please : the core question is in paragraph marked     <<<

the ‘parables form’ is not maintainable

                                                                                               
                                                                                     theme
 
        … we knew this was coming , right   —
        we entered the season of ‘declaring the scroll’ , and while cleaning up this site also
        the section ‘NT parables’ required a stance : and we decided to delete them    —
        below are the reasons why “the parables” are so Unworkable and we hope that you
        will fully agree please because it is a decision we enforce together , as Legal stance
 
        the first problem with them is that in each case “some aspect don’t fit the story”
        as either irreconcilable to , or even contrading the storyline itself :
        in ‘the Prodigal Son’ (or ‘Two Sons’) ,
        the main character as the son that got lost is an incredible strong archetype where
        the painted father is God ofcourse – but the problem is “the óther son” , since there
        is no matching figure or concept for him in all of prophets : which is a problem ;
        however —
        looking further at “the parables” something more devious is going on : 
        many parables DO contain ‘themes as in prophets’ but in a very mutilated form , 
        meaning that Esau sought to conceal these in “the parable form” in order to disarm
        the key themes that Christ lter would conclude in his book Revelation !
 
        ofcourse we do NOT dismiss anything He said but try find what he réally said ,
        just like we are doing all the time in prophets , right , until this very day still ; 
        but before we get into the main point something needs to be addressed please   —
        pondering to dismiss them as the current presented form in KJV surprisingly causes
        a kind of melancholia that is hard to describe … perhaps the most appropriate is 
        as “if having to say goodbye to childhood” — which in fact is a bit strange since we 
        never had any like feeling while restoring the many themes in the prophets , is it ?
        suggesting that this decision carries a lot of Legal weight — in the sense that most
        likely you and we are Undoing “a hook” which is affecting virtually all believing souls ,
        including our own , and as a Negative hook having been in place for very long time …  
 
        … this is an important difference please   –
        we saw how Esau presented a picture of “the disciples as rather ignorant workmen” ,
        the “first christian churches as half-heathens” and “Christ’s discourses as either very
        simple down-to-earth ór mystical and impossible to follow” : and none of that is true ,
        ever since we sáw in the restored chapters how incredible direct and to the point He  
        used to be especially concerning endtime themes and against the Pharisees ,
        however : somehow still “the Parables” were kind of like “our weak spot” , right ,
        until today when they simply are not maintainable any longer (-see below)   —
        the reason for our delay may be that these stories are so very deep ingrained into the 
        soul even from childhood , and perhaps therefore making it difficult “to let go of them” 
        since they almost became an integral part of the soul : 
        each one of us has specific memories , right — for example “attending as child the 
        Christmas evening church service” when all the lights got dimmed except for those
        of the tree and one spotlight beaming down upon the female sunday-school teacher
        standing at the podium narrating the Nativity story , her long blond locks glowing 
        in the light while her mesmerizing voice painted every beautiful location and event
   
        not undoing the intended message of the parables – but the parable form    
        … for some strange reason ‘the parable concept’ has an enórmous power by linking
        back tó that half-magickal world of the once young soul in regard to these themes ,
        proving that “the soul” is a very simple entity (-and there’s nothing wrong with that !) ,
        very susceptible for uncomplicated representations of “good and evil” ;  
        so that our problem is “the Parables pláying upon these representations” 
        (especially since invented as corruptions by the childish mind of Esau)
        since the so-called Parables contain many indecisive multi-interpretable aspects 
        which in fact feed that half-mystical world even that soul may be an adult by now  —    
        is that correctly phrased please ? 
 
        if we say (-which we DO !) that we want to understand everything He said ,
        and subscribe to “us being those five virgins” without understanding that Esau has
        concealed the condition for Christ to come get us , then what did we win ?
        if we subscribe to “us nót being the alleged person who refused the invitation to the
        wedding because he had other matters” without understanding that the réal theme
        here was ‘the corrupt KJV’ then what did we win ?
          
        the Gospel said ‘to the people’ — but the specific themes to His disciples
        … and here we get to the core of the problem :
        His overall message ofcourse was “the soul reconciled with God” as the important 
        joyful message for évery soul , likely accompanied with various forms of physical
        healing of people (-but this latter was not such a dominant aspect like Esau wanted 
        to have us believe , since several of the mentioned healings are his corruptions to
        conceal óther themes ; while originally these healings must have been a side note
        or they would come to confuse the important message as the specific themes) ;
 
        so : if He proclaimed the Gospel to the people , while speaking about the specific 
        themes to his disciples (-or as rebuke against the Pharisees) , then the at first sight
        strange question arises : ‘then for whát group the Parables were intended ?’
        it has to be the one OR the other :
        He would not tell these “to the people” because by nature most ‘parables’ contain 
        an endtime-theme which He would have demanded from them to understand 
        in spite of His proclaiming “that the Gospel is free – without strings attached” ;
        and He cóuld not have told parables “to his disciples” since in several restored
        chapters we’ve seen how incredibly direct He was concerning specific themes ,
        since the disciples were the forerunners of the group that God would raise up ,
        hence (only-) the disciples , like us , were asked to understand these themes  !
 
        how could He ‘have been vague’ about crucial events like ‘the tribulation’ ?
        … and here the validity of ‘the parables’ comes into play :
        in all prophets , God warns numerous time for “that day of IEUE” , specifying the 
        conditions for escaping that – or not : especially related to the Scroll ; 
        however , in the parables exactly these important conditions have been mutilated 
        or erased by Esau into his corrupted scroll project , having turned the conditions
        into a flat virtue “to wait (-for Christ)” in the very vague ’10 virgins’ parable ,  
        where the remnant of today’s christianity is devided in a “those that wait camp” 
        and “those that do not” , oblivious for that fact that “waiting” is NOT a laudable
        condition in itself , but only as the result of other conditions ; so that people could 
        be “waiting” forever IF not the by Him asked conditions would be fulfilled , first !
 
        ofcourse Esau deluded them with his “no one knows that day only my Father” 
        and the deflecting Mt.24 in which Esau encourages believers “to watch always” 
        for every type Nonsense but NOT for the only 1 sign : the restored scroll , 
        since that ‘watching always’ was the type corruption he implemented there ;
        however – his “parables form” is a new low ,
        because of the form it appears to be an intended way of speaking of Christ
        while ‘the parables’ almost always contain ‘endtime themes’ , suggesting a kind
        of exclusive information given to the soul , which however by nature she will not
        be able to decipher : so something devious is going on with these ‘parables’ :
        partial information is NO information concerning dangerous themes as the Trib ,
        so that Christ would have given the soul incorrect information   
        risking the oceans of Hurt of souls that will enter the Tribulation !
 
        therefore you & we have two options (-only) :
        OR we let to remain ‘the parables’ as they show now — but then we subscribe to
        the idea that Christ has been vague inténtionally , therewith playing with lives ;                             <<<
        OR we declare that He always was very specific and direct , just as we saw in the
        several restored chapters now — and we look in prophets for each original theme 
        which Esau subsequently turned into another of his vague ‘parables’ :
        is that fair please .. ?    
 
                                                 the ‘parables’ : devised for partial truths
 
        … apart from Esau’s corruptions and cut & paste he was cocky enough to deflect
        important aspects in the ‘full theme chapters’ (-though we saved a couple of them !)
        as in Matthew 24 where he turned the context in a “to be waiting” virtue , see above ,
        in order to deflect from “the 1 sign will be the restored scroll” there ;
        and our educated guess is ,
        that he used the same type deflection for the more complicated themes that were
        very difficult to corrupt because of their inherent coherence , in the form of ‘parables’ :
        by taking a sub-aspect of an original prophets theme (-now explained by Christ) ,
        then building the parable around it , making sure the core message is compromised ,
        and this is true for all the 37 listed parables 
       
        the ‘parable of the weeds (or ‘tares’)’ , for example , Mt.13 ,
        is the “corrupted scroll” theme in prophets further explained by “the evil ones (‘words’)
        will stand among my words”, hence “Satan sowing tares among the weed” hére ;
        and where in prophets “those that will hold on to the KJV will enter the tribulation”
        here it also ends with “the time of harvest” but as corrupted conclusion which Esau
        sought to enforce by having Christ ‘explaining the parable’ (in lines 36-43) ; 
                 to complicate things (-they always are) ,
                 the ‘parable of the sower’ is the same theme , (Mt.13, Mk.4, Lk.8) ,
                 just “the evil seed” turned into ‘the good seed’ and the wheat is replaced by the
                 several unfortunate conditions , and though this parable appears credible
                 the context itself is incorrect : does faith not flower dúring oppressions .. ?    
                 and the “thorns” mentioned here is “this flesh” in prophets ;
                 while the explanation (Mk.4:10-20) contains the Red flag “the kingdom of God” 
                 that is Esau’s corruption of ‘Eden’ , followed by dark lines about “people that will
                 understand and those that won’t” — which is absurd to say of the Gospel 
                 since the Gospel message is for éveryone of Jacob , 
                 however it DOES make sense in the corrupt versus restored scroll theme !
                           so that ,
                           the parable of the sower was the mid-section of the parable of the weeds ! ,
                           since the theme starts with “the evil ones between my words”, then the souls
                           that search for God’s words (not: ‘good seed between the thorns’) , 
                            then “the many that will hold on to the KJV” , see above ,
                           and clósing with the end of the ‘weeds parable’ : where a group (not: ‘cereals’)
                           are taken out before “the time of harvest” starts – which is the Tribulation …
                           [this also explains why both parables appear in Matthew : it was 1 theme !] 
         
         pointing to Revelation
       … now that we have so crucial theme back , appearing throughout all prophets 
       and again explained by Christ here , it is a logical buildup to the events in Revelation ,
       or rephrased : the reason why no-one saw that “the corrupt scroll” was the real subject 
       in chapter one and NOT some “seven + stars” was because the lead-up in the Gospels
       was concealed by Esau so that souls would never have a solid buildup in order to can
       identify the proper attributes appearing there !
       and though the setting in Revelation (-concerning the scroll theme) is different as here 
       – as a heavenly setting because He had his original being back –  
       he was the same direct and to the point there as he was in these alleged ‘parables’ !
       you still feel now as if those are a loss … ?        
 
                                                           is there not 1 genuine parable ?
      
       … an objection could be “but He certainly used proverbs and sayings” , and indeed 
       He must have used those — as long the main theme was not related to ‘the end time’ ,
       yet the line between ‘proverbs’ and ‘parables’ can be very thin :
       He responds to a question of his disciples “are there not 12 hours in a day ?” ,
       and though we interpret that (-at the moment !) as our saying “is water wet ?” it is by
       no means a parable — but what about
       the ‘parable of the pearl’ (Mt.13) , 
       where “the kingdom of heaven is like unto a merchant man, seeking goodly pearls: 
       Who, when he had found one pearl of great price, went and sold all that he had, 
       and bought it.” : what does all of that even mean ?
       it has head nor tail for every context has been stripped by Esau , it is not even sure
       that the intended context wás “the kingdom of heaven” (=Eden) , and for all we know
       it can have been a simple proverb said to the people — but turned into ‘a parable’ by
       Esau in order to justify his other ones ;
 
       then the ‘parable of the lost sheep’ (Mt.18, Lk.15) appéaring genuine ,
       especially since He is the typical shepherd figure — even as in top of this page —
       and though we do not doubt the genuine shepherd & sheep theme , see prophets ,
       originally it doesn’t seem to have been ‘a parable’ since her buildup is not right :
       the “ninety-nine righteous people who need no repentance” is outright Bizarre to say 
       éven with the forced interpretation “that those 99 already accepted Christ” ,
       therefore clearly invented as a false juxtaposition to hide something else ;
       if you ask us it is a persiflage upon Is.53 (-which we hold very high ! , see page)
       and instead of “one versus 99 sheep” it is “the saved soul AND her Original” 
       in the sense “that Christ rescued the soul so that she be restored in her Original” :
       and not “the angels rejoice” but “the soul : when she will have been restored” !
       the term “shepherd” in this case can have referred to the “lamb silent in front of her 
       shearers (-in Mystery-Babylon !)” per the same Isaiah 53 chapter ;
                 again please — ofcourse we do not discard ‘the shepherd & sheep’ theme 
                 since there are several sections about this , also the “I am the good shepherd”
                 as lines typically said to the people (-and hence the above was nót) 

 
                                                                                         part II
                          list of ‘parables’ & their original theme in prophets