these type pages will be a bit messy
but only because this important theme 
has been incredibly corrupted by Esau
 

… ofcourse we never trusted this “book Ruth” as some romanticized story without any depth which is typical of by Esau redacted chapters , where even an idea as “Boaz was like Christ” is but an over-spiritualized automatic reaction that will bury the intended theme even deeper

Absolutely Not ….

 
going through the text three aspects jump out :
a ‘redemption’ and ‘grain’ theme with a ‘10’,
where fortunately some months ago we found
the ‘redeem the 10 !’ said to us as the number
of the house of Eden that Adam had sold out ,
yet now also the “wheat vs barley” theme got
connected to that same ‘base 10’ — but what
was their correlation in this corrupted text …?
 
 
                                                                                  theme 
 
   … before starting the breakdown first some good news :
   apart from the huge find during the past months about ‘redeeming the 10 of Eden’ 
   there appears to be an indication of ‘Unleavened’ as our possible date because of
   a scene in chapter two in which “Ruth gleans grain at the field of Boaz” who calls her 
   to him to have a break and then invites her “to eat bread dipped in vinegar” together ,
   where the root of ‘vinegar’ (-chmts) is the same as that of ‘leaven’ (-chmts) ;
   now please ,
   you remember the (posted-) CT Spell that seemed to explain “how their matrix barley
   light-particles enveloped the eden-wheat light-particles” — which is a perfect image 
   for whý God hates “leaven” so much , as the evil copy glued to wheat !
   [we’ll need to do a separate page on this but this context feels very true !]  ;
   and since right now we are with the “wheat vs barley” theme we would be just in time
   for the day of Unleavened which IS about this very subject : unleavened bread made
   of PURE wheaten flour as – hopefully – the final offering you & we can give unto Him   
 
   in top of this comes the ‘redeeming aspect’ ,
   and interesting is that the “redeeming” aspect that as word-root (-gl) doesn’t have the
   colour of ‘divine salvation’ (root -iash) but is used in human context, first appearing in 
   lines as “redeeming you out from Egypt” wherefore it also can apply to human action
   in the form of “the sons redeeming the 10” — so that’s all good ;
   and curiously , the combination ‘wheat & redemption’ must be a valid one seeing how
   Esau very much sought to bury this connection : 
 

 
   the ‘10’ showing in every chapter must have been ‘base-10’ since we did the Jeremiah
   chapter where allegedly ‘he buys a field in Anathoth to redeem it’ but of which
   we found it was about “the sons redeeming the number 10 of the house of Eden” —
   also because the ‘high places’ show in that chapter which is about ‘the matrix
   year of 12 months’ ;
   reasoning from there ,
   after staring endlessly at the root of the ten freaken “camels” (in Gen.24) it turned out 
   that Esau searched another word for ‘to redeem’ : so that this story never
   happened , and not “some servant of Abraham had to search a wife”, then giving her
   “bracelets of a [weight of]  10 shekel” but instead ‘the sons finding base-10 in order
   to redeem it’ !
 
   if the above is true , did this ‘Ruth’ have the same theme ?                                                            <<<
   it does show a ’10’ (in the form of ‘ten men’ as superfluous addition) ánd has the main
   theme of ‘redemption’ so that now we need to see how the ‘cereal’ may relate to these ,
   but sadly the above examples do not help   —
   the “buying a field to redeem it” was Esau’s version first in Leviticus 25 then repeated
   in Jeremiah 32 and most likely also here , but the “cereal” lacks in the Jer.32 chapter 
   while it is unclear what happens with “the wheat and barley” (-mentioned in 41:8) ; 
   in this alleged ‘Gedaliah story’ ,
   that same line has “finding + 10” (sic) and previously even something being “in a pit” 
   which can only be the stolen crystal floor of the Sanctuary that will return to Eden ;
   but what was the phrasing of the barley and wheat theme connected to this ?
 
                                                                                      problem
 
 the redeemed ’10’ : but where is the sceptre ? and how fits ‘the wheat’ here ?
for this reason please ,   
we have “the breastplate of the 10 gemstones of fire (-within)” of the 10 tribes that
link to the 10 gems at the eden-star ruling the Behemoth & Leviathan realms (2 x 5) 
and because the star itself is part of the sceptre (‘axis’) this aspect seems all good ;
but how do the both ears of wheat fit into the ‘sceptre attribute’ ?
are they an integral part of it even “they stand to the left and right of the sceptre” 
(as separate) if that is what was explained about the ‘two olive trees’ in Zecheriah ?
and áre they an integral part ,
because “through them a palette of creations is made – through base 10” ? 
[which the matrix abused by making their illegal base-12 (Zodiac theme) by them ?] 
 
part of this problem is ‘that we don’t know yet what was the set-up in the tabernacle’ 
so that we lack a workable concept about the wheat sheaves (-or stalks)    —
what we dó know is that “the oil (of the wheat) is conveyed by the seven Torches to
the daughter of tsiun in her star” but what sacred vessel may have shown this .. ?
we never trusted the (corrupt-) concept of ‘showbreads as 12 cakes’ upon a table 
but also because we needed ‘the golden table’ for the scroll as positioned in front of 
the Ark – as an idea that still feels good ,
but ‘what’ was representing “two wheat stalks (-or sheaves)” in the old tabernacle ?
and through ‘what’ was the link with the seven Torches established ?
 

                                                                         this book ‘Ruth’
 

 
also here : ‘Adam sold (-out) base-10’ :
though ofcourse not appearing like this , while our problem is that Esau has cut up
in sections the original narrative to re-use the distorted sections for his own story , 
and we have so many themes that it’s hard to see ‘which ones fit where’ here ;
however ,
– there was no “Eli-melech” (in chapter 1) that “went to Moab” 
     but ‘the king (mlk=mlk) (-of [matrix-]  Egypt)’ as Horus for he is the one to whom
     Adam sold the eden base-10 to , in the first place 
     [Esau recycled his ‘Melchizedek’ trick from Gen.14 here]  ;
– while the subject was ‘base-10’ but moved to chapter 4 ,
     per the totally unnecessary line there as “10 – men of – the old ones of – the city” 
     which almost surely has said “the number – 10 of – the house of – Eden” !
     for in next line it has “to Eli-melech – is selling – Naomi”
     that has read “Naomi=Adam (nAMi-AdM) – sold (-it) – to the eli-king (‘Horus’)” ;
  
back to chapter 1 ,
– the ’10 – years’ (in 4) was “the (eden-) year of – 10 [+months] “ ,
– so that Elimelech’s ‘two – sons’ Dumb and Dumber that resemble Esau’s dual
     invention ‘Gog & Magog’ compared with the “Machlon and Chilion” here ,
     which should be the monsters “Leviathan (k-lLiun=Luithn !) & Behemoth” 
     as ‘the two – (sides of-) sons=heaven’ ruled bý the base-10 Eden year !
now ,
no one ‘was going to Moab’ but ‘to [matrix-]  Egypt’ (MoAb=mtsrAiM) or another
version as “the land of the nations (-of demons)” (Moab=guiM) ,
but what “was taken to there” (in 4) besides “the women=sceptre (nshim=shbt)“
really can be anything [the floor / 7 torches / star / wheat]  ,
where ‘Orpah’ perhaps was ‘Jacob’ , see below ,
and ‘Ruth’ either “the remnant (RuTH=shRiTH)“ or “ruth=covenant (ruth=brith)“ 
[and the latter makes very much Sense because the covenant IS about ‘base-10’]  ;
so that , in chapter 1 ,
the ‘Orpah going back to her people and her gods’ (line 15)
must have been ‘(endtime-) orpah=Jacob worshipping the 12-month year’ as 
the ‘[+strange]  gods’ often used in the chapters about ‘the high-places’ ;
while (in 16) “but the ruth=remnant – will follow – thee=Me” for they “died” ;
 
we’re not doing so bad until now , aren’t we ; )
 
because Jacob is now worshipping ‘the 12-months’ we need a line how the
matrix ‘had made their Zodiacal year’ and the text has surplus numbers so
that eventually this can have been said — it’s just undoable to try restore it
since Esau mixed up the start of chapter 1 and 4 ;
 
but then it gets more difficult – in chapter 2 ;
Ruth now is going to work in the field and it shows ‘ear (-of wheat) + to find’ 
so that this must be “about you & we finding the wheat and floor and sceptre”
[and perhaps at the end of this chapter ‘also base-10’]  
but the text is so invented that little to nothing reveals any original theme ;
after which (at 11) starts the ‘IEUE will repay’ as discussed above ;
 

    [added : we thought to compare the ‘dipping the sop’ in the alleged Passover scene (John 13)
    even it does not mention the word ‘vinegar’ – but the section became far too long and
    therefore better needs her separate page] 
 

                                                                                           buildup :