may 11

spoiler : … finally a useful line as “the 5 sacrificial-priests” in similar context as “the four sons of (and) Horus”  so that we tend to keep the Maruts as ‘4’ in number , also much easier for us to connect to our 4 Cherubs ; then a surprise : very deeply hidden appeared “the number 10 theme”  which by context ‘they use to smite Eden with’ , as a type offering-knife Adam (!) must have given them , as the probable secret of 4 x 10 = ‘the 40 days’ …

                                                                                          theme
 
    … there was no way – at all – to see “the number of the Maruts” until the line in [2:34]  :
    now that ‘4’ (plus Rudra-Horus) is very assumable we need to go to the Zechariah
    chapter where after the (corrupted-) first half about ‘horses’ a totally unrelated section
    follows about “four crowns” — which however should be about our “four + cherubs”
    where no (person) ‘Cheldai’ appeared but “the (living-) animals” with the (-chi) root !
    so that there were no ‘four people that returned from exile’ but ‘the four cherubs’ … 
 
    but now comes the messy part — this page :
    we knew that the serpent-race was hellbent to get our four cherubs , or better ,
    specifically “the three that represent animals” representing the (eden-) qualities of 
    the south-land , for they themsélves are ‘animals’ and desired those qualities for 
    their new habitation , after Eden fell ; 
    so that the answer must be in the theme ‘realms themselves’ yet how to approach
    an uncatchable subject like that ? it made no sense – until ‘Trita’ :
 
    the ‘three-fold (matrix-) (serpent-race) realm’ 
    … Rg-Veda often talks about “3” and it is consistently linked to the ‘realm’ theme for
    example in their own deity ‘Trita’ (three, third, three-fold) in combination with phrases
    as “the three worlds” – probably ‘three-fold’ , “(filling !-) the three (matrix-) seas” that
    must be a dimensional theme ;
    we don’t know what “a three-fold realm” could mean but perhaps linked to the three
    worlds “of land-animals , of birds and of fishes” together forming a sound whole 
    [and remember théy were ‘fishes’ and ‘jackals’ and whatever ugly animals !]  ,
    as a three-fold realm they stole from Heaven :
    since they were placed (‘by Satan’ ?) upon the south-land as the shore of Heaven ,
    as the very reason why God started eden there in the first place , to repulse them !
 
    God countered them with His four cherubs 
    … that must be the explanation why “three are animal-like , yet one is human-like” :
    He literally ‘created man in his own image’ as ruling the three-fold animal-world
    but specifically “the by the serpent-race type fetched three-fold animal-world” ;
    so that it can hardly have said in Genesis “Adam gave names to the animals” for
    that seems a silly job , but “ruled the animal (-bodies) of the serpent-race” !
    this would make sense !
    therefore the whole Annunaki-serpent-race was crying of fear !
 
    so the serpent-race sought to steal the four cherubs
    … which from their POV must be the next logical step :
    as far as the serpent-race was concerned [-because not yet the corrupt-type
    souls as ‘the Ammon sons’ , the sons of Adam , their “brothers in crime” had
    come fully into being]  , 
    they could only regain power ‘by incarnating into an eden-type body’    —
    we don’t know hów that was possible but we just saw “Horus and the Nest” in
    PT and we try find back in Rg-Veda “the hero born in the (eden-) nest” ;
    and remember the other Rg page saying “this was done for the great battle” 
 
    so one *cough* ‘courageous serpent-race soul’ — Rudra , in spells ‘Horus’ — 
    entered (sic) the eden-mother and came forth of her with an eden-type body ,
    immediately escaping to the North [their location now]  , 
    and then it gets tricky :
    either Rudra “devised four concepts that stole the four eden-attributes” or he
    had “four óther serpent-souls born by the mother to steal those attributes” :
    problem is the vast host of “concepts” and “ideas” as presented in the spells ,
    however ,
    this Rg-Veda [2:34]  talks about “four (human-like) sacrifical-priests” so that 
    indeed “four literal serpent-race-souls may have obtained an eden-body by
    which they automátically obtained the rule over the three-fold realm” 
    … does that make sense please ?
 
    that they are ‘5’ – just as ‘Horus + his four sons’ isn’t necessarily a problem
    since the four eden-cherubs showed the rule of the by God created male 
    who was separate as “the fifth” – just as the later situation of Rudra-Horus ;
    however for many reasons it’s better in our case to say ‘representing the 4’ 
    as to denote a separate “fifth” – which will bring us trouble ;
 
    the (matrix-) ’10-fold 4′ (as the hostile ’40’)
    … we don’t want to go against (Sanskrit-) institutions as Monier-Williams 
    but we have a credible case that “the concept 10” , as a word connotated
    with Eden , which was “given” (!) to the monsters (-though it does not say
    directly ‘by Adam’) , was used by them “to constantly smite Eden with”  — 
    though this is very difficult to prove
    [as is our theme of ‘Adam having obtained the ’10’ at that tree]  ,
    it is a very … elegant explanation for ‘a judgment period of 40 days’ 
    in the same category of “the 7 multiplied by 10 as the Babylon 70 years” ,
    as the same 40 days we’re in right now – until Weeks :
    or why would this theme be pushing upon us these days .. ?
 
   
                                                        Rg-Veda : the ’10’ and the ‘4’ 
 
    below section is only for the incurable die-hards needing to understand :
    bless you deeply if you succeed to finish reading this impossible mess —
 
    but (the number) ’10’ (-in Rg-Veda) was given to them (by Adam) ?
    … though we still cannot fully próve that Adam caused the “10” in Gen.4 ,
    curiously this number in Rg-veda seems to link to eden because of the -ś in
    the root (-daśa) “10” combined with very strange descriptions related to ’10’ ;
    within a Maruts chapter [2:34] 
    (12) They , the daśagva ,                                                                                                   [the ‘slaying 10-s’ ?] 
              first of all brought the sacrifical ceremony ,                                                 [‘sacrificing eden’]  
              sending us the dawn of Ushas (‘dawn’) ;                                                    [‘stolen eden-dawn’] 
    here ,
    the ‘Ushas’ can be traced to eden , so that “their daily sacrificial ceremony
    is by this ’10’ in order to (daily) steal the eden-dawn” is a solid interpretation ;
    this strange (-daśagva) can be linked to the Maruts here , who because of
    their origin may have “inherited the 10 from Adam” [but too complicated now]  ;
    this chapter [2:34]  continues (below) but to stay with the strange (-daśagva) :
    [8:12]  has ,
    (1) Indra [..]  , you smite the greedy foe for that which we long for ;
    (2) [you]  who is helped by (?) Adhrigu    +                                                                  [‘slayer (of eden)’] 
           the daśagva                                                                                                                           [the ‘slaying 10’ ?] 
    here ,   
    the (-adhrigu) cannot be traced while (-dasagva) [also with -g]  is singular now ,
    where both roots are accusative (negative) , having the same ‘dawn’ theme ;
    but then comes the problem [and we stepped in that trap before]  :
    all chapters are written by different authors , “poets” (-Aṅgirases) often writing
    their own names so that the dictionary of Monier has here : dasagra , ‘decimus’,
    a poet and his family , with naga-gva worshipping Indra” — now who are we to
    doubt Monier ? yet in the third and final example there’s something wrong :
    in chapter [10:62]  ,
    the author ‘speaks to his fellow-poets’ paraphrased as “you do so good work 
    you guys , for you are helping Indra you guys” – often mentioning ‘you poets’ , 
    after which must follow :
    (6)  Navagva and Daśagva, noblest Aṅgiras , together given (!) tó the gods ,    +
    (7)  With Indra for associate they were made the institutors of the sacrifice
           [then ‘fór to be the (matrix-) stable full of (matrix-) cattle and horses’?] 
    so ,
    likely not “Navagva and Dasagva ARE the noblest Angiras’ ! , yet must be a
    construct as previous ‘Adhdrigu & Dasagva’ , and where (-nava) is ‘new’ but
    with that -g ending perhaps as “the new slayer (that is-) the slaying 10” ? 
    because in (7) THEY are ‘the sacrificial priests’ helping Indra – as chapter 8 !
    for the whole point please ,
    is the case of ‘the ’10’ being the number that is slaughtering Eden’ !  
    which would support the interpretation of ‘the 10 coming from Adam’ , 
    and hence it was ‘given (-mah) to the gods’ ! not ‘as power’ ofcourse since
    Adam is not stupid – but as “sacrificial knife” given to them where through 
    some type Ritual they keep desolating Eden …
    however ,
    we still don’t know whether the Maruts were (are) ‘4’ or ’40’ by having taken
    this ’10’ theme .. what can be the most logical ?
 
    [back to 2:34 :] 
    so the chapter had the (-dasagva) ’10 (-slayer)’ in relation to the Maruts ;
    after that line 12 , see previous , 13 follows with calling them “Rudra’s” who
    is ‘Horus’ but as identifying them with Rudra (Horus) , but still the Maruts are
    the subject in next : 
    (14) Soliciting their high protection for our help, 
              with this our adoration we sing praise to them ,
              Whom, for assistance, [like]  the five – protective (?) – sacrificial-priests 
              [that]  Trita has made to reborn (?) on his cart (‘world’) to aid us ;
    here ,
    THE important question is “who are those five” ?
    there is no reference to another subject , while (-hotR) ‘sacrificial priest’ is a
    term for a person – unlike the ‘institutors of the sacrifice [as the slaying 10] ‘ in
    previous section which was a conceptual expression ;
    neither it shows the word “like (-the 5 priests)” : and because previous line (13)
    called them ‘Rudras’ – ‘are the Maruts + Horus the 5 priests’… ?
    you see how important this is   —
    for now it suggests that we have ‘Horus & his four sons’ here !
    moreover , even a juxta of numbers shows : saying how ‘Trita’ ,their three-fold 
    realm is helped “by these five” : or who élse is the subject ? the same four (5)
    that bring the eden-type dimension to him as matrix-realm ! 
 
    then what about the 7 (x?) 7 (-Maruts?) in [5:52]  ?
    … at the end , as per Griffith ,
    it has ,
    (16) Princes, who, when I asked their kin, named Pṛśni as their Mother-cow,
              And the impetuous Rudra they, the Mighty Ones, declared their Sire. 
    (17) The mighty ones, the seven times seven, have singly given me hundred gifts. 
             I have obtained on Yamuna famed wealth in kine and wealth in steeds.
    but here ,
    the ‘mighty’ (in 7) is (-śākina) again with that Eden-related -ś while the version
    of this noun is nominative-singular-masculine so no “strong ones” here ! ;
    the wisdom lib has “seven times seven all-potent (Maruts)” that is a bit better 
    yet perhaps the subject was NOT ‘the Maruts’ !
    there is a word-play here as “seven + seven + one-one + hundred” yet hard to
    decode : perhaps ,
             (16)  …. declared Prsni [as]  their mother cow ,
                       [as]  the skilfull ones (‘Maruts’)                                                                              [again that -ś] 
                      [that]  declared the impetuous (?) Rudra [to be]  their father ;
          (17)  [while?]  the sevenfold + seven + of (eden-) might                                       [again that -s] 
                                       [for?]  the single + one                                                                               [‘the matrix’ ?] 
                                      a hundred-fold + to bestow ,
                  [by]  to learn about (?) – the gifts – [through]  the Yamuna (‘Nile’?) ….. (etc) ;  
  here ,
  ofcourse it is an attempt — but after mentioning Prsni and Rudra (‘the matrix’)
  perhaps now they addressed ‘eden’ – NOT “their own number” ; though we 
  cannot rule out that it said “7 x 7 (they) by a single one (Horus)” : but then the
  continuation as the closing makes little sense