[the Exodus is about birth-right] #A : the blessing of Joseph : as his sceptre unto mt. Sinai [Unleavened] unto the day of acceptance [Unleavened soon] for ‘the future sons’ – the 144 [final version ; 2023-02feb.22] |
[fulltext is in top]
theme
because “the birth-right theme” became more extensive we need to find its start
and especially how she developed over Time — hence please first this overview :
the ‘journey’ of the birth-right
start :
– Adam took the birth-right from our Originals (‘as the soul in her Original’)
– causing “the corrupt type souls” to come forth (‘Cain, Canaan, Esau, etc’)
Exodus :
– on earth , Jacob took it back from Esau as “the battle between type souls”
– Jacob on his turn gave the birth-right to Joseph (this chapter)
– Joseph had become virtually a Pharaoh (‘a Legal Right matter’)
– therefore the birth-right Exodus theme is now about “Mystery-Babylon vs Eden”
– because “Pharaoh” in the scroll is ‘the dragon as the evil region’
– hence the metaphysical Exodus events as the immediate interference of God
– the birth-right sceptre will stay with Joseph — as tribe
when the covenant at Horeb will be made with the people [=Unleavened]
and at that point the main timeline stops :
until “the future sons” – the 144 – will receive the sceptre (this chapter)
as the proper fulfillment OF that (stopped-) timeline
[sub :]
hence Esau corrupted the Joseph theme here , in Gen. 50 and Ex. 13 ;
Christ :
– via Ishral’s generational birth-line Christ annuls Adam’s claim upon the birth-right
– but Adam fights back ,
by corrupting the scroll of prophets — as “the leaven”
– and we are the end station [=Unleavened fulfilled]
#A : Genesis 49 (22-26)
the chain of corruptions concerning the birth-right + Joseph
#1 though we rightly understood what was said about Unleavened in our days in Ex. 13
concerning “the sceptre be given to the future sons” ,
to really confirm that we need to understand what was the ‘Joseph’ corruption there ,
#2 if we want to understand what was said about Joseph in 13
we need to see what was the (corrupted-) section it referred to – in Gen. 50 ,
#3 if we want to understand what was said in 50
we need to get some idea about the totally corrupted blessing of Joseph in Gen. 49 :
for complete interpretation and restored text : see below fulltext
[this section is quite extensive – but that was what these just five (!) lines took]
please remember : the 144 represént the twelve tribes ! :
fulltext : [the blessing of Joseph]
22
Joseph is as a son to Pharaoh , [22: see intro as why]
b
therefore through Joseph the tribes of Ishral will be delivered from oppression , +
23
even as the many ones that will be saved in the days of end ; [endtime]
24
because continuously the sceptre (-of the tribes) will stay with Joseph +
b
when IEUE will make a covenant +
with the people at his mountain Horeb , [Unleavened , see note]
c
until the days that the sons of Ishral will arise ; [the 144]
25
for I your father am bestowing upon you the sceptre of birth right ,
b
until IEUE will appoint it +
into the hand of the remnant (?) in his day of acceptance , [see pages]
c
when he will make the future sons of Ishral to have dominion by it ; [the 144]
25
then our God will bless the birth right , + [Haggai 2]
b
when +
he will restore our people upon our (adm-) ground as the everlasting hills ; [eden]
e
and it (-all) will come to pass through the (birth-) sceptre of Joseph ,
d
as the lawgiver (-sceptre) that will have united his brothers .
end
text remarks :
(line 24)
covenant at mt. Horeb :
… the blessing at mt. Horeb will prove to be THE crucial aspect in the whole Exodus ;
for this reason Esau corrupted these sections as well as ‘the location of the mount’ ,
simply because “the confirmation of the birth-right” announced his downfall ;
(line 24)
in the day of acceptance (Isaiah) :
… see posted chapters — the same crucial as the day of Unleavened for ús ;
it was a prophecy which Jacob spoke and could never have lacked here ;
(line 25)
blessing of the birth-right :
… only this can have been the theme of Haggai 2 — and we gathered that ! ,
but you see how in-cre-dible well Esau has hid this entire subject ;
(line 25)
everlasting hills (-as eden) :
… how to rephrase certain lines in the right cólour is not always easy :
the entire Exodus was ofcourse a foreshadowing of “the return to eden” yet the latter
may not directly have been said as such to the people — but in terms revealing that
the “eden land” was intended , not “palestine” ;
a similar situation we also have between what Christ said to the people
and the things he discussed with his disciples (-or argued about with the Pharisees)
[the problem of “a sceptre of Judah” in this 49]
… the blessing of Judah (lines 8-12) were also corrupted – likely starting in 10 where
a ‘sceptre’ theme appears : however , it seems that the term “the lawgiver (sceptre)”
was taken FROM the Joseph line and moved over to the Judah ones —
the Judah text gets most erratic after that , if not Insane , and the descriptions suggest
to us that Esau has seen “a theme concerning physicality” : as the birth-right theme !
therefore we already withdrew its restoration attempt and will look at it again
with the interpretation that Judah must be about ‘the cornerstone / eden gate’
*** *** *** ***
interpretation + restored text
the blessing of Joseph (Gen.49 : 22-26) per KJV :
… this page half will be a mess – but not by our fault ,
a) first impression :
utterly corrupted , weird roots and nonsensical (-as are several other brothers) ,
while the type corrupted roots suggest that indeed the corruption of the whole scroll started here ;
yet these two lines are interesting : look how often “to bless” appears ,
especially where ‘to bless’ (-brk) can easily be ‘birth-right’ as inversed root (-bkr) :
(25-26)
“[Even] by the God of thy father, who shall help thee; and by the Almighty, who shall bless thee
with blessings of heaven above, blessings of the deep that lieth under, blessings of the breasts,
and of the womb:
The blessings of thy father have prevailed above the blessings of my progenitors unto the
utmost bound of the everlasting hills: they shall be on the head of Joseph, […] .”
now ,
the “blessings of breasts and womb” is a similar type corruption as in Gen. 13 (2 and 15) ,
meaning that the Esau who doctored that one also doctored-back THIS chapter ,
and we should revisit that line there depending upon the outcome hére ;
b) restoration — per line :
22
“Joseph [is] a fruitful bough, [even] a fruitful bough by a well; [whose] branches run over the wall:”
— twice ‘fruitful’ cannot be ,
— the line is too superficial , too sleek ,
— after his ówn corruption KJV “plastic-surgeried-it” because the real lineup of words is ,
son – fruitful – Joseph – son – fruitful – on – eye – daughters – march – over – wall ,
and looking at the roots to see whether we can find any recognizable phrase
(though the use of certain (‘old’-) roots is sometimes different as in prophets) :
bn – phrth – iusph – bn – phrth – oli – oin – bnuth – tzode – oli – shur
1) other brothers “start with their own name” so either the first “son + fruitful” was added ,
OR Esau swapped it and the first fruitful (-PHrth) was ‘Joseph’ (-iusPH) ,
2) hence the whole “fruitful” can be UNTRUE because it was a result of wordplay ,
3) important can be Joseph’s dream that “he would rule his brothers” – sic , and Gen. 50:18 ,
4) ‘wall’ (-shur) is a corrupt root ,
5) ‘to run’ (-tsaad) is also a corrupt root ,
attempt ,
22
[w/ restored after 23 first :]
[..1x..] – fruitful=Joseph – (is) [+as] (a-) son – (to-) joseph=Pharaoh (iusph=pharoe) ,
b
[+therefore] son=through – fruitful=Joseph (phri=iusph) +
c
the daughters=tribes (bnuth=shbti) of – march=Ishral + [comp. line 16]
d
(will be) on=delivered (ol=gal !) [..1x..] – over=from – wall=oppression (shur=shud !) , +
23
“The archers have sorely grieved him, and shot [at him] , and hated him:”
— what does that even mean ? ,
— suddenly verbs with pronouns appear , unlike line 22 ,
embitter – many – begrudging – owners – arrows ,
lineup as ,
u·imrr·eu – u·rbu – u·ishtm·eu – boli – chtzim
1) KJV illegally created an invented term ‘shoot’ but was “many” ,
2) ‘bear a grudge’ (-shtm) suspect but possible ,
3) the ‘arrow’ (-chts) cóuld be “end (-time)” (-qts) , “days (boli=ium) of the arrow=end” ;
23
and=even (as-) – [..] the many ones – [..] (that will be) saved (?) (shtm=iash) +
b
(in-) the possessors=days (boli=ium) of – the arrow=end (chts=qts) ; [also : endtime]
… that makes much sense because of Joseph’s position + theme , and see now 22 :
2) in line 1 is used “last days” lit. as “the days hereafter” ;
24
“But his bow abode in strength, and the arms of his hands were made strong by the
hands of the mighty [God] of Jacob; (from thence [is] the shepherd, the stone of Israel:)”
— if true , “bow” here seems an invention AFTER “arrow” ,
— the ‘stone’ is suspect : either “heavenly stone” [birth-right]
OR – if ‘the endtime’ previously was true , now “the future sons of Ishral” can be the theme ,
yet just as well can be “stone=garden (abn=gan) of ishral=eden” , as intro to 25 ,
— ‘arms of his hands + hands’ ? ,
and·she-is-being-located – in·perennial bow-of·him – and·they-are-being-supple – arms-of –
hands-of·him – from·hands-of – one-sturdy-of – Jacob – from·there – one-shepherding –
stone-of – ishral
lineup as ,
thshb – b·aithn – qshth·u – u·iphzu – zroi – idi·u – m·idi – abir – ioqb – m·shm – roe – abn – ishral
1) ‘strength’ (-phazaz) is a corrupt root ,
2) ‘strength + made strong’ is the same poor repeat = corrupt ,
2) if 23 was true then now we’d need ‘the start of a réason‘ for the rescue ,
root of future [-son] was (-mchr)
24
[=because] – continuously – the bow=sceptre (-of the tribes) (qshth=shbt) +
b
(will) stay (‘dwell’) – and=with made strong=Joseph (phzz=iusph) +
c
[contextual attempt :]
[=when] hands=IEUE (idi=ieue) – (will) arms=make (lit. ‘cut’) (zroi=krth) +
d
(a-) him=covenant (u=brith) – (with-) the from=people (m=om)
e
hands=at (iad=ol) – [+his] sturdy=mountain (abir=har) – jacob=Horeb , [Unleavened , see note]
e
from=until the there=days (shim=ium !) +
f
(that-) the stone=sons (abn=bn) of – Ishral – (will) shepherd=arise (roe=rm) ; [<< the 144]
… now ,
ofcourse we agree it is conjunction – but it’s póssible ;
it also raises the question if Esau was lazy [=no fantasy] and swapped the theme
of “the sceptre staying with the son” to Júdah , see line 10 —
Judah cóuld have “another sceptre” but that would very much complicate things ;
25
“[Even] by the God of thy father, who shall help thee; and by the Almighty, who shall bless
thee with blessings of heaven above, blessings of the deep that lieth under, blessings of
the breasts, and of the womb:”
— see also intro , while saying to Joseph “breasts and womb” is just plain Weird ,
— the ‘Almighty’ could be but is a negative (-shd) ‘destroy’ and akin to ‘breasts’ (-shdim)
so probably BOTH were invented as another repeat ,
— the ‘father of you’ as also in start of next line 26 is suspect ,
25
[=for] +
deity=I (an=ani !) – your father – [..] (am) help=bestowing (iozr=iana !) – (upon-) and=you
b
the almighty=sceptre (shd=shbt !) +
c
and=of bless=birth right (brk=bkre !) ,
[next : until end of line totally corrupted ;
would he say something like “of the heavenly people” (‘Originals’) since the birth right IS theirs
or would that complicate the narrative – because of a new third group ,
and was Jacob not more explicit as just saying “the mountains of old” [=eden] , in next 25 ? :]
(until-) +
heavens=IEUE (shmim=ieue) – (will) bless=appoint (?) [+it] (‘sceptre’)
d
from=into the on=hand (ol=iad) of – the blessings=remnant (?) (brk=shbrth) +
e
(in-) [+his] abyss=day (?) (theum=ium) of – recline=acceptance (rbts=rtsn !) , [sic !]
f
[+when] [+he] (will make) [..] the womb=future (rchm=mchr – inversion !) +
g
blessings=sons (brk=bn) of – breasts=Ishral (shdim=ishrl) +
h
(to have) under=dominion (-by it) (thachath=rada?) ;
[closing :]
25
“The blessings of thy father have prevailed above the blessings of my progenitors unto the
utmost bound of the everlasting hills: they shall be on the head of Joseph, and on the crown
of the head of him that was separate from his brethren.”
— ‘utmost bound’ (-thaavah) is a corrupt root while “(positive-) Mark” (-thav) don’t make sense ,
25
[=then] your=our father=God – (will) bless – the prevailed=birth right (gbR=bkRe) ,
b
over=when – [+he] (will) blessings=restore (Brk=shB) +
c
my=our progenitors=people (?) (eur=om) [Esau saw ‘persons’ + compare 23 and 24 d]
d
[=upon] – [our?-] bound=(adm-) ground (thvah=arts) – (as-) the everlasting – hills ; [eden]
e
[+and] they=it (will) come to pass – to=through the head=sceptre (rsh=shbt) of – Joseph ,
f
[next : sceptre renamed + the ‘nature’ of Joseph (-as attribute) (?) :]
[=as] the scalp=lawgiver (-sceptre) (qdqd=cgqq , line 10 at Judah !!) +
g
(that will have) separate=united (nzir=iachad [3x listed] , line 6 at Simeon !) – his brothers .
… now ,
1) Joseph WAS ‘separate’ but the goal always was “to get united” , compare the story where
his brothers did not know he was virtually the Pharaoh ;
2) we have somewhere “the lions upon your scalp” in a prophets (oh , Jeremiah 2) ,
that could be the same lawgiver (-sceptre) imprisoned by the sons of Ammon
end