content : wading into the hotly debated “ark of Noah” theme — it turns out ‘that two type souls were rescued’ as our souls by God and the heathen souls by Adam , but that not Noah ‘had a boat’ : so that the Sumerian Gilgamesh epos is ‘true’ where EA saying “that in secret a deluge is coming” is but as euphemism for God having ordered the flood [as breaking down the zero-point Field on earth] !

alleged ‘found remains of Noah’s ark’ :         a mindf*ck just as ‘the face on Mars’

content overview :
#1   the massive technical problems of ‘an ark’ & her corrupt term (-thebah)
#2   Noah safe in a huge cave of which the entrance was closed (‘collapsed’) ?
         since in the Scroll caves are linked to ‘destructions upon this earth’ !
#3   not the deluge itself is in question !
#4   an ark “of Noah” invented [-by Esau]  to hide something élse ? 
#5   TWO type of souls escaped the deluge ! Adam saved his ones ! (here)   
          saying in chapter 6 (as in 9) “the flesh I made”                     
#6   suspicious : chapter 9 [about Adam]  corrupted like 6-8
#7   the importance of ‘continuation on earth’ (Legal aspect)
#8   why are we so obsessed by ‘Noah needing a boat’ ?
#9   chapter 8 : not ‘looking if the land was dry’ but ‘if all the evil ones had perished‘ ?
#10 the problem of “one pair of unclean animals” and “seven pairs of cléan ones” (here) :
          so that God only rescued his clean ones ! – as greatly reduced number ! (compare #5)
#11 Noah’s still pre-deluge type body and “subterranean caves (still) filled with fauna” 
#12 angels guarding subterranean caves to be entered by the evil ones (?) :
          no ‘dove’ : but Christ guarding Noah’s cave ! 
#13 instead , the degenerated were forced ‘to build boats’ :
#14 the Gilgamesh Epic (here) : 
          examples confirming that Esau knew this text and inserted them in Genesis &
          examples showing that God (in ch.6) had “the enemy (‘Sumerians’) build a boat” &
          examples showing “that their gods wárned for the coming flood” [read : Adam !]  &
          examples showing that “they knew the deluge would take long” [‘starvation theme’]  
          examples suggesting “that the flood itself lasted 7 months” (see #10) ;
          conclusion : God intended to refer to ‘their boat’ in Genesis 6 !
#15 closing / summary + Matthew 24 ‘days of Noah’ !
           [1st add :]
           likely NO “Daniel in a lion den (‘cave’!) but “Noah’s story” !
#16  links
 

[first version ,
which as it seems right now
will not change substantially]

                                   the ‘ark’ [-of Noah]  version : not maintainable
 
 … that is some conclusion is it not    —
 apart from the massive technical & logistical problems [-see links at end]  with 
 the concept of ‘Noah having built some gigantic boat’ that are very compelling ,
 also these points are in play :
 #1 
      the available text is suspiciously and strategically corrupted at key points ,
      and espécially the crucial term “ark” (-thebah) and that very consistently 
      [as important for us since we always FIRST look at Esau’s text itself !]  ;
      for example 6:18 ,
      “But with thee will I establish my covenant; and thou shalt come in to the ark, 
      thou, and thy sons, and thy wife, and thy sons’ wives with thee.” 
      why not as : and you enter – into – the·ark (=tampered) = the earth ,
                                  you – and your sons – and your wife (etc)   ?
      is that not infinitely more easy ?
 #2
      therefore , why not ‘hide in a gigantic cave inside earth’ ?
      the Hopi indians have this mythology : the serpent-race had concealed them
      inside earth during a worldwide flood — then whý go build ‘a massive ship’ ?
      and how easy would many animals & supplies fit in an underground cave !
      moreover ,
      in Genesis 13 ‘Lot dwelt in a cave’ (also linked to a ‘destruction’ : of Sodom)
      while in Isaiah 2 in which (probably) the return of the Lord shows “the kings of 
      the earth hide in caves” though that line is suspicious and can have said the
      opposite as “will nót hide in caves (-this time)” ,
      yet it consistently shows ‘caves’ linked to ‘a destruction on earth’ !                                         [sic] 
      and apart from this ,
      not only ‘an ark’ has “a door (or ‘entrance’) but ‘a cave’ has one as well !
      in fact not a proper ‘door’ (-dlth) is shown as root but (-phthch) ‘entrance’ that
      just as well “can have been closed by God” — as ‘collapsing its entrance’ …
 
not questioning ‘a deluge’ itself :
… the sheer amount of [corrupted-] text does point to ‘an event as a deluge’
and can hardly be completely invented by Esau – while “the changed condition”
of this earth is an important aspect [-nicely supported by Genesis 9 now , see page] ;
but knowing Esau – while looking at the text ! – he can have swapped aspects :
 
but then why invent the idea of “a boat of Noah” ?
… difficult to say ,
perhaps to deflect from the “inside earth” theme related to “the serpent-race” ..?
so that Esau had us look ‘far up’ on top of a flood instead of ‘inside this earth’ ?
because of the warped text (in 6 & 7) ,
many [‘scholars’] take the Sumerian version of a deluge as the origin of Noah’s
flood and some of their arguments are compelling [-also see the links at end] ,
yet something else is going on here :
the insane text suggests other hidden aspects : that not ‘Noah’ has built some
boat but his enemies did : as “the óther type evil souls that existed on earth”
and that were NOT so stupid as Esau described them in Mt.24 , as if they were
partying and being careless —- since Adam (chapter 9) warned them !
[and compare what ‘EA’ said , in the leader in top of page] ;
 
                                    TWO type souls ‘escaped the deluge’ (?)
 
 … ploughing through these awfully corrupted chapters (6-8) it makes Sense :
 it’s possible that Esau searched to hide “the continuancy of that evil bloodline” 
 [perhaps to continue his suggestion “that all of us are 1 happy family here” !]  ,
 because though the KJV states “that all of the life had been exterminated” , 
 she dóes say that “there were giants before and after the flood” — hów then ?
 now ,
 though the insane type bloodthirsty ‘réal giants’ indeed were all destroyed ,
 see Enoch where their punishment is ‘that they are slaying eachóther’ ,
 they existed as “physical abberations” only functioning upon the pre-flood 
 “corrupt-type souls that did NOT belong to God” :
 so what if a group of those souls has survived the flood [-through Adam !]  ,
 and not only became “the nations of heathens” as the majority on earth ,
 but right áfter the deluge a number of them assumed “giant-like traits” as 
 the Rephaim and Zamzummim — the sub-giants .. ?
 
 now we saw ‘Adam’ (in later Gen.9) , these 6-8 are similarly corrupted
 … which ofcourse is a major Red flag unto us    —
 the same evasive talk and mixup between ‘elohim’ and ‘IEUE’ ; the same 
 erratic buildup [=corrupted]  with endless repeats and restarts , where the
 very fact of “6 & 7 being a far too long intro tó the event of the deluge” is
 already suggesting that ‘Adam’ was interfering here      
 [how ‘scholars’ think “that chapter 6 & 7 were written by ‘two sources’ as
 the ‘priestly source’ (P) and a later Babylonian one , is totally irrelevant :
 Esau worked the insane corruptions and he was Babylonian]       —
 how much is the chance ‘that Adam rescued his type corrupt-souls’..? 
 
 the importance of ‘continuation [-on earth] ‘ 
   … which is a bit tricky theme ,
   but probably important for context :
   the earth and her Neanderthals were “the Legal right of the serpent-race” 
   before the evil sons of Ammon suggested to put ús there ; and though we
   came to dwell there but as ‘unfinished project’ God could not destroy them :
   only in thése days since we have become ‘the finished project’ !
   or better : also “because we have connected with them but overcame them” ,
   as the same concept He uses concerning Adam and (mystery) Babylon
 
   this likely is the reason why He chose “to break down earth’s paradise” 
   [her zero-point Field]  but He had no ‘Legal right to totally destroy them’ or 
   He would have destroyed ús — as hostages — with them !  
   Adam ofcourse must have known this , which is a major indication that indeed
   he rescued a group of his souls — while doubling down [as he does]  áfter the 
   deluge when he as revenge (!) tried to imprison our souls forever (chapter 9) !
    
   this is important insofar ,
   that it lessens our obsession for ‘Noah needing a boat‘ since it in this context
   it’s even more probable ‘that the others needed a boat’ — because Noah and
   probably many animals were safeguarded below the surface of earth , 
   saving us endless problems & discussions and headaches ;
   though we have one question left :
   since “this earth was the Legal territory of the serpent-race” [cq ‘of Adam’]  , 
   why would the serpent-race ‘allow’ Noah to be hidden in it ? 
   or was the reason “that they [or Adam]  had allowed such crimes unto His souls
   that He had Legally órdered them to supply a safe shelter (a cave) for Noah” ..?
   considered all the context this is the most probable ,
   and important if we choose to continue the ark=cave option
 
   what can Noah ‘have sent out’ twice [-when the waters receded]  ?
   … see how much problems we make ourselves ; ( ,
   that we need to recompose so many aspects involved — like this one :
   the closing of the story (Genesis 8) is the same important – yet also horribly
   corrupted with repeats and restarts :
   if ‘Ararat’ (in 4) is true : are there not giant caves in that region of Turkey ?
   [and how would that link to the Göbleki Tepe theme – see page ?]  ;
   in 6 , 
   not “Noah + opened + the window of + the·ark” ,
   but God + opened + the entrance of + the·ark = the cave     (?)
   [even though ‘window’ seems untampered – yet may be Esau’s mistake] 
 
   but what happens next ?
   because both ‘raven’ and ‘a dove’ are corrupt , while it makes no Sense that
   he ‘sends out birds to see where dry land is’ if he’s still floating on the water ;
   did he want to see ‘whether still violent ‘cursed (-qlu) people’ survived’ ..?
   [since IEUE uses a same root ‘curse’ in closing lines 21 ?] 
   since also the subject of this line was corrupted ,
   while it would – again ! – support the “evil souls álso rescued” theme !
 
   13 has ,
   “..and Noah removed the covering of the·ark ..”
 [which makes little sense in itself !]  , as 
   and – Noah – departs (45x , 5395 sur) (or ‘removes [+himself] ‘ ?)
   b
   ath=from – (having been) hidden (verb now ; same root !) – the·ark = the=in the cave ;
 
    the problem of ‘two types of animals’ (and ‘pairs’ and ‘sevens’) [+solved !] 
   … 7 : 2-3 has this ,
   “Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: 
    and of beasts that [are]  not clean by two, the male and his female. Of fowls also of 
    the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth.” ,
   but it shows as very corrupted , as is a similar line in chapter 6  —
   a)
   intended seems to be “7 pairs of clean animals” and “1 pair of unclean animals” ,
   b)
   where the clean animals are designated as “male & female” (-zkr & -nqbe) ,
   but the unclean animals as “man & woman” (-aish & -ashth) !
   this difference is very prominent :
   indicating that God only sent the animals that are related to Him !
   and if you think about it : why would He save UNCLEAN animals ??
   so that it must have said : “I will NOT send unclean pairs to you ,
                                                              but only clean pairs as in sevens” !
   while the very concept again supports ‘that Adam saved his type animals” !
 
   but what about ‘the ecosystem’ ?
   … now we get into trouble since the ecosystem is tightly functioning
   and breaking apart if random animals are removed from the cycle ;
   but remember that this cycle on earth is strongly linked to ‘waste and death’
   which ofcourse never was the case in Eden ,
   so that “Adam may have copied certain types of animals from Eden” …
   ofcourse we can only guess which ones then ,
   but it greatly narrows down the number of animals in the cave with Noah 
   since a host of ugly small ánd large beasts would not apply : crocodiles ,
   flies , apes (!) , pigs (experiment for our body !) , hippos — as all the ugly
   animals that for a réason appear in the Egyptian Spells !
   [ofcourse we leave out the silly ‘dinosaurs were involved’ as some claim] 
 
   there appear to have existed “beings as half-man half-animal” and that
   probably as fun-experiment by the sons of Ammon , but likely only of the
   unclean type animals upon the unclean type souls … 
 
   so that the concept of ‘Noah in the cave with a number of species’ 
   has become a very workable one ! which however in turn raises the same
   question “if limited then could he have built a boat , afterall ?” .. sigh …
   
   which dies sooner : those in a cave or those in a boat ?
   … to finally decide whether Noah was in a cave or made a boat perhaps
   we need to consider “the survival rate” : if the duration of the flood was 
   long enough any ‘inside a boat’ would starve through lack of supplies ,
   which exactly seems to be the theme ‘about the enemy’ in chapter 8 !
   as already hinted at , above ,
   the “constant added times” were not about “seeing if the water receded”
   but “to wait until all of the degenerated survivers indeed perished” 
   and would not appear in that part of the world
   [even though a number did survive but you get the point] 
 
   by this same reasoning it is not logical that Noah was on a boat but
   inside a cave with enough supplies — and who knows as a cave that
   contained fauna that also exist in today’s region of Turkey !
   please remember that Noah still had pre-flood features while also
   a cave containing fauna may have looked more abundant 

we hesitated to put this pic in top [of page]    >> because impossible in our post-flood world ; but befóre the deluge the boundary between  physical life and ‘dimensional light’ was much more ‘connected’ — but at this point we touch the “inner earth theme” [of the serpent-race]  which probably is best to leave Out now [upd.30/4:] we thought the picture to right was fantasy-art but it’s actually an existing cave ‘with a forest, river and clouds inside’ (link) ;

   
   God’s angels ‘guarding caves’ ?
   … considered the Legal right (see that previous section) the serpent-race
   may have transgressed against His command and succeeded to anyway
   hide a number of their souls inside caves — we can’t rule that out ,
   but “that angels guarded the available caves so that degenerate souls 
   would not enter them” appears a very possible option :
   if “angels guarded the entrance to Eden” just ago in chapter 3 [save that
   is true , ofcourse]  then why not here , as well .. ?
 
  moreover , it’s even possible that Christ guarded over Noah’s cave !
  so that NOT “he [=Noach]  sent forth the·raven” (corrupt -orb) but because
  God speaks here , “my servant that I sent to guard the cave” (orb=obd) !
  why would our Christ nót appear in this story ,
  especially since His mortal enemy Adam figures so prominently .. ?
 
  then also the strange “added waiting-times of seven days” makes Sense :
  not “then Noah sent out some dove” but “Christ went out to see if that part
  of the world was cleared from the degenerated enemies” ! or why also here
  appears the divine number 7 ?
  in line 11 “Noah knows that the cursed ones perished”
  and in next 12 “Christ does not return again to the cave” – not some ‘dove’ 
 
  the degenerated were fórced ‘to build boats’ (hence Sumer !)
  … if they were blocked from entering caves ,
  while they had been warned by their gods [cq Adam]  that a flood was coming ,
  then chapter 6 shóuld be about ‘a boat’ — and curiously the very first use of
  the phrase ‘ark’ (-thebah) is untampered there !
  moreover , the strange given measures as ‘300 x 50 x 30 cubits’ surprisingly
  may indeed be “a Sumerian circular vessel” as claimed by the link shown here
  at the end in the ‘notes’ section ! [how strange : the writer set out to thoroughly
  debunk the ‘creationist version of the ark’ yet he has done ús a favour …] 
 
  Sumerian Tablet XI  
  … has in the section “building and launching the boat” ,
  8. Three times 3,600 units of raw bitumen were melted in a kiln and three times
       3,600 units of oil were used in addition to two times 3,600 units of oil that were
       stored in the boat ;
  9  Oxen and sheep were slaughtered and ale, beer, oil and wine were distributed
       to the workmen, like at a new year’s festival”
  now ,
  curiously Genesis 6 shows ‘bitumen’ as well as ‘go collect food’ (in 21) ! 
  in the above a “distributed to workmen” is not logical but must be BY them ofcourse
  namely as the supplies on the boat of Gilgamesh ! the description wants to say it
  was a huge amount – so that they must have known that the goal of the enemy 
  [God]  was about ‘starvation’ !
  while the “go collect food” does not appear in chapter 7 about Noah !
  [a better version has “.. which the boatmen stored away” – see link at end]  
   
  14  His relatives and craftsmen and “all the beasts and animals of the field” then
         boarded the boat ;
  15  And the time arrived, as stated by the god Shamash, to seal the entry door ;
   … here ,
   this is no proof an sich but indeed ‘they took their ówn type animals’ ;
   where likely “the god Shamash himself sealed the door of the boat” : this may
   have been lost in chapter 6 when Esau messed around , while in chapter 7
   God closes the entry of the cave ;
 
   in the section ‘the Storm’ ,
   14  The flood and wind lasted six days and six nights , flattening the land .
   15  On the seventh day the storm was pounding [intermittently ?] 
          like a woman in labour ;
   … now ,  
   because in next section he disembarks the ‘6 days’ is ridiculously short
   even in their ówn version after having stored so much food ; the other
   version has “.. six days and seven nights..” which is strange also ;
   Sumer held ‘the number 7’ as sacred –but perhaps ‘as stolen from God’
   as the reason why “the 7th day was the worst”.. ?!!
   perhaps ,
   in reality “the flood lasted 7 months” ? for ‘7 years’ seems Too long ;
   and though ‘this earth’ has nothing to do with God the ‘7 (-months)’ can
   have represented “a sign that it was His judgment” conform the veiled
   reference to that here !
   now because ch.8:4 shows “the 7th month” but because NOT “[the ark 
   had landed on-]  Ararat” something else happened ‘in the 7th month’ :
            as “Noah had stayed in the cave fór seven months” ?
   [we’ll get back to this theme in the restoration] 
 
   in next section ,
   1  … all humans had turned to clay …
   2  … Utnapishtim opened a window …
   4  … the boat lodged firmly on mount Nimush …
   5  On the 7th day he released a dove that flew away but came back to him.
        He released a swallow but she also came back to him ;
   6  Then he released a raven that did not come back to him ; 
   … here ,
   the “Noah opens a window” is in ch.8:6 , “the raven” in line 7 and “the dove
   and 7 days” in 10 , and we have a curious situation now    —
   it does NOT imply “that these phrases need to show in chapter 6” [non-Noah] 
   and that we need to move them there because we need these corrupted lines 
   for “the guardian angel” theme !
   it is a mindf*ck : Esau , who knéw this Sumerian story , must have shrieked of
   pleasure seeing he could ‘overlay’ their version on these lines in chapter 8 ,
   also because ‘the number 7’ was important in Sumer , too ! he was so excited
   that he by mistake wrote down the word ‘window’ untampered !
   besides ,
   God already gave info about ‘a boat’ (in chapter 6) and would not give Esau
   any ideas by speaking about ‘the dove’ (etc) while He cértainly would not
   ascribe His number ‘7’ being used by the enemy there 
 
   in next ‘offering a Sacrifice to his gods’ [but tricky]   ,
   2  The gods smelled the sweet odour [..]  gathering like flies over the sacrifice
   3  Then the upper-goddess [..]  says :
   4  […]  The gods may come to the sacrificial offering. But Enlil may not come, 
        because he brought about the flood and annihilated my people without 
        considering [the consequences] .”
   5  When Enlil arrived, he saw the boat and became furious at the Igigi gods. 
        He said “Where did a living being escape? No man was to survive the annihilation !
   6  Ninurta spoke to Enlil saying “Who else but Ea could do such a thing? 
        It is Ea who knew all of our plans.”
   7  Ea spoke to Enlil saying “It was you, the Sage of the Gods. 
        How could you bring about a flood without consideration?”
   8  Ea then accuses Enlil of sending a disproportionate punishment 
        and reminds him of the need for compassion.
   9  Ea denies leaking the god’s secret plan to Atrahasis (= Utnapishtim), 
        admitting only sending him a dream and deflecting Enlil’s attention to the flood hero.
   now ,
   apart from line 2 — whoever says ‘gods gathering like flies’ ? it shows an inversed
   mindset and compare the ‘unclean animals’ section above — this is tricky :
   also because we have not yet a proper view on ‘Enlil’ – perhaps as an invented
   personification related to ‘ the matrix-region BY fallen Eden’ ? which may be 
   correct for we found the quote “Enlil was considered the main god of Sumerian 
   civilisation, the separator of air and earth in the midst of the cosmic ocean” ;
   be that as it may ,
   the ‘no one was to survive’ is telling because ofcourse the Sumerian gods
   didn’t go kill their ówn so it is an allusion to us Jacob-souls ;
   just as the ‘revealing the plan (-to the own people) for a coming flood’ is , 
   which in our case almost próves that Adam knew very well what was to happen !
 
   added for completion : the Atra-Hasis :
   … as a related Sumerian-Babylonian flood story having similar components as
   the Gilgamesh epos [and none of them mentions any ‘hiding in cave’ !]  ; 
   the Wiki-page tells how it writes “how after 1200 years the population had grown
   but after another 1200 years they roamed around like roaring herds that were
   keeping the gods from their sleep” ,
   now — we know for sure that the expression “loud voice” means “us that are in
   contact with God” since the Egyptian Spells use that ‘loud voice’ for ‘Set’ ,
   proving that they [& their gods]  were annoyed by the Jacob-souls on earth as
   proving that indeed “two type souls had come to exist here” ;
   second ,  
   if we understand the 1200 + 1200 correctly [-but are too lazy now to check it] 
   it comes very close to our calculation of 10,900 BC (Göbleki Tepe) , 9500 BC
   (we are put on earth – the ‘loud ones’) and 8000 BC , the deluge !
   while “the mother-goddess accuses Enlil of not fighting the rebels” which again
   ofcourse is not about their own people ; 
 

to not complicate things ,  until here ‘the comparison with Sumer’ ; we’d need to learn to read that language [well , can’t have ’em all]  since as usual those that translated must have missed many colours of the original intent ; but for our purposes the above section is good enough for now

the ‘buoy’ boat of Gilgamesh

 
    [added : Egypt :] 
    … though she appears to have a text about “Râ destroying the world by a flood” 
    related to Sekhmet and ‘beer’ [sic..]  we never saw the glyphs yet [-for to check]  ,
    also because it is not part of the Spells and most likely written much later when
    a type silly-magickal sorcery came up (in the Greek period) ,
    and to not pollute the theme so far it’s best to keep Out dubious texts]   
 
                                                             closing & summary
                                                       (did we forget something ?)
 
   … now that was some journey right ; )
   some other aspects still may come up since the whole idea is very new still ;
   in general we may have resolved a whole lot of conventional problems even
   though seemingly ‘we but transferred the problems to Gilgamesh’    —
   however , Gilgamesh álso only had a reduced number of (unclean) animals
   [and why hé was never ‘debunked’ by those arguing against Noah ?]  ,
   while we cannot trust Sumer enough to know if they had not móre vessels
   as in “the spreading of risk” scenario (?) since they knéw what was coming   —
   the burden of proof ‘to prove technics of an ark’ is not on our side anymore !
   probably anyway they cheated [-somehow]  ,
   and who cáres ‘how they got across’ their crocodiles and hippos and flies ?
   
   what about Mt.24 ?
   … we never really came to “the days of Noah” lines there (37-39) because
   any serious content was absent in them — was it all invented by Esau ,
   or did it say to you & we : and – not=when – they=you (will) understand

    or why mention this theme in the first place ?
    perhaps because then finally the “moon theme” (Gen.9) has ended ?
    intriguing is it not ? 
    [40 seems to follow , perhaps as original ? , as “two will be in the field”  —
    as referring back to “two pairs of Adam & the seven pairs of IEUE” .. ?
    perhaps “the unfinished Legal situation” (see section above) finally is
    undone at this moment – and hence He added this (for Legal reasons) ?
    is this related to the war to have Genesis 6-8 correct .. ?  
 
    after this whole page , now comes the massive job of restoring 6-8  … 

 
for you , our Majesty ,
for you sir our Lord
and for all of the 144
 

 
    [first addition : +2 hours :]
    … suppose that the story of “Daniel in the pit (‘cave’!) with the lions” is true ,
    coming to think of this because of posted picture in top of page ,
    what can this story – in the insanely corrupted chapters – have been about ?
    did Daniel “depict the situation of Noah” ? since most of the book is about
    Eden and our history since her ?
    why he came into that pit / cave ? not ‘by the king’ — for it is absurd that he
    later ‘in secret’ (!!) returns at night to ask Daniel how if he is doing well :
    or was there NO ‘Daniel in the lion pit’ but THIS (real) ‘Noah story’ …?
    who is more insane — Esau , or we ?
    how much is the chance that after explaining all of Eden , our God also 
    told him “how we came to this earth — including the (important) flood story ?
    [2nd add , + 3 hrs :]
    Dan.6 : “120 years” … the 120 years of age in the Noah chapter ?
    3-4 : “someone is disgruntled” — God about the situation on earth ?
    5-6 : “some decision is made” — the punishment as the Deluge ?
    7 : “difference between people” — difference between two type souls ?
    10 : “Daniel went into the house” — Noah went into the cave ?
    16 : “Daniel + [cave] + lions + God + deliver”
    17 : “den + sealed + by the king” — Christ protected the cave ?
    18-20 : “king is concerned , goes to the den” — Christ watches for evil survivors ?
    21-22 : “Daniel says : God’s angels protect me” [sic sic !] 
    23 : “Daniel taken out of the den (cave)” [sic !] 
    24 : “instead , the evil ones die” — the evil souls died ,
    25 : “king says : peace be multiplied” — God says to Noah ‘multiply’ [sic] 
    26-28 : [too difficult] 
… how much is the chance ??
 
notes :
 
#1
compelling arguments for Gen.6 [Adam’s rescue !]  being a Sumerian vessel :  
Shape of Noah’s Ark; Mystery Solved – Tablet Magazine
#2
the massive technical & logistical problems of ‘an Ark of Noah’ ,
rather degradingly written but very useful :
The Impossible Voyage of Noah’s Ark | National Center for Science Education
#3
Epic of Gilgamesh :
Epic of Gilgamesh: Tablet XI