this is a bit messy page – but not by our fault ; the third method of Esau to conceal the need to declare “the number 10 of the Eden house”  was by turning it into ‘a census of the people’  that unexplainably is linked to “God’s anger” as if it were a sin to execute a census ;  now , perhaps at times “the people were counted” but the returning keywords show a context of God’s anger when the ‘10’ is not declared ,                       which suddenly makes much móre sense ! , compare the teary confessions of the people  leading to “restoring the 10-month calendar” in the examples we found until now       —

census (registration) of the people :      most likely a corrupted concept

 
this chapter became very valuable for us but is the same time dangerous ,
because though the summary (see above) indeed is based on shown key words ,
they are interpreted according to the probable buildup of the ‘10-month theme’   

                                                                                   2 Samuel 24
 
                                                    David makes a census — and God is angry
 
       … as a rather famous example of the (alleged-) ‘census’ theme ,
       that has three major problems : why the obsession with “endless lists of names 
       of people and of quantities of silver” (hence the one book was called ‘Numbers’) ; 
       what was the reason for “Satan enticing David to make a census” (this chapter) ,
       and why “God was always angry after that , severely punishing the people for it” ?
       and this apart from the overall problem ,
       that “numbering the citizens” is an act of ‘subduing them for the sake of society
       and mainly with the intent of “placing taxes upon them” where this practice would
       go against the whole idea of “annulling everyone’s debts in the Jubilee year” ! 
       anyone arguing “but that is why God was agáinst any census” is proving to be 
       reasoning according to the KJV text for nowhere ‘a census’ is explained ,
       which is THE litmus test for the validation of any given command ,
       so that we can only guess why ‘Satan pushed’ or ‘God was angry’ while ignoring
       the political-correct-KJV-quasi-spiritual ‘answers’ by for example the concordances 
       so that there only remains one serious other possibility :
       did Esau mutilate an other important theme with this ‘census’ abberation … ?
 
       the answer may be in the “declare the number 10 of the house of Eden” ,
       where curiously the root-word for ‘number’ is the same as that of ‘the scroll’ (-sphr) 
       strongly suggesting to us that we not only “need (-ed) to declare the scroll to God”
       but also “declare our own number — that is , of our house Eden” ,
       as the same number 10 that Adam handed over to the locust Horus in Genesis 14 !
       keeping this in mind ,
       ánd the matrix that fabricated their solar plane with base-12 , 
       how much is the chance that each time he saw the word ‘number’ Esau went into 
       a frenzy and scrambled to cover up the theme of “the ‘10’ of the house of Eden” ?
 
       the ‘Satan pushing a census’ 
       the ‘mirror-chapter’ (and using that word lightly) 2 Chronicles 21 starts with a line
       saying “Satan provoked David to number the people” which , if you think about it ,
       is a nasty trick of Esau since he gave the “number (-ing)” a Negative connotation 
       while the original idea was exact the opposite : ‘find the number and declare it’ !
       and Esau repeated that ugly trick in the infamous Revelation line of “whoever will 
       change these words will go to hell” ,
       which is a massive subconscious blockage for serious souls that die to know what
       He réally may have said as blocking them from any other interpretation as that evil
       KJV in front of them supplies to them ,
       and connecting ‘Satan’ with the concept of ‘number (-ing)’ definitely causes the 
       same type (subconscious-) blockage to go investigate a theme about “a number” ;
       in hindsight , what incredible long way you & we together have journeyed …
 
       the curious “twenty [+fourth]  of the ninth month” here :
       this date keeps popping up : in Haggai 2 , Zechariah 7 and Daniel 10 , and recently
       even in Ezra 10 as “the twenty [+fourth]  day of the ninth month”, and though in slight
       variations it is as if Esau wanted to cover up that specific date — 
       because we hold on to “the 70 days after the middle of the seventh month” which
       would land on “the 24th of the 9th” introducing the start of the 10th month ,
       and because Esau devised his fake ‘Hanukkah’ AS the start of that real 10th month
       each time this date shows it is a Red flag :
       (8)
      “So when they had gone through all the land (‘to count’) , 
       they came to Jerusalem at the end of nine months and twenty [+four]  days.”                                           [sic !] 
       that’s impossible !
       what is our important “twenty [+fourth]  of the ninth month” doing here ..?
       the line as it shows here adds nothing to this story– but it dóes , per our theme !
       and if you look further in this chapter it shows “70 (days)” and “(three) months” 
       so that this line (8) must be an intro to a later more specific date ;
    
       the tearful repentance (because of nót keeping the 10-month ?)
       just as in Ezra 9-10 and the king in the 2Chronicles 30-31 chapter , befóre they                                         <<<
       re-installed the 10-months calendar , also here it shows a heartfelt admission :
       (10)
      “And David’s heart smote him after that he had numbered the people.
       And David said unto the LORD, I have sinned greatly in that I have done : 
       and now, I beseech thee , O LORD, take away the iniquity of thy servant ;”
       but ,
       more probable here is “that David pleaded for the péople that rejected the 10-month”
       since the buildup leads to ‘many people of the land that died’ , so , as their own sin ;
       also important is ,
       that in both mentioned examples “they sent a proclamation through the land” for the
       people of the (10 !) tribes to gather to Jerusalem” where here allegedly a servant 
       went through the land to number the people and ‘came to Jerusalem’ (line 8 above) ;
       you can see the overlap here with the “inviting them to declare the 10-month” ;
  
       yet some tribes resist :
       also this is attested — especially in 2 Chronicles 30-31 ,
       [1Chr.21] 
       (6)
      “But Levi and Benjamin counted he not among them: for the king’s word was abominable to Joab.”
       here ,
       it was not “the word of – the·king” but “of IEUE” ;
       and though we don’t know ‘who’ resisted (-in this corrupted mess) probably some
       number of tribes did as according to the pattern ; while here unfolds the clue : 
       because they refused to declare the 10-months , it made God angry !
       (7)
      “And God was displeased with this thing; and smote [=certain people , we can’t know ‘who’] “
       wherefore the pattern is ,
       that “people constantly go astray and forget to keep the 10-months” especially in 
       the case of the Northern kingdom because they had no Scroll that was in Jerusalem ,
       or in the case of Ezra when they returned after many years of Babylonian exile , 
       then they rediscover in the Scroll the command concerning this , 
       and after much repentance “they re-commit to keeping the calendar” ;
       where however we stumble on a for us dangerous problem ,
       because we may not confuse this theme with “the declaring of the Scroll (-itself)”                                     [sic] 
       which – at minimum – is equally important as the declaring of the 10-month ,
       where Esau may have hidden either theme through the same root (-sphr) both for
       the ‘scroll’ as for ‘the number’ which greatly complicates things for us :
       in fact we can only know which one was intended by looking at the context of the rest 
       of the involved chapter IF that was original and not imported from another chapter ;
       an option to tackle this is ,
       A) that ‘the declaring of the Scroll’ and ‘of the 10-month’ go together ,
       first ,
       because the Spring-feasts and the declaring of the (proper-) scroll at Weeks 
       seems to introduce “our part” represented by the Fall-feasts in which we are to 
       declare our number ‘10 of the house of Eden’ ,
       which we only can do BY knowing the original scroll of the words that He spoke
       (so that in our case “we first had to restore it” before we even could know of the ‘10’) ;
       which actually is a very .. sweet model   —
       first He does everything – as usual – in order to have us do ‘our part’ ,
       and this model supports the concept ‘7 (Spring) [divine]  x 10 (Fall) [us] ‘ that will
       become important in the “plus 70 days” and the “2 x 70,000 witnesses” ; 
       B)
       so that either a blessing or curse follows — IN ‘the 10th month’ (?)
       … actually this would follow from the above :
       in context , and perhaps even logically so ,
       as if people fail to declare the ‘10’ , then judgment follows in ‘the 10th month’  
       [but only in the situation of the important Jubilee year]  ;
       so that “Nebuchadnessar having sacked Jerusalem in the tenth month” may be true
       where this chapter also suggests “the many dead ones” of old-Ishral in that month ;
       it’s true that we don’t have many examples yet ,
       but considering that “declaring His scroll” is step 1 followed by “declaring the 10”
       does suggest that either blessing or curse follows that same ‘tenth month’ , is it not ,
       where ‘the blessing’ – hopefully – applies to our situation now
       and please consider the next aspect :
       C) 
       the ‘angel of IEUE’ (Christ) appears [in both versions]  :
       … and this is a huge Red flag to us     —
       though this was “a failed” Jubilee – because the people did NOT declare the ‘10’ ,
       the fact that Christ appears here must have been intended ‘as photo-negative’ for us ,
       even (only) if the show that the 24th of the 9th and His appearance are linked ;                                      [sic !] 
       and curiously we have support of that in Daniel 10 ,
                 [line 2]   why is he mourning “three full weeks” (three – sevens – days)  ?
                                    why not “seven[+ty]  days” ?
                 [line 4]   then something happens at “the twenty fourth of the·first (!) month” ,
                                    shall we say “24th of the 9th” ? like in Haggai 2 and Zechariah ?
                 [line 5]   the angel of IEUE appears (Christ) ;
       again please , we cannot know “what” the angel was doing here because the text
       is too corrupted , but the fact that He appears probably was genuine , 
       and where Daniel was ‘mourning’ (sic , repentance !) like David in this chapter ,
       where obviously Daniel got the promise of “restored Eden in the days of the end” 
       as the very reason WHY the angel of God appeared ,
       it is possible that He appears on the first day of the 10th month now ….                                                      <<<<
       leaving us two more problems to tackle :
       C) 
       a blessing or a curse : after ‘70 days’ since the middle of the 7th month (?) :
       and this is our current problem :
       these “70 days until the start of the 10th month” seem too good to be true ,
       yet this appears to be exactly the theme that Esau tried to cover up 
       [using the 2Sam version because the 1Chr is more corrupted]  , 
       (13)
      “So Gad came to David, and told him, and said unto him, 
       Shall seven years of famine come unto thee in thy land ?                                                                   [still ‘70 days’?] 
       or wilt thou flee three months before thine enemies, while they pursue thee ?                   [‘10th month’?] 
       or that there be three days pestilence in thy land ?                                                                         [‘on the first day’?] 
       now advise, and see what answer I shall return to him that sent me.”
       here ,
       there is no way we can restore the line because her very structure was changed ,
       but ‘at the end of these 70 days , in the 10th month something will happen’ 
       feels like a plausible intent , does it not , and see the curious ‘date’ phrasing next :
       (15)
      “So the LORD sent a pestilence [..]  from·the·morning (!) even to the time appointed :”
       what does that even mean ?
       while it has “and until the time the appointed-time” which is double , but more important ,
       after the Time-buildup (in above 13) now should have followed a very specific day   
       since that is the proper conclusion after line 13 ;
       suggesting ,  
              from=on the·morning = the day (‘close’) and·until = one (‘first day’) of
              [to]  the time=month (Oth=chOdsh) the appointed-time=seventh (mOed=shbO) 
       and though this is a total guess ofcourse ,
       since there is no way we can próve any “first day of the tenth month”  ,
       the entire buildup leaves us with this tantalizing possibility ;
       then one more theme please ,
        D) the ‘70,000’ : (no ‘144,000’ but) ‘70,000 sons and 70,000 daughters’ (?)
       (line 15, continued)
      “…  and there died of the people from Dan even to Beersheba seventy thousand men.”
       where 1 Chr.21 has similar ;
       now , we can’t help feeling that “this was intended — after the previous 70 (-days)” 
       in order to show *us* the combination ‘7’ X ‘10’ into ‘70’ and even into ‘70,000’ :
       and though ofcourse here the example is Negative ,
       it does show “70,000 men” that died because they did NOT declare ‘the Eden 10’ ,
       and in our opinion juxtaposed to the 70,000 today that WILL have declared it ;
       because of the same ‘7 x 10’ base , and the strong “10” theme ,
       it is more probable hat there are ‘70,000 sons ánd daughters’ (as the 140,000) 
       as the version of “12,000 x 12 (-tribes)” together as 144,000 males     —
       the FACT that the matrix built her “base-12 solar system” coupled with those that 
       represented her as “the 12 princes (sons) of Ishmael” (or perhaps ‘of Esau’) are 
       strong arguments that there were NO ‘12,000 from each of the 12 tribes’ ;
       adding , 
       that Esau in Revelation has those “as males that didn’t fornicate with women” as a 
       rather absurd line , while God consistently says “My sons ánd daughters” ,
       so that it may well be that Esau added his phrase about “only males” to have no one
       question the non-uniform number of this “144,000” as existing of two components 
       (namely “sons & daughters”) since 144 cannot be broken down in ‘two’ 
       [and yes this gives us other problems – but not for this page]  ;
       yet remember that this theme is still linked to ‘the angel of IEUE’ (Christ) !   
     
       sub note :
       we don’t know (yet) what to do with concepts as in the NT about caesar Augustus
       having commanded a census : it very well may have been a by Esau corrupted 
       version of this very theme , but we are very careful to change themes randomly
 

 
may you our Majesty
completely forgive all our pathetic days and our pathetic existence here , 
may you only look at our great care to have your and our paradise back ,
instigated by yourself that called us back from being so hopelessly lost ,
and that you rejoice in the themes we brought back to you
and , if you want please , restore Eden — and us