the symbolism used in prophets about the other Reality –

and Adam as a recurring theme


understanding Symbolism in prophets

Symbolism exists because our soul is still connected with the other Reality ,
where ofcourse concepts as land , nature , sea and mountain also exist ;
and by connecting our soul with the same concepts (analogies) in óur world ,
our adm-soul can confirm or cancel certain things in the other Reality
(as the theme of “what you bind on earth will be bound in heaven”) ;
and therefore especially “human actions” have symbolic value .

In prophets an important aspect is added : the names of persons or deities .
Concerning deities , the concept “name” is very important in the other Reality ,
because the name includes “all the power and character of that certain being” ;
while human names are often linked to a certain theme or attribute
which is most often related to their life   —
human names belong to certain “root-word clusters” the old-Hebrew uses ;
for example , the name “Eve” is (-chue) from root (-chiy) ‘eden-life’ ,
hence she was named “the mother (=first one) of all the living ones” .

But the same is true even for concepts as “morning” and “stone”,
because the used root shows ús “to which realm that certain concept belongs” :
for example , the eden-dawn (-bqr) is different from the matrix-dawn (-shchr) ,
and especially in prophets this helps us to discover the context of the theme .


1) symbolism : geography , countries and cities

Analogous to the situation in the other Reality ,
God lays as it were a "geographic map" of that 
situation across a part of the ancient Middle East :
the land old-Ishral represents “the mountain Tsiun”
(God’s mountain, somewhere S-East of this earth) ;
then there are places like Tire and Sidon (Lebanon)
and the island of Kittim to the north of the mountain ,
the area of Damascus and Assyria in the north-east ,
and so on (much later Plato did the same , and also
the Vedic pre-Hindu Ramayana knows this usage) .


Without exception , in prophets all of these areas are also addressed as if they
would have characteristics : they are all hostile , and often is extensively described
what their sins are .
For example , Tyre is mentioned as “the trading-city enriching herself”,
and though that may have been trúe in a distant past , at the time of writing this ,
the power of Tyre was already waning . Even móre strange is the disproportionate
number of chapters having been used for the Tirades against this city ,
which hasn’t been at war with the people of old-Ishral , neither through a trade war.

But it becomes clear that God means “a different kind of Tyre” – not just the literal
city at the shore of the Mediterranean – when He starts using uses bizarre concepts ,
as accusing her of being the "great pot boiling the original bodies of adm-souls" (-hR) ,
because that is the practice of Tyre ; and this statement only makes sense when you
will go understand how our soul got into this present body of ours .
In another chapter, He accuses Tyre of dealing “in adm-souls , in gemstones and in
expensive gaments” (-hR) ; and you remember per Revelation the same trading in souls
as the sin of Mystery-Babylon – showing that Tyre and Mystery-Babylon are the same !

Because the gemstones and expensive garments are in the same sentence as “souls” ,
the context of this line determines that all her three ‘trading products’ belong to God ,
and more specific : they are aspects of the land Eden .
Scripture uses analogies to express certain concepts : the “expensive garments” relate
to “aspects of the physical body” (in this case the type body of Adam and Eve – not ours) ;
while ‘gemstones’ relate to “the different qualities of the dimensional Light of Eden”
(like our sunlight the same time also exists as heat and light waves) .
To interpret the objects of the other Reality is often tricky , and we leave them now for
what they are – but we mentioned them to give you an idea whére Tyre actually trades in ,
and why this causes such a great fury of God .

Now that it is at least justifiable that God addresses a different Tyre as the coastal city ,
we must dare to draw certain conclusions — almost against our own understanding :
what God tells about His Reality is that "in the North of this intermediate area is a city"
(sic) , which "in illegal manner trades goods coming from the land of Eden in the south".

Now we shouldn’t make the mistake of immediately thinking “well ; but our telescopes
have never seen something”, or “that’s impossible according to the laws of nature”,
because then we try to pull the other Reality back into óur one .
Our mind has trouble with these kinds of concepts :
not the soul – she has no problem whatsover imagining this !

Another example in prophets is where the Spirit of God (feminine!) sadly laments
“how the Assyrian demolished our beautiful citadels” (-hR) ; where the context of that
chapter is about the darkened land of Eden .
So we understand here that God’s land also had “citadels” : and because a city like Tyre
also needs a land to be established upon , and because all belong to the same evil club ,
the context is now so far that “there is a hostile land north of God’s Eden land ,
and the hostile land is even in contról (“has taken”) ; and that this hostile country has a
city trading illegally in aspects of Eden – and some difficult concept about a cooking pot”.

The examples above alóne are ofcourse not enough to prove our interpretation ,
but that is why God needed so many prophets : to further substantiate the situation !
Another chapter addresses the theme "Gog" (which has nothing to do with our Russia) ,
as a hostile construct “in the north” which “will fall upon the field (below)”,
again showing that an evil region has nestled itself north of eden ,
and reading the consistent prophets this way , we can step by step almost “map out”
that other strange Reality .
Doesn’t the exhortation towards us “to go return to the darkened land of Eden”
sound only half as strange as it did in the previous page….?

terms for ‘land’ and ‘city’

In this context it is important to mention that the original text does not have separate
terms for “land” and "the earth (which we understand as our planet)": the old-Hebrew
uses only one term (-arts) for both , and again the context of the chapter determines
which land the text intended : the subject may be ‘the land of old-Ishral’ , ‘our world’,
‘the eden-land’ or even ‘Assyria or the land of Tyre’ :
therefore we need to read carefully , especially when the word is used in prophecy  —
because there are chapters starting for example with a literal situation of old-Ishral ,
but halfway through the chapter a “tipping point” appears and the chapter continues
about  the óther Reality (using the situation now as a background , see previous page) .
The subject “land” has ofcourse also major implications for the context of Genesis 1 .

The same is true for the term “Jerusalem” : this is not only used for the literal old-city ,
but depending upon the context also as “this Earth, represented by her”
and even "as the capital of the land of Eden" ; compare the Jerusalem in Revelation  —
but never , ever , is used in prophets
to denote “the city with the same name which nów exists in the Middle-east”,
since God doesn’t CARE about what was Mimicked upon an anyway perishing earth ;
… it’s just Sad that false concepts like that cause fanaticism by a large group of christians .
For the record , the concept “mt. Tsiun”
is God’s mountain in the other Reality , which ‘carries’ the Eden land ;

2) symbology : nature , objects and constructs

This category is difficult for us souls because we live in a “mechanical world”,
as our reality which is a closed system of cause and effect  —
and although we very “scientifically” declare that our habitat is governed by
something like “laws of nature”, we forget that those laws come from outside
our closed system in order to maintain our environment :
the events in Revelation describe what happens if those laws begin to cease .

Imagine then a dimension where “is nothing yet”  —
in the book Job God tells “how he made two gates in the sea : one in the north
and one in the south – and inbetween those two he created eden” ;
the concept ‘sea’ is always “the matrix dimension”, while ‘a gate’ is obviously
the entrance or exit of the eden-dimension ; the gate enables eden “to exist”.
… in order for us (!) to understand what is the situation in the other Reality ,
Ezekiel is asked to portray the “intermediary realm” between God and this Earth
in the following way : he places a tile on the ground and writes ‘Jerusalem’ on it ,
that tile now representing planet Earth ; then he must place an iron pot between
himself and Earth , showing how Mystery-Babylon stands inbetween God and us ;
because the iron pot is Negative – we already saw the cooking pot in Tyre ,
where the concept "iron" is consistently used for the attribute of the fallen ones .

The list of possible objects is endless ,
yet in order to not confuse , we better return to this theme in Introduction V ;

3) symbology : names of personal enemies and constructs

Just like our adm-souls are connected to God’s Reality ,
the same concept is true for the evil realm connecting to hér type souls on earth .
For example , Nebuchadnessar as "the king of Babylon" was a human enemy of 
the people of old-Ishral , and ofcourse especially of the southern kingdom Judah .
But as mentioned earlier , the text “switches” constantly back and forth between
our and the Other Reality , causing that one time the human person with the title
"king of Babylon" is addressed , but other times the fallen angel carrying same title ;
and again the cóntext of the chapter determines whether the subject in question
is the human person or the fallen archangel :
in a number of chapters the mentioned aspects of this “king of Babylon” supercede
any possibe reference to the húman Nebuchadnessar
(compare certain descriptions of Tyre , ruling out that the coastal city was intended) .
The root of Nebuchadnessar’s name is (-Nabu) , as the Assyrian version of the name
of the Egyptian god Thoth ; while certain actions of the mán Nebuchadnessar show
that he even shared the nature of his deity : the story of “the three boys in the oven”
in the book Daniel refers to the practices of Tyre aka Mystery-Babylon !

It’s true that 500-BC Babylon wasn’t located “north of Ishral” (read : of mt. Tsiun) ,
but in this case the connection “Babylon – Mýstery-Babylon” is so obvious that her
literal location probably didn’t even matter :
we know the verse "get out of her My people!" where the term ‘Babylon’ represents
"this world" ; but prophets describe the fallen angel in his capitol “Mystery-Babylon”,
therefore this Earth is ruled by his headquarter in the (evil-) other Reality !

Egypt is a bit more difficult , because she represents “their region above mt. tsiun”
as the region the evil realm built after paradise fell , per Genesis .
Egypt was typically divided in a southern and northern region , which were ‘fed’
by the river Nile : this whole concept represented the situation in their other Reality ,
as the Nile “bringing Eden-aspects to their northern region in order to supply them”;
hence the Ezekiel chapter about “the river which the Dragon made”,
and of which the latter roars “I won’t give it back – for it is mine , I made it !” .

The northern region of Egypt represents the ‘unadultered’ evil dimension
(where also our earth is residing in) , while the southern region of Egypt is more
like a “transition area between eden’s dimension and their own dimension”
(since both dimensions obviously cannot exist right next to eachother) .
In prophecy ,
that southern region is further explained using the term “the land of Assyria”,
because within Assyria (Syria) is the city ‘Damascus’ – as the place where Adam is :

4) symbology : the subject ‘Adam’ in prophets

Adam is a separate story: he is an almost continuous subject in prophets ,
but practically unrecognizable because of the neutral titles used for him ;
only in combination with the original text it becomes clear that titles like
‘prince’ and ‘the king of Assyria’ are addressing Adam .
It may seem as if he disappeared from the scene after the book of Genesis ,
but nothing could be further from the truth :
God gives certain textual directions for us readers to identify the themes  —
for example , by means of a certain worduse or repetition He factually says
“watch out : read this piece carefully !”.
This is apparent in Ezekiel who , unlike other prophets, is always addressed
as “you son of man” – yet the word for "man" here is (-adm) as in ‘Adam’,
not the standard word for "man" (-ish). Many nowaday translations have
ignored important differences as this one and read just “son of man”,
but in that way we automatically overlook that warning "read carefully !".
Just like we saw with the title "king of Babylon", the title "son of (-adm)" is
given to Ezekiel to indicate to us (!) that a transcendent aspect plays here :
and indeed the book of Ezekiel contáins chapters where Adam is the subject .

Another way which God uses to have our attention focused is “juxtaposition”,
as placing themes or persons opposite to eachother to achieve an effect ;
a chapter can for example start with “the proud princes of (literal-) Judah”,
then switch to the óther Reality ,
showing (us) that the “proud prince” nów described refers to Adam   —
these type chapters often provide also other clues like “the land Assyria”
(where he is) , “proud of own wisdom” (which he is) , “creating” (as he does) ,
and all these factors combined show ús that indeed Adam is the subject there .


what prophets tell about Eve and Adam

Adam and Eve went to the enemy territory north of the now darkened eden ,
where they reside apart from each other : Eve in a “confined environment”
(to avoid the term prison) , and prophets are remarkably silent about her :
in but one chapter she is mentioned as “the wise woman who left (-eden)”,
as the woman we (!) have to call to , saying “that she must weep , and teach
her sisters to weep – because Adam will be slain soon”
(though the ‘wise’ may have written “innocent” – for that is her attribute) .

Adam is a different story :
despite we have óne textual problem (see next section) ,
we read in prophets that in a way he became “bewitched” and is now working
for théir realm , and against Eden (and us!) : he has stolen many eden-constructs ,
he now supplies their realm with everything they need – inclusive creating ‘idols’
as the “physical bodies for spirits” which he designs .
He also “maintains their reality”, portrayed as a kind of gardener who connects
“stems of the right kind with branches of the wrong kind” (-hR) , implying that he
sustains the blending of Eden and their Dualistic dimension – which is a Crime ;
but God tells him “that which you planted and what grew in the morning ,
will bring destruction in the evening” (-hR) , the latter referring to Revelation .

Another chapter describes how Adam is “the adviser to the King of Babylon” (-hR) ,
the king here as fallen archangel ; and how “Adam made an illegal covenant with
the king” (-hR) ; the context of that chapter is that both Thoth and Adam will be
punished because it was Thoth’s idea “to make our souls live in this body on earth”
(=to be far from eden) while Adam designed this type body .

No one can stop Adam – unless the 144,000 sons understood through prophets
that they will need to return to the other Reality ; because then also the (144,000)
attributes will have returned which Adam had lóst by the fall of paradise .
At that moment God Himself will intervene , and it says “but in that day Adam
will see his Creator” (-hR) ; here again the word (-adm) is used ; then Adam will be
taken to a place “where he will die by the hand of asassinating spirits ,
and the description of events stops at this point .

Also in hieroglyphs – which we only use as contextual support on this site –
Adam often occurs ; and the pre-Hindu Rg-Veda is as usual even more clear :
in Book X shows a conversation between Yami and Yama (as Eve and Adam) ,
in which Yami begs Yama to come to her , but he replies that he will not do
that "because the gods have said that you are evil" (-hR) ;
Yami then calls him “weakling” and muses to herself how much they (=she?)
need a son" – which we (-hR) understand as a hint to the 144,000 sons .
In another chapter of Book X it is said how “Yama (=Adam) sits under the tree
together with the gods , making all that the gods need : therefore pay homage
to him with song and flute playing” (-hR) ;
note how close the concept “tree” links to him ‘being a gardener’ .


4 b) how can the Prophets have Adam as their theme , per Genesis 5 ?

The interlinear text indeed writes "he lived 930 years and he died" (-hR) .
Whoever reads this line can hardly think anything else but that Adam has
disappeared from the scene – and that is logical after a sentence like this .
Yet he is so strong in prophets as subject , word choice and storyline ,
that we are forced to question the meaning of this one sentence  –
but above all we need to question its origin .
The "only valid interpretation of scripture is scripture hersélf" (as a concept
called cross-reading) , and that is also what we of hR are doing constantly  –
but here we have the problem that the context of many prophets oppose
this óne sentence in Genesis 5 .
Why would God have put so much effort in prophets , by means of the said
juxtaposition and wordusage , to try to make a theme clear to us ,
as a theme which had been already debunked at the very start in Genesis 5 ?

erasing themes

Instead of debating impossible themes as “then where stayed Noach’s father”
we should start with the Adam-theme which appears in many prophets :
who would have benefited from ‘erasing’ Adam right in the book of Genesis ,
and that “by just adding an extra sheet numbered ‘chapter 5’ ,
containing a useless (!) number of supposed lifeperiods” … ? 
Enoch , who coincidentally is also on the chapter 5 list , writes ,
“And now I know of this mystery, that sinners have the words of change and
falsify righteousness in many ways, and speak false words, and lying”
(Book of Enoch, chapter CIV, 10). Why would he have said that ?
Prophets also fulminate against a certain group of people which have messed
with the original text , and explain whý they did it : to hide the Eden theme ;
now , what is more effective as erasing a main subject right at the start ?

discovering themes :

In that same prophets chapter a crucial theme is “understanding scripture”
in spite of that group which sabotaged her : explaining how God is literally
looking for souls who will understand His words : “and the scripture scroll is
given to a teacher ("professional") who knows the language ; but he says :
I can’t read it , because the scroll is sealed” (-hR) .
This sealing probably does not only refer to theme as described in Daniel ,
or even to the old-hebrew language itself , but especially the kind of belief as
“following the common interpretation of scripture where each word is inspired”
without taking into account that a percentage could have been corrupted !
However , then the chapter continues , saying “then the scroll is given to
someone who does nót know the language” (-hR) , read : to us laymen ,
and suddenly connections appear in the text  –
when we follow the call “separate you the good ones from the bad ones !”,
as removing (or restoring) the corrupted words from the original ones
(see for example the marvellous Jeremiah 3 about this theme) .


4 c) the horrible problem for us between the symbolism of Real and Copy

Our handicap , as laymen who try understand prophets ,
is in the sécond place also caused by our own modern languages ​​as Dutch and
English which lack adequate language roots , and therefore we are forced to use
only abstract words in order to convey a concept or explain a theme .
God is Light , sure – but the Evil One is also ‘light’. God uses a term "mountain"
as the seat of His authority in the other Reality – but also the Evil One has his
mountain as his seat of power , and so on ;
but we do not see those differences – because our abstract word ‘light’ just 
fails to differentiate between all the different types of “light”.
Basically , our modern language is like a bulldozer squashing the fine nuances ,
and there is a deep relation between “language” and “modern consciousness”
(see previous page) .
We make entire series of "latest Bible translations" , and improve “a fire” into
a more visual “beautiful crackling fire”, but that dóesn’t mean we understand it !
Others propose to use the themes in prophets as "metaphors" so that modern
humans can understand them also – but that method can only work like a sieve ,
holding back the things which are réally important to the soul .

Prophets tell how dangerous our modern mindset is , in our days (!)  –
they describe it as “fuming incense to Baal” , and though these are older terms ,
Baal represents “the evil mindset” and the fuming is simply “honouring” :
… because many believers have created for themselves an abstract parallel world ,
and then proudly state that “the Evil One is a silly and harmless character :
because Christ has already defeated him !”.
Certainly He has ; and that according to Legal Law – but they don’t have that (yet) .
And thát is exactly the only and real hope of the Evil one : do you understand …?

Because the horrible thing is that many christians have turned the Evil one (and God!)
into an abstract concept , in which the “good” abstract concept then “overcomes”
the bad abstract concept — but that type of thinking resembles more a thoughtline
from the tree of good and evil than the conviction of scripture !
The Evil one , who introdúced this abstract modern thinking , is fine with all of this :
ergo, maximum he plays the defeated one against us : because the truth is that he
has enough Power over us to hide and conceal “the other Reality” theme from us ;
and as long he succeeds in that , he wins every day from us , de Facto .
our blind soul
Regarding the above , an example may support this case : back in 2006 , one of us
saw two identical images – as two identical “shepherds”, like the picture on this
site or according to your own interpretation of the theme “the good shepherd” :
one of both shepherds was Christ , while the other image was the Evil one .
… yet , in spite of what we thought we all had understood about faith backthen
(and that was retrospectively rather poor and full of mistakes…..) ,
it was absolutely impossible for the soul to point out the real Christ .
This is the terrible situation in which all our souls find themselves in .
And this reversed the focal point : there was only óne possibility how the soul
could know who the réal Christ was  –
namely , in the moment He would speak to the soul . Not the other way around .
Only this way the soul can recognize Him – and therefore immediately also the copy .

But then we must be able to recognize the (type-) lánguage ;
not in the sense of ‘learning old-hebrew’, but the language which corresponds to
the theme of God’s other Reality — because the concepts , the symbols and words
will "light up" when the soul decides to accept and enter that Reality .
And this “lighting up” is the beginning of speaking .

[22.09sept.20 submitted –
from slightly adapted 2018 Dutch original]