this will be an unusual and dangerous page :
not directly because of the theme – that should be allright – 
but because of “adding 3 days” without any proof whatsoever after the ’70th day’ expired .. 

 
                                                                                      theme
 
                          ‘the denial of Peter’ and ‘the sleeping disciples in the garden’
 
      … yesterday for some reason the section strongly came to mind yet it refused
      to make Sense – probably because of the pain ; today this came out : 
      that “two story lines are at play here” is rather sure [-before we’d attempt any
      restoration of the text]  and also the main theme most probably is about 
      the ‘soul dying out of love for God’ — which is less romantic as it may sound ;
      but “connecting this section with the just expired 70 days” is dangerous 
      and perhaps even Silly : yet it is an ultimate attempt to not have another long 
      year looming ahead , while ‘an added three day trial’ is not impossible  
 
      problem : the real theme
      John 13:37 does not have Peter saying to Christ “I will lay down my life for you” 
      but ‘lay down my soul‘ which must be the clue here : therefore in the previous
      lines He must have said “love God like I love Him” , not “love eachóther” ;
      while the ‘soul theme’ returns in the garden [in which allegedly the disciples fell
      asleep while He was praying]  where He says “my soul is sorrowful even to death”  —
      which however can have read “my soul is sorrowful for she will die“ :
      in this case the prayer was not “that the crucifixion would not come to pass” 
      but ‘the soul dying’ was the sorrow … so that the important “Will of God” was not
      about “preventing the crucifixion as such” but about : the soul dying” ;
      as the very thing Adam ran away from [-see other pages]  
 
      Peter’s 3x denial was about ‘the soul not dying’ 
      … we’ve to be careful here   —
      that Peter ‘denied Him’ can have been “because it was not the time yet for souls
      to be taken away” – since that will only happen with the 144 – so that the denial
      can have represented (the theme of-) ‘the soul not dying’ ; 
      in turn ,
      this would make the event in the garden , after His praying , not about ‘disciples
      falling sleep three times’ but “about you & we — considered (the -theme of) dying” !
      so that originally it were two themes which Esau has forged into one :
 
                                         the soul not dying                                            the soul dying
                                           3 times [-denial]                                      3 times [-something] 
                               before dawn [the rooster]                                also a time frame
                                 [‘dawn’ = eden-morning]                                           […..?……] 
 
      a rooster or ‘a trumpet’ ?
      … we cannot know if “the crowing [lit.: ‘sounding’]  rooster” theme is true or not   –
      perhaps it said “trumpet” but would that make sense ? could they have started
      the day – at 6am – by blowing a horn throughout the city ? perhaps Esau can
      have changed if from ‘a trumpet’ to conceal the ‘foreshadowing’ theme ?
 
      three times then — three days now ?
      so we have “three times before Dawn started” … but how that would show in
      the lines about the garden ? if Peter was ‘tried’ then so we – is it not ?
      so that now comes the dangerous question :
      it was all about ‘being dead’ the past 48 hours     —
      can ‘our being tried’ be “the disappointment that He has not acted” after the
      70th day has expired just ago ? would we have failed (it) if we had been 
      angry with Him – as a proof that we had not died ?
      coincidentally that log also was about ‘His Will’ .. then what can He have said
      in that garden ? instead of saying to Peter “you could + not + watch [‘be strong’] 
      with + me + one + hour” it was “that they be strong + for + three + days” ?
      did He say about us “that they will not enter into trial (‘temptation’)  [Mt.26:41]  ?
      so that we would not be angry with God for not acting ?
      if it wás said about us then it supports “Peter (‘disciples’) being tried and we” 
      indeed as two different subjects and not as ‘one story’ ! 
 
      why ‘three days’ ?
      … perhaps because of ‘the morning’ – that could be ‘the eden morning’ to us ;
      perhaps because of the “us being made to rise on the third day – like He” ;
      it may sound outlandish and even pretentious — but it’s possible ;
      then there’s something else :
      in Mt.26:31 , said to the disciples , “Then saith Jesus unto them, 
      All ye shall be offended [lit.: you shall stumble’]  because of me this night: 
      for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be 
      scattered abroad.” ,
      and said to warn for ‘the denying of Him’ [-yet so unclear that it álso can have
      referred to the alleged “sleeping of the disciples” because the story is mixed up]  ;
      supposedly taken from a [very corrupt-]  line in Zechariah 13 ,
      where in John Peter says “cannot I follow you now ?” ; 
      however , Hos.6 has “Come, and let us return unto the LORD: for he hath torn, 
      and he will heal us; he hath smitten, and he will bind us up. After two days will 
      he revive us: in the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight.”
      Then shall we know, [if]  we follow on to know the LORD …. (etc)”     
             
      now – the lines are corrupted but suppose the ‘third day’ is valid , supported by
      the ‘smite’ phrase ? would that not support this theme ?
      also , the “smite line” was not said to the disciples , because John 13 is the proper
      intro unto them , but must have been about us 
 
      so that we have some 18 hours from now to see whether the above is palpable ;
      in truth there is very little chance — but it is possible …