please , 
this is a so difficult and exténsive theme
that it’s very hard to even present the problem clearly to you ,
do read with much goodwill please ;
perhaps best first tell you how we got here so you can follow the reasoning ;
do at least get to the ‘moon section’ ; )
 

page also intended for our Legal Right — because some five or more Scroll chapters are about this very theme , see part I here , but [=therefore]  also insanely corrupted ,  costing Time — yet our April date is close

 
[first version ;
‘contents’ and part II will be added] 
 

                                                   stumbling upon this problem
 
     … and starting with the deluge      —
     if ‘Noah in a cave’ wasn’t a big find already when fighting with Genesis 6-8 ,
     at the end of the deluge – the alleged ‘dove theme’ – the “twice seven days” 
     refused to make Sense : though we already assumed that Christ must have
     smitten the enemies that still survived , why the prominent ‘7’ also here but
     now related to ‘smiting’ , after saving “7 pair of animals” ..?
     would “a war of numbers” as those of God and those of Adam play here ?
 
     if (IF) there were “twice seven days” then Christ destroyed two groups ?
     but where then showed their (!) total number ? and why the many shown
    ‘dates’ as her duration etc while only at the end of 8 the flood is over ? 
     what if those dates showed ‘the amount of enemies’ that were slain ?
     moreover ,
     what if “and the flood lasted 153 days” had said ‘144’ , for example ,
     or another number that would be diametrical to the sacred ‘7’ ?
     the point is that the “twice 7 days” smiting is almost ‘a ritual slaughter’ 
     which could imply that the enemy had used (stolen) a sacred number !
 
     what then — could Sumer (Gilgamesh) have boarded 144 ?
     we saw that Sumer ‘stole’ the number ‘7’ : could they also have stolen
     God’s other sacred number ’12’ ? and made some illegal ‘144’ from it
     by multiplying it — and THAT was the reason Christ smote them twice 
     because the practice of ‘multiplying’ (copying) is not of God !
     this made very much sense ,
     especially since the egyptian Spells “double” stolen eden-aspects as
     copying them while in Amduat they even do that with ’12’ aspects ! 
     [please see part II of this page for an extensive look at this]  ;
 
     perhaps “the boatsmen” in the Gilgamesh epic (-see page) was not
     a reference to ‘workmen’ – because Gilgamesh had his own ‘captain’ –
     but “to OTHERS that boarded théir boats” ? who then kind of vanish
     from the story ?
     so – can it be that Sumer (Gilgamesh) boarded ‘a 144,000’ ..?
     we’re not so interested about questions as ‘population numbers’ or
     whether that ‘was technically possible’ — since Adam was involved ;
     but then a next ominous possibility appears :
 
     did Adam create ‘the 144 / 144,000’ number ?
     … after the initial shock ,
     this concept seemed póssible : afterall he is OUR main enemy in the
     sense that he tried to never have us [-as 144,000]  come into being ,
     while we sáw in Gen.9 that he played God and us against eachother :
     could it even go deeper — and did Adam create a trap against us 
     through this theme ? like ‘a mole’ ? one that we failed to see ?
     what could the Monster have done ?
     did he appoint his own evil ‘144’ (or 144,000) – against you & we ?
     however , it was impossible to see which one , ‘144’ or ‘144,000’ ….
 
                                           enter Revelation 21

… searching for the required numbers she shows      those we need : 144, 12 and 12.000 — but since      we know that some ‘new jerusalem’ is nonsense      what can it réally have been about .. ?      her buildup is also erratic [=corrupted]  : after lines      1-9 being very ‘flat’ [=disarmed]  it kind of ‘restarts’      yet containing repetitive and unlogical sections

 
     (12) has the “twelve gates , twelve angels , and twelve names of the tribes”
     and (15-17) the alleged “measuring of the city” with “12,000” and “144” ,
     but there is something strange :
     in (21) again appear “twelve gates , with twelve pearls” : WHY ?
     why not having put them at line (12) that already talked about ‘the gates’ ?
     yet –  since this story is a phantom : what if we overlay ‘Genesis’ here ?
     even more ,
     IF both ‘gate sections’ being apart is true , do we have a major juxta here ?
     so that the first half máy have been ‘about Adam’ and the latter about us ?
     but then ‘the measuring of the city’ belongs to ‘Adam’ ! 
     what did he do ? plotting his deluge trap ?
     for in the second half do NOT appear any ‘12,000’ and ‘144 (cubits)’
 
     at the end of the chapter “the moon theme” shows , if true ofcourse , álso
     fitting the Genesis chapters since in 9 there Adam talks about it in context
     of “the eden-gate as moon” as the enemy of his ówn gate in Babylon …….
     bless you : the eden-binary sun & moon ‘just shine’ as time-indicators ,
                              but God’s sanctuary (‘moon’) ‘illuminates Eden’ !
                              with twelve types of her light !
                             as ‘twelve seasons’ !
                             as types of light represented by twelve gemstones !
                             of the twelve tribes on earth !
                             and their twelve gemstones in the breastplate !
                             and you & we – as 144,000 – bring back that light to Eden !
      
     is this not an extremely plausible concept ?
     hence (in 19-20 here) shows “a list of twelve types of gemstones” just not
     as : “the first , sapphire ; the second , jasper (etc)” but ‘of the twelve tribes’ !
     and hence next lines are about ‘the sanctuary’ – for the light is brought back .. 
 
     sidenote :
     in the Gilgamesh epic we didn’t include the line about “their mother-goddess
     after the flood speaking in the company of gods : I hung around my neck 
     the pendant of sapphire” — the ‘hanging around neck’ means some aspect
     stolen from eden : of one of our type twelve lights .. ? 
 
     but what did Adam exactly do here ?
     … because sadly we haven’t yet resolved the ‘144 / 144,000 problem’ ;
     Adam stole the eden-light and that for his own gate when he built 
     it in the same time that he helped to build mystery-Babylon ;
     the réal context of Genesis 7 suggests “that he also put his type people 
     (compare ‘Gilgamesh’) on earth , supporting them with the (stolen) light”  — 
     as a light greatly diminished ofcourse , not as in Babylon 
     [while áfter the deluge “this moon” regulated those energies .. ?]  ;
     either way :
     at the end of Gen.7 “the (evil-) bloodline people” [root -leom]  could be  
     a proper phrase for his people , while at the start of Gen.8 he appears 
     to place ‘attributes’ upon certain ones of his people ,
     for it did not say “tops of – the mountains” (rshi + the·mountains , sic)
     but “chiefs of – their people” ! (same -rshi ‘head (chief), top, first) :
     THESE were the type that Christ smote !
     and remembering “twice seven days” they must have had a number !
 
     God starts His rescue plan – using His numbers :
     … after Abraham who represented a type ‘Adam’ [-since he also had 
     to undo aspects that Adam caused]  for us souls upon this new earth ,
     from him God raised up ‘the 12 sons of Jacob’ as our twelve tribes ;
     this is the absolute main “12” in all of OT ,
     in spite of whatever other ‘twelvefold events’ may have happened or
     that simply are a case of corruption or synchromystic reading – or both ;
 
     now — the second Solid ‘twelve’ are “the twelve disciples” in NT ,
     and both groups could reflect a profound truth :
     that God was ‘undoing’ the sacred number ’12’ that Adam had stolen ,
     [not directly as ‘the twelve eden-seasons’ – for it were attributes now] 
     but as those that Adam used for his ‘144 / 144,000 concept’ !
     for this is the point please ,
     God uses His “single sacred number” (so ‘7’) which He can multiply
     (which is different as ‘to copy’ ! , see earlier) as the period between the
     Passover and Weeks , therefore the most logical count to get to ‘144’ 
     with a ’12’ is ’12 x 12′  — this theme will become important ! —
     so that in the idea of “the 12 sons of Jacob + the 12 disciples” He 
     would have “taken back the sacred number 12 that Adam had abused” !
     moreover ,
     if the ‘144,000 version’ is valid , we [-144,000]  may be the third aspect
     by ‘providing’ the factor ‘1000’ in this count ! so that this picture shows :
     the 144,000 are the Jacob sons + disciples x you & we [=144,000]   ! 
     no trickery here : for all of us are the same (saved) family-tree !
 
     back to ‘the counting’ – Rev.21 
     … because something ELSE is showing in the book Revelation :
     in chapter 7 “12,000 souls of each of the twelve tribes” appear so that
     their total number is ‘144,000’ , 
     while here (in 16) it has the alleged angel measuring ‘12,000 (-stadia)’ ;
     so why has (next 17) only “144 cubits” .. ? which numbers are real ?
     do we need to get to ‘144,000’ or (only) to ‘144’ ? and to see whether 
     the “12,000” here could be Valid we need to look at that ‘144 cubits’ :
     Esau says : “hundred + forty + four + cubits” 
     yet look : hundred + forty + four + cubits=thousand (péCHuS=CHiliaS !)
     that’s a Too close root to ignore combined with context !
 
     again please — WHAT did ‘the angel do’ there ?
     that is important because we saw the count of 12 x 12 x 1000 but what
     Esau tried to conceal here ? what if “the number 12,000 is corrupt” ?
     or better phrased : if God only uses “single sacred numbers” then the
     count with ‘12,000’ is illogical : so where did ‘12,000’ come from ?
     for it is a combined number !
     so – what if ‘12,000 itself’ is an illegal combination ?
     what if ‘the angel’ had caused THAT ..?
     which consequently Esau wanted to cover up here even ‘by count’ ?
     what if the number ‘1000’ is NOT ‘a number of God’ ?
 
     that sounds ridiculous for everyone assumes that phrases as ‘1000 y’
     belong to Him — yet if you look in Strong’s ‘1000’ is rather negatively
     glued (pun) to situations which have little to do with Him !
     therefore even “the millenium , the 1000 year of Christ” is suspicious !
     because of this : the phrase about “1000 years + satan” should be true ,
     but the situation has changed when first Eden will be restored :
     though “he and his army will make one final attempt to invade restored 
     eden but that they will fail” is true , it are the 1000 years OF satan ,
     not “of God” ! not “satan will be let loose” but “satan will be given back
     his 1 x 1000 years” — in which he subsequently will try attack eden !
     Esau must have cunningly distorted the ‘1000’ theme :
 
     what if an illegal ‘1000’ was glued to ’12’ — as ‘the mole’ number ?
     … was THIS the real goal of ‘the angel’ ?
     Rev.21 (15) has “and [he]  had a golden reed for to measure the city” as 
     the introduction to the ‘1000’ theme ; but why some “golden + reed” ?
     what is the significance of that ? 
     now , if our attribute is “the eden-light as her twelve seasons” as “time”
     while ‘1000’ also may be related to time , where this section is as we 
     saw about Adam , then can Adam have messed with ‘Time’ here ?
 
     Esau shows “and he has + a reed + golden”                      [‘a golden reed’]  
     but look :          
     and he (Adam) had – the (dimensional-) golden=time (chrusous=chronos)    +
     b
     of (mystery-) reed=Babylon (kalamon=babylôn !)    
 
     how much is the chance ?
                he glued the time of his mystery-Babylon to the seasons of Eden !
                cáusing the illegal number “12,000” !
                and that “during the deluge” !
                linking it to the sons of Ishral , that they would be ‘too late’ !
                and destroyed by God at his already decided date as ‘that great day’ !
                so that Eden would never be restored – and Adam never judged !
 
                                                                                                          
     Adam : 144,000 = 12 + 1000 x 12
     .. if we want it or not , we are part of this concept that he forced upon us ;
     but he did not stop at ‘12,000’ : he then multiplied that with a single ’12’ 
     as God’s sacred number , for the second time (and see earlier) !
     now ,
     this very much looks like – knowing the monster – as his direct attack on
     God : as if he added His single number ’12’ as ‘sealing his trap’ because
     through that his original ‘12,000’ increased almost exponentially !
     surely this idea was the now corrupt “the measure of man , the angel” ….
 
     perhaps his plan was “to shatter the eden-attribute into a million pieces” 
     as her twelve seasons now fragmented across 144,000 of ús , making it
     impossible for God to get those twelve seasons (placed upon us souls)
     back together again ,
     not in the least since 144,000 would need to die to their flesh that Adam
     designed as ‘extra Blind version’ for in the (long!) time after the deluge ..
 
     are we still ‘in danger’ ?
     … something definitely has changed last week : ‘the Sorcery pull’ left
     (see Noah page) since starting the deluge theme ; now pondering if
     that sorcery was (!) linked to Adam’s type ‘1000’ — that as “time” could
     be responsible for the type waiting of that whole  watchman community’ 
     [combined with that awful KJV ofcourse]   ;
     reasoning the other way around : it is very possible that until this theme
     the final completion of our 144,000 still was in danger for reason of that
     same Sorcery-pull upon members — 
     yet not any longer since we understood the root of this very theme now  
 
     is this whole theme showing élsewhere ?
     … that is important – to can verify our theme interpretation of this Rev.21 
     [in which the start may have been about the deluge : the ‘new earth’ 
     (in 1) must have been about the flood , NOT some soon new earth !]  ;
     #1
     searching for ‘overlay’ it is VERY possible that “2 breads & 5 fishes” 
     a ‘5000’ crowd [=’144,000′!]  in Mt.14 [+16]  was this theme ! , and even 
     more so since the alleged “Jesus walks upon the water” followed by
     a ‘Peter’ ‘drowns’ (sic!) seems to be the continued text there : 
     can someone say please “Christ smiting enemies at the deluge” ?? 
     [while the cut-off juxta must be some lines in a next chapter 16]    —
     the realistic possibility of this would be a sweet victory for you & we !
     #2
     we already suggested ‘Daniel in the lions cave’ (-see page) where now
     also Esau’s thrice ‘3’ at the start makes sense : as ’12’ ofcourse ;
     #3
     also 2 Peter 3 must have been this theme for it shows a number of 
     key-words inclusive ‘1000 + year’ but all the text is insanely corrupted ;
     #4
     where also the entire “measuring some temple” in Ezekiel must have
     come close to this Rev.21 : so that it was nót all a completely invented
     phantom by Esau , as we opted …  
     #5
     and – surprisingly – also Isaiah 37 :
     “The angel of the LORD went out, and smote in the camp of the 
     Assyrians an hundred fourscore and five thousand: and when they 
     arose early in the morning, behold, they were all dead corpses” ,
     where the surrounding story about “(king) Hezekiah” was “Noah”   —
     the ‘185,000’ is obvious and the angel of IEUE – Christ – smote them !
     [yes we already retracted previous version ….. can’t have ’em all] 
 
     however , restoring their text will – hopefully – no longer be required 
     if our date this month will come to pass , please see top of this page  
 
     what about ‘the 70 bulls / years’ theme — or was it this ?
     … if anyway now we’re listing our mistakes   —
     truth is that the whole ’70 bulls’ remained unsatisfyingly unresolved 
     so that it was put on the shelf until some opening would appear , later ;
     curiously ,
     it contained a similar “70 = illegal 10 + sacred 7” base theme as here , 
     identifying the “70 years” as ‘an illegal time of mystery-Babylon”      —
     and though it is póssible that she has a separate Legal time (of 70 y)
     it is not logical , especially not after all of the above here 
 
     though we were absolutely sure , end of last year , that after Babylon’s 
     (long) matrix-time was over we would finally go — yet didn’t ;
     but perhaps our God was so kind to give us this theme now to go win it 
     for reason ‘that you & we were so very close with that bulls-theme’ …?
     and that this time we réally go ?
     in His sacred ‘7 days‘ week ? when He collects ‘his twelve seasons’ ?
                                                    how much is the chance ?
 

 
 
for you our Majesty
and you our Lord
and for all of us now really to be completed 144,000
 
 
 
[first add , +2 hrs :] 
“..and you will select a lamb on the 10th day [=before Passover 14th] “ (Ex.12) ;
… this line came today and lingered , where you must know that He helped to 
write today since the past week was an utter chaos because of this theme ; 
the line can be true [=as a non-corrupted concept]  ,
because where “you & we” are the ‘sacrificed lamb during Atonement” ,
this specific lamb choice must refer to ‘either Adam — or Christ’ ,
as if some “open option” ,
and where ‘usually’ — say ‘the past 2300 years’ — that lamb would be Christ ,
this time that sacrificed animal will be ‘ADAM’ !
since this was the intént of the “choosing a sacrificial animal before Passover” !
yet this time Christ won !
… and “the 10th” cannot be a coincidence — as the root of ‘1000’ ….
 

 
                                                                                          — continuation —
 
                                         both the ‘144,000’ AND the 70 years’ were by Adam
 
                                  —  through HIS (number) ‘10’ by the tree of good & evil !
 

spoiler please , because it needs text to come to specific points : not ‘Cain’ was ‘the wanderer’ but ‘ADAM’ ! hé said the “they will slay me” : the nations of demons ! therefore he took revenge through an insane act : please see the restored Genesis 4 lines below …

 
     … after the whole section above one aspect kept bugging : if he stole the
     sacred ’12’ eden-number then why not also God’s own ‘7’ ..? since we saw
     how much Sumer loved the by them hijacked 7 — why not go steal both ?
     this is important for ús because then our ’70 bulls’ theme was NOT wrong ,
     as “the 70 (dimensional-) years of mystery-Babylon” !
 
     the 70 years exile of Judah & 1000+ of Ishral
     … in the context of foreshadowing  —
     whether ‘the (500 BC) exile to Babylon indeed had a duration of 70 years’ 
     based upon historical records and so forth is a rather silly discussion    —
     interesting for ús is that the announcement of a 70 year exile to the earthly
     Babylon in Jeremiah 25 appears valid there , as opposed to the 70 years
     elsewhere in prophets that are about mystery-Babylon ;
     Esau perhaps thought that ányway we wouldn’t understand the difference
     between both ‘Babylons’ so that he did not doctor the number ’70’ !
 
     if Adam , as we saw , constantly plays out God and us against eachother ,
     and God’s number 7 trumps ‘our’ 12 , 
     then why wouldn’t he connect the ‘7’ to his HQ Mystery-Babylon while he
     would connect the ’12’ to prevent the coming attáck against her ..?
     it is as if God used ‘many live examples’ to show ús this important theme 
     even as “the reason why Judah went into literal exile 70 years” while the
     tribes of Ishral with ‘a factor 1000’ !
 
                              so where did the ’10’ come from that Adam used ?
 
     … for he must have some Legal right to connect ‘a 10′ to 7 to make ’70’ ,
     where we saw that ‘1000’ already is ‘a factor 10’ — 
     the 10 cóuld be “of Satan” (see ‘the thousand years’ in previous section)
     but then what could give Adam the ‘right’ to use that negative number ? 
     
     only when he at a point in time ‘officially connected unto it’ !
     but how in the world to connect to ‘a negative 10’ ? and where then ? 
     or was it linked to the event at ‘that tree of good & evil’ ?
     enter Rev. 22:2 :
         “[…]  and on either side of the river, [was there]  the tree of life, 
          which bare twelve [type]  fruits, [and]  yielded her fruit every month” 
     great ,
     now we have ‘a tree + a number’ — just it is NOT ‘the tree of life’ !
 
     [before Rev.22 & Ez.47]  remember the situation in Gen.3 :
     … for ‘the tree of good and evil’ was not in the garden but “east of Eden” ,
     being fed by a brook that came fróm Eden unto her :
     that’s important please since Esau swapped these components :

     … now ,
     though only Rev.22 shows a clear number (’12 fruits’) linked to a tree ,
     Esau used a “thousand (-cubits)” for a same ‘type angel measuring’ 
     as his concept we saw in part I above — it’s the same Adam theme !
     moreover ,
     nowhere in prophets is added an attribute to the (real) tree of Life 
     that is only scarcely mentioned : on purpose since God would give
     no ammunition to Esau since His ‘7 & 12 problem was important !
 
     Esau guessed that he had hidden well enough the réal place where
     the tree of good and evil stands , and the Ezekiel lines show what
     tree he réally had in mind : “fróm eden a river goes TO the east”  
     meeting “(very many-) trees” !
     how much is the chance that in Rev. it originally had “10 + fruits” 
     and that in Ez. Esau made a factor ‘1000’ from an original ’10’  ..?
 
     yet – due to all insane corruptions ’10’ is hard to prove
     … therefore it is useless ‘to do a search for the number 10’ where
     even the idea of “a number connected to a tree” has been erased ;
     so that options as in Gen. 4 séem contrived (but we’ve no choice) :
     next lines are the same theme – though far apart , and not spoken
     ‘unto Cain’ but this is ‘ADAM speaking’ (!) before he leaves (in 16) :                                      [Genesis 4 :] 
           (14-15)
           “Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; 
           and from thy face shallI be hid; andI shall be a fugitive and a vagabond 
           in the earth; and it shall come to pass, [that]  every one that findeth me 
          shall slay me.
           And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, 
          vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a
           mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.”
           (23-25)
           “And Lamech said unto his wives, Adah and Zillah, Hear my voice; 
           ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech: for I have slain a man 
           to my wounding,and a young man to my hurt.
           Cain shall beavenged sevenfold, Lamech seventy and sevenfold.”  
     …  now please ,
     after Adam had refused to say sorry to God ,
     14
     you=he drove >> me – out – [..?..]  – from – the face of – the·ground (‘Eden’ !) (said odn?) 
     b
     and=upon the (sur-) face of – the hid=wilderness (?) ,
     c
     [skipped now] 
     d
     and anyone (‘nations of demons / serpent-race) – finding me – (will) slay me ;
     15
     and he said – (to) himself : ieue=behold ! ,                                                                 [next : sounds like him ! :] 
     b
     therefore – he=I (will) avenge=eat – sevenfold=ténfold      +
     c
     every=from – the slaying=fruits (eRg=hRi) of – the cain=tree ,
     d
     [=so that]  he=I (will have) put=power (?)      +
     e
     [+against]  (!) IEUE – for=and the cain=nations (-of demons) ,
     f
     by which none (of both) – (will) smite >> him=me – [..2x..]  ;  
 
     … how does that sound please ? isn’t this so extremely logical ?
     hé had been evicted ‘from the ground’ — long before ‘Cain’ was born !
     and his “fear for the demons” was justified since after having eaten the
     fruits “he had like become one of thém” — but not devious enough to 
     be able to survive them !
     the only problem we still have now is “was there 1 type fruit carrying the
     attribute ’10’ , as unity” , or had it “10 type fruits” (per previous Rev.22) ?
     or is it this : “did he eat TEN-FOLD from óne unity” .. ?
     the latter is the most probable — first since he was a disgruntled toddler ,
     but “áfter eating the first time , he was still vulnerable” ,
     so that it makes much more Sense ‘that he ate 10-fold’ :
     virtually proving that ADAM himself created the ’10’  !!
 
     and there’s something else please ,
     how could “satan’s numbers” (and of the serpent-race) ever compete
     with God’s numbers ? how do 18 cheese-sandwiches compete with
     18 juicy steaks ? the number may be the same – but not their nature !
     as indicated by the lines below “where the demons had been sláin by
     Eden until now” ! [just as the Sumerian epic the Anunna – that wére
     the serpent-race – cried out to their gods !] :
 
     next lines 23-24 :
     … Adam now is ‘in the north’ and must confer here with the demons (!) 
     for he now has become one of the most powerful of them — however 
     the buildup is Too corrupt to can see whether he (also) addresses his 
     own ‘sons of Ammon’ as the corrupt-type souls :
     23
     and the lamech=adm-man (lAMch=AdM) – says     +
     b
     to (the serpent-race / nations of demons / etc) :
     c
     hear – my voice – [..]  [=as]  listening – to my saying :
          d
          that=no – man (-of you) (‘nobody of you’)      +
          e
          (will be) slain (‘verb now’) (-no more) – [=by]  me=your wound=enemy (?) (‘Eden’)
          f
          [=but]  (instead,) – for=you (will) wounding=plunder – boy=eden (ilD=oDn) ;
    24
    because – [+I]  (will) avenge [+me]  sevenfold – (upon-) [+her]  cain=sanctuary (of IEUE) ,
    b
    and – seventy=two – and seven=ten (‘twelvefold’)     +
    c
    (upon-) [+her]  lamech=seasons (?) ;                                                                   [‘the 12 types eden-light by it’]  
 
    … please you see that it’s VERY congruent with previous lines 14-15 :
    he , now as ’10’ attacks the ‘7’ of God and the ’12’ of His seasons 
    [where the latter by extension is “us”]  ;
    the above sounds better as an “I will steal the number 7 and 12” for
    is a too vague description while now we have the reason why in the
    first place he cóuld make “the 70 years of mystery-Babylon” as well
    as the playing with numbers as his “144,000” attacking us !
 
    [this theme elsewhere :] 
    — in Ezekiel 8 , where he is shown “the gate of Adam” (as ‘the image
       of jealousy’ since he kind of copied God’s sanctuary) a “70” shows
       and also a “25” that must have been ‘the original 7 + 12’ as here ,
       but the text is corrupted ofcourse ,
    — two sections in the book Isaiah (36-39 and 7-8) suddenly jump to
       an assumed ‘500 BC literal event’ and in BOTH “stories” the evil
       Assyrian army threatens to attack ,
       but the monologues appear to show THIS theme : no ‘Rebsakah’ 
       used big words against ‘Hezekiah and his two (or three) comrades’ 
       but Adam , to his new clique of serpent-race and demon-nations !
       however restoration of seems impossible …
 
   — even ‘the woman with 12 stars and the moon’ (Rev.12) must
      have been THIS theme (as cut-off by Esau from his mutilated intro
      of ch.22 (see part I) : no 12 stars but ‘the 12 (eden-) seasons’ 
      where ‘the woman’ is ‘God’s sanctuary’ below the eden-binary
      as sun and moon [=so not ‘standing upon it’]  ,
      after which ‘the dragon’ – either Adam or Babylon – steals it :
      though even wé (yes) for long time assumed it was a corrupted
      depiction of the (real) ‘daughter of tsiun’ it is not maintainable 
      also because God doesn’t speak about her like this  —
      we’ve sáid that much of Revelation is too tricky even for us …
 
         [contrast :] 
         because the bulk of the text of “the whore Babylon” (Rev.17)
         is NOT about ‘babylon’ : the key is ‘mystery’ (in 7) which was
         the ‘mystery of lawlessness’ theme — where ‘the beast’ (!)
         (-theron) was ‘the scroll’ (-biblion) :
         no ‘seven + heads’ but “should be declared every 7th year” 
         because the alleged ‘beast that thou sawest was and is not’ 
         was “the original Scroll that ceased to be” , etcetera …….
 
 — and for completion here : Isaiah 60 was the Rev.22 mirror : 
      (2) has “darkness [=deluge !]  + cover + earth + bloodline-people (sic)” ,
      (3) has “all gather themselves and come” [=animals]  ,
      (5) and (9) “ships” and “sea” ,
      (10) has “in my wrath i smote” (sic) ,
      (19) has “no sun no more but god will be the light” (-as in Rev.22 !) , and
      (22) shows “thousand”     —
      but the chapter [as much of Isaiah !]  is too corrupted to can restore …
   
 
                                                                 closing (-for now) :
 
    a “to select the flockling at the 10th day before Passover” still looks
    to be a genuine concept (see closing of part I) but in this Exodus 12 lines
    4-5 are tampered so that Esau wanted to hide some type condition here
    [because (in 5) ‘to take a flockling from the goats’ ? , c’mon]      —
    perhaps ,
    the intent of 5 was “and it will be a flockling without blemish [=each]  year ,
    [=úntil]  (and now something with Adam ? so ‘the·goats’ (e·ozim=adm) ?)” ;
    because , since today , ‘the 10th’ represents ‘Adam’ …..  

 
 [/17apr.]  
          
       [intermezzo :]
       this is a Legal Right page , and placing Esau’s timely Occult Ritual here 
       ofcourse does not mean that we endorse it – for that’s his goal with all
       his rituals : that Jacob souls will confirm the hidden message they don’t see] 
       but what are the odds :
       this  Blue Origin ‘trip’ depicted “the ARK of the (evil-) BLOODLINE” !
       

ofcourse it was all studio work and CGI :        the shape of the rocket & it’s module ,        the alleged ‘lift off’ within two seconds        with an added plume so cringe that only        the total blind would consider it to be real         (China faked similar two years ago) ,        the opening of the door of the module ,        the fact of bimbos playing astronots (pun) ;        all Esau’s deliberate hiding the message :        let souls guess ‘whether they went to space         or not’ as long they confirm the aspects !

 
       because they represent that bloodline they are ‘6 different races’ coming 
       from the Blue Origin pre-Deluge Earth , in a vessel ‘- which btw confirms
       their ‘escape in boats’ theme ! – called ‘Shepherd’ referring to the faces
       on the *cough*  (mission patch) that are the sons of Ammon watching 
       over their survival ; the ‘scales of judgment’ on the patch is also clear
       as is the ‘meteor’ that (likely) destroyed the dome (and see this chapter !)
       which they Ritually ‘touched’ namely the Kármán border 60 miles above
       earth referring to the position of that previous dome —
       there’s much more but you get the point
       

… after our ‘Atonement the 14th’ about        the moon-month Esau showed his google        matrix-moon Ritual for the past five months :         now we’re but two weeks into this whole         Deluge theme and this Ritual is splattered        all over his MSM … what are the chances ?        [/ intermezzo]

                                                     *       *       *       *       *       *      *
 
                                                                             part II