[also Mt.25 has “when I appear (-on the clouds)” and compare this chapter , “I will separate the sheep and the goats” : the section is corrupted ofcourse but may be about this same theme …]

 
                                                                                             theme 
 
       … we need to move on please , and see whether Atonement can be our date , okay  —
       though still two months away [-since we’re also two months past Weeks now]  and we
       may have to cross that time , anything is better as next year : while if we can find
       solid reasons for Atonement we won’t need look at any ’40-49 days’ again 
 
                                                   theme interpretation – at first glance
 
                             Atonement : NOT in the first place about Christ’s work
 
       … as always we first need a proper idea what the very corrupted text can have said
       before we even attempt to restore her ; and though the overall cóncept ‘atonement’ 
       ofcourse does belong to Christ , obviously this sacred day is not ‘Passover’ since
       certain aspects simply do not fit Christ’s work — only be greatly forcing them
 
       to put it more bluntly : then in some way ‘Atonement’ must be about you & we ,
       and that makes sense considered the season of Death that we currently are in ,
       combined with the Spirit having left , and ‘the anti-144’ theme ; while THE feature
       of Atonement is described as “you will humble (or ‘afflict’) your soul” :
       somehow – unexpectedly – these aspects now seem to come together , no ?
       combine that with a reasonable chance “that Atonement re-starts the Time line” 
       that begán at Trumpets (-some years ago) as the start of the restored scroll , 
       and Atonement appears to be a serious possibility …
 
       yet again please : the ‘atonement’ theme is dangerous so we must tread carefully ,
       keeping in mind that Esau corrupted the sections for a reason : 
 
                                     the sent-away goat : the Tribulation & the wilderness
 
       … two animals — probably not “two goats” but “rams” because goats represented
       the evil dimension but rams “this body that we carry” which is the main theme  —
       were to be presented before God at the entrance of the tabernacle ;
       one ram was to be slain as sacrifice for Him ,
       but the other to be burdened with sin – through laying up of hands – and sent into 
       the desert where it eventually would perish ; that the text names this ram ‘azazel’ 
       and interprets it as “scapegoat” is most probably NOT the intent but Esau’s lie ;
 
       now – the most workable option is “both rams representing two groups” and per     
       the timing of Unleavened as “two groups of people – at the start of the Trib”
       and possibilities are :
       a)
       the one animal represents ‘the 144’ , and ‘Jacob’ the sent-away one                   <<<<  probably 
       b)
       the one animal represents ‘the 144’ , and “the anti-144” the sent-away one 
 
       because related – clarifying – sections are álso corrupted 
       it’s hard to see which one of the three above could be validated :
       #1
       it’s important to remember that the rams represent ‘this body’ , not “the soul” ,
       and that this body is consistently called “THE SIN (-of the soul)” in all prophets ;
       #2
       the ram for IEUE is sacrificed — read , the final 144 —
       but ‘the sent-away ram is kept alive : yet burdened with sin’ (line 21) ,
       implying that Jacob enters the Tribulation with his sin – this body ,
       if the interpretation of “the desert” as “the Tribulation” is correct ofcourse , right ;
       #3
       but then NOT ‘the scapegoat makes atonement’ , in line 10 ! per definition not !
       for the simple reason that the burdened goat “did nothing” for IEUE , 
       did not die (-to the flesh & recently even ‘of soul’) but is still ruled by his own flesh :
       from here derives the 100% misunderstanding everywhere about these animals ..
       #4
       so that “the ram offered to IEUE made atonement” , 
       and now you see why in 9-10 this was swapped by Esau : to have Jacob in the Trib !
       for he would equate ‘the scapegoat’ with Christ , as pósitive , not understanding             <<<<
       that ‘the desert’ here is the Lethal equivalent of ‘the Tribulation’ !
 
       the name ‘azazel’ :
       if “one lot is for IEUE” (-in line 4) then should the other lot not be “for his enemy” 
       or better phrased : “for THE enemy of Jacob” that is ‘Adam’ ? the name ‘azazel’ 
       is just too weird (-though showing in Enoch perhaps not known by this Esau scribe)
       and suggests his panic move as name-for-a-name , (-adm) to (-uzazal) ;
       it would not imply “that all of Jacob IS OF Adam” but that they face the consequence
       of what Adam DID to them – namely ‘this flesh’ – and that reasoning is defendable !
 
       the sent-away ram : burned ? :
       … Esau hussled the sections but at the end you can see “burned animal remains” 
       while “a certain man having guided the ram into the desert” may have been there
       for reason to also búrn the animal : not to push the ‘burning’ but the fire cast on earth
       is a major theme in prophets pointing to the Tribulation , 
       exactly why Esau would have buried that aspect by mutilating it and moving it     — 
       perhaps if we restore the section the precise text will show again 
 
                                                               shown aspects of Atonement
 
       #1
       Atonement ‘is about God appearing’ :
       showing right at the start in line 2 — though very corrupted the words “appearing”
       and “cloud” are a red Flag for us , right ; and though it is possible that God did
       appear “over the Ark” at Atonement in those days , it certainly is a foreshadowing
       of the future when Christ appears on the clouds for us ; underlined by the phrase
       (in 34) “this will be an everlasting statute for you (in 34) ; 
       #2
       the ‘new clothes’ :
       in spite of the death and sacrifice theme related to both rams as “our body” ,
       the “putting on new clothes” seems an integral part of that — where ‘new clothes’ 
       always represent “being restored in our Original” ; and please note the phrase
       so that “you become clean” : that is absurd IF not about finally leaving this body !
       [memo :
       perhaps we need to look again at the – recently done – Zecheriah chapter about
       the priest Joshua and the clothes : was that in context ‘about Atonement’ ? with
       main reason “that he would become clean” ? and who showed there ? Adam ..] 
       #3
       the both rams :
       and here is a catch : the section about the 144 is horribly corrupted , see next : 
 
                                                  but what do the sons ‘have to do’ ? (Ex.30)
 
       … as found in Exodus 30:12-16 , a mirror section concerning Atonement    —
       yet we believe nothing of “the numbering of the sons of Ishral as each one of 
       twenty years and older , that will have to pay half a shekel as atonement offering 
       for (the sins of-) their soul” … ‘buying off with money’ is such an Esau thought …
       but what can it réally have said ?
       it’s loaded with corruptions (the·ones-being-mustered , the·shekel , etc) but it’s 
       hard to see what the original roots may have been — yet somehow it HAS to relate 
       to the previous ‘ram’ theme … did they make a play-out ? or was this section not
       even about them , in the first place .. ?
 
12
“When thou takest the sum of the children [=sons]  of Israel after their number, 
then shall they give every man a ransom for his soul unto the LORD, when thou numberest them; 
that there be no plague among them, when [thou]  numberest them.”
…  what does that even mean ?
—  the weird ‘curse’ (-negeph) is used in Num.8 section about Atonement , with something about
       the ‘firstborn’ and ‘the matrix-womb’ , as : “…. to make an atonement for the children of Israel: 
       that there be no plague among the children of Israel, when the children of Israel come nigh 
       unto the sanctuary.” ;
       the “appearing” is also a theme here , inclusive the new clothes , yet it’s all mixed-up ;
       worse – Num.8:9-15 must be a corrupt version of the ‘two goats’ in this Lev.16 ;
       so that
       this Ex.30 has “the ones numbered (PHqd) + give + half (MCHts) + a shekel (shql)” ,
       and Num 8 has “opening (PHtr) + the womb (rCHM) + firstborn (bhur)” ;
 
       so what did it réally say ? for both feel as Esau’s corruption of a real – third – version ;
       the (PHQD) is “to number” but also “to appoint”… ‘appoint + the firstborns” (-as the 144)” ?
       wait :
       (Num.8:19) : “… [the-]  sons from among the children [=sons]  of Israel, 
       to do the service of the children [=sons]  of Israel in the tabernacle of the congregation, 
       and to make an atonement for the children [=sons]  of Israel.” ;
       but we don’t believe this is about ‘Levites’ :
       it says “tent of + appointment” >> how much is the chance it said ‘TIME of + appointment” ?
       so that there are two groups here :
       the “sons of Ishral” that is ‘Jacob’ [-but called ‘sons of Ishral’ in general , in the olden time]  ,
       and ‘the (group of-) sons of Ishral + that get appointed + to MAKE ATONEMENT FOR THEM !”
 
       yet now we get in hot water ofcourse :
 
       for you & we would never say – or even think – that “we make atonement for Jacob” 
       since the very term ‘atonement’ belongs to Christ ofcourse ; 
       however , then how to place the ‘dying to the flesh’ and recently even ‘of the soul’ ?
       it may be a poor copy of what He did — but atonement is atonement , no ?
 
       let’s phrase very carefully here , please :
       Christ made atonement ‘for others’ – for all of Jacob , inclusive the 144 –
       and no one of us could do that “for others” ;
       but something else is at play here : what you & we did was ‘for ourselves’ 
       [-and boy haven’t we enough trouble already doing thát]  ,
       yet ‘at the same time ‘for Jacob’ : or ALL of us would remain imprisoned and perish …
 
       so that our situation must be similar to ‘the priests in the tabernacle’ ,
       who exercised the requirements for the sake of the people but the same time for themsélves ,
       and it does appear that God indeed makes that link :
       (Num.8:16) “For they [=Levite priests]  [are]  wholly given unto me from among the children [=sons] 
       of Israel; instead of such as open every womb, [even instead of]  the firstborn of all the children [=sons] 
       of Israel, have I taken them unto me.” ,
       which ofcourse must be :
       “for LIKE they [=the Levites]  are wholly given unto me from among the sons of Ishral [=Jacob]  ,
       ALSO the the ones that I will appoint + at the solemn time + to be the firstborns [=144]  
       óf all the sons of Ishral , I will take unto me [=sic] ” ,
       where the “open + womb” was “appoint + time + the firstborn” as previously shown ; 
 
        so : “I will have appointed them – at the solemn time” [=a future Atonement] ” ?
       … this is a rather important question for us     —
       the entire context still is “about the day of Atonement” , and though it could be ‘a starting day’ 
       from which onwards He will begin to collect the final 144 – like Trumpets was a starting day – 
       that option does not sit right , also because of everything that happened until now ;
       instead ,
       the both rams being “the very day that the Tribulation stárts” is more logical ,
       implying that “on that same day the final 144 will have been appointed by Him” .. right ..
 
       hoping that everything was readable ,
       and more : that you have expectancy again .. for that is THE most important
 
 
       for you Majesty