spoiler : … the ‘serpents that stole a body by the eden-mother’ and then ‘took the crowns from the four living-animals’ has turned into a very solid theme by now ; for several reasons it is part of the ‘forty days’ theme as these very days between Unleavened and Weeks  and it seems to be the final subject we needed to find ..

 
                                                                            theme
 
    … though we knew already (-for some years) “that the eden-mother together
    with her land had gone astray to halfway the matrix , and was made by Adam
    to birth his corrupt-type-souls as his Ammon sons” , we somehow overlooked 
    that also “other entities could have stolen aspects from her”    —
    or better : when starting the Scroll we were aware of the ‘Maruts’ theme which
    we opted could have a kind of relation towards Eden as the later ‘Ammon sons’ 
    turned out to be ; yet so many new concepts showed while restoring the scroll 
    that this theme got buried as it were : until it resurfaced these days … 
 
    you will forgive the short overview please ;
    but at the end of 2023 after finding ‘Eve’ we really thought we found everything ,
    remember , then came Unleavened last year when we understood how she was
    about “declaring the scroll” [which we still think we did at that time]  ;
    then came Weeks where we understood “that our scroll would be accépted” yet
    nothing happened — that is , apart from Adam pushing in a nasty way while the  
    soul entered her final stage of death ,
    yet móre new themes kept coming even until this latest ’40 days/4 cherubs’ one
 
    the eden-mother theme includes the important ‘birth-sceptre (-of the 144)’ one
    said in prophets as “the iron staff that will smite the nations (-of demons)” which
    is immediately linked to “birth-right” namely that never again the matrix will have
    their corrupt-souls brought forth by her , NOR an eden-type body for those ;
    considering this ,
    in relation to “the 144 being the first-fruits” , it may be our final theme .. no ?   
    so that – and only a couple of weeks ago – we did see the ‘firstfruits theme’ well
    but missed seeing the proper embedding of it
 
    hence , with this understanding the Luke 2 section became suspicious :

                                           the ’40 days & Simeon’ story    [Lk.2] 
 
    … in the KJV narrative ,
    Mary has completed her forty days of uncleanness after giving birth to Jesus 
    (21-24) and now she , Joseph and the child visit the temple to bring a sacrifice , 
    where they are met by a righteous man Simeon “who waited to see the child” (!)
    and after meeting the boy extensively blesses him in a prophetic way ;
 
    yet this version sounds like Esau-nonsense :
    the figure ‘Simeon’ and his actions are far too shallow and nothing links back to 
    any genuine deeper theme in the prophets , so that this story must have hidden
    something else as having been glued here by Esau under a similar ‘birth’ theme : 
    namely about: ‘the (eden-) mother’, ’40 days’ and the ‘4 cherubs’ theme !
 
    it’s true that no literal ’40 days’ show in KJV but that is implied in the days of a 
    woman being unclean after birthing a boy child [-and was this penalty-time for
    a mother linked to the situation of the eden-mother ? we need go study that 
    section in Leviticus]  ,
    but because these lines 21-34 were cut-off and moved by Esau it lacks an intro :  
 
    is it the continuation of the ’40 days (-temptation)’ ?
    … as almost inavoidable   —
    we interpreted that section as about “Adam’s main crimes” ; then the chapter
    shows a cut-off after which follow the Isaiah ‘acceptance’ lines [-at Weeks] 
    when “the prisoners will be set free” : not only our Originals & Eve but also
    the eden-mother per this current theme — and hopefully we ;
    but after “the 40 days & Adam” MUST follow this eden-mother theme or the
    buildup of the problem of the birthright would become invalid
    [please see (this page) where in prophets the eden-mother theme must have
    been the original subject – as impossibly corrupted chapters – yet at first glance
    indeed supporting this current theme] 
 
    so that the restored buildup can be ,
    #1 — the (corrupt) ‘road to Emmaus’ (about ‘declaring the Scroll’)                                    [Lk.24] 
                [now the time frame must be Weeks (Pentecost) :] 
    #2 — the 40 days & Adam (the ’40 days temptation’)                                                                    [Lk.4] 
    #3 — the 40 days & eden-mother (here , the ‘4 cherubs’ theme)                                            [Lk.2] 
    #4 — the eden-mother & eden justified (here , the ‘Simeon prophecy’)                              [Lk.2] 
    #5 — then the Scroll is accepted (-at Weeks)                                                                                     [Lk.4]      
 
    the ‘declaring the Scroll’ as Esau’s alleged ‘road to Emmaus’ story must have
    been the original intro to áll of these dispersed sections , 
    where (-Emmaus) was “Unleavened” (-azymos !) and the ‘two guys’ you & we 
    as the “sons” that “are sad” (Lk.24:17) likely “because they DID declare the scroll 
    after “three-score + stadia” [=the 3d + year]  yet their date did not come to pass” ;
    FOLLOWED BY THE 40 DAYS ‘TEMPTATION’ & THIS 40 DAYS SECTION
    as the explanation why we still had to find this eden-mother theme ! no .. ?
 
                                     but how could ‘the 4 cherubs’ theme show in this ‘Simeon’ version ?
 
[21-24 : intro to ‘Simeon’ :] 
(21)                                                                                                       (21)
“And when eight + days were accomplished                and it will end=happen in + those forty + days ….
for the circumcising of the child, 
his name + was called + JESUS,                                            the sons + understand + about the name=mother ..
which was so named of the angel                                       conceived     +
before he was conceived + in the womb.”                      a womb=body + for the angel=demons (?)
(22)                                                                                                       (22)
“And when the days of + her purification                       the day of + her purification (‘justification’ ?)   +
according to the law of Moses 
were accomplished,                                                                     will be fulfilled 
they brought him to Jerusalem, 
to present [him]  to the Lord;”                                               (and God makes her to return to (mt.) tsiun ?)
    here ,
    – we can use ‘sons’ (‘you & we’) for it continued from ‘the 40 days (-temptation)
        where Esau often corrupted (iésous=yhios) ,
    – not sure what indication was used : “demons” ? “masterful-men” ? , see Rev.9 (page) ;
        it can have said ‘angel + before’ = ‘demons + five’ (pro=penta) , but we need a similar
        concept as in Rev.9 “four demons + their leader (‘Horus’)” to avoid confusion ;
    – the “making her to return” (?) ,
        she DID go astray together with her (eden-) land half-way to the matrix
        and in prophets “she is made to return” so this could be possible here ;
next ,        
(23)                                                                                                       (23)
“As it is written in the law of the Lord,                             (about ‘restored firstborn-right’)
Every male that openeth the womb 
shall be called + holy + to the Lord)”                                 (‘she will be sanctified + by God’ ?)
(24)
“And to offer a sacrifice according to that                     and her enemies + will be judged (?)
which is said in the law of the Lord, 
A pair of + turtle-doves,                                                           as the two=four + turtle-doves=demons (?)
or two + young + pigeons.”                                                      and [..]  the young=king of – pigeons=Babylon 
    here ,
    – the “restored firstborn-right” indeed is ‘the eden-mother theme’ ,
        about “no longer enemy-souls can acquire an eden-body” as those 5 did ,
        and also “no longer will she bring forth the corrupt-type souls” as Adam’s sons
        [the sons of Ammon / sons of Esau / ancient Egyptians / etc]  
    – the “opening the womb” :
        as the tricky “opening the matrix” lines in Leviticus , but there as corrupted 
        and moved sections — however we need to add this to the prophet chapters
        about this theme and look into it ;
    – the “king of (mystery-) Babylon” as in the Rev.9 chapter ;
 
    next : the ‘Simeon’ section :
    … but who or what réally was the subject here ?
    after the above , would it have explained “what they did to the eden-mother” ? 
    but then again we face the same problem : just how much exactly was said to
    the disciples concerning ‘prophetic themes’ — also this ? even though Christ 
    said them many things but with the goal that you & we would understand ;
    looking at lines 25-35 ,
    it cóuld be about us since also we “are waiting to see Him” (in 26) but then
    what content had the other lines ? while , suppose that now an explanation
    followed about the mother where (-SumeÓN) was (-SiÓN) .. ?
(25)                                                                                                       (25)
“And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem,                …. mother in Eden 
whose name [was]  Simeon;                                                     [as]  the name=daughter of – simeon=Tsiun , 
and the same man [was]  just and devout, 
waiting for the consolation of Israel:                                  … (eden-) Ishral ,
and the Holy Ghost was upon him.”                                     as the sacred + [=people]  + [=begotten]  + by [=her]  ;
 
    but next , the continuation will be very difficult   —
    though 27 can read “and the spirit=serpents came to the temple=mother” 
    for example , what to do with “the golden crowns of the four cherubs” :
    was that included or not , as almost integral part of the same story ?
    or was next line “the serpents aquiring a body by her” as
                      (26) 
                    “And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, 
                     that he should not see death , 
                     before he had seen the Lord’s Christ.”
                     as
                     ………………                                                                      [‘after her people had left her’ ? ; is possible] 
                     b
                      the ere=serpents (?) (prin=ophis) – acquainted=acquired – a christ=body ..                    (?) 
                      (27) 
                     “And he came by the Spirit into the temple [=sanctuary]  : 
                     and when the parents brought in the child Jesus , 
                      to do for him after the custom of the law,”
                     as 
                      then – [=they]  came – to – the sanctuary (‘swapped’) of – spirit=God                                (?)
                      b
                      to brought=steal – the parents=crowns – from the jesus=four – child=animals
                      c
                      ……
    this interpretation is not impóssible , and perhaps this one line is enough !
    yet then in closing lines (28-34) MUST appear “the birth-sceptre” of the 144 ,
    however these lines are very staccato while ‘sceptre’ (-rabdos) can fit upon
    several type other words (objects) ;
    while (31) can have “firstborn-right” ,
                   “Which thou hast prepared before the face of all people;”
    where ‘face’ (-prosôpon) can be (-prôtotokos) “firstborn-right [-for all people] ” ;
 
                                      conclusion : the interpretation is very possible
 
    … which in turn is very good news for us concerning our date   —
    after “the other sacrifice – Adam – was chosen the 10th just before Passover”
    [we had that]  these ’40 days’ follow (after Unleavened) where we found his
    number ’10’ [Gen.4 & Maruts]  and by extension his ’70’ [70 bulls page]  and
    his ‘144,000 type number’ [see page]  even though we cannot trace the theme
    of these numbers back in the restored buildup hére ,
    closing with “the eden-mother and the four cherubs” here [and Rev.9]  which
    appears to be really , really the final theme this time
 
    what a journey , and what a war to get Out , wasn’t it … 
 

    [added :]    Christ’s ascension — at Weeks (our date now) ?
     … it seems possible   —
     Acts 2 has “that after his resurrection he was forty days on earth still” yet that
     does not make Sense – to leave ‘ten days before Weeks’ 
     [while we know that Esau stole ‘acts’ 1-2 from a gospel then invented the rest
     of that book]  , so that ‘forty’ must have been ‘this forty-days theme’ ;
     and it gets more interesting : where our God appeared at mt.Horeb in the day
     of Unleavened “where at the mount were trumpets and clouds” ,
     Christ returns with “trumpets and clouds” as if ending this 40 days theme !  
     would that not make sense .. ?
 
     [added :]    the (corrupt) ‘road to Emmaus’ – leading up to ‘Weeks’ (?)
     … looking at the section ,
     starting with “the sons + having declared + the scroll + in the third year” 
     [as Esau’s “two guys + going + to Emmaus + sixty + stadia”]  
     it indeed may have said “that they were sad” (Lk.24:17) but because they
     assumed that their date would come to pass — which didn’t ;
     but Esau moved this ‘ascension (-of us)’ under ‘Christ’s resurrection’ 
     just as he did here with the eden-mother under the Mary theme !
     therefore this alleged “Emmaus road” may well have been the intro to the
     final forty days theme after which He WILL return — moreover , in the Luke
     24 chapter Esau created a debile bridge (‘to close his moved sections’) to
     the situation of the disciples “who thought Jesus was a ghost unto them” 
     [but nonsense ofcourse — invented by Esau’s warped mind]  , 
     and right after that is Christ’s ascension (though much of that he deleted) !
     implying that “the 40 days theme was directly linked to His ascension” !