‘Esther’ : no named ’10 sons of Haman’ but our 10 (!) tribes’ remnant :
Adam ordered his Esau-sons to change the sacred feasts
and ‘Haman throwing the lot (phur) in the first month Nisan’
until “a rejoicing at the 14th in the [..a Fall..] month” shows
which per context can have been ‘Trumpets’ (phur=s-phor)
— undoing Esau’s invented ‘feast of Purim’ —
..it’s sure that Adam ordered his Esau sons
to go change the Fall feasts in God’s scroll
to prevent the plagues on mystery-Babylon
repeating as destroying her in the end-time
| because of the plagues [-about base 10] , the Spring feasts that started the 14th day with a total of ’70 days’ were the standard , wherefore the Fall feasts must mirror this yet with a total of ’40 days’ through base 4 [according to the buildup of the Prophecy] but any “14th” linked to ‘the 7th’ is erased though this ’14th’ could be ‘Trumpets’ followed the 15th by ‘Atonement’ 10 days culminating into ‘Booths’ at the 40th day ; however , the curious buildup within these chapters should show what Esau has tried to bury trying to block us with his fukn ‘Purim’ |
|
| theme |
it’s true that the past months were the most heavy , while the relation with our deity
got virtually broken because of His never ending iron silence — yet we found the full
theme of “the four garments of Dew” , as the base-4 for the 40 day Fall feasts ;
but since we’re not out of the danger-zone yet and in fact the pressure is ramping up
we made another attempt to see whether “the 14th of the 7th” may have appeared
as “a 14th” literally so showing in chapter 9 , and “at the end of the year”
[so that perhaps “the 24th of the 9th” in Haggai (‘feast’ !) was the 14th of the 7th”..?] ;
now ,
any solid end-time Date is virtually impossible to prove in the Scroll yet not because
God would not have explained it but because this theme simply is too corrupted ,
so that the only option we have is to search the buildup of it per ‘the Prophecy’
that placed ’70 days’ for the Spring feasts per base 10 and 7 , and ’40 days’ for the
Fall ones per base 10 because of the four vessels of the four cherubim ;
rendering the “Haman devising something in the spring fór the fall” interesting to us
though Esau corrupted all the other chapters in the scroll concerning our Date ,
he picked this one to go base his counter-attack called “the Purim feast” against us
where his serpent-race sons annually would Ritually bury our very date ,
and must be the reason why , in his blind hate , he maintained “10 sons of Haman”
and even calling them by (their presumed) names , forgetting that the names serve
no purpose but that ‘the remnant of the 10 named tribes of Ishral’ is common ;
also “the wrath of Esau” shows now as “the wrath of Haman” ,
including the “slaying of the little ones” that was Esau smiting the children of Jacob
so that you & we the sons would not discover the base 10 Eden months year ;
but after the (corrupted) situation of both stolen Eden concepts at the beginning ,
the middle section of this chapter is a mess now :
it wanted to tell “how God commanded old-Ishral to keep the 10-months Eden year”
because Adam would search to change this in the scroll to have them to perish ,
and that abandoned this command – which sadly they did – would invoke His anger
[as a second “wrath theme” now corrupted & misplaced here] ;
then turning to the sons of Ishral , you & we , in the end time that will find back the
base 10 of Eden and hence the completion of the (2x) 70,000 remnant ;
wherefore the shown ’14th of that [..Fall..] month’ has our undivided attention
do please realize that even though we gathered all the main themes ,
we cannot force our Date : just hoping that it happens before we be murdered here
the crucial ‘delay’ theme here : from ‘Nisan’ [1st month’] unto a Fall month
in Esau’s story ,
he has “the lot thrown for Haman” in Nisan saying him he has to attack “in the Fall”
but since the whole story is bogus and this aspect doen’t even make sense in itself
the original context was Adam ordering to change the Fall feasts in the Scroll ;
but because Esau messed with that buildup we first need the end of this book
that shows ‘much joy happening at the 14th of the [… some Fall…] month’
but immediately related to “the killed 10 sons of Haman” — our remnant theme :
#1 the ’10 Haman sons’ >> was ‘the remnant of the 10 tribes’ [chapter 9]
he forgot that “the remnant coming from the 10 named tribes” is rather common ,
whereas “mentioning the names of the 10 sons of Haman” serves no purpose ,
9:7-8-9
“And Parshandatha, and Dalphon, and Aspatha, and Poratha, and Adalia, and Aridatha,
and Parmashta, and Arisai, and Aridai, and Vajezatha,
10
The ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews, slew they;
but on the spoil laid they not their hand.”
in this case ,
in context and because of the other lines [see below] as “(2x) 7000 of each”
being “the sons and the daughters” that together make up the number 140,000 ;
connected to this line are two phrases that repeat throughout this section, as
5
“Thus the Jews smote all their enemies with the stroke of the sword, and slaughter,
and destruction, and did what they would unto those that hated them.
And in Shushan the palace the Jews slew and destroyed five hundred men.”
10-b
“…. slew they; but on the spoil laid they not their hand.” [section :]
so that the section would read ,
… “[‘the jews slew’ << to be decoded] [the] [=twice] 5=7 – 100=1000 […….] +
[from] parshandatha=Judah , and dalphon=Joseph , and aspatha=Reuben [+7 more]
[as] the sons – and hammedatha=daughters (‘moved’) of +
the 10 sons=tribes of – haman=Ishral ;
[‘but laid not their hand’ << to be decoded phrase] ” ;