a bit different page as the usual — undoing the root of the false ‘baptism’ theme

     
                                                                                              theme

 
     … the Mt.3 page “no ‘John the Baptist’ & no ‘baptism of Jesus’ : but all about the 144″
     as restored chapter remains valid , where the Mt.3 is the corrupted ‘best version’ of its
     mirrors [Mk.1:1-11]  and [Lk.3:2-22]  ,
     but now we need to decide whether there existed any figure ‘John’ at all , even if
     interpreted as “a person born to represent the 144 – that will be born in the last days”  —
     where the decision must be “that no such figure has existed” by this reasoning please :
 
     #1  after the 144 [Mt.3]  the concept ‘John’ is almost unmaintainable
     … the Mt.3 page is a rather Solid restored text ,
     and combined with the contextual problems of any ‘John the Baptist’ (see MainPage) 
     perhaps the only reason for keeping the ‘John theme’ would be because such a figure
     could be “representing the 144 that will rise up in the end of days” , 
     since “the birth of the 144” is so important in prophets that it cóuld have been shown
     through ‘the birth of a type forerunner (-of the 144)’ to include the completion , as well :
     but even if we keep this — plausible ! — idea we run into a next problem :    
 
     #2  it does injustice to the twelve disciples (’12 tribes’)
     … this was in mind the past day ,
     almost “that they are feeling sad IF we would maintain the ‘John’ figure”  —
     the pattern of ’12 representatives from the tribes of Ishral’ is solid , right , and we saw
     from what we restored so far that Christ told them everything (-they needed to know) ,
     and however dissapointed they might have been when understanding that they only
     would receive their Gorgeous when you & we had would have risen up , 
     they – and the First Christians in general – have been appointed to be our caretakers 
     by Christ himself , to be our fathers that pleaded for us and for what we would do — 
     any “other parallel concept” (as this ‘John representing the 144’) does them Injustice
     and even more important breaks the chain of Attributes from them unto us : if you
     please remember that they – as ‘bondservants and bondsmaids – are mentioned in
     the Joel chapter together with us ; 
 
     #3  any ‘birth of John’ [Lk.1]  vexes the birth of Christ
     … as described only in this chapter    —
     reading it causes the feeling of a strange type rivalry between both births in spite of
     the lines where – allegedly – the baby of Elisabeth is responding to the baby of Mary ;
     where the uniqueness of Mary’s conception is blurred by the ‘miracle’ of Zacharias
     and Elisabeth not having been able to conceive now foretold to receive a child   —
     the entire ‘birth of John’ section just doesn’t sit right ,
     and even the phrase “overdoing it” comes to mind : two angels , two announcements ,
     it’s just too complicated : 
    
     #4   the Zacharias & Elisabeth story [Lk.1] 
     … other gospels mention nothing about “the birth of John” but start with the alleged
     theme of ‘John baptizing in the Jordan river’ — rendering this Luke 1 chapter suspect ;
     looking at the content while remembering the above ,
     the “not being able to have a child for old age” seems a rip-off of Abraham & Sarah 
     where even Sarah’s role – not believing she was able to conceive – is now the play of
     the figure ‘Zacharias’ who as a type punishment for unbelief ‘becomes a mute one’  —
     however this ‘sign’ as him unable to speak does not appear to serve any purpose but
     for the sake of ‘a miracle itself’ since nowhere that specific punishment is explained ; 
     all of this supports the realistic possibility that this was another of Esau’s invented 
     quasi-deep storylines to serve his purpose ;
 
     #5  quite some text in Luke 1
     … as the final hurdle for us   —
     it can be argued “that some concept of ‘John’ as the 144” can be true because of the
     amount of lines showing in Luke 1 concerning his birth — yet knowing that Esau has
     ghostwritten entire epistles – as ‘the book of Acts’ – the probability that he did the same
     here is very high , in order to cement his ‘John theme’ ; 
     another possibility is that he DID see “the birth of the 144 theme” but corrupted it in the
     form of this ‘Zacharias & Elisabeth’ where curiously the former derives from root (-zakar)
     as the old-Hebrew word for “male (-child)” also used in prophets , 
     so that the original intro OF the (now restored-) Matthew 3 chapter that currently lacks
     a proper intro may have been this corrupted ‘birth of John’ story instead of the birth of
     the 144 in the latter days … – in fact this possibility feels to be true 
  
     interestingly Esau has his “Zacharias asking for a writing-tablet to write upon” [Lk.1:63] 
     and though that fits his “because the man was mute” narrative it even more so fits the
     sons of Ishral theme [-apart from the bizarre ‘writing-tablet’ (pidax + inion) suspiciously
     looking like ‘scroll’ (biblion) which however is no proof in itself]  ;
 
     conclusion :
     so often we have been asked to make a decision concerning various themes , right ..
     it’s what we do : rejecting false themes and Legally declare the genuine ones so that
     whatever devised enemy Trap will not have right over us (-anymore) ;
     we really have lost nothing by dismissing this ‘John’ that in fact was the very root
     of the entire false ‘baptism’ theme : undoing ‘baptism’ is one thing but to decide to also
     undo its root in the figure ‘John’ is another and even móre difficult    —
     but we did , and hope that He will be pleased with that

annex
 
… the above Legal declaration also removed any presumed right of ‘the Baptist church’
as the sect (!) that was founded by John Smythe in Amsterdam in 1609 AD , though ofcourse  
he did not introduced a new concept since this corrupt theme always showed in the KJV ;
this sect has relatively much power — it has spread to much of (southern-) USA , acquired a
reasonable following in the East after the Iron Curtain fell , and recently since Esau’s Covid
hoax the Baptist communities appear to thrive where the Protestant churches lost a quite
staggering amount of members – as a trend still ongoing
since the secret of this sect ofcourse is ‘the connection of ‘libation’ with ‘that evil tree‘ 
 

a dream 48 hrs ago ,
about “a baptist type preacher” (never dreaming of such topic b/c so irrelevant)
that illegally held rights over believers – which caused a furious rant of me unto him – 
shown in “a restaurant wall having groups of tables and 6 pairs of people sat at them” ,
but there were “markings on the floor around each place , each table” that the pairs were
not allowed to cross while the pathway (-alongside the tables) was owned by the preacher 
so that in fact he held the people hostage by a legal situation
 
no longer , your Majesty , please
always please forgive us that so war for you and for our relation with you