please — we don’t search problems but as often stumble upon them ; the evidence for the existence of this ‘star’ is quite substantial but as usual we first need to know whether the concept itsélf can be true , and for what reason the sceptre needs a star  — coupled with this question :

No . the eden-sceptre axis but with one star on top ?]

why would — if true — Christ start about ‘a star’ at the end (sic) of Revelation ?
and why could that same line read ,
     “I – Jesus – (will) send=come – [..]  (with-) my – angels – to testify=gather – you
      b
      these=and – (the-) on=remnant (ePo=hyPoleimma) of – [..]  churches=Ishral (sic) ,            [‘144’] 
      c
      (when-) I=you – (have) am=found – the root=top (?) of    +
      d
      [..]  the – breed=sceptre (genos=rhabdos) of – [..]  david=Eden (dabiD=eDen)
      e
      [..]  [with-]  the – shining – star – [=of]  – (the) (eden-) (dimensional-) Dawn” …. ?
and mind you ,
this is not impossible because (in Rev.3) 
at the Philadelphia church (the 144.000)
the corrupted text is about “this sceptre” 
 

pyramidion of Amenemhat III , Egyptian Museum ;          you will see the full translation of the glyph lines

 
 
                                                                                  theme
 
   … asking you please for all of your goodwill in this unexpected theme ,
   because ‘finding a new concept’ is one thing but establishing it is quite another    —
   before any Spells we will need to go to that KJV first (unintended pun) to see what 
   the Scroll réally may have said about an idea like this ,
   where key words show a number of Esau’s toddler-stories suspicious in this case :
   (only-) Matthew 2 has one about “a moving star standing still over a certain place”
   while “Herod is diligently searching out something” — yet that ‘diligently searching’ 
   is a phrase exclusively (!) used concerning you & we that search the themes ,
   even showing (-as him saying) “and when you have found him […]  I will come”,
   yet compare the Revelation example above !!
   while please remember ,
   how Esau swapped themes from ‘the birth of the manchild’ under “Christ’s birth” as 
   we saw for example in the alleged ‘circumcision’ — so how much is the chance that
   it also happened hére , and after the find of this aspect the 144,000 are “born”… ?
 
   the very first question for us is “then was the birth-sceptre-axis theme not enough ?”,
   because for all imaginable reasons it does appear to be the final one ,
   however if this ‘star’ is true then it be merely ‘an extension óf this same axis theme’ 
 
   start : the concept in the PT 600 line
   … we will go to the KJV but perhaps it’s best to first show what triggered this   —
   apart from the still ongoing search in the Spells concerning related themes at one
   point another one appeared as ‘a stolen star’ linked to “the Bennu bird” (phoenix) 
   as important to them and which seemed to have a connection with Eden ;                           <<<
   now please ,
   yes the glyphs are draining you but only short now because it is quite important :
   the long PT 600 is about ‘a pyramid’ and closes with a line ‘officially’ translated as :
         “O Atum-Kheper , you became high on the height ,
          you rose up as the benben-stone in the Mansion of the Phoenix in Ôn” :

   but wrongly read form left-to-right while it also is completely contextless because
   the ‘official’ translation hasn’t put it in Eden context (whether on purpose or not) ;
             as ,
           “[at]  ÔN (‘mystery-Babylon’).    +              (but a bit ‘below’ her)
            [to be]  the evil (-eden one) (in) the (matrix-) fortress-prison. ,
           [and from that-]  benben (-pyramidion) (‘as that prison’).    +
            for [-the sake of] . thou. (matrix-) existence.     +
            the (matrix-) Bennu-bird. (as the (matrix-) light-) to rise up” ; 

[top line we do later]      though the bird in the square resémbles the Bennu somewhat     it is not the same but is ‘a swallow’ representing ‘evil’ (‘of Eden’)     while the square is a weird glyph not exactly positive ;     and this context matches óther spells [-that we’ll do later]  where     the “imprisoned object” is “an evil star” — moreover as linked     to the glyph ‘the staff TÁ’ which is ‘the stolen eden-axis section’ !

the ‘pyramidion’ idea seemed to link to Marduk (‘Orion’) where     he is depicted with – likely – “two halves of some stick” which we     found to be about “the two halves of the eden-axis”, right ;     but you see that one has some strange “tip” as if some spade :     was this top disassembled from the staff now as benben idea ?     yet from here we need to speculate   —     we probably will not find any confirmation of this in the Scroll ,     and worse : the ‘triangle form’ doesn’t sound like an eden idea     [but then again , who knows ? :      if the upper half of the sceptre was attacking the matrix as      in the phrase “(the to-be) scepter of iron , ruling the nations”      where the latter is “of demons” and “iron” is the typical metal      óf their corrupt Dualistic realm , therefore *perhaps* that rule     is executed through a star and some Tertrahedonal form ?     later copied by that same realm but to now attack Eden with ?

 
    so — what would that KJV have .. ?
    … searching for ‘star’ brought disappointing few results : so that IF the theme is 
    valid it should have been disguised by Esau in more stories as only Matthew 2 ;
    where however our danger ofcourse is ‘over-projecting’ — because of the many 
    themes we found we need to be very careful “which one of those” could neatly 
    be projected over the -umpth by Esau corrupted text theme ;
    while also we would need “a complete story” :
    like in the “stolen vessels / winds of the four cherubs” one , also here we would
    need “the star stolen — and at the end returning to her real place”, but realizing
    that we’ll need to stitch together again the by Esau cut-up & distributed sections
 

I)                                                           Matthew 2                                                                 [result : good ! :] 
 
   … all of the examples as showing in that KJV are horribly corrupted
   [and again please – that’s why we read ánd grasp Esau’s own writings the Spells]  ;
   and though the large intro here is missing at least it has sóme kind of buildup still :
   — in (1) ,
        the “in those days” no “magians – came – from the East – to Jerusalem” 
      but “serpents – descended – from the North (-of Eden)” – into Eden” , 
  — in (2) ,
        no “born = king of – the jews” 
        but “brought forth – by the daughter of – tsiun” and we need “locust” (-akris) ;                     
  — yet then ofcourse (3-6) is tricky – until the sons appear in 7 :
        there’s no place here for the “stealing of the Eden sky” theme 
        so that maximum they must “have taken the sceptre” ;
        (6) has “come – a governor – that rules – my people – Israel” but as the restorátion
        as “returns the dominion as the rule of the (eden-) people Ishral” : our Originals ;
  — hence (7) ,
        where not “Herod – privily – called – the magians” ,
        but “the sons (‘you & we’) – that will restore (kaleô=katartizô) – the Scroll….” ,
        yet second half is dangerous :
        the “enquired – [……]  the time of – the appearance of – the star” 
        cán have been “waited – the time of – My – appearance” – because of next :
  — then (8) ,
        the start “and – he sent – them – to – Bethlehem” 
        can be “but – I will tell – them – about – the sceptre (Bthlhm=rhBdos)” ,
        and the next “(Herod-) searching diligently – for – the little boy”
       must be “that we again search the Scroll” >> and becáuse of previous 7 ;
       followed by “and when – you have found [him]  , bring – me – word – again” 
       as “and when they will have found [-him]  , they will declare (!) him” ;
       with the important line ,
       as “so that – I – will come – and worship=gather – him=them” !
 
     then there still are five lines left (9-12) , but ‘the ending’ is always tricky :
     — in (9) ,
          a “star” shows while “king” can be “sceptre” (basileios=rhabdos) but more
          proof is the phrase “till – [it]  came and – stood – over – where – the little boy – was”
          because also so said in prophets ,
          as “again [the sceptre]  will stand over [=the]  sanctuary (eN=hagioN) of God” ;   
    — in (10) ,
          the “when they saw – the star – they rejoiced – with very – great – joy” 
          should refer to the , until now , now having been gathered stressing the importance
         of this find : “and then they will see – Me , and rejoice” ;
    — while (11) ,
          must have been about “we returning in Eden when brought there by Him” ,
          as “they will meet you (‘disciples’)” and you be restored in your sacred ones ,
          where the “treasures” should refer to ‘the rescued servants’ : the sceptre , stone , etc
 
   closing :
   you see that an above type buildup is possible , even though much seems missing still :
   however , if He intended the ‘birthright’ theme , all components are there – so that
   the ‘extensive version’ like in Revelation , see below , was not required here !
 
II)                                                         the ‘star’ in 2 Peter 1
 
   … yet sadly as one of the most Hatefully corrupted books   —
   so much that almost every two lines seem to have been cut & pasted-in elsewhere ,
   without any followable build-up now , where this completely out of context line shows :
       (19)
      “We have also a more sure word of prophecy; where unto ye do well that ye take heed, 
        as unto a light that shineth in a dark place , until the day dawn ,
        and the day star arise in your hearts :”
   complete gibberish now ,
   but question is “why Esau re-used the ‘star’ theme combined with ‘(Eden-) dawn’ :
   because it DID show somewhere — just as the star Christ mentions in Rev. 22 ?
   wherefore this line can only serve as supporting the concept of this strange star ; 

 
III)                                                           in Revelation
 
   #1)  ‘the woman & dragon’ — the steal ? [Rev.12] 
   … after having established that there were ‘7’ judgments over (matrix !-) Egypt 
   the same is true for the those in Revelation since Exodus was a foreshadowing ;
   but Esau hated Revelation’s very detailed explanation of the important themes
   and cut out the most dangerous sections to make “individual plagues” of them ,
   so that it’s up to us to re-compose the original buildup     — 
   
   you know this story so no need to repeat that here , right ;
   likely John is shown here “the original situation” also as the to-be restored one
   just as in chapter 4 he first encountered  “the complete eden-Sanctuary of God” ; 
   looking at the buildup here ,

[which can have followed ch.4 because related themes !]  ,     — why can ‘the woman’ not be “the sceptre” as axis ?    — and just ‘one star’ and not twelve ? [but indeed “as crown”]     — while the sceptre is said “to stand over the Sanctuary”         which is also ‘a moon’ as directing the eden dawn ;    — not “she was about to give birth”          but “the birth sceptre theme” instead ;

[next : if now was said “what happened to these” it should         be followed by ‘an explanation’ — in another cut-off section ! :]     — no ‘dragon’ here but “the Locusts” (or just ‘Horus’)         perhaps in combination with ‘Adam’ , because :    — there was no “seven heads and ten horns” but was about         the ‘seven-fold revenge’ (!) that Adam swore against Eden     — the dragon didn’t “drag – a third of – the stars” but probably         has ‘dragged away – half of – the sceptre – and its star’ !           because the sceptre as two halves seems a valid theme          [and then also “the iron staff” is mentioned , see above]  ;

 
  we don’t know if the ‘one star’ could be “a twelve-fold one” 
  perhaps linked to “the twelve gems of the twelve tribes” ,
  but since those were in the breast-plate this appears to be another theme altogether ,
  as twelve eden-energies that beautify the people , not so much attacking the matrix
 
  #2) continued : ‘the star Wormwood’ : sceptre + star placed in the matrix (?)                    [Rev.8] 
  … this is difficult   —
  áfter the “dragging-away the sceptre and its star” one more aspect must follow 
  befóre the extensive explanation about “how the Locusts came into being” 
  and the extensive theme of ‘stealing the 4 vessels’ (in chapter 1 etc ; see page) ;
  yet the problem is we’ve not much to go by here :
       (10-11)
      “And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven , 
       burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers , 
       and upon the fountains of waters.
       And the name of the star is called Wormwood : 
       and the third part of the waters became wormwood ; 
       and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter.”
   here ,
   what we’d need (in 10) is “the vine now shooting fire at Eden” but the structure
   of the lines seem changed for ‘lamp’ can be ‘(eden-) vine’ (lampas=ampelos !) ;
   second point is the curious “wormwood” :
   Esau MUST have seen something linking back to prophets where “wormwood”
   is also used in combination with ‘gall’ (the ‘bitter’ here) , and this is interesting :
   in prophets (but KJV) is “[you]  change (-hphk) – judgment – into – wormwood” 
   yet connected with óur theme now ,
   a “the right one (‘star’) changed into wormwood (‘Bennu’)” is póssible !!                            [SIC !] 
 
   God would never say ‘of his own star’ [-if true]  that “(now) he is like wormwood” 
   so that per definition it must be a matrix-concept , where “change” is Negative ,
   while the phrasing hints to “some vampiring situation” …
   yet though we saw the 2-3 instances in prophets that will be tough to restore 
   we may yet have another workable connection now 
 

#3  explanation now : the serpents invaded Eden & became Locusts [Rev.9] 
  … now could start the ‘full explanation’ ,
  how the Locusts came into being , how they stole the atmosphere through the 
  vessels of the four living-beings “just as they stole the sceptre & star” previously ,
  and this would make a rather Sound buildup , right    — 
  not ‘a star falls in the bottomless pit’ (Rev.9) but “the serpents enter Eden” :
  our first attempt of the Locusts theme was Rev.9 [-needing be checked]  , yet :
  — in (1) ,
        no “star – fell – from heaven” 
        but “star=serpents (aster=ophis) – descended – from heaven (‘north’) – to the land (‘Eden’)” ,
  — next , in same line , 
        not “given – the key – of the well – of the abyss” 
     but “by opening – the gate (phreatos=pylôn) of – eden – the north (abus=boras)“ [‘north gate’]  ,
  — in (2) ,
       as  “and [+like]  they opened – the key=gate of – well=eden 
                b
                they and=also ascended=opened – the smoke=mouth of – the well=mother
                c
               [=as]  the smoke=mouth of – the oven=daughter of – large=tsiun”             [< specified b] 
               then probably ,
               how “she darkened=brought forth (skotizô=apokyeô) ……….” ;
   — and in next (3) ,
   not “and out of – the smoke – came – locusts” 
   but “then – the smoke=serpents (kapnos=ophis) – had came=turned – (into) Locusts…. ” 
 
   after these :
   … is not the theme of our subject please , enough is that there was NO ‘star’ here ;
   probably first “their description” followed as ‘breastplates / lances / etc’ (in 7-9) ,
   then ‘their leader’ – Horus – is mentioned in (11) but then as “[=king]  of [=Egypt] ” ;
   where next the stealing of the atmosphere should start

                                                closing of this part I
 
   … again please the key word “star” yields very few results which *may* show that
   Esau searched to cover up this specific theme — or , alternatively , ‘we are wrong’ ,
   and we are in danger of ‘reading things that are not there’ :
   in Ezekiel 17 “a bird steals the top of the tree (axis)” but which was ‘Horus’ ,
   while a bit further on ‘anóther bird’ appears : could that be about ‘Bennu’ ?
   but would He have used a description like that .. ?
   next up is a selection of Spells as part II which however has the problem that in the 
   miles of glyphs we probably have not found yet áll of them concerning this theme .
 

 
[page end]