the ‘choosing the flockling in the days before Passover’  as described in Exodus 12 had to happen ‘at the 10th’ , which is directly linked to the number 10 of Adam     — please see the 144,000 MainPage for that theme

this time Adam won’t escape

 
                                                                       theme :
 
   … the ‘choosing Barabbas or Jesus’ is another plausible deniability of Esau ,
   not only because the Romans would never release some insurrectionist in
   the place of a figure representing a religion they wanted to stay far from 
   [so that even the components of the alleged scene do not make any Sense]  ,
   but the key ofcourse is ‘Esau hiding the Exodus 12 theme here’ 
 
   dismissing this corrupted story gains us a crucial Legal fact :
   once God appoints Adam to be the sacrifice , the age of grace is over ! 
   so that there is no heresy here : not ‘Adam is replácing the Passover itself’
   but instead the very reason for the Passover has been fulfilled now !
   for 2000+ years Christ had to ‘repeat’ his sacrifice , until finally the days
   would come that souls understood what God spoke concerning Eden 
   (as the concept so restored in the text , below) ,
   so that now finally Adam becomes ‘the carcass’ (Mt.24) as the days
   that “the sacrifice as the gift will cease” (Dan.27) which means ‘Golgotha’ ,  
   and we right now should be at the point that He gets us home !
 
   before Unleavened He had us find ‘the reason of it’ , and so with Weeks 
   and the other themes — and now this before ‘the 10th’ … isn’t that kind ? 
 

                                                                                text
 
   however , projecting a solid buildup upon Esau’s horribly corrupted lines 
   will not always retrieve a full original text — as is the case here :
   the first usable key-line is (15) “release a prisoner whom they would” as 
   the ‘choosing an animal’ in Exodus 12 ; yet while the section áfter that
   (until 22) succeeded rather well ,
   the intro to that (11-14) presented as “Christ standing silent before Pilate”
   fails to be interpreted as a proper intro to the Exodus 12 theme     —
   it may be that the ‘standing silent’ wás part of the crucifixion intro where
   Esau saw an opportunity to glue this Exodus them below that 
   [we now won’t go into the was the ‘standing silent before His shearers’ 
   referring to Mystery-Babylon also repeated hére , and was indeed a sign
   placed saying ‘king of the Judahites’]  

 
for you Sir
seven more days 
 

 
corrupt mirrors : in John 18 & Mark 15 , but this is the most useful version
corruptions : 
theme : context 100% restored 
fulltext :

 
Matthew 27 (15-22)
 
 
[starting this section here because it is the Exodus 12 line :] 
Mt.27:15 [=Mk.15:6]  :
(a) “Now at [that]  feast the governor was wont to release unto the people a prisoner , 
(b)  whom they would.”                                                                                                                        [Mk: they desired] 
as
[=now]  , according=before – (the) feast (or ‘passover’)                                                              [‘at the 10th’]  
b
one of – the – throng=flocklings of – (the) prisoner=herd – [..]  (was to be) [=chosen]  
c
(for) (to be) released=sacrificed – [..]  (unto-) governer=God ;                       [‘flockling’ used in Ex.12] 
as
‘to-the God shall-be-sacrificed [+subject] ‘
 
Mt.27:16
“And they had then a notable prisoner, called Barabbas.”  
as
[=but]  – [+a certain one]  (?) of – then=them (?) – (would) had=represent (?)    +
b
[attempt :] 
notorious=their (?) – prisoner=enemy (?) – (that) called=is – bar-abbas=Adam ; 
 
     [next 17-18 : very difficult to see the reasoning :] 
 
Mt.27:17-18
(a) “Therefore when they were gathered together, Pilate said unto them, 
Whom will ye that I release unto you? Barabbas, or  Jesus which is called Christ ? 
For he knew that for envy they had delivered him.”
17
a [… unknown …]    
   b
   (and) whom – you=they (would) will=choose – (would be) release=ruling (?) – you=them :
   c
   bar-abbas=Adam , 
   d
   or – [+his]  jesus=servant (Christ) – (who would) called=become – (the) Christ (‘as office’) ;
   18
   [=but]  (only by) – understanding – because=about – envy=Eden (phthonon=eden)
   b
   they (would) deliver=recognize – him=this ;
 
   [next 19 :
   no ofcourse we cannot see whether this strange line perhaps was even invented by Esau ,
   yet for the buildup we could need a “therefore He sent the prophets”   —
   compare ‘a dream’ and it shows ‘sent’ (dispatches) ! :
 
Mt.27:19
a) “Then he was set down on the judgment seat,
b)  his wife sent unto him, saying, 
c)  Have thou nothing to do with that just man: 
       for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him.”
as
a)  [… unknown …] 
b
(therefore) [+he]  – sent – unto – him=them – his – [..]  wife=prophets , saying :
as
‘he-is-sending toward them the prophets of-him’
c
[…totally impossible – not one word sticks out …] 
 
Mt.27:20
“But the chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude     +
 that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus.” 
as
[=but]  – the – chief=priests = sons of – [..]  elders=Esau     +
b
(had) persuaded=corrúpted – the – throng=scroll
c
so that – [+always]  (?) [..]  bar-abbas=Adam – (would) ask=escape                                                [20 : sic] 
d
and – [..]  Jesus – (would be) chosen ; 
 
Mt.27:21
“The governor answered and said unto them, 
Whether of the twain will ye that I release unto you? They said, Barabbas.”  
as
[=therefore]  – [..]  governer=God – (has) answered=promised (?) ,
b
saying – (unto) them=you :                                                                                                                                        
c
(only-) which=when – you (will) willing=understand      + 
d
(the) from=words – [..]  two=which – I release=spoke – (unto) you , 
e
[=then]  – the=it – (will) said=become (to be) – bar-abbas=Adam ;                        [or ‘I will choose’ ?] 
 
27:22
“Pilate saith unto them, What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ ? 
[They]  all say unto him, Let him be crucified.”
as
them=wherefore – [+he]  (God) (will) said=raise up 
b
the – pilate=sons of – what=Ishral (ti=israel)      +
c
then=that – (will have) do=restored – [+his]  jesus=scroll (iesoun=biblion , as shown) ,
d
[d-e : the word ‘Christ’ was swapped :] 
–
(and when-) they (will have) declared (‘say’) – [+his]  called=words – (to) him ,    
as
‘when word of-him they-shall-declare to-him’
e
(then) all=no longer – Christ (‘moved’) – (will be) crucified=sacrificed (but sic !) ; 
 
mt.27:23
“And the governor said, Why, what evil hath he done?                                                             [27 : key line :] 
 But they cried out the more, saying, Let him be crucified.”  
as
[=because]  – the – governer=sons (reaff.subject) – (will have) said=understood     +
b
[no new line :] 
–
why=all of – for=the – evil – (that) [+Adam]  – (has) done ,
c
[=and]  – (will) cry out – [..]  (unto) very=God , saying :                              (or ‘will plead’ etc — but sic !)
d
let him be crucified=sacrificed ! ; 
 
   closing-lines 24-25 , only in Matthew : too dangerous :
   for a proper closing of the above we still would need an ‘Adam dies & Eden restored’ 
   but these two lines are just too unsure , Esau may even have added them for drama , 
   and though we cóuld make something of them it’s best not to for we have what we needed :
   (24-25)
   “Then Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but [that]  rather a tumult was made, 
     he took water, and washed [his]  hands before the multitude, saying, 
     I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye [to it] .
     Then answered all the people, and said, His blood [be]  on us, and on our children.”

added : [but not for Legal reasons :]   the impossible ‘coincidence’  … when writing this page , news came in the feed : >> the point ofcourse isn’t ‘that the man was already old’  but the timing of aspects directly linked to the above , as “(the church of-) Adam       (now in the process of-) choosing       a (new-) representative ,      (and that-) by his 120 (sic) chiefs (‘cardinals’)”   —

      
… please remember the posted intermezzo about the
Blue Origin ritual (-in 144,000 page) that Jacob-souls
are helping Adam’s case when confirming aspects of 
an event irrelevant whether deliberately fabricated or
are “real” aspects like in this case ;
and if you ask us , this is the hand of Adam …….