[added 6/29]
Ex. 24:7 (KJV) “And he took the book of the covenant, and read in the audience of the people:
and they said, All that the LORD hath said will we do, and be obedient.”
must be : “the stone (-tablet) of – the covenant” !
 

 
page content :
part I  :
— the 10 commandments of the Covenant do not contain ‘the Covenant’ !
     (why the first 4 are Solid – but the other 6 questionable)
part II :
— ten or seven commandments ?
     (examples — including ‘the Beatitudes’ of Mt.5 : full restored text)
part III :
— the seven commandments : full restored text (click)
[annex :] 
several observations
 

                                       the tablets were about the covenant of God
 
                     … if perhaps you will think “oh no , even these  must be questioned ?” ,
                     the answer is “sadly — yes” : but because Esau messed with them ,
                     and we do nothing else as trying to recover what was really  said , right ;
                     many equate the commandments with “the laws of Hammurabi” but that
                     is only the lazy mind seeing a similarity — these are about the covenant
 
                                                                          the main problem
 
                    in all of prophets “God’s covenant” is about “the restoration of Eden”
                    first by the sons (144) returning to her – and followed by all of Jacob ,
                    but none of this shows in the present ‘ten commandments’ !
                    in fact ,
                    at the fifth commandment her sound buildup appears to have been cut-off
                    right after the line “.. the land which God will give to you” : one can expect
                    that the logical continuation would refer to Eden – but it does not !
                    instead , it takes a whole óther turn , talking about things as “you will not kill” 
                    and “you will not steal” : but these type instructions show at the next page ! 
 
you see ?
 
but aren’t the “you will not kill and not lie” (etc) proper commandments ?
… they are –
but they are not the point here because not part of the Covenant concept !
the cutting-off after the fifth strongly suggests that Esau saw what theme was coming now ,                        
and he removed the original text as “the commandments 6-10” , replacing them with the more
mundane laws about “no stealing and no adultery” that accompanied  the main Covenant laws ! :

                                Exodus 20                                                                                          Exodus 21
2
1)    I am IEUE your deity
3
1)    you will have no other deities before me
4-6
2)    you will make no graven image
7
3)    you will not use my name in vain
8-11
4)    remember the sabbath 
         [Ex.:]     ‘because God rested on the 7th’
         [Deut.:] ‘because God brought you out of Egypt’
12                                                                                                                                  21
5)    honour your father and mother       [suspicious >]                    he that smites his father or mother 
       because of the adm-ground that God will give you    
 
                                                                                                 [last five :]

 
                                                                         so what was really said ?
 
               … it’s one thing to spot where it went wrong — but to restore the original is difficult
               because we do not know ‘where the buildup headed to’ , and second it was probably
               not phrased directly about Eden but in a type “foreshadowing [=concealed]  way” 
               so that outwardly  it seemed to be about Palestine but the same time also true for Eden  ,
               since obviously God knew that the Palestine-project would fail ,
               compare the ‘adm-ground I gave to your fathers’ said in the 5th commandment (KJV);
               and the only chance we have is to find Esau’s cut & pasted lines elsewhere :
 
requirements / problems :
a)
… do the last five need to be as ‘lengthy’ as the first ones ? because will we find enough text for that ? ,
and considered the latter , were there really ’10’ commandments — and if so , why ? 
can there have been ‘but’ just ‘7 commandments’ , as divine number … ? , 
b)
… what needs to be in them : “hearken to my words” etc , 
but put in the conditional way : “IF you will hearken ….” ,
c)
… a reference to the birth-right in combination with the tablets ,
d)
… in Deuteronomy appear some usable lines : the problem there is that this chapter is about
the time that the people éntered the land — so that ‘what happened 40 years ago’ stands next
to the promises and warnings of 40 years later and it’s hard to spot the difference ,         

 
                                                                                            part II
 
                                                    ten or seven commandments ?
 
                                                      the (7-) so-called ‘Beatitudes’ in Mt. 5
 
               … before any possible restoration we’ll first need to decide (sic) “how many” ,
               which is strange to do because the phrase “the 10 commandments” is so ingrained :
              10 :
               – said as “man’s number” as opposed to “the divine number” ,
               but there is very little to support  the ’10’ when also “the 10 horns” in Daniel and in
               Revelation proved to be corrupt ; the only ’10’ remaining would be the plagues in the
               land of Egypt but that is negative  ;
               – probably the ’10’ is more a subconscious thing :
               two rows of 5 commandments upon two tablets somehow feels neat ;
               7 :
               – but concerning Patterns :
               there are “7 main feasts” , “7 churches” and “7 seals” ,
               while on top of that there is also a theme as — most likely — “7 beatitudes” : 
               spoken by Christ while he was “at a mount” , reminiscent of the Horeb situation ;
               – secondly , though it are 10 commandments FOR the people , the first four contain
               aspects about God himself  – which would almost exclude the 10 as man’s number 
               (and also note the ‘4+3’ appearing also in the main feasts , the seven churches , etc) ;
    
why the (so-called) ‘beatitudes’ are for the 144 :
… this is not about “claiming them for you and we” , you know that ;
it’s just that there is a difference between the statements that He made ‘to the people in general’
and those statements which were intended to the sons   —
in this Matthew 5 , lines 1-12 were ‘to the sons’ , recognizable in phrases as “sons of God” (9)
supported by the “kingdom of heaven” (or: Eden) and the “prophets” theme (in 12) ,
while fóllowing this section ,
the “salt of the earth” , “the city on a hill” and “the candle under the bushel” are to the people :
but Esau – on purpose – has lumped all the statements together to diffuse the difference ;

 
the (so-called) beatitudes – and please note the buildup : 
 
[‘number of blessing’ :] 
1)
3
blessed (are) – the – poor=humble ones of – [..] spirit=soul (pneuma=psuché) ,                                   [per prophets]
b
because – [+through] them      +
c
(will) come about – the – kingdom of – [..] heaven ;                                                                                                [or : ‘Eden’] 
note :
… compare also the “I will return when I will have found the belief” (see parable page) ;
 
2)
4
blessed (are) – the – ones mourning=remembering (pentheó=mnêmoneuô) [+her] (‘eden’) ,     
b
[… 3x : neither “being comforted” is the promise : but the proper one is :] 
5
[… 3x : the repeat of 4 a , now as a “blessed are the meek” , is invalid :] 
b
because – they – (will) inherit – the – (eden-) land ;                                                               [proper conclusion of 3 c !] 
note :
… though indeed you and we “mourn for her” — also in the sense of ‘longing’ , Zeph.3 ,
the buildup of the text first works towards “understanding the scroll (-about Eden)” :
 
3)
6
[therefore] , 
blessed (are) – the ones – hungering       +                                                                             [‘the flesh’ theme in prophets] 
b
and – thirsting – [..] (for-) righteousness (-considered their situation on earth) , 
c
because – they – (will be) satisfied ;         [goto 8 :]  
 
7
[illegal addition] 
a) the previous three started “negative” (‘wanting’) but this one is positive – which is impossible ;
b) the “be merciful” is far too general ,
c) most important : previous “hungering” is in prophets always “for the word” : see next :
     (so this one Esau inserted to conceal that connection)
 
4)
8
[therefore] , 
blessed (are) – the (-ones) – pure=empty (!) (katharos=kenos !!) of – heart ,                                        [per prophets] 
b
because – they – (will) see=diligently search (optalomai=exeraunaô)           +
c
the [+words of] – God ;
 
5)
9                                                                                                                                                                                              [per prophets] 
[therefore] ,
blessed (are) – the – (ones) peacemakers=fully understanding (eirénopoios=parakoloutheô !!) [+them] ,
b
because – they – (will) called=become (!) (kaleó=ginomai) – the – sons (‘144’) of – [..] God ; 
note :
a) though they will also ‘be called’ that , first is “to become them” ;
b) the ‘peace + maker’ as two words (1x in Strong’s) was G3877 as two words ;
 
[so we have ‘five blessings’ by now , all interlinked   —
but what could have said the final two ?
that both KJV 10 and 11 have “persecuted” and their contents almost similar is suspicious ;
however : (one of-) the ‘persecute’ may be pósitive as in “to seek after” ,
and could imply “the others of the 144” as theme :]  
 
6)        [the others of the 144 (not aware of the restored scroll) :] 
10 
[therefore] ,
blessed (are) – the – (ones being) [+oppressed] (+kataponeô)        +
b
[+and] (are) pursuing – righteousness (considered their situation on earth , line 6) – [+like] [=you] ,
c
because – [+also] they – (will) is=enter – the – kingdom of – [..] heaven ;                                       [or: ‘Eden’ ; line 3] 
note :
… the “you” here may seem Off but shows in KJV 11 ;
we consider it allowed because now a second group is being addressed (as “the (other-) ones”) ;
 
[next 11-12 : must be ‘about the corrupted scroll’ :] 
 
7)
11 
blessed – are you – when – [men] (will) reproach – you         +
b
and=for – persecute=exposing – and – saying=renouncing        +
c
all – (the-) sayings (‘lines’) of – (the-) wicked one (‘KJV’) ,                                                  [‘wicked one’ : per prophets] 
d
against=as – (the-) you=scroll (humON=bibliON) – (that is) deceiving – [..] – me=them ;       +
 
12
[+but] rejoice – and – (be) very glad ,
b
[next : what can be appropriate (considered ‘the prophets’ as closing) ? :] 
–
because – [..] great=soon (polus=tacheôs) – [+I] (will) reward=bring – you         +
c
in=tó – [+the kingdom of] – heaven ,                                              [or : ‘to eden’ ; here as “conclusion of all the above”] 
d
just as – the – prophets – [..] before – you – (have) persecuted=declared – (to-) for=you .
note :
… last line d) may have read “just as the prophets of old have declared” 
but the main point must be “that we understood whát the prophets have declared” , as in unison ; 
 
end
 
conclusion :
a) as often , we have to decide — the “7 beatitudes” as above appear more solid as KJV’s “8” (or 9) ,
      while having removed a doublet is better than thinking up an additional two ;
b) the mirror in Luke 6: 20-26 is much more corrupt :
      the four negative ones (‘Woes’) in 24-26 Christ simply cannot have said
      since they per context would refer to the tribulation ;     
   
                                                                           additional :
 
– the “seven Woes to the Pharisees” :
… as found in Luke 11 : 37-54 ,
but we would need to study that one first ; perhaps indeed the ‘7’ is “divine judgment” in this case ;
– the “seven blessings” (-in Revelation) :
… this probably is more ‘a coincidence’ as that indeed ‘7’ have been intended ,
since these are scattered all over in the book (1:3, 14:13, 16:15, 19:9, 20:6, 22:7, and 22:12-14) ;
           Esau’s “seven Noahide laws” :
           though corrupt ofcourse , it raises the question whether Esau knew  it were ‘7 commandments’
           and tries to gain Legal Right because of the number (-7) : remember his Occult Ritual
           [unofficially tied to the UN through plausible deniability] from a couple of months ago
          of “going to mt. Sinai” near Egypt — see logs from that time
 
           so … what do we decide ? we go with “seven commandments” … ? 

part III

 
[the ’10 commandments’ : Deut.5 , mirror : Ex.20 :] 
[and see annex below] 
 

the seven commandments

 
1 st commandment                                                                                                                                                                    [Deut.5]
6
                                     I (am) – IEUE – your deity 
                                     who – brought you forth – from the land of – Egypt
                                     (as-) from the house of – bondage (‘servantship’) :
7
you (will) – not – have – other – deities – [..] before me ;
 
2 nd commandment
8
you (will) not – make – [=unto] you – (any-) graven image (‘idol’)        +
b
(as-) anything – (that is-) representing – [=something] – in the heavens (‘sky’) – above      +
c
and=or [..] – [=upon] the land (‘earth’) – below (-them) ,
d
and=nor [..] – in the waters=heavens (‘Space’) – [..] beneath=outside – the land (‘earth’) ;
9
you (will) – not – worship – to=any of them , [..] nor – serve them ,
b
because – I – IEUE – your deity – (am) a jealous – deity ,                                                              [c: generational curse] 
c
visiting (‘to punish’) – the iniquity of – the fathers – upon – [+their] sons ,    
d
[..] to=until – the third – and fourth (-generation) of – [..] (those that-) hate me ;
10
[deleted because moved : the “showing kindness to thousands” — see the 7 th commandment]  
 
3 d commandment
11
you (will) – not – take – the name of – IEUE – your deity – [=in] vain ,        
b
because – IEUE – (will) not – (hold) innocent       +                                                              [‘name’ : ‘power + character’] 
c
(the one-) who – (will) take=use (nsha=osh) – his name – [=in] vain ;
 
4 th commandment
12
keep – the sabbath – day – [=for] it (to be) sanctified ;                                                                          [based on Ex.20:8]  
13
six – days – (are at) your service – [=when] you (may) do – all – your work ,
[Ex.20:10:] 
10
[=but] the seventh – day (is) – the sabbath of – [..] IEUE :
b
(then-) you (will) – not – do – any – work , 
c
you , [=nor] your son , [=nor] your daughter , [=nor] your manservant , [=nor] your maidservant ,
d
[=nor] your [=cattle] (‘yoked for work’) , 
e
[=nor] the stranger – who (is) – in your gates ;                                                                              [‘living at your property’] 
                     [Deut.5 again :]                                                                                                                                                                               [Deut.5 :] 
15
and=because – remember – that – you were – servants – in the land of – Egypt ,
b
and (that-) IEUE – your deity – brought you forth – from there       +
c
[=through] [+his] – strong – hand (‘doing’) – and – stretched=mighty – arm (‘own power’) ;
d
[instead , Ex.20:11 :] 
therefore – IEUE – (will) bless – the sabbath – day – [=as] sanctifying it ;  
 
5 th commandment                                                                                                                                                                    [Deut.6] 
17
you (will) diligently keep – the commandments of – IEUE – your deity ,
b
and his testimonies (‘declarations’) – and his statutes
c
which – he (has and will) instruct you ,
18
and=so that you (will) do – (what is-) right – and good – in the eyes of – IEUE ;
b
in order that – he (will be) good – to yóu ,            +
c,
and (will make) you to enter – and possess – the land ,            +
d
[+as] the good=(adm-) ground (tub=adme)      +
e
which – IEUE – swore (‘promised’) – to your fathers ;
19
[..] casting out – all – your enemies – from before you , 
[=by] what – IEUE – (will) speak [+to you] ;
 
6 th commandment                                                                                                                                      [next 6) and 7) : Deut.7]
[Deut.7] 
1
[..] [+you] (will) bring=trust – IEUE – your deity            +                                                [no ‘7 names of enemy nations’] 
2
and=that – he (will) deliver – [..1x..] – your deity=enemies – before you
b
and (will) smite them – and utterly destroy – them ,
c
not=according to (la=ol) – the covenant            +
(which-) you=I (am) making (‘re-affirming’) – [=with] them=you            +
d
[‘and not show mercy’ and ‘and not intermarry’ have virtually the same roots]    […2x…] 
–
and […2x..] – your daughter=sons ,                                                                                                              [also endtime theme]
e
not=as – the one (that-) you=I give=made – to=with him=your son=fathers (bn=ab) ;
f
[the ‘take for son of you’ is exactly the same as in next 4a) , same trick as d above] 
–
and=because […1x…] – you=I (am) take=restoring – [..] your son=birthright (Bn=Bkre) – (to-) not=you
4
that=which – your son=enemies (bn=eab) – took away (interl.) – from [..] me=you
b
and=so that they=it (would) serve [+them]        +
c
[+and] [+their] people – (would) other=rule [+you]  ;
d
[=therefore] the burning – anger of – IEUE (is) – [=upon] you=them – […2x…] ,
10
and he (will) repay – [..] the ones (that) hate him , 
b
to=as – [..] the ones (that will) perish – in front of him ;
c
[copy of line a-b ; similar to the repeats above] 
 
7 th commandment
[Deut. 7] 
9
[..] you (will) know=cling – that=to – IEUE – your deity ,
b
[+for] he (is) – the deity – (being) faithful – and=to El=you ,
c
keeping – the covenant of – [..] [+his] kindness       +                                                                                                            [sic] 
d
(with-) to=all the ones (that) love him – and (are) keeping – his instructions ,
e
[=to] a thousand – generations ;                                                                                                                     [may read : b-c-e-d]
 
8a
that=know – from=that – IEUE – loves – you ,                                                                                      [rest of line : repeats] 
6
[…6x…] in=for you=I (k=anki) – (will) choose=become – IEUE – your deity ,        +
b
(and-) to=you (will) become – the people – to him=me – [..1x..] ,
c
[lineup :]                                                                                                                                                                       [6 : often so said in prophets]
[+as] [+my] treasured possession         +
d
whom – [..1x..] – [+I] (will make) to [=dwell]        +
e
upon – the face of – [+their] (-own) (adm-) ground .

 
end

            
                                    we hope and trust that this was what you have said , Sir

B)                                                       observations

 
 
this time it sounds like a real Covenant
… with an even attractive undertone : in exchange for taking Him seriously , He will protect you   —
as a very agreeable proposition that would make someone want  to step into ;
quite different from Esau’s legalistic setup where a series of commandments automatically invoke
a kind of aversion  in the fallen nature of man – and Esau knew this very well , ofcourse ; see next ;
 
it was easy (-for Esau) to go corrupt
… because the text of the covenant only shows at two places , and , like he let Adam to disappear
from the scroll by inserting his ‘Genesis 5’ , factually he did the same with the entire Covenant
just by mutilating these two places ;
and though the restored  concept shows everywhere throughout prophets , he deviously turned 
the Covenant into a “bullying with the Law” concept – for which fallen man is very susceptible – 
therewith creating a state of mind that will not spot the real Covenant woven through the prophets !
 
the restored buildup
… having kept in mind the “4 + 3” like in the seven feasts and seven churches etc , the first four
are exclusive about God – while in the last three He keeps the initiative  , so to speak ,
where the last three describe the promise as the result of taking Him seriously       —
the same type buildup also shows in prophets where first the conditions are being posed 
working towards the end often showing as the concept “I be your deity and you my people” ;
          continuity :
          very difficult to restore is ‘the continuity’ of themes as well as of syntax
          so that one has the feeling that the text “runs properly” from one theme to the other ,
          since it was recomposed from the corrupt (end of) Ex.20 and (the end of) Deut. 5 , 6 and 7 ,
          which are full of repeats while those repeats themsélves contain themes in random order ;
          Palestine and  Eden :
          another difficulty is that the phrasing “has to be true for Palestine as well as for Eden” ,
          therefore terms as for example “(bring you to-) the ground that I created” cannot be said 
          since that is not true for this  world ; overall we think that this trap was avoided ;  

 
the individual commandments 
per commandment : 
the second one :
– the “heavens outside the land” : because it follows upon ‘above’ and ‘below’ the only proper
    continuation would be “outside” ; some ‘flat-earthers’ consider KJV’s “waters below” indicating
    a certain creation model for this earth — which is a brave attempt , as far we’re concerned ;
the third one :
– the “name” : as we saw , the ‘name’ is an important aspect in the other Reality ,
    containing all the power and character of a being ;
    strangely this became the shortest commandment now , 
    and though we looked there does not appear to be anything more needing to explain this one ;
the fourth one :
– the “sabbath day” :  Ex.20 links it to “the creational week” but though true it is not the point here
    (rendering this Ex.20 section corrupt) ; instead it must relate to “the 6 days unto mt. Horeb”  
    as the text in 15 confirms , as a foreshadowing of the entrance to Eden — the real sabbath ,
    hence we chose “will bless” in 15d conform Haggai 2 “in this day I will bless you” ;
the fifth one :
– now ‘the final three’ should start , and now the theme “the (adm-) ground” appears ,
    including the conditional aspect : “IF you will hearken …..” ;
    in KJV the closing line was also ‘the ground I swore to your fathers’ but Esau had it preceded
    there with his “honour your father and mother so that your life will be prolonged… ” –
    where apart from the corrupt ‘father and mother’ ‘prolonged’ can never refer to Eden ;   
the sixth one :
… arguably the most difficult : 
– we kept previous 19 “(you will be-) casting out your enemies” 
    because the Covenant is also ‘a type of cooperation’ — where indeed the people warred the
    giant tribes just as the 144 will war Mystery-Babylon ; but also as a setup to this 6th commandment
    where God has the initiative and He will deliver the enemies ;
            “… according to the covenant that I am making (re-affirming) with you and your sons ,
             as the one that I made with your fathers” :
    the whole section where this was taken from is apparently about “the 7 enemy nations” but that
    theme was already in Deut.2 and 3 so this was Esau’s coverup : we didn’t want to drop the original
    term ‘covenant’ and combined with the suspicious roots we came to this  —
    the covenant was first made with Abraham (‘your fathers’) but must also count for the sons (‘144’)
    since they would come forth FROM the people (and see Exodus Joseph page) ;
            “the birth right” ,
    we opted “the enemies took it” as reason FOR the reaffirmation of the Covenant
    since it almost immediately follows upon ‘the Pharaoh having given it back’ ;
the seventh one :
– the promises as the closing in prophets
  
the odd one out : ‘love God with all your heart’ – per NT
… though Christ is supposed to have said this , her phrasing is very questionable    
because it encourages the power of the Self while prophets always describe ‘a humble soul’ ,
implying that Esau tampered with His response ;
in the Covenant the theme of “people loving God” must show in 9d where , interestingly ,
the “loving God” is combined with the conditional “that keep his commandments” – so that’s good ; 
          the “thousand generations” ,
           fitting much better here as in the KJV under the 2nd commandment