failed b/c of the calf [Adam] ; a sécond Weeks [49+49 d] now b/c of finding Eve (?) [educated ATTEMPT] [version ; 2023-08aug.08] |
… the theme is so tricky that it causes a nervous tummy while doing the page —
please do make the difference between the Adam & Eve theme an Sich
and the connection to ‘a possible second Weeks’ which. is. not. sure. atm ;
this section (1-14) is usually considered as “the rules for a second Passover”
but there simply are too many inconsistencies both in KJV and as concept ,
while phrases as “a generation” points to ‘a far future‘
and the sloppy translation “being defiled by the dead body of a man”
reads “defiled + soul + adm-man (‘Adam’)” which is a huge Red Flag ofcourse
the calf event : ‘their soul defiled by the adm-man’ (line 6) :
… actually nowhere is found any explanation WHY the calf event was so horrible !
or rephrased – IF there was , it has been professionally erased by Esau in 250 BC !
and this is our approach towards the text here :
if ‘Adam’ was the cause of failure at the “first feast of Weeks”
and if the “finding Eve” is SO important – just as we saw lately –
then is “a restored feast of Weeks” so impossible : as undoing the former one … ?
text notes :
(line 1)
‘the third month’ :
… the “third month” as the time of ‘the second Weeks’ [49 + 49 days] ;
it would make sense that God would tell these things to Moses áfter he had went up
the mount for the second time — because it reveals the clue here ;
(lines 2-3)
‘they kept the one – but not the other’ :
… makes much more sense , especially as intro to next :
(line 5)
the réason for the not keeping that one :
… is the only Logical theme that could follow now ;
(line 6a-b)
‘defiled by Adam’ :
… this is the first and only line in the scroll addressing this aspect — [<<]
everything that went wrong is phrased in this ONE sentence
[considered all the themes connected with this event , see pages] ;
but now we have the base for our preposition
as the juxta “the sons of (old-) Ishral + Adam” vs “the sons (‘144’) + Eve” !
part I b :
(line 6c-g)
‘second Weeks’ :
… this is the aspect we do not know for sure – eventhough it seems Valid ;
however , supporting this concept is that Esau saw a ‘second chance’
and just perhaps this was the original intent !
(line 13)
‘she (Eve) will cut him off’ :
… though the penalties concerning other aspects of the laws did include a cutting-off
it was always “he or she will be cut off from the people” but never ‘the soul being cut off’ !
yet the verb here shows “she cut off + from her” , and though ‘the soul’ is feminine
it can just as well – read : better – have referred to Eve ;
(line 14)
‘sojourn’ :
… arguably the most weak [restored-] line but because the intent was hard to see ;
[you saw every minute , Majesty ,
so hoping that it’s the right colour now ..]
corruptions :
theme :
Numbers 9 (1-14 as section)
1
[=then] – IEUE – speaks – unto – Moses
b
in the wilderness of – Sinai – in the second=third (?) – year=month (?) [49 + 49 days ?]
c
[=since] they went forth – from the land of – Egypt – in the first – month ,
d
saying :
2
and=though – the sons of – (old-) Ishral – (have) do=kept – the Passover
b
[=as] the appointed time +
3
[=at] the fourteenth of – [..] the month – at – even – [.. 1x ..] [..] ,
b
you=they (have) [+nót] do=kept [..] – the appointed time +
c
as the all=day of – the statute=feast (chqth=chq) of – [..] customs=Weeks (mSHpht=SHbo) ;
4 [likely added by Esau]
5
[total attempt :]
and=for – they (had done) do=wickedness
b
the=during – [..] [+your] first – passover=ascent (?) – in=on the four=mount (ARbe=hAR) (?) ,
c
(because-) ten=at – month=that – day [‘Weeks’]
d
between=when – [+you] evening=returned (arshB) – [=to] the wilderness=people (Mdbr=oM) ,
e
[.. 1x ..] – the sons of – (old-) Ishral – (had) so=nót – do=kept – [..] all
d
that (‘which’) – IEUE – (had) commanded – moses=them ; +
[next 6 : now we’d need a major leap to the 144 :]
6
(and-) and=therefore – [=they] (had) become – the man=people + [6a-b : crucial !]
b
whose – [..] soul – (had) become – defiled (‘unclean’) – [+by] the adm-man (‘Adam’) ;
note :
… originally has read “who she-became soul-of-them unclean-one in-adm” ;
part I b
c
[total attempt :]
and=but [.. 1x ..] – a passover=second (?) – [..] do=Weeks (?) (osh=shbo)
d
(will be) able=kept (?) – in=as – that – day ,
e
and=when they=I (will) come near=raise up +
f
[..] the faces=sons (phni=bni) of – moses=Ishral (‘144’) (mshe=ishrl) +
g
[..] in front of – aaron=IEUE (aErn=iEue) – in – that – day ; [‘that day’ = future time]
[next 7 : as the sons that will search the woman of the adm-man :]
7
and=as the the=sons (e=ben) of mortals=Ishral (‘144’) (anshim=ishrl) + [e·anshim = corrupt]
b
(that will) say=search (AmR=dARsh) – [..] [+their] they=mother (em-e=am) (Eve) ,
c
to=because (ali=ki) [..] – [+they] (will) we=need + [or: ‘for I will ask them’]
d
to unclean=find (tma=mts) – [..] the soul=wóman (nphSH=ansh) of – the adm-man ;
e
to=and what=when – we=they (will) disadvantaged=remember [+her] (gRa=zkR)
f
[+they] (will) surely present (2x -qrb) – [..] not=her – to IEUE ,
g
in=as his=their appointed time=mother (moed=am) +
h
(that will be-) in the midst of – the sons of – Ishral (‘144’) ;
note :
.. the buildup of this line is very strong , especially as the ending g-h ;
8
9 [likely invented by Esau as continuance for his story]
10
(and-) you=I (will) speak=bless (?) (dbr=brk) [..] +
b
the sons of – Ishral – [..] (that-) (will) say=become (amr-eie) – the man=remnant (aish=sharth)
c
man=which (aish=ashr) – [.. 1x ..] – will – unclean=find – [..] the soul=woman + [see 7]
d
[..] in the way=time – far off ,
e
[=for] (it will) or=be – [..] the generation + [sic]
f
and=when he=I (will) does=save (osh=iash) – [+my] passover=people (?) – [..] ieue=Jacob (i=eue=iaqb) ;
11
12 [both most likely added by Esau]
13
[=because] the=then (?) the man + [or : ‘the adm-man’]
b
who – [..] (caused) – [..] [+my] way=people – to clean=wander-astray (?)
c
(will) not – be (‘exist’) (-anymore) ,
d
[=for] he (will) stop – [..] doing – passover=wickedness (phshch=phsho)
e
[=when] – [..] the soul=woman – (will) cut – [..] he=him (-off) – from [..1x..] her (-self) , +
d
[.. 5x ..] [appears invented – as excuse – as ‘the penalty for b’]
e
in=as the appointed time – (when-) the man (‘Adam’) – (will) bear – his sin [..] ;
note :
… the usual pattern is “the oppressor of the people will be oppressed”
and though the Adam theme is ofcourse very large
the context of “what he caused to my people old-Ishral” must have played here as well ;
14
and=in [+that] that=day (ki=ium) ,
b
the sojourner=sons (‘144’) – (will) sojourn – [=to] [=me] , [as opposed to old-Ishral ?]
c
and=as the does=fulfillment of (?) – the passover of – [..] IEUE , (?)
d
[a possible date]
e
and=when the strangers=sons – [..] (will) native=restore (?) – the (eden-) land .
end of section