.. literary every angle of this theme is corrupted — to confirm the base-10 theme we need sections showing a number of certain key-words together  – but those instances are virtually absent   – or the key words just stand too far apart to can     restore any credible running context – while often in prophets they simply disappeared

 
the ‘redeem the base-10’ idea is Valid
for it is the same idea as “restoring the Scroll”
where the scroll leads to finding the 10 so that
we’re not overstepping our given own Legal right 
which is important to remember please :

                                                                                   theme
 
       why Esau’s concept “kinsman redeemer for a field (etc)” does not make sense
       … this corrupt concept appears in Leviticus
       and even more famously in “the book Ruth” — that is a complete fabrication by Esau 
       in which our word ‘redeem’ (gl) dóes again appear and that forty times , but he only
       penned it because he was so proud on the pavlov-reaction he created knowing that
       Jacob would immediately link it to the office of Christ , of what He did ,
       in order to erase the notion “that sons would be needed who would DO something” !                  <<<
 
       not going to repeat here the one-sided Gospel that Esau created for Jacob ,
       but that same pavlov-reaction also plays in those Leviticus ‘redeeming the fields’ :
       it is considered very spiritually “as an example of what Christ would do” 
       yet forgetting that in the Jubilee all debt already wás forgiven !
       as exactly the same situation after the sacrifice by Christ ! 
       then WHO would need “a relative with money” (money is Esau’s favourite subject !) 
       that would have to pay for ‘a house and a field’ (two of Esau’s favourite deflections)
       unto a third greedy person that risked Hell for not obeying the Jubilee command …?
       because it is a mindf*ck he created ,
       but indeed based upon the fact of “the sons needing to redeem the base-10” !                                 [sic] 
           
                                     Passover                                                               Atonement
                                 Christ died                                               so that the sons can die
                                redeeming all                                   redeeming the scroll & base-10
 
       you will forgive that it shows a bit ‘harsh’ but just to make the point ,
       that “redeeming (by restoring) the scroll and base-10” is not ‘blasphemous’ at all
       since that has a quite different nature & goal as Christ’s redemption of everything ;
       for this is about ‘Adam that sold our Eden house’ 
       by giving her identification so to speak “to the nations of demons” and literally to  
       the serpent-race that ‘Horus’ is as the awful beings that were OUR direct enemies 
       ever since Eden began now having her number 10 that is ‘exclusively’ ours !
 
       and now we have this theme sorted out we can look at what Esau did :
 
       first tactic : ‘houses redeemed by a kinsman’                                          (Leviticus)
       into               : ‘refuge cities’                                                                                    (Numbers)
                                  (but has the same intrinsic problem as above !)
       into               : ‘Ruth’
                                  as romanticized version ; ‘Boaz’ is the root “plunder” 
                                  and see the 1Kings page about the ‘Solomon’ crime , sic
       into              :  only (!) in many Isaiah chapters ,
                                  where now IEUE is ‘the redeemer’ 
                                  but the added “holy one of Ishral” probably said “the 10 of Eden” !
       into               : ‘Jeremiah redeeming a field’                                                                                                                        <<<
                                   Esau using his original trick 
 
       also here shows ‘a development’ (disarming) of key-words of the 10 theme
       as we saw with “host” (-tsba) and “tithe” (‘ten’) that álso completely disappear 
       where even the ‘innocent’ word “month” is virtually written out of all prophets !

 
#1  Jer.32
[case]  : said to Jeremiah : “Hanameel the son of your uncle will buy a field that is in Anathoth ,
                                                            for [by]  the custom of the·redemption it is yours to buy it” ;
                                                          “so I weighed him the money , seven + teen shekels of silver” ;
       yes this nonsense could be ánything ,
       but line 29 & 35 have “burned incense to Baal” as the high-places base-10 theme ,
       and even about “I make my people to return to their place” as the promise 
       so that the weird ‘uncle’ line MUST be a concealed base-10 :
       (8)
      “So Hanameel mine uncle’s son came to me in the court of the prison 
       according to the word of the LORD […] ”                                                                                                   [said to us :] 
       as
       the hanameel=months (chnmal=chdsh) of – the son=house (Bn=Bth) of – uncle=Eden (dD=oDn)
       b
       as=that – IEUE – word=created (dBAR=BARa)     +                                          [‘which – he-created IEUE’] 
       c
       [=for]  – court of + the·jail (!) = the the=two + halves (chtsr=chts) of + heaven (Mtre=shMim) ;    + 
       this feels solid ,
       for both are expressions belonging to the 10-theme where (-chts-r) was a giveaway 
       and as the two halves ‘Behemoth & Leviathan’ linking to ‘Baal’ in lines 29 & 35 !
       (8 , cont.)
      “… and said unto me, Buy my field, I pray thee, that [is]  in Anathoth, which [is]  in the country of 
       Benjamin: for the right of inheritance [is]  thine, and the redemption [is]  thine; buy [it]  for thyself.”
       d
       and say – to [=them]  (‘you & we’) :                                                                                                        [d-i is GOOD ! :] 
       e
       buy=declare you ! (qn=qr) – please – the field=10 (?) (SHd=oSHr)     +
       f
       which (are) – [..]  the anathoth=seasons (unthoth=oth) – [=for]  – the land of – benjamin=Eden ,
       g
       because – [it is]  the custim=number (MshPHt=MsPHt) of – your – inheritance (‘Eden’) 
       h
       and [=for]  you – to redeem (-it) 
       i 
       [+if]  you (will) buy=declare (qn=qr as in e above) (-it) – [=unto]  you=me (IEUE) ; 
       j
       and you (will) know (‘sense’) – that – [=these]  (are) – the words of – IEUE ;                                       [true] 
       in above 8 ,
       the buildup runs extremely well ,
       and though we cannot be sure that ‘field’ was ’10’ it needs ‘a’ number there ; see next , 
       but more difficult : now “a reason” may follow :
       (9)
      “And I bought the field of Hanameel my uncle’s son, that [was]  in Anathoth, 
       and weighed him the money, [even]  seven + teen shekels of silver.”
       as
       [=because]  – the ath=adm-man (‘Adam’) (ath=adm) – buy=took away (?) (Qn=lQch)     +
       b
       the·field = the year (?) (SHde=SHna) of      +                                                                 [< perhaps nót ’10’ here] 
       c
       the hanameel=months (chnmal=chdsh) of – the son=house (Bn=Bth) of – uncle=Eden (dD=oDn)
       d
       that (were) – [..]  her anathoth=seasons , 
       e
       and weigh=made (SHql=oSH) – for himself (!)    +
       f
       the·silver = the months – seven=two – (and) shekels=10 (shql=oshr)   +                            [’12-months’] 
       g
       and=fróm the 10 (!) of – the·silver = the the=house (e=beth) of Eden (‘excuse-word’) ; 
       this also feels good ,
       also because the key words are evenly distributed now ;
       anyway the line-up “seven – shekels – and ten – silvers” was an incorrect syntax , hidden by KJV ; 
       but then the text completely runs away ,
       and Esau has swapped sections in the buildup :
              #1  first ‘the scroll lines’ 10-14 (as “the sons finding the 10 in the scroll”)
              #2  then the above lines 8-9 ;
       conclusion :
       .. in the first lines also show “court of – the·jail” so this must have been the proper intro
       where “king of (mystery-) Babylon” was ‘Horus’ who gót the ’10’ from Adam , Gen.14  : 
       (3) 
       “….   giving this the·city in the hand of the king of Babylon” 
                 as “giving the city=ten (oir=oshr !) of this=Eden in the hand of the king of (mystery-) Babylon” 
                 [and if here ‘city’ was ’10’ then the later ‘field’ in 8-9 can surely have been ’10’ also]  ;
                 but the sections are very very corrupted
                 even though this (3) also supports the interpretation of 8-9 !

 
#2  Lev.25 & 27
[case]  : an absolute mess ; 
                  we now know “that keeping the 10-month year would bless old-Ishral” 
                  but that by forsaking it they would be given over to their enemies ;
                  and how the phrase “keep – my statutes” was ‘my calendar’ (line 18) 
                  [a different phrase as “keep my laws” !]  ;
       in this context ,
       the weird “brother that will act as redeemer” must be “their sons in the end time”                           <<<
       “if old-Ishral would fail in keeping the 10-month” — which they would , eventually ;
       but to be fair this is difficult to restore
       also because Esau very heavily forced his own version upon the original concept
       so that the structure of the lines & buildup has changed ;
       next chapter 27 may only have been spoken to Moses ,
       (15)
      “and if he that sanctified it will redeem his house, then he shall add the fifth [part] 
       of the money of thy estimation unto it, and it shall be his.
       as
       [=but]  – the·one-sanctifying = the the=sons (e=ben) of Ishral (mqd-ish=ishrl)
       b
       (will be) redeeming – the house of him=Eden (u=odn)
       c
       [=by]  add=declaring – the fifth=10 – silver=months of – [=her]  estimation=year (‘no match’) – to [=me]  ,
       where in next 16 ,
       you see the same trick as in previous Jer.32 ,
       “….an homer of – barley seed [shall be valued]  – at fifty – shekels – of silver.”
       but it’s undoable to restore this on purpose created mess ,
       where at the end he did restart the “tithe” (10) theme and how it was “changed”

 
#3  Num.35 (etc)
[case]  : the alleged 3 (or 6 or 42 or whatever number) ‘refugee cities’ :
                  here Esau just didn’t care anymore to follow ány original intent ;
                  it is so unreadable that it only gives headache and only fractions still show
                  (which he consequently used in next chapter Joshua) 
                  in phrases as (19) “one-redeeming-of the·blood” 
                  that was “redeeming – the·blood = the the=house (e=beth) of Eden (Dm=oDn)“ ,
                 but the context ofcourse shown not even one key-word we need 
                 [because he used those and particularly ‘numbers’ in the chapter start]