pentecost

spoiler :
it looks like our date is ‘Pentecost’ as “a double feast” ,
which “started with the disciples and their people” and “ends with you and we (-as 144)”
 

 
                … this one is very tricky , therefore please first look at the buildup below ;
                we needed to know what is with the “forty” [1] and searched the text backwards
                whether the previous sections [2] and [3] as seemingly unrelated stories could 
                form one solid theme when combined : 
 
A) step one

                     conclusion :
                     the buildup appears a congruent whole so it’s worth a try ;
                     the event of “John’s beheading” does not appear in the gospel of John (eh?)
                     but interestingly John 4 contains a “four + months” [=forty + days”?] 
                     in a similar context of Christ returning , see above ;
 
B) step two
                                        “forty (-or 50?) days” after Passover ?

 
… this is a real problem : how can we know if our key term in the above chapter is right ?
– if we maintain that “the final three feasts” are about ‘the time of the end’ ,
    and that Trumpets was not the day of our departure
    but “the appointed day” as the time when the restoration of the scroll would start ,
– and that instead
    our date must link to the ascension of Christ
    (considered ‘the two flanking witnesses’ and other reasons) ,
    we have the 7th day (-after Passover) , the 40th , or the 49th (50th) ; 
– however the ideal candidate — the 7th — obviously has not come to pass , for whatever reason ;

                             what if Pentecost / Jubilee was ‘a double feast’ ?
 
… the ’40’ appears to be a too negative number , perhaps only as part óf the ’49’ ,
while in our case ‘the Jubilee aspect” of the 49 is very compelling  — since the Isaiah chapter 
mentioning the Jubilee continues with “… and the 144 will rebuild Eden” :
at the start of the seven weeks “the barley sheaf was lifted up as wave-offering” which – probably – 
symbolically represented “ascension” , in this case of Christ and all of those who would be His’ ;
then at Pentecost there is a double wave-offering as “two loaves” , Leviticus 23 
[and it probably wrote “baked without yeast” because “with yeast” makes little sense] ,
and where “a sheaf” is ‘the raw produce’ , the loaves must represent “a completed product”  —
but were there two as representing “male and female”
or did both loaves represent ‘two groups’ …?
 
… we saw that the disciples and their friends were very closely linked to us because they were 
the first and were requested to pray for us [the theme of “they receiving their Originals when we will”] ,
and the mentioned John 4 , after the line of “4 months” [=’40 days’?] , repeats the relation between
those who sow and those who reap : why would that be said if there was NO link ?                                             [# 1] 
is it therefore impossible that Pentecost / Jubilees was .. a shared feast ?

 
… though , apart from corruptions , at least half of Acts is ghostwritten by Esau ,
chapter 1 writes
(1)
“I am writing this to you , Theo+philos” ,
but considered context it said “..to the sons (theos=yhios) of Ishral” – you and we ;
(3)
“To whom also he [=Christ] shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, 
 being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God:”
(5) 
suggests that the Spirit would come down “in a couple of days” ;
(6) 
says “they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel ?”
but likely said ,
“they asked him , saying : Lord , at what time will you restore the sons of Ishral (‘144’) ?” ,
since they knew of that promise – that they also would be restored – and ofcourse they were cúrious ,
yet showing again their link with you and we ;                                                                                                                                 [# 2] 
but the answer in line (7) : “the Father knows that time” is questionable
since in part II of this chapter Peter seems to explain some things about the sons ; 
(8)
has Him saying to them “you are my witnesses” , 
where God says to the 144 “you are my witnesses (-you house Ishral)” ; again a link ;                                            [# 3] 
(11)
is akin to the Transfiguration [=Ascension] in the gospels ,
saying there that “Jesus […] shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven” ;
read : at the (2nd-) wave-offering ?
(12)
“Then returned they unto Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, 
which is from Jerusalem a sabbath day’s journey.”
very likely it said “.. returned + the same + sabbath (-day)” — so no ‘several days till Pentecost’ ;
 
… then follows a totally corrupt section lines 13-26 (end)
about some guy who’s belly split open upon a plot of ground , which is Nonsense ofcourse ;
almost certainly ‘the 144 were the subject here’ , compare line 1 , but restoration is tricky :
(13)
“And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples, and said, (the number of names 
together were about an hundred and twenty,) (14) Men [and] brethren, this scripture must needs 
have been fulfilled, which the Holy Ghost by the mouth of David spake before concerning Judas, 
which was guide to them that took Jesus.”
15
[..] [=at]      +
(a-) [=certain] – days=moment – Peter – stood up – in – the midst of – the – disciples , saying :
b
[..] the – [..] [..] hundred + twenty=144,000        +                                                                               [‘was 1 term , see Rev.] 
c
[..] – throng=sons of – names=Ishral (‘144’) – are    +                                                   [no “sub-line between brackets”]      
 
16
[w/ swapped 1x :]                                                                                                                                                  [compare line 1] 
men=our – brethren ,                                                                                                                                                               [# 4] 
b
must=as- (the ones that-) (will) fulfilled=restore – the scroll of
c
(the-) this=words – which – [..] spirit=God – spoke       +
d
through – [+his] mouth=servants – (the-) david=prophets ; 
e
[and now ? back to 15c-16a :] 
        about=and – (the-) judas=sons (?) – (will) be – guide=re-created (?) (‘be the firstfruits’?)
       f
        the=when – [+they] (will be) arrested=gathered – (by-) the – Lord ;
 
17
[=and] – [=we] will – (be) numbered – with – us=them ,                                                  [per ‘re-created’ theme !] 
b
and – [..] (will) part=also – receive – this=our – ministry=glorious (diakonia=doxa) – the=body (tes=sôma) ;
 
… but this is as far as it goes : next lines unto the end are utterly corrupt :
(18)
“Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder 
in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out. (19)  And it was known unto all the dwellers at Jerusalem; 
insomuch as that field is called in their proper tongue, Aceldama, that is to say, The field of blood.”    
… it has no sense to even attémpt to restore anything :
the ‘Aceldama’ can be ‘Adam’ who caused evil things to our Originals (-of line 17)
and that finally the “desolation of Eden” (?) (line 20?) will be over — but it’s all a guess ; 
 
            Acts 2 has ‘Pentecost starting’ 
            and it can very well have started “that same night – or morning – when they were still together” 
            since it says “they were all in unison” — arguably ‘after the above end of chapter 1’ !

 
… the term ‘pentecost’ only shows 3x in the NT — two times in Acts and one time here :
8
[=but] – I=he (will) stay=delay (‘tarry’) (epimenó=okneô)        +
b
in=from – ephesus=Passover (ephesos=pascha) – until – [..] Pentecost ;       +
 
9
for=then – (the-) great (‘expected’?) – door=day        +
b
[..] (will) effectively – open=happen (anoigó=ginomai !) ,
c
and=when – [+he] (will) oppose=return (antikeimai=anakamptô !) – (upon the-) many=clouds ;
                                                                                                                                               (polus=nephos)
[next 10 : because the theme was so much about ‘tarry’ 
we opted that also here was intended the trauma of waiting :] 
10
[=and] – [..] [+he] (will) come=gather – (the-) timothy=sons (‘remnant’?) – (that were-) see=waiting
b
        that=and – (had) become – fearless=worried (?) – toward=concerning – you=Him ,       (?)
c
        because – he=they work=desired (?) (ergozomia=oregô !)
        d
         the – work=appearance (ergon=eidos) of (?) – the – Lord
                           e
                           [unsure :] 
                           like – I=we – also (-do) (‘in their days’?) ; 
 
[next 11 : if previous 10 was true then now ‘they must rejoice’ :] 
11
then=and – no=all of – [..] him=them – (will) despise=rejoice ,
b
[=and] – [+he] (will) accompany=bring – him=them – in=to – peace=tsiun (eiréné=tsiun – no Strong’s) ;
c
that=and – [=they] (will) come=arrive – unto – me=us          +
d
(as-) [=the ones] (that will-) eagerly wait – for – [..]  [..] [+their] brethren ;      [sic]                                              [# 5] 
 
[next 12 : per context now the theme should be ‘all the other souls’ (Jacob) — see interpretation :] 
12
 “As touching [our] brother Apollos, I greatly desired him to come unto you with the brethren: 
but his will was not at all to come at this time; but he will come when he shall have convenient time.”
interpretation :
you see that “something is with this subject” as “being delayed” !
12
[=now] , concerning – (the-) apollos=people (apollós=dêmos !) – [..] brother=Jacob , 
b
I – greatly      +
(would have) [=wished] – them – [..] to come – to – you=us – with – [..] [+our] brethren (‘144’) ,
c
[dangerous – how was this phrased ? :] 
n
 
…. 13 – 14 missing
 
15
[=again] , I beseech – you – brethren ,
b
know=pray – (for-) the – house=sons of – stephanas=Ishral (‘144’)                                                         [or: ‘house of’] 
c
so that – it=they (will) is=become – (the-) firstfruits of – [..] achaia=Eden (?) (‘a province’=eden)
d
and=by – dedicating – themselves – to – ministry=understand – the – saints=scroll ;
 
16
so that – [..] you=they – (will) put       +                                                          [b: ‘wicked one’ – so called in prophets] 
b
the – such=wicked one (?) (‘corrupted scroll’) (toioutos=athesmos) – into subjugation
c
and=through – every=our – [..] cooperation – and=with – work=them ;
 
[next 17 : the ‘stephanas’ and ‘achaicus’ not necessarily have the same meaning now :] 
17
       [=then] – [=we] (will) greatly rejoice – [=in] – (having) presence=become (?)
       b
       (the-) stephanas=sons (15b) – and – fortunatos=daughters of – [..] achaicus=God ,
c
because – (that which-) (will be) (still-) lacking – (to-) you=us       +                                  [namely ‘the Original’] 
d
(will be) supplied – (through-) them (‘144’) ;         +
 
18
[wrong syntax :] 
for – [=He] (will) refreshed=restore        +
b
[..] my=our – spirit=soul – and=in – your=our – the=glorious one (?) (‘Original’)
c
and=when – [+they] (will have) understood – the – you=scroll (humon=biblion) of       +
d
[..] such=His – the=words (tous=logos) ;
 
 
closing     (greeting his own people)
 
end