Mt.15   : possible : no ‘5 breads & 2 fishes’ — that were ‘multiplied’ ,
              but ‘ the wrong date [49th day]  of Acceptance addressed’ :
              the sons must multiply (base-) 10 x 7 to be ‘the 70th day’ 
              for the ‘70,000 sons & daughters’ [+children !]  , no ‘5000’  
              [very readable ! — text mirrors: Mk.8, Mt.14, Mk.6, Lk.9, Jn.6] 
                    
                                                                         [2026-07jul.21] 

 
were 5=10 and 2=7 multiplied into 12=70 ?
in order to get to the 7=70th baskets=day ?
for the 5000=70,000 as the men=remnant ?

 

 
…it is because of never-ending trying to verify
if indeed we got the ‘7 x 10’ combination right 
as an idea hopelessly corrupted in the Scroll , 
but this text possibility feels good    —
just ago we had the “12 from base 10” theme
in the alleged “10 minas Parable” supporting 
that here may be a closing of this main theme ,
moreover ,
in this same Mt.14 this section is preceded by
the ‘John beheaded’ hoax of which we posed
it was about ‘the two halves of heaven’ (page) :
…. do we have a chance ? 

Mt.15 : possible : no ‘5 breads & 2 fishes’ — that were ‘multiplied’                                   No

 

 

                                                                                        theme
 
     … that said , it’s not easy to (re-) project a possible theme upon the toddler-stories
     that usually are cut off from any (preceding-) context , requiring several attempts
     until the proper theme appears to fit ,
     where for example the ’10 minas parable’ also was about ‘multiplying’ (as ‘money’) 
     yet the attributes there were ‘several groups’ divided by ‘a certain period of time’ ,
     where here “the multitude of 5000” must make a crucial difference … 
 
     just like the reasoning we found (?)
     in the 1Samuel, ‘Judges’ and now 2Kings chapter , all about the same prophecy ,
     we postulated the reasoning ‘7 x 10 hence the 70,000 remnant and the 70th day’ 
     though it can only be a probable interpretation since all is very corrupt ;
     that this section appears to confirm that reasoning either means ‘we want it to’ ,
     or that indeed it may have been the original intent : let’s say both please :
     for the text is eerie close to what indeed happened ..
 
 
for you Sir
 

 
start (part 3 of 3) :
 
           [start : because of the invented ‘bridge’ we cannot be sure what exactly it said ,
           but per context perhaps “the sons (‘you & we’) wait for Acceptance (‘Weeks’) 
                                                                    but they have the wrong date — ’49 days’ in KJV ,
                                                                    as a corrupt date ,
                                                                    hence Esau’s “blind, dumb, maimed” etcetera :] 
 
Mt.14:13
“When Jesus heard [of it] , he departed thence by ship into a desert place a part: 
and when the people had heard [thereof] , they followed him on foot out of the cities.”
Mt.15:30-31
“And great multitudes came unto him, having with them [those that were]  lame, blind, dumb, 
maimed, and many others, and cast them down at Jesus’ feet; and he healed them:
Insomuch that the multitude wondered, when they saw the dumb to speak, the maimed to be whole, 
the lame to walk, and the blind to see: and they glorified the God of Israel.”
 
 
mt15:32 ,
“Then Jesus called his disciples [unto him] , and said, I have compassion on the multitude, 
because they continue with me now three days, and have nothing to eat: 
and I will not send them away fasting, lest they faint in the way.
14:14-15
“And Jesus went forth, and saw a great multitude, and was moved with compassion toward them, 
and he healed their sick. And when it was evening, his disciples came to him, saying, 
This is a desert place, and the time is now past; send the multitude away, 
that they may go into the villages, and buy themselves victuals.”
    a
    [……….. 5x unknown ……….] 
    b
    [for-]  (the-) 3=49th (?) – day – they (will have) continue=waited (?) – me ,        
 [’49th’ – why not ?] 
    c
    and=but – not – (have been) have=delivered    +         
    d
    (at the-) any=day of – eat=acceptance (phago=plēthynō) ;
    e
    [……. unknown …. “and they (will be about) to faint” (?) for that’s true ………] 

    here ,
    a) in [14]  “the hour is now past” reminds of “the summer is past and we’re not saved” in Jeremiah 8 ;
    b) verb ‘to eat’ (phago) is different as later where it was ‘to deliver’ , see below ;
    c) perhaps “49th” seems overdone but a number is a number ,
         and if we make that 3=7 + day=weeks” we get in trouble with the 2 breads & 6 fishes 
         because of the different fractal — so we stay with ‘days’ ;
 
Mt.15:33 [only] 
“And his disciples say unto him, 
Whence should we have so much bread in the wilderness, as to fill so great a multitude?”
33
[=then]  – the – disciples=sons [….]  – (will) say – (to) him=themselves :            
[< ‘thinking out loud’] 
b
whence=why – (are there to) us      +
c
(the-) so much=same (?) – bread=numbers (?) (artos=arithmos) – in – (the) desert=scroll ,
      d
      [impossible :]  “and not the one we satisfy=found ?” [-as attempt , see next :] 

 
Mt.14:17
[15:34-b same] 
“And Jesus saith unto them, How many loaves have ye?
“And they say unto him, We have here but five loaves, and two fishes.”
a
and – they (will) say – (to) him=themselves :
b
(have) we – not – have=found – (the-) here=number [..]  – 5=10 of [+the house of]  breads=Eden
c
and (or ‘next to’ ?) – (the-) 2=7 of – fishes=God (ichthos=theos) ? ;

 
[Mt.14:18] 
“He said, Bring them hither to me.”
[=then]  – [=they]  (will) said=remember (?)
    b
    (what-) [=he]  bring=spoke – (to) me=Moses – [at-]  here=Sinai (?) ,    +       

    here ,
    a) it may seem searched but we need a pretext for ’70th day & 70,000′ — immediately ;
          while He ofcourse knew that those ’70 sons’ were nót corrupted ;
    b) the ‘bring me’ showed in next line ? : 
 
Mt.15:35-36
“And he commanded the multitude to sit down on the ground.  
Ad he took the seven loaves and the fishes, and gave thanks, and brake [them] , 
and gave to his disciples, and the disciples to the multitude.”  
[mt.14:19:] 
“And he commanded the multitude to sit down on the grass, and took the five loaves, 
and the two fishes, and looking up to heaven, he blessed, and brake, 
and gave the loaves to [his]  disciples, and the disciples to the multitude.”
a
[..]  to command – the – throngs=70 (?)      +
b
to sit down=come up (sic) [+with him]  – on – the – grass=mount (chortos=oros) :
b
[+and]  [+they (will) understand]  – (that-) and=by – take=multiplying (?) (no match’)     +
c
the – 5=7=10 of – breads=Eden – and – the – 2=7 of – fishes=God (ichthos=theos)       +
d
[….1x….]  – up=this – heaven=number (ouranos=arithmos) – (was) blessed=reached ,

     [next : unknown :
     “…. and brake, and gave the loaves to [his]  disciples, and the disciples to the multitude.”
     perhaps “and so He would do this time” (?)
 
Mt.15:37
“And they did all eat, and were filled: 
and they took up of the broken [meat]  that was left seven baskets full.” 
37
and=because – (the-) all=same – (is) eat=valid (?) – (for the-) satisfied=appointed time (?)      +
b
[=when]  – they=I (will) pick up=gather (sic !)     +
c
the – fragments=remnant (klasma=hypoleimma) of – surpasses=Ishral (‘moved’)
d
[at-]  the 12=70th – full=day (‘moved’) – (that is-) basket=Acceptance ;

       here ,
       a) but now we have to wait whether the interpretation is true – or not …
       b) spuridas + full [here] 
             kophinus + full [Mt.15:20]   >> ‘acceptance’ is (apodochē) ;
       c) so that it *may* be that He never used ‘Weeks’ but ‘Acceptance’ ?
 
Mt.15:38
“And they that did eat were four thousand men, beside women and children.”
38
[=for]  – the – ones (that will be) eat=delivered (esthió=sōtēria)     +
b
(will) be – (the-) 4 + 1000 = 70 + 1000 – men=sons ,
c
[and-]  (the-) [+70]  apart=1000 (chóris=chilioi) – women=daughters                                   
[2 x 70,000] 
d
and=together with – (the-) little boys and girls (‘so shown’) ;                                              
[< in part 2 of 3]  
 

                                           …. how does that sound please — is it possible ?