to right : the deity QÂN (Cain) in the Book of Gates ; in other spells the Egyptians called him ‘our father’ but it’s difficult to see what happened with him : here he shows as ‘a mummy’ indicating that it was about “his body” [-as the Eden one he obtained !]  , writing that “he is giving (matrix-) existence” and how his body is to be “cooled-down” – read , to be made suitable for the demon souls to inhabit it , as “the sanctified aspects of (matrix-) beauty”

  
                                                                                        theme
 
          … in-cre-dibly corrupted but restored into an important page    —
          though we learned in prophets that Adam got his insane idea to can rule us
          after he saw how Cain had killed his brother Abel , the question was how 
          that concept could have been narrated in this chapter 4 :
          what Esau did was turning the side-issue (‘Abel slain’) into the main one in
          order to conceal how not “God and Cain discussed” but “God and Adam“ ,
          and how not “Cain went to the land Nod” but “Adam to the north of Eden” ;
          
          while the second storyline is “Cain killed Abel out of jealousy” shown by 
          the pun of the words (-qain) and (-qna) , from which you & we are to deduct
          that the reason of his rejection was because Cain was another type soul ,
          linking back to the situation of ‘the nations (-of demons)’ surrounding Eden !
          [for an exploration of this strange ‘corrupt-soul’ theme see intro II below[
 
          Adam wants to take back Eden by force :
          … he is depressed because of his misery , pondering how he was evicted
          from his own heritage and starts to become angry with God — which must
          be one of the greatest mysteries in the entire scroll — and even thinks of a
          way to get back at God by injuring His people : similarly to what Cain did !
          then God answers him ,
          warning him to not go execute that horrible plan , inviting him back instead
          but mentioning “to make atonement” as a condition for his return ;

          [total lines : 17]

          after line 15 >>> narrative continues in chapter 5-B

          for the restored text , below , of this chapter 4 (click here)
 

 [8/6] 
intermezzo : the Curse : the guilt of Adam — as your & our guilt
 
… a bit unusual this time because more like ‘a contemplating section’ yet very relevant ,
expanding upon yesterday’s log , and how come that these days are so deeply empty
and lonely while instead we should somehow be happily waiting for our close date    —
 
if you think about it it’s a very profound concept “how eternal truths always have been
blocked because of corrupted text” and “how re-arranging the letters undo that blockage” ,
as the method He chose to restore everything of Eden that got lost ;
yet concerning us that re-arranging of the letters is not some abstract job :
when restoring the text every single word “has to go through our being” who validates 
or rejects it , and every single term and concept needs to be understood by her so that
the text… causes a re-living (-by her) of what was said … is it not ?
 
and that re-living is very pleasant for her when wonderful themes are involved ,
but becomes dangerous when a Negative aspect like ‘a curse’ or unresolved problem
will be the case , having been dormant until the letters are now being re-arranged 
but becáuse of this suddenly unleash their darkness and most often ‘by surprise’ ,
as if the curse starts to connéct with her …
a sad example of that was a log in November last year when ‘the strange fire theme’
just had come into view : though she has felt the cold sphere of ‘Adam’ before during
sections in which he appeared , at the Strange Fire theme it was violent — as if having
become totally encapsulated in his consciousness which character is nothing short of  
an unimaginable Greek Tragedy : an ever increasing loneliness fueled by ‘the notion
of great injustice having been done to the own entitlement’ , together as two aspects
that continuously propel eachother , and resulting in a bizarre defeatistic but resolute
type self-pride to survive no matter the odds ,
not knowing love because having rejected the concept of “the other” since any ‘other’
is but categorized either as enemy , ór as useful tool for that own defeatistic goal      —
 
this chapter states “that he begán to be wroth about his situation” perhaps implying
that he also has pondered ‘to return or not’ , where however the condition that God
had connected with that “as having to make an atonement” was a too great hurdle
[-and we should keep it by this chapter only to not confuse ourselves :
the “book of Adam and Eve” probably is written by Esau yet based upon some truths ,
writing “how after the apple Adam committed suicide several times – but to no avail” ,
yet the réason for that action remains unclear and even “remorse” can be selfish]  ;
the point is that eventually he made a choice ,
but he was a soul like us — and what would wé have chosen in that situation ..? 
 
… let’s be honest and not immediately shout “no ofcourse not !” ,
if only for the obvious reason that – as far as our memory goes downhere – we never 
had a Gorgeous (-body) like his’ which in his case had rather exclusive powers since
it still resembled a number of aspects of God himself … 
is there any guarantee that we would NOT have chosen the way he did ? 
you see the problem please ?
for this causes a sécond problem : because theoretically it could happen again
once we would have been restored , having powers we can only dréam of right now ,
IF we fail to tackle this problem by nót being brutally honest with ourselves … right ?
 
please remember that God makes a remark about this problem ,
saying something like “lest they [=Jacob]  would conquer Eden” : we need to search
back that section but the idea definitely was about this and showing in the ‘conquer’ 
while the context was related to “whý He let the scroll to be corrupted” ;
so that it’s not some invénted problem — but about us understanding what we are
and even be brave enough to accept that it doesn’t look too positive and how for
some reason specifically you & we are to understánd what is the point here 
 
and — going to the brighter side now —
it’s almost as if we were to know the soul hermetically sealed-off from God ,
or even whatever is left of the soul , not even receiving the slightest notion of Him :
THIS was the real curse after the apple : forget any ‘knowledge’ aspect concerning
matrix-good and evil ; totally sealed-off the soul will completely wither and will learn
with 100% accuracy the difference between impulses from herself — or of Him 
[leaving ‘the evil realm’ out of the equation]  :
in fact we are placed in the same situation as Adam .. but to undo that curse !  
please read that again  
 
… you know that “any curse can only be undone by a group or a person finding 
themselves in a similar situation bearing the same Negative epithets’ – with ofcourse
Christ as best example – yet then acting differently so that the epithets are Invalid :
and apart from Adam’s power – which we obviously lack – the situation is similar :
we’re lonely and He neither shows to us while the paradise is on the other side …
yet we. keep. on. choosing. Him. over. and. over. again. even. He. don’t. show. 
 
perhaps you think “but is saying this not close to blasphemy” ?
is it ? are we not to represent all the attributes that Adam has squandered ? 
and would that not include THE fatal mistake he made : choosing against God and
against his homeland and even against his own people … ? why would we think that
He would not place us in exact the same situation — but now as ‘to restore that’ ?
no – we cannot know “how long it took for Adam to come to his decision” but have 
not at léast the past two years been an utter withering for us .. ? and – let’s hope – 
that because we can phrase the problem now it may imply that it is ending .. ? 
 
… returning a moment to that negative “conquering Eden” ;
for some strange reason the past week several movies were broadcasted of the 
category ‘Doctor (Stephen) Strange’ with the themes Sorcery and the other Reality 
(or how one gets through the evenings , right , zapping away if it will get too much) ,
and though the idea of all kinds of changing beautiful landscapes and especially
the having influence upon a reality seems appealing in fact the barrage of beguiling 
pictures and impulses becomes tiring – for the soul remains empty and lonely ;
that type reality is very similar to the one described in the Spells with their exulted
talk about the neverending beauties of their Field of Reeds – or see the murals – 
and their examples of the great desirableness and advantage of their sorceries :
it is all without life , and remains a empty lovelessness because there is no ‘other’ …
 
now please ,
becáuse we understood that her main problem is “a covering consciousness” 
as the first layer between her and whatever any paradise itself may look like ,
if He will grant her his type covering (Sir.. ) she will be in for a sweet surprise :
namely ‘realizing that every single aspect is a continuous GIFT unto her’    —
like right now she has no eyes but she will see what He sees , she will have an
absolutely stunning body but not feeling as ‘her own’ but as a beautiful GIFT
and becáuse she’ll feel all the presents as gifts she will honor the GIVER of them
through which His kindness will shower her with even more gifts … you see ?  ; )
in truth ,
this must be the situation which He desires upon our returning ,
as the type relation we would understand by the undoing of that ancient curse 
 
[you please judge me for every word above Majesty
pleading you to have all the 144 completed in the next couple of days] 
[/]

                                                               
      [9/6] 
       postscript :
       … never dreaming useful anymore , while blind as a bat — yet this showed last night
       before sleeping : ‘something’ had been extinguished and rather recently since the grey
       fumes still ascended , while the point was it would never be rekindled again – ever
 
       pondering that and your & our situation today , it can only have been about ‘the curse’ 
       and it reminded of the Zechariah 3 line “a wooden poker rescued from the fire” ;
       though the vision may not exactly match it the theme comes remarkable close :
       (a)  “And the LORD said unto Satan, The LORD rebuke thee, O Satan; 
       (b)   even the LORD that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: 
       (a)   [is] not this a brand plucked out of the fire ?”
       … though these chapters are horribly corrupted , 
       rather sure is that “Satan” was “Adam” and “Joshua” representing “us the 144” ;
       the previous context (-in chapter 2) was “the Strange Fire theme” and following this
       section “Joshua receives new clothes” – read “we receive our Original” ;
       but opposed to the Fire-theme élsewhere here an unusual “accusing” is mentioned
       which may very well denote ‘the curse’ theme linking to his Strange Fire  
 
       so that (b) can have read , introducing ‘the removal’ in (c) :
       “I will remove (gR=sR) [+your] ieue=curse from the in=sons of choose=Ishral
       –
       that will have in=understood (b=bin) [+it?] [+my] scroll” ,
       –
       (because-) (will) this=they – not (be) – (as-) a wooden poker – rescued – from the fire ?”  
       it can have read “undo + your curse” ofcourse ,
       and the said “rescued from the fire” is “from the (strange-) fire that is cast to earth” ,
       but the point is that ‘the accusing’ suggests ‘the curse theme’ , don’t you agree ?
       while directly followed by “the new garment” — not even a “and I bring them to tsiun”
       so that ‘the curse’ appears to be immediately linked to (-our) ‘physicality’ !
 
       now please ,
       if the negative “conquering Eden” (see the Adam’s guilt section) was unclear , still :
       the Jacob soul herself has become so .. corrupted ever since she dwells in this ape
       that even souls that THINK they ‘desire to be in Heaven’ have No Idea how quickly
       her nature can turn around to become a self-entitled spoiled child towards God
       (not mentioning here ‘resentment’ or possibly even ‘hate’ ofcourse)
       IF they would be “”raptured”” without having died to self   —
       so unpredictable and labile the Jacob soul has become that even ‘hardship in life’
       is NO guarantee that this soul would not turn nasty if her circumstances change :
       we say nothing absurd here , right ,
       while we’re honest with ourselves knowing we also were close to that , once
       [so that we can only plead for the wider 144 going throught that awful process of
       dying and dying again — these males & females are the real heros …]   
       and the mentioned “No Idea” is the key here , 
       since God ofcourse knóws how unpredictable the soul has become over time ,
       saying – but very paraphrased ! – “therefore also what I réally said in my scroll is 
       a mystery unto them , and rightly so : since IF they would understand my words
       in the corrupted scroll by their own smartness without they died first in order to , 
       then I would Legally have to give them entrance to eden but they would use me 
       to profit from and to take from since they would be selfish individuals” ,
       and see the end of previous section why that would be the ultimate Horror …     
 
       … while it is not impossible that Adam cóunted with this in the form of “if I will go
       down and have nothing – then He will have nothing , neither” ;
       hence the interpretation in Zachariah that it can have been about this curse 
 
       but right now ,       
       the vision , combined with what we learned , appears to be very positive
       in the sense of “the completion of your & our death to self AND that of the curse” 
       where the latter is a result of the former – or rephrased :
       we ended ourselves and (-therewith) the curse from catching fire again – ever –
       because the smoking ashes appear to be a permanent state
       very much suggesting “that it will NOT happen again” per previous section
       
       we can be very hopeful that the above is true
       and how good it would be if He would confirm that in a couple of days from now
       [/]
 
          if you wish to continue to restored text please (click here),
          since a number of themes in this chapter are so .. foreign to us that we’ll
          try explore these further in below intro :

                                                                                           intro II

 
 
Genesis 4
 
[first line :
right away we have a small problem since ‘not Eve herself was pregnant’ 
because the eden-mother brought forth their children , see intro , and she may refer to this :] 
1
“And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, 
and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.”
1
and – Adam – knew – Eve – his woman , and – Cain – (was) born – (unto-) pregnant=them ;
b
and she says : I (have) obtained (pun on ‘cain’) – a human being      +
c
(through-) the with=zeal (?) (‘compelling action’) (ath=QNA) of – IEUE ;                               [‘as pun on Cain’]  
note :
… this is no nitpicking but her response must “give some information abóut Cain” ,
just as in line (KJV-) 25 a description is given about ‘Sheth’ ; concordances think that the name
Cain (QAIN) relates to “a lance” (etc) but it bégs the link with “jealousy , zeal” (-QNA) ,
however we cannot use the same colour ‘jealousy’ here and must use ‘zeal’ instead ,
interpreting that as “they having a child through the eden-mother construct whom God created” ; 
 
2
and [=after]  – [..]  [=they]  (have) begotten – Abel (?) ,                                                                        [Abel ? , see note] 
b
[..]  Abel – becomes – a cattle – shepherd ,
c
[=while] – Cain – becomes – a tiller of – the ground ;
note :
… the name ‘Abel’ is unsure and in fact suspect because linking to ‘idols , vanity’ (H1882) ;
at the end of this chapter the scene has changed “to the situation upon this éarth” 
and “the birth of Cain & Abel seems to be repeated there — in that new situation” :
as a son called “iabal” that is born , and then a “thubal-cain” ,
and whatever Abel’s name was he must be linked to this ‘iabal’ born on earth
[note that no description is given of Abel , very possibly deleted by Esau]  ; 
 
3
and it came to pass – [=on]  a [=certain]  – [..]  day 
b
[=that]  – Cain – brings of – [..]  the (first-) fruits of – the ground 
c
(as-) a gift (-offering) – unto IEUE ;      +
 
4
and – also – Abel – brings of [..]  – [..]  the firstlings of – his flock – [=for]  [..]  the fat thereof ;
b
and – IEUE – took notice of – [..]  Abel – and [..]  – his gift (-offering) ,     +
 
5
(a) “But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. 
(b)  And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.                                                                                [<< later]  
5
a
[=but]  [..]  of – Cain – and [..]  – his gift (-offering) – he (did) – not – take notice ;   
 
8
(a) “And Cain talked with Abel his brother:                                                                        [key line – and see line 1 :] 
(b)  and it came to pass, when they were in the field,
(c) that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.”
8
[=then]  – Cain – (was) say=wroth (amR-chRe) – [=with]  – abel=IEUE – [.. moved ..]  ,      +     [see KJV 6] 
b
(when-) [+he]  brother=realized (achi=bin)        +
c
[+that]  [..]  [+his]  field=soul (shde=nphsh)      +
d
(had) and=not (u=la) become=come forth – in=from become=him (IEUE) ,
e
and he (got) rising=filled (iqm=tsm) – (with-) cain=jealousy (qin=qna)       +
f
to=against – his brother – Abel ,
g
and slew him ;
 
note :
… there was much wrong with this line , not only the “and it happened + that they were + in the field” 
as rather useless information — while the point is that Adam saw Abel being killed ,
and more : an important clue about Cain must have been hidden here ;
a) the obvious pun “Cain” and “jealous” bégs to appear somewhere — here ,
b) the whole idea is ‘that Cain was wroth with God – and took it out on Abel’ ,
c) so that we only have the midsection of the line to invent the reason why ;
 
9
“And the LORD said unto Cain, Where [is]  Abel thy brother? 
And he said, I know not: [Am]  I my brother’s keeper?”
9
and – ieue=Adam – (had) said=seen – to=how – Cain – (had) where=killed – [=his]  brother – Abel ,
b
[now what we do ? write ‘Cain’ out of the story ? :] 
–
and said=afterwards (amr=achr) – [.. 1x ..]  – (had) know=gone forth (?)        +
c
?=to the keeper=nations (‘of demons’) (shMr=guM)       +                              [b-d : dangerous – but see note] 
d 
[+from]  brother=which (achi=ashr) – [+he]  (had) I=come forth (?) ;                       [confirming above 8-d ?] 
note :
a) it may seem overdone – but why would the scroll not tell crystal clear “who Cain really was” ?
b) and can be very well an intro to Adam’s ponderings ;
c) and note how Esau must have seen ‘someone disappearing’ ; 
d) Cain went there ‘still having an eden type body’ ! , 
      but he was not alone in that , overthere , since also Horus had acquired one
      and possible also some 30 golden soldiers – the Maruts – if Rg-Veda is to be believed ; see intro ;
 
25
“And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: 
For God, [said she] , hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.”
25
and – Adam – knew – his woman – again , and – a son – (was) begotten (-to her) ,
b
and she called – his name – Sheth ;
c
[+saying]  : because – [+our]  deity – (has) compensated – [..]  me – (with-) another – descendant
d
instead of – Abel – [=whom]  – Cain – slew ;    +    
 
26
(a) “And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: 
(b)  then began men to call upon the name of the LORD.”                                                    [< next theme intro !] 
26
and [=from]  Sheth – also=onwards (?) – [+many]  [=children]  – (were) begotten
b
and=as called=becoming – the name=family (?) of – man ;                                                                   [‘family tree’] 

 
                                                                                                 part I b
                                                  but Adam ponders his misery in a dangerous way 
 
[new line / theme :] 
c
then=but – [..]  name=Adam (shM=adM) – (had) started – to call=doubt (?) (“resent” ? ‘other ?’) – IEUE ;    + 
13
“And Cain said unto the LORD, My punishment [is]  greater than I can bear.”
13
[..]  saying – to – cain=himself : to=woe ! – (to-) ieue=me ,
b
(because-) my depravity=misery – (is) (too-) great – [=for]  (-me) to bear :        +
note :
a) the end of 26 “then began men to call upon the name of the LORD.” is a typical excuse-line ,
      while we need the important term “begin” ;
b) perhaps indeed it wrote “resent” in 26-c but it don’t feel good to put that in bold ;
c) after “misery to bear” only two words remained , opting “woe !” as strengthening b) ;
 
14
“Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; 
and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, 
[that]  every one that findeth me shall slay me.”
14
(for-) behold ! , you=he (has) driven >> me (-out) of      +                                          [key line : high probability :] 
b
the·day (=tampered) = [+my]  (-ówn) day=heritage (iuM=Morsha) ,
c
(as-) from the surface of – the·ground = [+my]  (?) ground (‘eden’) ; 
d
[next : can be anything but let’s say he devises a plan to get it back :] 
–
and=therefore – I (will) hid=oppose (?) – his presence     +                                                           [next : b/c of a-c :] 
e
and=by become=cooperating (?) – (with-) the fugitive=nations (‘of demons’)      +
f
and=for to vagabond=take back – [..]  [+my]  land ,                                                                     [‘next : as Cain did !’] 
g
[=while]  he=I (will) become=rule – all – me=his find=people (Mats=oM) – (by-) slaying me=them ;
5
b
[w/ moved :] 
and – [+his]  cain=wroth – (against-) very=IEUE (mad=ieue) – wroth=increased ,
c
and – his countenance – fell (or ‘darkened’) ; 
note :
a) the “desire to take the land back” seems solid , and reappears in the answer , below ;
b) that “fugitive + vagabond” appears in the answer (-below) in cóntext of ‘the nations’ 
      means that it was also the theme here — so that’s good ; 
c) leaving only the ‘slaying’ line still : the ‘getting back at God’ – like Cain did should appear here
      but perhaps it wrote “and I will rule it by slaying all his people” or alike ;
      tempting is “I will be like the deity by slaying his people” but perhaps overdone ;

 
[next 6-7 : NO ‘Cain’ ! – but God tells Adam ‘the condition for him to return to eden’ :] 
6
“And the LORD said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?”
6
[=but]  (then-) – IEUE – says – unto – the cain=man (‘Adam’) :
b
[..]  [=why]  (are) – [..]  you – wroth ? , and [..]  [=why]  (is) – your countenance – fallen ? ;      +
note :
… again please : NO ‘Cain’ here ! that was Esau’s smart coverup !
why go in discussion with a figure that disappears again from the whole scroll almost immediately ?
instead , these lines must have been said to Adam :
first because in prophets appears the same type reproaching of God unto him ,
but never before we were so close to the reason why those lines were said …
 
7
(a) “If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted ? 
(b)  and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. 
(c)  And unto thee [shall be]  his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.”
7
[line a) unknown still ; perhaps :]  “is it not your own transgression which has caused this ?” ;
b
and=yet if – you (will) do good=repent (?) – (unto-) not=me (?)          +
c
to=and (make-) portal=atonement (?) (PHthch=khPHr) – (for-) [+your]  sin (‘used in KJV’) :       [in ch.3] 
d
(then-) [+I]  (will make-) [+you]  to recline=return (?) (rBts=shB)       +
e
[..]  unto [..]  – your impulse=ground (?) – and you – (will) rule – [=over]  it (-again) ;   +           [continued :]  
note :
.. perhaps THE most important line in this chapter : God offered him ‘a way back’ !
because He is like that !
yet it is an incredible mystery – perhaps one of the greatest in all of the scroll –
why Adam would refuse this offer and be the subject of an unspeakable Greek tragedy …
 
      [at this point indeed another section was cut-off , shown by the weird start of next KJV 8 ,  
      “And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, ….. “] 
 
12
“When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; 
a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.”
12
that=but (-if) – you (will) serve=make an oath (‘pact’)      +                                              [his pact : see prophets] 
b
ath=with – the·ground (=tampered) = the nations (-of demons) ,
c
(as-) nót – proceeding=hearkening (?) – give=unto [+me]         +
d
(but-) (will be) give=proceeding (‘w/ swapped ?’) – (-in) [..]  your (-own) – power , 
e
(then-) you (will) become – a fugitive – and a vagabond – in the (‘their’?) land ;       +
note :
… by sheer coincidence ‘the fugitive and vagabond’ can have been original :
in the Rg-Veda stanza the demon contemplates Adam saying “he indeed is a strange guy
yet he makes everything we need – therefore let us praise him with harp and flute” [book X] 
[and how bizarre that Esau used the same ‘harp + flute’ corruption at the end here !] ;
 
11
(a) “And now [art]  thou cursed from the earth, 
(b)  which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother’s blood from thy hand;”
11
and=because [..]  – [+you]  (will have) cursed – yourself – from – [+your]  ground (‘eden’) ,
       b
       which=and – (will have) opened=put a curse (?) – ath=upon – [=your]  (own-) mouth=people
       c
       [w/ swapped :] 
       to=by – (you-) (having) blood=devised – to take – your=their brother=life (a-chi=chi)      +
       d
       from=by your (-own) hand (‘doing’) ,       +                                                                                        [continued in 10 :]  
note :
… perhaps the intention was “because not only you will have cursed yourself from your ground , 
     but also by the (inevitable-) curse upon you
     by devising to take the life of your people (-in order to maintain your situation)”  – 
     but you see it’s hard to rephrase that by the given number of words ; 
 
10
“And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.”
10
(but-) and=restrain (-you) ! – (from) the said=abomination – [=which]  – [+Cain]  (has) done , 
b
(for-) the voice of – [=his]  brother’s – blood – (-still) cries out – unto me – from the soil ;      + 
 
15-16
“And the LORD said unto him, 
Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. 
And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.”
“And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.”
15
and – IEUE – says – unto him (‘Adam’) :
b
therefore : whosoever – (will) slay – [+my]  cain=sacred ones (Qin=Qdsh) ,   +              [read : ‘Originals’] 
c 
vengeance (-shall be taken) (-on him) – sevenfold ; 
 
                                                                             >>> narrative continues in chapter 5-B
 
[new line / theme :] 
16
[=yet]  – the cain=man (‘Adam’) – went forth – from the presence of – IEUE ,
15-d
and placed=abandoned (?) – [..]  [+his]  cain=woman – ieue=Eve – [.. 1x (‘sign’) ..]  ,                [goto 16-b ? :] 
e
“lest any finding him should kill him.”            [w/ just added to end the ‘sign’ line ?] 
16-b
and dwelt=ascended – in=to the land of – the nud=nations (‘of demons’) – east=north (!) of – Eden ;   
note :
… it’s tempting for us ‘to write what we know’ yet we need to keep it as simple as possible :
any 1200-500 BC Hebrew would have read “the forefather being warned to not hurt his own people
and the forefather now having left while abandoning his wife , going to ‘the nations” ;
of which they – by all context – never understood that “this was about the other Reality” ;
hence we need to take care that wé won’t spoil it
by restoring “and placed his woman Eve in a secure place” – for that would be Too Much ;
 
       [next : now we have only 1 (-and a final) line to get to ‘the situation on earth’ :] 
 
17
(a) “And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: 
(b)  and he builded a city, 
(c)  and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.”
17
and – his (Adam’s) wife=people – knew=went forth – (to-) cain=him ,
b
and=but she=he pregnant=betrayed [+them]  (thr=bgd)       +                                            [‘so said in prophets’] 
c 
and bare=gave [+them]  – (to-) the enoch=nations (‘of demons’) ,
d
and=which (made) >> built=them  (?) – to be=dwell – (in-) [+their]  city=land                           [read : earth] 
e
and=as the called=descendants (?)     +
f
(being-) name=far – the·city (=tampered) = the=from [+their]  (-own) (eden-) ground ;                            (?)
note :
a) ofcourse the evil soul ‘Cain’ never conceived ‘Enoch’ (-you silly concordances) ,
b) while – again – Esau’s “milking out the Cain theme” is quite obvious here ; 
c) and considered “how old-Ishral has read these lines” :
     they sound like “some common type of exile” and therefore the interpretation can be correct ; 
 
[new line / theme :] 
g
(and-) of as=them – a son – (called-) Enoch – (was) name=born ;       +
18
“And unto Enoch was born Irad: and Irad begat Mehujael: 
and Mehujael begat Methusael: and Methusael begat Lamech.”
18
and – Enoch – begat – Irad ; and – Irad – begat – Mehuael ;                    [18 : perhaps ; comp. book Enoch]
b
and – Mehuael – begat – Methusael ; and – Methusael – begat – Lamech ; 
note :
.. it’s defendable “that first a group of souls – say ‘a group of a few thousand’ – were on earth
which were then named “the lineage of Enoch (etc)” ;
just like Abraham came forth from that same group , much later ;
 
                                                                                          part I c
  
             next : probably : the first division upon earth of ‘souls’ and ‘matrix-animal-souls’ :
             in the form of a proto “Rachel and Leah” situation (-which happened later in time) :
             considered the context ,
             these enemy souls were not yet “the Ammon / Esau corrupt-type souls” 
             but “the animalistic (demon-) souls” that were the inhabitants of ancient Sumer 
             and – very likely – even as the drone type souls of ‘the Neanderthals’ (etc) befóre history ; 
             but now those clone souls started to inhabit the type body we have today
             [and please see the ‘quran’ pages about “the king of the east” where that king amasses
             exactly that type drone souls]  :
 
19
“And Lamech took unto him two wives: the name of the one [was]  Adah, and the name of the other Zillah.
19
and – Lamech (?) – took [..]  – two – women :
b
the name of – the [=first]  (was) – Adah (?) ,                                                                                 [linked to “ornament”] 
c
and the name of – the [=other]  (was) – Zillah (?) ;                                                                         [linked to ‘shadow’]  
note :
… we cannot do much with them names – not even sure whether they were original or not –
but ‘Zillah’ would birth “the incarnated evil type souls” as “shadows” ;  
 
[next 20-21 :
interpreted : “the born sons & daughters” as Jacob-souls (=belonging to God) :] 
20-21
“And Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of such as dwell in tents, and [of such as have]  cattle.”
“And his brother’s name [was]  Jubal: he was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ.”
… here ,
ofcourse we believe nothing of the “dwelling in tents + cattle” : but what did it say ? :] 
20
and – Adah – bare – iabal ,                                                                  [linked to “to lead” but also to (-iobl) ‘Jubilee’] 
b
[=who]  – became – the father of – [+all]  (‘see 22+23’)       +
c 
the ones (that) dwell=belong (?) (ishB=Bl) – (to-) tents=IEUE (ael=ieue)       +
d
the and=deity (u=alei) of (eden-) cattle=Ishral (‘no match’) ;                              [20 : read : ‘all Jacob souls’ ?]  
21 
[=then]  [+she]  name=birthed – his brother=sister (‘see 22’) – iubal (?) ,
b
[=who]  – became – the father=mother of – all       +
c 
the ones (that will) hold fast (or ‘take hold of’) – [+his]  (God’s) harp=words (knR=dbR)     +
d 
and (will be) shepherds pipe=delivered of [+him]  (?) ;                                                          [21 : read : ‘the 144’ ?] 
note :
… these two MUST mean “something general” and “a sub-division” 
but it is very difficult to retrieve the intent :
the first one “as all of the souls of God that now dwell on earth” appears correct , 
[even though that will be further specified during Abraham]  , 
while the second one – the daughter – is but an (educated-) interpretation ,
as “a sub-division of Jacob” where the female aspect (‘daughter’) could relate to ‘words’ ;
 
[next 22 : needs to juxtapose 20-21 :] 
22
“And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: 
and the sister of Tubalcain [was]  Naamah.”
strong>22
[=while]  – Zillah (?) – also=afterwards – bore – Tubal-Cain (?) ,            [‘incarnated Cain-souls on earth’] 
b
the forging=father of – all – the ones (that will) brass=hate (?) (chrSH=SHna)      +
c
and=iubal (?) (u=iabl) (and-) [+his]  iron=deity (‘no match’)  ;
d
and (-bare) – Naamah (?)        +                                                                                                     [read : ‘(matrix-) beauty’ ?] 
e
(as the ones that will-) …… hate ? ……. [+his]  tubal=words (?) (thBl=dBr) ;                          [unknown action]  
note :
… equally complicated   —
though these two children MUST be ‘the enemies of (later-) Jacob’ , 
and this “daughter Naamah” , or whatever it said , must juxtapose “iubal” in 21 , 
and therefore by context also the áttribute of ‘iubal’ , the original wording is a guess ; 
 
[closing lines 23-24 : 
MUST refer back to ‘the serpent bruising the heel – but his head destroyed’ in chapter 3 :] 
23
“And Lamech said unto his wives, Adah and Zillah, Hear my voice; ye wives of Lamech, 
hearken unto my speech: for I have slain a man to my wounding, and a young man to my hurt.”
23
and – Lamech (?) – says – unto his women – Adah (?) – and Zillah (?) :
b
hear – my voice , women of – Lamech (?) :
c
[no repeat required :] 
you (-both) (have) hearken=brought forth – the saying=seed (AmR=zRA) ,                          [now ‘on earth’] 
d
that=as – the slain=evil (hRAg=RA) (adj.) – man=seed – (that will) bruise me=us ,
e
and [+our]  (-own) boy=descendants – for=who (will) bruise=sláy me=them .                [‘slay’ was moved] 
 
24
“If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold.”
… here , 
a) we’re not sure of the intention of this line ,
b) yet originally it appears to be a closing of 23 ;
24
because – [+our]  cain=sacred ones (‘Originals’) (Qin=Qdsh as in line 15 ?)      +
b
(will be) avenged – seven-fold (‘same line 15’) ,
c
and=but [+our]  lamech=people (‘as souls on earth’) (?) (laMch=oM)         +
d
seventy=seven (-times) – [..]  seven (-fold) .                                                     [‘as allusion to the Great Jubilee ?’]  
note :
… because of the “Rachel & Leah situation” Lamech must have known what was going on  —
though sadly our Originals were horribly abused (-in Mystery-Babylon) 
the hurt done to Jacob by his enemies is of the same – if not greater – magnitude ;
while we can’t escape feeling that “7 x 7” may be an inherent prophecy

 
25-26  [was used]  

 
end             >>> theme continues in chapter 6 (-because ‘5’ is Esau’s hoax)