| Gen.29+ : proof : why Jacob had TEN sons — per the Eden base 10 : he just was shown Eden [in the ‘ladder to heaven’ event] , so both his wives begat the ten sons per the pretty 10 tribes of Eden , NO maids ‘Bilhah & Zilphah’ but were about ‘Behemoth & Leviathan’ which the 10 Eden-months (-and her tribes) will rule again ! also , the 10 sons have ‘names representing our trajectory back to Eden’ ; [this section is hidden within the ‘wheat’ (sic) and ‘crystal floor’ theme] [2026-04apr.16-17] |
[important Legal theme]
| it’s good to see the evidence ‘at the base’ now | ||
| in spite of the insane corruptions of this theme : | ||
| now we do not have "blind spots" anymore , | ||
| it shows Esau’s corruptions as the silly duals | ||
| Zilpah & Bilhah here are like his Gog & Magog | ||
| and ‘Machlon & Chilion’ [in ‘book Ruth’] | ||
| but only to conceal ‘the two heavens’ theme | ||
| and promote his (matrix-) 12-months curse (!) , | ||
| and he really did a thorough job with this … | Joseph | |
| Shimeon | ||
| additional proof of the TEN sons in chapters | Judah | |
| 29-30 here is that this is (wrongly) embedded | Issaschar | |
| in the themes of "Jacob being shown Eden" : | Naphtali | (real name ?) |
| for both the ‘wheat’ and ‘crystal-floor’ still are | Zebulon | (not real name) |
| being explained (and hence ‘Bilhah & Zilpah’) | Levi | |
| and revealing the context of the sons | Reuben | (real name ?) |
| Gad | ||
| about their names forming a theme : | Asher | |
| interesting examples but some are difficult : | Benjamin | (not real name) |
theme
… after the above intro we need to disentangle this textual trainwreck ,
and though ofcourse we looked at ‘the sons’ before , the surrounding sections here
remained sealed for us – because of corruption – and therefore until now prevented
us from making the decision whether ‘ten sons’ or ‘twelve sons’ were born :
(chapter 29)
— 1st half : the crystal floor (‘remove stone from the well [cave] ‘)
2nd half : four sons born (also “Bilhah and Zilpah” introduced)
(chapter 30)
— 1st half : next sons born (and a ‘Reuben & mandrakes’ hoax)
— 2nd half : the wheat theme (the alleged ‘speckled rods for herd’)
(chapter 35 !)
— : final son born
giving another context and colour to ‘Jacob and his wives’ [chapter 30]
… and indeed this makes a bizarre read at first ,
but only because we’ve been so used to the toddler-story where jealous wives are
competing for the favour of Jacob as some personal vendetta through which Esau
succeeded to completely obfuscate the involved Eden-theme ;
because ofcourse ‘the vendetta’ was ‘against evil Adam’ and “the return unto hér” !
so that the alleged “Jacob not loving Leah” — or whatever her name was — is bull
since Esau needed a pretext for his false ‘women rivalry’ theme ;
however , this corruption also influenced the names and aspects of the sons ! [sic]
for he first made the women as drama queens in a Jerry-Springer-show who used
their sons as mutual revenge against each other —
yet more than likely they ofcourse knew about the important background because
with each son ‘they (!) declare a reason whý the son will bear that specific name”
and this reveals wise & pretty females instead of the figures that Esau painted
[yet in truth it proves very difficult to reconstruct what their original themes were..]
the several restarts [-of Jacob with his wives returning to the land]
this also is confusing —
Esau did this to hide “the Eden themes as the wheat and crystal floor” with ,
making it difficult to see the sequence of events in the real-time life of Jacob for
example “whén he & his two women returned to their own land” : before or áfter
(some of-) the sons were born ? for reason of this :
God said Jacob he will have 10 sons [-but Laban made him to work for it ?]
Gen.29:16-28 ,
the famous section where Jacob first ‘works 7 years for Rachel’ but then is being
betrayed by Laban and has ‘to work another 7 years’ for her :
though by context we know God promised ten sons to Jacob and though his one
woman ‘Leah’ — or whatever her name was — is introduced here , maybe that did
not show in these lines here :
because Laban may have been ‘an Adam-figure’ working against Jacob ,
as being inspired by ‘the deity’ (Adam) also often showing in the life of Abraham
to hinder the important people and later shows in his war with his brother Esau ;
so that for example ,
it’s possible that Laban tricked him into working 5 + 5 years for him not only
since it would represent ‘the ten sons’ but an essential reason for this possibility
is that ‘the 10 was about to be taken away from Adam — bý the 10 sons’ [sic]
as an enormous metaphysical aspect that can have been in play ,
so that “Jacob had to suffer (‘work’) for the acquiring óf those 5 + 5 attributes”
perhaps as the only thing that Adam could do — and wóuld ! — to at least make
an attempt to hinder phase 1 of the upcoming loss of ‘his’ base 10 …..
does this feel true please ?
so that by coincidence “the first four sons born” [end of chapter 29] can be true , <<<
and even next chapter 30 opening with ‘Rachel’ : but NOT “because she could
not beget children” but because after anóther 5 year Jacob married Rachel :
that ‘the maid Bilhah’ shows (in 3) which was about Leviathan & Behemoth ,
may have said “that now the óther 5 sons would be born” — the base 10 theme
Zilpah & Bilhah , Gog & Magog , Machlon & Chilion [-and other false duals]
it took us some time to find the pattern , right ,
but once you know it’s everywhere [-also as ‘Hophni & Phinehas’ the alleged
two sons of Eli in Samuel 1 , the tear-jerker about ‘Hannah that was childless’
which even shows “10 sons” as base-10 ;
and moreover in the “two kings of Og and Sihon” always combined with the
phrase “the half tribe of Manasseh” – as ‘the two halves of heaven’] ;
being extensive here please ,
to confirm that “Bilhah & Zilpah” is one of the first types of these corruptions
that always show the same cluster of key-concepts around them which in
this case proves there were TEN sons
the 10 sons’ names
… because this is all about “winning back the 10” from Adam that gave it away
but ‘to be won back by souls so that they will be restored in their pretty Originals’ [sic]
[for the Attribute is of the sacred people as the soul IN her Original] ,
therefore the names of the sons should reflect this trajectory of restoration ;
ofcourse as the point we run into problems here :
— two ‘sons’ never existed ,
and by context we need to find ‘who of them’ were (Esau’s) moles ,
— their names may not be true ,
first depending upon Negative or even corrupt word-roots (sic) ,
but even more important needing to match the lines their mothers spoke (next) ,
— their birth line-up may not be true
where this sequence is also important because of next :
the lines that their both mothers spoke at birth
this is the only information we have —
the mothers first stated a reason and their given name reflects that theme ,
BUT because Esau turned all of the context in his “women rivalry” form we need
to find what was the real metaphysical context , so to speak ;
yet here is the second major catch please :
because ‘one line each’ is prone to corruption , in Deut.33 [-and another one]
God had ‘Moses bless the 12=10 tribes’ — including descriptions about them ,
but Esau saw that danger and turned it into an unfathomable mess , as well ,
where unsurprisingly he added two extensive ‘prophecies’ to his hoax tribes : <<<
so that indeed we have Nothing to go by …
yet : ‘knowing the intent’ is good enough :
for if we reconstruct the intent , even before looking at the names themselves ,
they MUST have included mentioning “the number (-of Eden)” and very likely
even contained the word “10” in the descriptions by their mothers , right ,
together with the buildup of the story :
for example one name can have meant ‘overcome’ [-in context of ‘the flesh’]
denoting the war of the soul to get Out of this silly Earth prison for her ,
and ofcourse as speaking for áll Jacob-souls since these were ‘his own tribes’ ;
in this way ,
we are not bound “to restore all of their names & meanings” since it’s virtually
impossible to trace what Esau did , but won the Legal right through context
[sub :
many think that “the patriarchs list of names from Adam until Noah” would
also spell (sic) out a certain story leading up ‘to Jesus’ — but that is a wrong
idea for many reasons while “the explanation” of any theme buildup there is
just too vague , and most of all : it was never intended as the theme here
decided through the lines by their mothers specifying the Attributes !]
the names
son #1 : Reuben [valid :]
(32)
“And Leah conceived, and bare a son, and she called his name Reuben: for she said,
Surely the LORD hath looked upon my affliction ; now therefore my husband will love me.”
as
officially : from “see + son” (rea + ben) , interpreted as “behold ! , a son”
but : what is the name good for ?
we need : suppose ‘my man’ was “the Original (-for the soul)” (aiSH=qdSH) , clearly ‘the goal’ ,
what would that require ?
the verb (oun) ‘affliction’ often is “being humble” in prophets , as pósitive ,
and as the desired character of the soul that will return to Eden ,
roots : see (-by God) + humble as “rea + b-oun ,
as ‘viewed (-by God) – as the humble one (‘soul’)‘ (rea-b-oun)
and “that will be loved=restored (aeb=sheb) – [=in] [=her] man=sacred one (‘Original’)‘ ;
how is that please ?
rank : this indeed is like “the start of the whole trajectory” , the condition of it ,
and again – valid for every Jacob-soul (but needed here as singular)
but many others are much more difficult :
son #2 : Shimeon [valid :]
(33)
“And she conceived again, and bare a son; and said, Because the LORD hath heard
that I [was] hated, he hath therefore given me this [son] also: and she called his name Simeon.”
as
officially : from “heard” (shama) + suffix
line : problematic & corrupt , and likely the theme is also :
the line suggests ‘a distance’ but the “heard because hated” is just not good enough ,
we need : the ‘saved’ concept , but the question is what verb ,
perhaps ‘(he) hearkens – [=to] the hated=saved one (shna=iash)‘ ! ,
but important fóllowed by “something He gives” >> Christ , but how ?
the “this-one” (ZE) is nonsense and could be ‘sacrifice’ (ZEbach) ,
roots : as “the one hearkened (-by God)‘ ,
and “that is hated=saved – [=by] the given – this=sacrifice – to [=him] ‘
even though the exact colour may alter somewhat
[and perhaps first “hearkened” and (only) later “restored”]
so by enormous coincidence (Sir ..) we have two now already
that even can have been the original sequence !
son #3 : Levi [valid :]
(34)
“And she conceived again, and bare a son; and said ,Now this time will my husband
be joined unto me, because I have born him three sons: therefore was his name called Levi.”
as
officially : from “to join” (lavah) (join, unite, attach)
(but the root is suspicious to us — and first used here)
line : problematic & corrupt ideas ,
note how ‘the husband’ (Originals) again appears ! , and suspicious ‘numbers’
while “the·once” (phom) (time, times, once, this once, now’ [following ‘now’ !]
is tampered also showing at other sons next below ;
we need : after being saved , in previous , now a conclusion ? but to ‘what’ ?
as ‘the one to be united’ (?)
and “(for) now – the·once=soul (PHam=nePHes) – (will be) united +
(with-) [..] the man=sacred one (‘Original’) – to=for me=her ,
[where noun ‘soul’ was corrupted & moved]
yet probably important : as “conditional” — because of the other themes :
the addition ‘three – sons’ is tricky but the subject is ‘the Originals’ now ,
[=as] – born – for=into (?) [..] – the three=ten – (eden-) son=tribes” ;
and this feels right :
téchnically the term “re-born” is true (though prophets have ‘restored’)
while we wouldn’t use it for wrong connotation [New Age and KJV – sic] ;
but more important now the link is made unto the 10 pretty Eden-tribes <<<
[sub : the root of ‘levi’ :
no nitpicking but just for the Legal — ofcourse the “reborn” suggests
a stronger term like ‘to join’ (-lavah) but Esau often invented roots to
deflect just enough from the original intent , hence our suspicion ;
next problem for us is “that we are so úsed to terms” [like ‘Levi’ here]
that re-naming feels too concocted :
he could have been called “Luni” or “Ishabi” (verbs -lun and -iashab)
as “(the one that will-) dwell (-in)” but that is undoable and especially
when áfter this hundreds of next instances should be adapted …….]
son #4 : Judah [tricky name but-] [valid :]
(35)
“And she conceived again, and bare a son: and she said, Now will I praise the LORD:
therefore she called his name Judah; and left bearing.”
as
officially : from “to praise” (iadah) (give thanks, confess) (throw 2x)
(but root is suspicious — and first used here)
line : seems to be incomplete [=erasure] and in truth ‘is flat’, “the·once I-shall-acclaim IEUE”
while we know that Esau always had a specific hate against Judah ;
like the deflective (-lavah) [from ‘Levi’] similar happened here but we lack an
additional line — if that was not hidden as closing verbs :
containing (-iad) “hand” in prophets mainly used as “own doing” or “own being”
[‘my hand will + action’ or ‘give someone in + the hand of’] it sometimes lacks a
specific colour to have a certain action to run properly ;
“the·once=soul – (will be) praise=the own autonomous being – [through] IEUE
and added
[=as] left=standing (-omd) – [=in] [+his] bearing=image (?) (iaLad=tseLem)” (?)
ofcourse this is an attempt please
[where ‘image’ is the proper noun not as ‘idol’ but as ‘made in image’] ,
and could be the conclusion of previous ‘Levi’ name
[sub : question is , why the expression “house Judah (-and that of Ishral)”
IF NOT connected to ‘the Behemoth & Leviathan’ theme — so that we still
lack 1 son here often connected with Judah : ‘Benjamin’ ,
so why did Esau move that fifth son far away as in chapter 35 (!) ?
and if that wasn’t enough , has given that son a false name ?]
[here : lacking the 5th son “Ben-iamin”]
[next Gen.30 :
now it is Rachel’s turn — though she was not ‘barren’ for that was the
story by Esau but probably “for she married Jacob now” (see above) ;
in the 2nd half shows the “Jacob and the mysterious stalks” that was
the ‘wheat stole from the Sanctuary’ theme :
can we say that these two women “represented the wheat sheaves” ?
[and what about 1 Sam. ‘Elkanah and his two women’ which was the
sáme theme as we saw earlier ?] ,
note :
only ‘the deity’ (not : IEUE) shows here , which ofcourse means that
Esau rewrote áll of this – but with a chance that ‘Adam’ is involved ;
and , *possibly*,
a “revenge (upon him) , no ‘jealousy’ thing (roots -qna and -nqm) :
were the first lines an intro to the next 5 sons ? :
(1) rachel=IEUE – (will) jealous=take revenge (-upon) – the sister=deity (‘Adam’) (?)
[………….] (and-) [+he] (will) die ,
(2) Rachel – [..] said : instead of – the deity …… [‘now something about us’]
(3) the knees=first-borns (BRK=BKR) – (will be) brought forth – [by] on=IEUE ….
son #5 : Dan (?) [-related to intro :] [wrong name but-] [valid :]
(6)
“And Rachel said, God [=elohim] hath judged me, and hath also heard my voice,
and hath given me a son: therefore called she his name Dan.”
as
officially : from “to judge [-a case] ” (din) , very suspicous root for d-n ‘is’ nothing ;
son #6 : [wrong name but-] [valid :]
(8)
“And Rachel said, With great [=so where is ‘elohim’?] wrestlings
have I wrestled with my sister, and I have prevailed:
and she called his name Naphtali.”
as
officially : from ‘to wrestle’ (pathal) but seems invented ;
line : many problems ; ‘my sister’ could be another form of ‘the sacred ones’ (Originals)
while a subject may have been left out ;
son #6 : Gad [invented]
(11)
“And Leah said, A troop cometh: and she called his name Gad.”
as
officially : from ‘troop, gang, raid’ (gad) and “fortune (as in wheel of fortune)” g-d , invented ;
shown “K in·raid Qָ he-came Q raid” so even Esau messed up ,
— but this is no valid explanation line , not even close
— and no so can have a négative name ;
son #7 : Asher [invented]
(11)
“And Leah said, Happy am I, for the daughters will call me blessed: and she called his name Asher.”
as
officially : from ‘happy’ (ashr) , invented – and not the same as ‘to bless’ ,
invented verb hidden by Esau as showing often in the by him written ‘psalms’ ;
negative root (Assyria link) ;
typical ’empty’ Esau line , ‘daughters call me happy’ – and what daughters ?
son #7 : Ishshakar
(18)
“And Leah said, God hath given me my hire,
because I have given my maiden to my husband: and she called his name Issachar.”
as
officially : from ‘reward, hire, wage’ shkar — as “carry (nsha) + reward (skar)”
but verb is rather negative as in ‘transaction’ = suspect ;
line : compare next Gen.31:7 ,
Jacob saying about Laban “and he changed my wages ten times” ,
as ‘the wage=number (mshkrth=mshpth !) – 10 – of times=Eden (mnim=odn)‘
that must be the subject hére [though Esau was not stupid for he invented
the root (-shphchth) for ‘maiden’] ;
but here a ‘carrying – the number’ must be the clue – as having won it ,
and the line syntax can have been messed up also :
we need : as ‘the one carrying – the number’
for ‘the deity (‘Adam’) – gave away – me=our (!) wage=number + [< good syntax]
tricky :
which – (is) given back – [as] maid=possession (?) (shphchth=mrasha) +
to [=our] man=sacred ones (‘Originals’)“
this feels good ,
and is probably enough : though “(number-) 10” (asher=oirsh) can have
showed it would complicate the line while , combined with other sections ,
originally it was clear enough ‘what’ the number is
… so that we only have 2 left : Joseph and “Ben-iamin”
annex
this was valuable Majesty for we returned to one of the important beginnings
and this time how you started your journey with Jacob
we did see , have seen , the beauty of him returning to his sacred ones
but the past .. two years all of that diminished , the wider view diminished ,
because of the .. infathomable themes that demanded to be found
that is okay ,
you know how pretty that reunion will be
… we’re exausted , please get your sons & daughters