Rev.7 : 1-3[-and proper continuation] the ’40 days’ and the sealing :
… because both the ‘4’ [‘forty’] and ‘sealing’ show here it was worth a try :
first Esau mutilated “the réal 4 (5) Locusts theme” making it ‘chapter 9’ ,
then cut-off the mid-section following that ,
then placed the by him mutilated end here ;
so that we have “Rev.9 restored ‘locusts’ > missing section > this Rev.7″
however , we learned that ‘the 40 days belong to the 4 locusts’
and after having hidden the locusts as “the 4 horses” he hid the theme
of the “40 days trial” and changed back that one into ‘four angels’ hére ,
even being so cocky to add “the four cardinal directions” implying to us
that lines 1-3 here were original (but corrupted) indeed containing a ‘4’ !
the 40 days as the trial AND the sealing ?
… this is so very difficult to establish since all about this is corrupt :
if we go by our instinct knowing that ‘ 40 days (or years) is a trial time’
it also should have a positive outcome for a certain group , right
[and perhaps ‘Noah in the cave’ is the best example of this – see page] ;
yet we still fight with “a 40 days after Weeks – but only in the Jubilee” ,
though Ex.16 and Num.11 appear to support this ,
and also connect it with ‘the sealing’ where – important – the buildup
here is interpreted according to Leviticus 25 , see section below
[and perhaps so said by He cause we would find those lines in Lev.?]
the ‘because of the flesh’ here
… only because both Ex.16 and Num.11 suggested this is the problem
perhaps even as “the deities coming down to try it” which makes sense
because the serpent-race greatly influences this silly ape ;
yet given here in [brackets] until that is more clear
below lines : restored buildup & syntax : VERY high :
[first line :
restart , Esau’s cut-off after “Weeks as accepting the scroll & four locusts (Rev.9) theme” :]
1
…. four=forty – angels=days +
c
(will be) standing=added (histémi=prostithêmi) – on=to – the – four=forty
d
(in the-) winds=year (gonias=etos , as shown) of – the – land=Jubilee (?) ,
e
(in which-) (the) four=candidates (sic) (‘fellows’) (tessares=hetairos) + [< not véry positive , Ex.16]
f
(for-) (the) winds=remnant of – [..] earth=Ishral (‘144’) (aneMos=hypOleiMa)
f
(will be) holding=tested (krateó=dikimazeô) [Ex.16] [jews in rev 3 ?]
g
[=whether] (that-no = if-no) +
h
[+they] (will) blow=commit (Pneó=Poieó) – wind=iniquity (anemos=anomia)
i
[….. [through-] [+their] (-own) flesh (‘body’) ……] [< the suspected theme in case]
[next 2 :
now “the specific sitiuation of those 40 days — related to “the sealing” :]
2
[=then] – I see – other=the – angel=Lord ,
b
ascending=commanding – [from=to] – sun=his – rising=angels : [< we need subject already]
c
[..] (during-) whom=these – forty – angels=days +
d
them=the – hurt [=do unrighteous] = unrighteous (-ones) (‘noun now’) +
e
(will have) given=fallen away (?) (didómi=aphistêmi) +
f
[…… (through-) their (-own) flesh ……] [< the suspected theme in case]
note :
a) the subject needed to be Sped Up for us to can use the ‘four / forty’ :
if it already is the + Lord we don’t need spoil words with rising of + the sun ,
and same with “shouting + in loud + voice , since there ARE NO ‘four angels’ ;
b) this 2 appears a repeat [-of 1] but probably not so :
any important theme often “poses the general idea” followed by the actual situation
3
(therefore-) saying=pass (-you) along ! (legó=paragô) – no=the – unrighteous (-ones) (‘as in 2’) +
b
[because of-] [….. their (-own) flesh …..] , [< the suspected theme in case]
c
until=but – (let-) we=you – which=only – (be) sealing +
d
the (ones) (that have-) servants=overcóme (-it) – (through-) [..] us=our – God (?) +
e
upon – [..] their – foreheads ;
note :
a) the “pass along the unrighteous ones through their own flesh” is not ideal
but we simply have no other words left to can use ,
b) after the defeats we now need a juxta as ‘overcomers’ ;
first attempt was “overcome their flesh” but then too often ‘flesh’ would show ,
instead “overcome +it through God” would describe the týpe fight ;
4
[from here , see KJV — list of the 144,000 — however that was phrased exactly]