 
end       (-and probably as end of theme)

 
annex :

 
        … the problem is that there are not enough clues to go by , from this point ,
        so that we don’t even know if He would continue with “the feast of Weeks in the end time” 
        or , because the “return on the clouds” was so prominent , it was intended as juxtaposition
        so that now “the feast of Weeks when the disciples would receive the Spirit” was meant  —
        to show how difficult it is , the optional version :
 
[version A :] 
b
(that-) [+I]  (will) enter=go forth – [..]  – into=unto – [..]  [+my]  synagogue=Father ,                   [no ‘teaching’] 
c
and – [+he]  (will) was=send – (the-) human=comforter (Spirit) (anthrópos=paraklêtos)      +
d 
and=unto – [..]  his=my – hand=people (?) (cheir=démos) – to [=sustain]  (?) – [=them]  (?) ;