(NOT 50 !) as the Jubilee year : in which the feast of Weeks is the ‘day of acceptance’ [Isaiah] [part III : unknown : overview] [version ; 2024-05may.15- ] |
theme of part II
(the Jubilee : lines 8-12)
… just a short intro – since the restored text and notes virtually blended here
as required simply because of the neverending string of Esau’s corruptions ;
the absolute main point in this one is ‘that the number “50” is a mindf*ck’ ,
seemingly logical but foreign to the entire context —
the buildup ‘from 7 x 7 = 49′ does not allow any jump from ’49’ into ’50’ since
the latter would imply some type of new holiday and therefore a “new intro”
or some “restart” – which simply is not there ;
apart from the fact that ’50’ is a weird number as a rather unbiblical one ,
rendering it likely that it was a coverup by Esau to hide the intended context ;
and it took some time to get all the epithets correctly —
the 49th year , as a cycle of seven sabbaticals , is called “the Jubilee year”
while IN that Jubilee year the main holiday is “the feast of Weeks”
[which also makes much Sense : as ‘the 49th day in the 49th yéar”, right] ;
that holiday also called “the day of acceptance (-of the scroll by God)”
[sub :
yet it was surprisingly difficult to restore every term rightly in the text !] ;
the ‘secondary theme’ here : “return to your land” (read : ‘Eden’) :
… and added is the theme of “setting people free” , both also showing in
the Isaiah chapter where the three groups of prisoners are freed , followed
by the 144 “rebuilding their own (eden-) ground at the Great Jubilee
[though the term ‘Jubilee’ is lacking there in KJV – in fact it totally vánishes
from the scroll after this chapter – apart from once in Joshua] ;
so that important for you & we is please ,
how every 7th year at Unleavened ‘the scroll was to be declared unto God’
where in the 49th year — as the sixth sabbatical , the theme of this section —
God either accepted or refúsed the declaration of the sons of Ishral ,
so that after each 49th year they either brought a curse upon themselves
OR God would bless them because of them “having done the right thing” :
considering all the context so far , we are exact in that situation this time , <<<<
and can only hope that indeed He will accept it – in some 27 days from now ..
part III
(overview only , no restored text : lines 13-end)
… the overall theme appears to be “redemption , as taking the place of” ,
ofcourse first applying to what Christ did — but in our opinion extended to how
the disciples were to take care of you & we , like we will take care of Jacob :
though we cannot próve that concept here since the section is too corrupted
same goes for Numbers 35 the alleged “refugee cities” chapter
but which is – was – nothing else as a repeat of this page Leviticus 25 ;
and even for Esau’s “book Ruth” : a romanticized epos masquing the theme
of “the time frame between Unleavened and the harvest (Weeks)” into the
redemption of the 144 (‘Ruth’) through the restored scroll (‘Boaz’) —
soon we’ll try an outline of that hoax
Lev. 25 (-part II)
[next 8 : crucial line :
please note how “we have a mentioned DAY” : this is important :]
8
“And thou shalt number seven sabbaths of years unto thee, seven times seven years;
and the space of the seven sabbaths of years shall be unto thee forty and nine years.”
real line :
a) and·you-number for·you seven sabbaths-of years
b) seven years seven times
c) and·they-become for·you days-of seven sabbaths-of the·years nine and·forty year
8
and you (shall) count – seven=six (-more) – sabbatical – years – for=from you=this one ,
b
(as-) seven=six – times – (this-) seventh – year , [‘the 7th sabbatical of part I specified’]
c
and – the DAY of – the seventh – sabbatical – (will) come to pass – for you + [1st day]
d
the·years (=tampered) = the=in – the [..] forty – ninth – year ; + [line runs on !]
note :
a) the adjectives are not always in their right place , but that’s okay – the line is good now ;
it can have written “six times this sabbatical of Unleavened” for that is the idea ,
but to not change the text too much it is enough that we know ‘which occasion’ here ;
b) Esau made this unusually complicated — but because of his corruptions :
in Lev.23:15-16 the feast of Weeks in a normal year is “counted from the first day after Passover”
so that there will not be any mistake (-though that section is corrupt , as well…) ,
but because we just had the first sabbatical it’s logical to continue from that one
instead of “going back to the start of the first sabbatical”, no ;
c) that we have a DAY now don’t show in KJV ,
so that in next line we need to specify that day itself – Unleavened ! :
9
“Then shalt thou cause the trumpet of the jubile to sound on the tenth [day] of the seventh month,
in the day of atonement shall ye make the trumpet sound throughout all your land.”
real line :
a) and·you-make-pass trumpet-of blast in·the·month the·seventh in·the·ten to·the·month
b) in·day-of the·shelters you-shall-make-pass trumpet in·all-of land-of·you
… here ,
a) THE red flag is ‘trumpet’ (-shupher) almost identical to ‘scroll’ (-sepher) : but what did it say ? :
b) you see that the repeat “pass the trumpet” is illogical : no one talks like that (-but Esau) ;
implying originally we may have had a juxta here ,
and if true then the first ‘pass the trumpet’ belonged to previous line !
which makes Sense – as specification of “that day” — hence ‘day’ was so important there ! :
c) the terms marked in bold are tamperings ;
9
(in-) and=which – you (will) make to pass=declare (obR=qR) +
b
the trumpet=scroll (shPHR=sPHR) of – [+my] blast=words (thRu=dbR) ; [or ‘the scroll – to me’]
[new line :]
c
in=and the month=feast (CHdsh=CHq) of – the·seventh (=tampered) = Weeks (‘close !’) +
d
in=as the ten=clósing (‘no match’) of – [..] the month=sabbaticals + [‘the 7-year cycles’]
e
(will) and=be the day of + [2nd day !]
f
the·shelters (=tampered) = acceptance (kphRm=Rtsn) (to-) the=IEUE (e=ieue) , [see Isaiah]
g
[now it gets very tricky — likely the main verb was at the end :]
–
(when-) your make to pass=declaring (as in 9-a) of – the trumpet=scroll (9-b) – in=unto all=him
h
(will be) land=confirmed (by-) you=him ; [shall-be-confirmed-of-him]
notes after 8-9 :
a) the link between “sabbath (-day), sabbatical , seven, and week(-s)” is important while they
share a similar root , but most important is that Weeks is the conclusion of that cycle :
a 49 year cycle is ‘closed’ at ‘the 49th day’ (-counted from Passover when everything starts) ;
b) here is the trick ,
as Esau’s f*ckup in Lev.23:15-16 , the theme is “counting until Weeks” :
“And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought
the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete. (16) Even unto the morrow
after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days (-etc)” ,
Unleavened – counted from Passover – is not called “the seventh sabbath” while the shown bold
“seven sabbaths (-to be completed)” is exclusively a term for for “Weeks” !
after that he tried “to clear the previous” by using his “fifty” — rendering this term corrupt !
and he did the same here –
because his ‘fifty’ only follows in next line 10 ;
c) moreover , we also have a very strong buildup of “the one day leading to the next day”
where BOTH are linked to “the scroll theme” now ;
[next 10 : now that pesky ‘fifty’ :]
10
“And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout [all] the land
unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubile unto you; and ye shall return every man
unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family.”
real line :
a) and·you-hallow year-of the·fifty year
b) and·you-proclaim liberty in·the·land to·all-of ones-dwelling-of·her jubilee she she-shall-be for·you
c) and·you-return man to holding-of·him and·man to family-of·him you-shall-return
… here ,
a) ofcourse the “year … year” is a corrupt syntax , as is the term ‘fifty’ itself ;
b) and who is the subject here (-after line 9) : who ‘will hallow’ here ? :
is not this hallowing conditional — only when God has accepted the declaration ?? :
therefore the subject must be “I” :
10
and=then + [‘IF He accepted it !’]
b
you=I (will) hallow – ath=this – year of +
c
the·fifty (=tampered) = the Jubilee of – [+my] year=acceptance (?) (sna=ratsn ?) ,
d
and proclaim – liberty – [=throughout] the land – unto all – her inhabitants : [Isaiah]
e
[question : now it was so specific , does “a jubilee” needs to be mentioned again ?:]
[swapped ?:]
she=after +
[=you] (will make) – the ram’s horn – to be=blast long (eie=mashk) – [=throughout] the you=land ,
f
[..] [=each of] – you (shall) return – to – his property , [‘in our case : Eden’]
g
[=as] – [=everyone] of – you (that will) return – to – his family ;
note :
a) we think “the blowing the trumpet” only follows after a positive decision —
compare in Lev.26 , the future days of Jacob , how that will not be always the case !
b) hence “the jubilee” term sounds nice but is a bit unusable ,
c) the “ram’s horn was also blowing loud at mt. Horeb” , but where in this case (probably) the
priests had to blow it , in our situation it will be a trumpet sound from the sky ;
part b
[next hurdle :]
… next 11-12 are about “the produce which the land brings forth” while we just established
that because “every 7th year sabbatical there is no harvest” – including this 49th which
only started 1-2 months earlier , we cannot go contradict that now ;
and adding to the problem is that Weeks is the typical “harvest of ingathering feast” :
a solution is that “in this 7th sabbatical anything grown by itself was allowed to be reaped”
(so , not the usual harvest — since there was nothing sowed in this 7th , anyway) ,
where this “reaping the selfgrown crop may be compared to “gleaning”
which was not the bulk harvest but “the grain stalks at the edges of the field” ;
or rephrased :
this must imply “that every 6 year period Weeks must have had a plentiful harvest”
and especially ‘in the 6th year’ to can cross the 7th in which sowing was prohibited ,
(and perhaps becáuse it was so plentiful it is dubbed “feast of ingathering” ?) ,
for in the 7th year it was not allowed “to reap nor to glean anything” (-at Weeks) —
but at this 7th sabbatical – in the 49th year – where just before any sowing had been
prohibited because of the Unleavened sabbatical , it is possible that since it was a
joyful time because of the acceptance of the scroll it was allowed to reap produce
but only that which had grown from itself ;
this neither violates the Luke “Christ and his disciples gleaning grain stalks” while it
keeps supporting the concept of “the 144 being gleaned” — though indeed it feels
a bit like having to merchandise to find a proper explanation
[next 11 : in bold is corrupt , having a similar buildup as in 10 :]
11
“A jubile shall that fiftieth year be unto you:
b) ye shall not sow, neither reap that which groweth of itself in it,
c) nor gather [the grapes] in it of thy vine undressed.”
11
(and because-) the jubilee=acceptance (‘no match’) of – she=IEUE (eua=ieue) +
b
(at-) the year=appointed festivity (?) (shna=moed) of +
c
the·fifty (=tampered) = the feast (CHmshim=CHq) of – year=Weeks (SHna=SHbo) +
d
(will have) come to pass – [=concerning] you , [indeed verb ‘to be’ as passive at end]
e
[now the verbs wére swapped :]
you (may) reap – (everything that-) grew by itself +
f
(as that which-) you (will) – not – have sown – [..] not=earlier (?) ,
g
and [.. 1x ..] – you (may) pluck – (the grapes of-) your untrimmed vine ;
12
“For it [is] the jubile; it shall be holy unto you: ye shall eat the increase thereof out of the field.”
12
for – [+you] (will) holy=rejoice (qdsh=shush) +
b
(in-) the jubilee=goodness (iUBl=tUB) of – she=IEUE , [‘and in-goodness-of IEUE you-shall-rejoice’]
c
[c-d : all swapped :]
(and-) (be-) be=satisfied – for=by [..] – the from=abundance of +
d
the produce=selfgrown things (…) of – [+your] field – (which-) you (will) eat ;
notes after 11-12 :
a) it’s not proof but the text supports very much the “now allowed to eat the selfgrown things”
especially after the aspect “the acceptance of IEUE” (!) ,
b) in 12 not ‘holy’ but “to rejoice” is the only proper option – for it WAS a joyful situation since
they must have known that He was happy — like we will , hopefully soon in 27 days ;
besides ,
anyway a curse would have followed if He had NOT accepted their declaration , right ;
c) this also explains the weird ‘jubilee’
as in both lines at the start , causing a strange syntax : for it was a cover-up ;
PART II