| content : … so the sceptre stands over the sanctuary of God bringing the seven flames to the star that is in top of the sceptre — the star in which the virgin dwells — which in turn “sends out 10 (!) type rays of light” that support and beautify our pretty Originals : in the case of the Tabernacle , would not the sacred vessels represent similar .. ? as the Menorah ‘powering’ the Ark – the star , and the Ark ‘the breastplate’ worn by the priest ? |
as suggested in a previous page |
[added : spoiler :
it is true ! , see worked out section of Lev.24 ;
moreover — it is the core of that cursed ‘Hanukkah’
of Esau by which he tried to block our very date !!]
theme
… there hás to be ‘a connection’ between the sacred vessels – but how ?
in an earlier page we tried “whether the Ark could have had gemstones decorated on it”
perhaps ‘worked into the golden flange (‘crown, rim’) on top of the mercy-seat’ (see pic) ,
yet with this 10-theme other interesting connections appear ,
caused by a phrase in Ezekiel about “(gem-) stones of fire” : as those 10 type lights ?
the seven lamps of the menorah were to burn day and night , and since they represent
God’s fire coming from the sanctuary they should “go” somewhere , is it not ?
why not “to the Ark of the covenant” the sacred object representing the Star ?
what if the Ark’s gemstones ‘would burn like fire , caused by the Menorah lights’ ?
| it’s not easy to find depictions but this idea , >> where the gemstones embedded in the flange would light up as ‘with living fire’ inside them ; representing the ten rays that the star sends across the Eden land for the sake of our Originals ; where the next question is obvious : if also ‘the breastplate’ had embedded stones then is it not to be expected that in turn thése were set aflame by the gems of the Ark ..? |
|
the (alleged-) problems with this concept
… that may be of ‘aesthetical nature’ : our 3D-eyes need ‘colour’ as light-descriptions
so that now the Ark would appear to be “some modern dressed-up christmas tree” ,
where the colours merely are an indication of the nature of the rays ,
and though ofcourse we cannot know ‘what’ qualities it makes no sense that the eden
atmosphere would look like the painting of a chaotic artist ;
second ,
10 stones as “two rows of five” upon the mercy-seat (and breastplate !) féels a bit ‘off’ ,
used as we are to a ‘proper’ idea of “four rows of three” << but what is the logic here ?
it may be just a subconscious problem of needing “a proper square” ,
where it helps to remember that the four Cherubim were over ‘the cardinal-directions’
that was represented in the square altar with the four horns
but now the (KJV-) text … :
| the odd one out : the ‘two stones’ of the Ephod … to have the above concept work , we need to find more gemstones as those in the breastplate that originally can have been part of the Ark of the covenant but as a connection that Esau may have covered-up [shall we say “to conceal the entire concept as above” .. ?] ; the suspect here , isn’t the breast-plate but “both stones upon the shoulder” >> of which nobody knows what those actually were about , except as some binary-idea related to the “casting the lot” as a bit nasty problem to tackle , so please consider this : |
|
these gemstones ‘are directly linked tó the breastplate’ : what we need !
where ‘the connection’ is important here :
both Ephod-stones are said “to be engraved with the names of the 12 (10) tribes”
just like the separate gemstones that are embedded upon the priestly breast-plate
so that there definitely IS a connection —
then why could the breast-plate stones not “be connected” to any of the Ark ?
the next suspicious is their placement :
why are those two stones carried “upon the shoulder” ? what does that signify ?
yet if we need the stones to be ‘upon the Ark’ then we’ll need to look at the roots ,
and behold , “upon the shoulder=mercy-seat (kaphal=kaphreth) of the Ark” … !
and finally ,
of these ‘two stones’ is said , see annex at end , that “six of the tribes’ names were
engraved on the one stone , and six on the other” — but because this must be the
gemstones on the Ark it virtually says “two rows of six=five stones” that also
appears in the for us important Leviticus 24 chapter
considering their connection ,
both the ‘Ephod’ stones and the gems of the breastplate usually appear together ,
Ex 35:9 [1 relevant line only:]
(9)
“And onyx stones, and stones to be set for the ephod, and for the breastplate.” [aspect #A :]
9
and – stones of – onyx=fire (?) (shem=ash) [or just ‘precious stones’ ?]
b
[=as] the stones – to be set (‘fillings’) – for the aphud=Ark (?) (AphUd=ArUn in text !)
c
and for the breast-plate ;
why bring only ‘onyx’ stones for both [-repeated in Ex.35:27] if ‘onyx’ is a proper name
for one of the several other type gemstones in the breast-plate ? instead , did it want to
say like in Ezekiel “stones of fire” ?
while the latter even has the line “the cherub in the midst of the stones of fire” :
what about ‘both cherubs (-on the Ark) in the midst of (10) gemstones of fire’ .. ? [sic]
the point please is that first we explore the concept’s possibility ,
for we certainly don’t want to throw-away any valid ordinance lightheartedly (..Sir) ;
yet the nail in the coffin here must be the weird “casting the lots” concept that seems
to be related to these ‘two stones of the Ephod’ :
the greatest problem with ‘lots’ is the “destiny” factor which is so unlike He ,
where the but few mentioned examples in the scroll usually are Negative even though
Esau tried to present that differently — while the most important example is never listed
but is about “the sons of Ammon casting lots about our Originals to decide who of them
will get the physical aspects of the slain Original” that seems to show in Rgveda also ;
wherefore – and there are more reasons – we dismiss that ‘casting lots’ theme
and therewith the justification fór ‘the two Ephod stones’ is Invalid
next problem : no table “for breads’ (-but for the Scroll) [aspect #B :]
though we knew that ‘the breads’ is a hoax ,
and that this golden table “for the (unrolled) scroll” was to be set “in front of the Ark” ,
now please ,
in Ex.25:23-30 this table first appears [-and indeed originally must have followed the
previous description of the Ark — keeping in mind Esau’s many swapped sections] ,
and with this table overlaid with gold also comes “a golden flange (‘crown’) around”
like that on the Ark , meaning that both objects belong together ,
and we saw in the Deut.4 chapter the strong link between the scroll and the ‘10’ of
the eden-star represented by the Ark , so that’s good ; then final lines 29-30 ,
(29-30)
“And thou shalt make the dishes thereof, and spoons thereof, and covers thereof,
and bowls thereof, to cover withal: [of] pure gold shalt thou make them.”
“And thou shalt set upon the table shewbread before me always.”
here ,
29 is a corrupt monstrosity of Esau for the table didn’t need ‘spoons and bowls’
but the roots are so bizarre that it’s hard to restore ,
and you make=place (osh=shm) – (on-) and=it +
b
the spoons=unrolled (adj.) (kphth=phlsh) – dishes=scroll ….. [‘when you set up the Tabernacle’ etc ?]
as a guess ofcourse ,
not the negative (gll) but (phlsh) ‘roll up’ probably also “of the heavens” , sic ;
30
and you set – [..] the·table – (with) [+my] bread=scroll (‘but no match’)
b
[faces – faces-of :] = faces=in front of – in front of = the Ark – always ;
it may seem nitpicking ,
but we need ‘the connection between the scroll and the Ark’ ,
where , because this was Esau’s first time , in next Lev.24 are NO ‘breads’ in rows :
no ‘2 rows of 6 breads’ of ‘that table’ but “2 rows of 5 gemstones for the Ark” [aspect #C :]
and here ,
the “lights of the menorah” introduce this section ! :
the mess is not our mistake ,
— in two restored sections (below) ‘the 10 stones are set into the flange’
that is “to be installed upon the mercy-seat of the Ark ,
— and that same “making of the 10 stones in two rows in the flange” could show here
OR it is about “the 2 x 5 rows on the breastplate of the priest” ,
but ‘the great connection’ seems to show because the chapter starts with the menorah ! ,
as menorah gives light >> to the stones of the Ark >> and those to the breastplate ; [sic]
yet it is hell to can restore this properly —
Leviticus 24 [the core of Esau’s ‘Hanukkah’ !]
we are toast if it was nót an ongoing section ;
– in 2 shows (maor) that can be noun “the one lighting-up” luminary , light ,
[but combination ‘oil – for the luminary’ seems corrupt in few instances] ;
but here Esau also has ‘to go [+light] up’ [as in Ex.40:25] ,
– the ‘to bake’ in 5 suggest ‘lighting up’
– (arak) ‘array, set in order, arrange,’ [also ‘be in sequence’ ?]
[start line 2 :] restoring this line áfter the others below and wondering what it said ,
the theme is “the menorah lamps must always burn” and see the repeat ‘continually’ :
did it command here “that they always must have enóugh oil” ?
wasn’t that THE core theme of Esau’s corrupt because stolen idea ‘Hanukkah’ ??
which he used as “occult ritual link” to identify with this theme of us here ?
moreover , (only) now we know the réal theme of ‘the 10 virgins’ !
1
“And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,”
and – IEUE – speaks – to – Moses , saying :
2
a) “Command the children of Israel, that they bring unto thee pure oil olive beaten
b) for the light, to cause the lamps to burn continually.”
2
command – the sons of – Ishral – [=that] they (shall) take=have (LqCH=nCHL) – [=for] you=him
b
beaten=plenty of – the purest – olive – oil (-always) ,
c
[swapped :]
(in order-) for – the lamps of – the luminary=lampstand (maor=mnre) – to burn (KJV) – continually ;
here ,
we need to look at the (few) other examples of ‘luminary’ for the same theme-corruption ;
[next 3 :
so “the plenty of oil” (also) refers to “the sceptre over the eden-Sanctuary” that brings his
(seven-fold) flame to the Star — as ‘the Ark’ in this situation :]
3
“Without the vail of the testimony, in the tabernacle of the congregation ,
shall Aaron order it from the evening unto the morning before the LORD continually :
[it shall be] a statute for ever in your generations.”
3
[because just like for-] + [b : as ‘Behemoth & Leviathan’]
b
the curtain=two (‘no match’) – outside=halves (chuts=chts) of – the·testimony = heaven ,
c
[..] the tent=lamps of – the appointment=menorah +
d
(will) sequence – ath-him = the (Eden-) season (?) (ath=oth) – [for] – the aaron=Ark (aern=arun)
e
[=as] the (dimensional-) evenings – and – the mornings – before – IEUE – continually ,
f
[being-] the forever – statute (‘fixed order’!) – for your generations=ground (‘Eden’) (drth=adme) ;
[next 4 :
now ‘the connection between the lampstand and the ark” :]
4
“He shall order the lamps upon the pure candlestick before the LORD continually.”
4
on=because – the-pure-one = the light of – the-lampstand (‘moved’)
b
(will make) to arrange=light up (‘to glow’?) – the-lamps = the (gem-) stones of – [..] faces=fire of +
c
the ieue=Ark of – the continually=covenant (thmid=brith) ; +
[moved :]
6
“And thou shalt set them in two rows , six on a row , upon the pure table before the LORD.”
6
[=so that] you=she (‘menorah light’) (will) set=light – them – up , + [‘light’ is always ‘she’]
b
(being-) the two – rows , six=five – on a row ,
b
upon – the·table = mercy-seat (‘no match’) of – the·pure-one = the ark (?) ,
d
in front of – IEUE ;
here ,
we can’t know “if all the 10 gemstones were glowing” but that is probable ,
since the Ark (the Star) will decide “the months” that will go out of it , next :
5
“And thou shalt take fine flour, and bake twelve cakes thereof: two tenth deals shall be in one cake.”
5
and (when-) – the flour=breast-plate (‘no match’) – (will be) take=worn ,
b
[=then] you=he (‘Ark’) (will make) to bake=light up (‘to glow’) – (on) [=him] (‘the breastplate’)
c
the two=(gem-) stones of – the ten (sic) – cakes=tribes (‘no match’) ,
d
[+as] tenth=each (‘one’ , see c) (adj.) – two=stone – (that) became (‘represents’) +
e
the·one (sic) = each – perforated=month (CHlE=CHdEsh) ; + [continued :]
7
“And thou shalt put pure frankincense upon [each] row,
that it may be on the bread for a memorial, [even] an offering made by fire unto the LORD.”
7
and he (‘Ark’) (will make) – on=them (‘stones of the breastplate’ now !) +
b
to give=light up (‘to glow’) – the·array = the=in séquence (‘but same word’) ,
c
b
[as-] the (specific-) frankincense=stone (lbne=abn) of – pure=fire +
c
and=when it has become – (that-) bread=month (lchm=chdsh) ;
d
[=as] a memorial of – the fire=year (ash=shna) of – the to=house (l=bth) of ieue=Eden (ieue=oden) ;
here ,
a) also often is “memorial to the sons of Ishral” but this seems proper now ,
or perhaps “memorial [+to you] of (etc)” ,
but “the memorial” is THIS context shows in mány phrases ;
b) meaning the 8 or so other examples of “frankincense at grain offering” is the same corruption ;
8
“Every sabbath he shall set it in order before the LORD continually ,
[being taken] from the children of Israel by an everlasting covenant.”
8
[so that-] [=from] the day of – the·sabbath = the new (-full !) moon (shbth-chdsh) +
b
in=until the day of (-the next) – the·sabbath = the new moon +
c
(will be) sequenced (by) him (‘the breastplate’) … [rest of line : can go many ways ..]
but now the chapter runs away ;
in all truth and after so many other chapters this restored text feels highly probable
even though we would need more (corrupted-) similar sections to confirm this content
FALSIFICATION
is it ‘too strange’ that each month is signified by one glowing gemstone .. ?
at the moment perhaps yes —
who would have thought that instead of the picture we have of ‘the simple olden times’
of old-Ishral with their ‘shepherding flocks’ , using ‘flaming torches to can see at night’
as a life that is easy for us — but unrighteously — to look condescendingly at ,
that these people would have ‘glowing gemstones telling them the calendar’ .. ?
and that in a way not even tóo far off from our assumed “victorious computer era” … !
yet it did not say crázy things . ? just “that one stone glowed” ,
that is not too much of a miracle – so to speak ? while the context is very important :
He said that He wanted them “to keep the 10-month” and álso acknowledged that
there “was nothing around them (on earth) to go by” per the Deuteronomy 4 chapter ,
and since He was kind to them why would He nót give them some help ?
especially since this theme was crucial concerning the fulfilling of the covenant !
also the later “Time wars” as in the books of Kings etc can be explained by this ,
where often the North kingdom went astray — because they refused to travel unto
Jerusalem where the Scroll was , coupled with the lazy priests in the South ,
so that eventually Esau inserted the old-Sumerian “looking for the first sliver of the <<<
new (empty) moon to discern the next month” into the context of the Scroll , as the
evil practice that was followed for the next centuries ,
until Esau started to develop his “science” which *cough* “irrefutably established”
that “the 12-month year is the only truth and that any other is subjective nonsense”
as declared by one of the most global non-scriptural religions that ever existed ,
so that ‘the whole world worships the image of the beast=heavens’ (Rev.9) …
please ,
don’t think this is another case of mistaking that image with “keeping the sabbath”
or even with our ówn mistake three years ago of thinking it was “the jab” :
it is 100% about this theme ,
not only shown through Esau’s “ten virgins” but also by his “666 number” that he
took from his “six rows (of bread)” here but about “the number (10 of Eden)”, etc ;
hoping to start the Revelation page soon
other examples (worksheet)
[because the above Leviticus 24 section was not baselessly interpreted ;
section is not complete yet and not even containing links to the prophets]
ex.39 6-7 [aphud=ark? , inserted here?] + 8-9 breastplate
6
“And they wrought onyx stones inclosed in ouches of gold, graven, as signets are graven ,
with the names of the children of Israel. And he put them on the shoulders of the ephod,
[that they should be] stones for a memorial to the children of Israel; as the LORD commanded Moses.”
6
and they work – the stones of – the·onyx = fire (?) – round about (sic)
b
[in] the mountings=fringe of – gold , [‘as the crown on the lid of the Ark’ !]
c
the engraved ones – engravings of – seal or : [to be] the 10 – months of – the year
d
[=with?] – the names of – the sons of – Ishral ; or : [=as] the number of – the house of – Eden ;
7
and – them=it (‘the completed fringe’) – (was) placed – upon +
b
the shoulders=mercy-seat (‘lid’) (KthPH=kaphreth) of – the·vestment = the Ark
c
[as] the stones – [for] a memorial – [=to] the sons of – Ishral [about ‘the calendar’ !]
d
[swapped :]
to moses=keep (mshe=dhmer) [+the year] – as [..] – IEUE – commanded [+them] ;
[breastplate :]
8
“And he made the breastplate [of] cunning work, like the work of the ephod ;
[of] gold, blue, and purple, and scarlet, and fine twined linen.”
8
[=then] they make – the breastplate , +
b
[as] the handiwork – designed – like the handiwork=design of – the ephod=ark (aphd=arn) , [sic]
c
[of] gold, blue, and purple, and scarlet, and fine twined linen. [< all corrupt — but what was it ?]
9
“It was foursquare; they made the breastplate double: a span [was] the length thereof,
and a span the breadth thereof, [being] doubled.”
9
square – [+like] was – the doubled=mercy-seat (kaphal=kaphreth) [< repeated connection]
b
(is how-) they (also-) made – the breastplate ,
c
[but as-] its length of – a span – and its width of – a span [.. 1x ..] ;
10
and – four=two – rows of – stones – they set – on it , [now Esau comes with ‘12 stones in four rows’]
14
“And the stones [were] according to the names of the children of Israel, twelve [=10] ,
according to their names, [like] the engravings of a signet, everyone with his name,
according to the twelve tribes.”
14
and – on (‘swapped’) – the stones – (were) the names of – the sons=tribes (!) of – Ishral ,
b
[as] the ten of – [..] their names – they=upon – two=them – (like) the engravings of – a signet ;
d
each – [=for] – two=one – [..] name=month (shem-chdesh) of – the tribe=year (shbt=shna) ;
now ,
here any “engraving of names” makes sense : in the previous ‘ephod’ it did NOT !
Ex.28 , same theme but extended :
stones of the ephod=Ark :
9
“And thou shalt take two onyx stones, and grave on them the names of the children of Israel:”
9
and you (will) take – two=ten – stones of – onyx=fire (?) [‘precious stones’?]
b
[=as] the engrave=number (phthchth=kphrth) of +
c
[..] the names=months (shm=chdsh) of – the sons=house of – ishral=Eden ;
10
“Six of their names on one stone, and [the other] six names of the rest on the other stone,
according to their birth.”
10
[whole line may be added :]
[as-] six=one – names=stone – [=for] – each (‘one’) – the·stone = [+her] months
b
and – the·six = five – names=stones – (will) remain=become
c
upon – the two (adj.) – the·stone = sides of – the generations=Ark ;
11
“With the work of an engraver in stone, [like] the engravings of a signet, shalt thou engrave the
two stones with the names of the children of Israel: thou shalt make them to be set in ouches of gold.”
11
[…… impossible ……]
b
[and-] the two=ten – stones of – the names=months of – the sons=house of – ishral=Eden +
c
you (will) work [..] – roundabout – [+into] the mounting=flange (‘for the Ark’) of – gold ;
12
“And thou shalt put the two stones upon the shoulders of the ephod [for] stones
of memorial unto the children of Israel: and Aaron shall bear their names before the LORD
upon his two shoulders for a memorial.”
12
and you (will) place – the two=flange – (with-) the·stones (‘b/c after his ‘two’)
b
upon – the shoulder=mercy-seat of – the·vestment = the Ark ,
c
[as] the stones – [for] a memorial ….. (etc) [at 15 starts the breastplate]
next (26-28) : the breastplate linked to the ephod=Ark (but totally corrupt) :
so much that it’s undoable to read ,
but it shows “corresponding with” (27)
until here
