please – for the clue of this chapter see intro but the original text will take some time , still       Thoth – the king of Mystery-Babylon at his altar making images from the stolen fire [Seti tomb]

   
 
                                          the alleged “mene mene theqal pharsin”
 
      … just like in many other chapters also here the root (-PHRaS) suspiciously much
      looks like Esau’s mutilation of the root “scroll” (-SePHeR) , and that combined with
      the said “hand that is writing on the wall” must be an enormous Red flag to us    —
      so let’s put together the main theme of this chapter , shall we :
 
      #1  Nebuchadnessar kindles a (strange-) fire upon the stolen Temple altar :
      … it was not “his son Belshazzar” since that is Esau’s cover up   —
      in all the Spells ‘Thoth’ (a fallen archangel) is the sorcerer of the flame and he is
      represented by king Nebuchadnessar upon earth who álso is infatuated with ‘fire’ 
      just like his Master : compare a previous chapter of “the young lads in the oven” ; 
      in the first lines here the king organizes a palace banquet and orders in his pride 
      for the stolen altar of the Jerusalem temple to be brought and kindles fire upon it ,
      indeed recreating the situation of the strange fire upon the altar in the Eden gate
 
               fire    >>>                (as if a hand here)           shadow of a writing hand
             [altar]                                                                                                   [wall] 
 
      … that in all other prophet chapters Adam entered the gate to place the fire there
      is not a contradiction : for in the evil region Mystery-Babylon it is Thoth managing
      their flame (Seshat) in “the gate of the nations (-of demons)” north of Eden ;
      here ‘Nebuchadnessar king of Babylon’ was used to depict this theme because 
      he represents Thoth “the king of (Mystery-) Babylon” in prophets , so that God
      created a link to the Egyptian Spells in which Thoth features : since we would
      understand the nature of the texts in the prophets by understanding the Spells
      (see lines in prophets “the sons will have read the sayings of their nobles”)  
 
       #2  the ‘strange fire’ + ‘the scroll’ :
      … after all the chapters about this theme there can only be one conclusion here :
      by us understanding the scroll , God will remove the strange fire from his altar ;
      and the king understood that : hence his shocked reaction !         (see line 6) 
      rephrased : he knew about the situation of the Eden gate and now saw how her
      deity would make to cease their stolen fire ; however , he may nót have known  
      (and that’s important) as “how a scroll related to that” , see next :
 
                                                                         the four words
 
      was it “a fluent line” or a staccato one caused by ‘a series of terms’ as in KJV ?
      why would God not show a fluent line – since interlinear has “and·bisecting”  ?
      to us it seems as if Esau wanted to suggest a mystery by using separate words
      which then in turn must be explained by Daniel :
      but isn’t it much more logical that he explained “the scroll connection” .. ?
      [which is exactly something Esau would hide !] 
 
        if we want to restore a line we minimum need “scroll” “fire” and “to cease”, right ,
        where the preferable candidate for a verb is (-theqal) :

MENE       MENE      THQAL       u·PHRSIN        noun          noun            verb       (‘and + scroll’) but what do we want to make it say ?                           fire          strange         cease     and the scroll            (?) and streamlined :          [+your]  strange         fire       (will) end  through the scroll      (?) syntax , since the scroll is the main subject :  fire-of-you strange one-being-removed in-scroll-of-me “the strange fire will be removed through my scroll”  roots :    menE=Esh – mene=zur – thQL=LQch – PHRSin=SPHR

THeQAL   inversal LAQACH [virtually similar]

      which is not a very bad score : for in (thQL=LQch) the “TH” is almost identical , see above ,
      and because Esau must have stárted with the ‘scroll’ corruption thén found his thQL he had
      the combination “divide + weigh” so he thought to add “to number” as the two short words ,
      but his weird double “mene + mene” is a 2-Tier like “strange + fire” !
      how does this sound to you .. ?
      so that the réal quote was “ESH ZUR LAQACH SEPHER” (-with additions) … 
      it may have said “his + fire….” either referring to the king having kindled it as mocking the
      Eden gate , or referring to ‘Adam’ himself — but it’s safer to not add that pronoun here ;
 
       falsification :
      though it may be TRUE that the king’s empire was given to the Medes soon after this
      and that Daniel even may have prophesied that as conclusion , it does not belong to
      to the main theme of “the stolen altar – the fire – the hand – and its message” ,
      since as always Esau connected these events into his plausible deniability ;
 
      #3 a related strange chapter :
      … we believe nothing of “Daniel being arrested because he prayed three times a day before
      open windows toward Jerusalem” (chapter 6) since that also must be “the scroll theme” 
      and related to this chapter — but unless we ll find a hook in it we’ve to leave it for now ;
 
      #4  personal :
      … perhaps already posted elsewhere on the site , but there are things one never forgets
      as an event that now became important because of Unleavened    —
      some 20 years ago an afternoon I was resting upon the bed when the soul realized that she
      was floating some ten , twenty inches above the body ; she turned around to look down and
      saw this body as if asleep , with huge red letters written across it “useless” ;
      and after she turned again suddenly “a body as of gold-dust” started to appear around her :
      first the arms .. then legs .. and it felt fan-tas-tic ! she tried to move her hand : and found that
      the hand as it were ‘was moved fór her’ , as if the moving itsélf was already a gift of God …
      but then came that harsh , thunderous voice , as if it came from every side  
      (and only much later we understood whý the Originals were so afraid for Him , right , since
      his voice – as a displeased one – must have resonated throughout all of their body…) :
      and the words said were this ‘TEKEL’ — but it had the ‘weighed & wanted’ colour ;
      because immédiately the vision stopped , all was gone , and the next years was Hell
              it’s impossible to remember ‘what time of year that happened’ , but for us right now
              is important that the TEKEL quote linked to ‘our Original’ : is it the same NOW ? ,
              moreover , now we understood about “the false fire + the scroll relation” ?       
      now please , I’m not saying He ‘quoted the corrupt KJV’ ,
      but only that I knew 110% that it was this TEKEL with the cólour of ‘judgment’ ,
      and the “not receiving the Original” seems to match “the not correct text” … no ?
      so – what if this time we have the correct text ?
 
      … we always said “that He will never tell anything that He hasn’t said in the scroll already”
      and that includes “confirmations concerning our Date”, no ; yet though this does not have
      the same ‘authority’ as lines in the scroll , the context matches her perfectly  
      and hope is what we need , your Majesty