well worth reading , clue is at the end  ; ) please then ask yourself ‘who’ instigated the insane “Jonah 4/8 eclipse” hype where ‘this sun’ is the false fire theme ?

                                                                                               theme
 
        … after the books ‘Acts’ , ‘Esther’ and ‘Maccabees’ it is time to Legally undo this one :
        though “three days in the belly of a big fish” and “a rapid growing tree” are not impossible
        as far as ‘miracles’ are concerned , a huge pillar supporting any authenticity of this story 
        falls away when knowing that Christ never referred to any ‘Jonah’ (-see page) ,
        and the final nail in her coffin is a presented buildup being contrary to how God works  
        
        we don’t want to bore you with objections as “there are no whales in the Mediterranean”
        and other questionable aspects concerning the events in this book , but make the point
        that also ‘the book Jonah’ lacks any deeper meaning — while ofcourse we are interested 
        in the réason for this týpe of ghostwriting – opposed to the ‘normal’ Scroll corruptions – 
        considered the huge Metaphysical event that was ‘the officially handed-over scroll’ 
 
        God uses enemies to punish Ishral – then punishes the enemies :
        … this is the absolute main objection    —
        it is virtually impossible that Jonah was sent to the cruel Assyrian capital to evangelize
        to the same heathens who around that same time were about to make all of the Northern 
        kingdom Ishral to go into exile to Assyria , and never to return to their land ! 
        in all prophets , in every situation , God uses the enemies of His people to discipline them ,
        after which He judges those same enemies for having harmed His people : indifferent
        whether the subject is old-Ishral, our Originals, the Eden land , Jacob , or ourselves :
        yet this important notion is glaringly absent in all of this alleged ‘Jonah story’ ! 
        the cruel Assyrians
        … her kings must have been the forefathers of Vlad the Impaler — you can find online their
        horrific practices against their subdued enemies , and thát gang had to be converted unto
        a deity from a tiny nation far away ? they were not even capable of “repenting” simply
        because they had become One with their ówn cruel deities : like we saw how the king of
        Babylon Nebuchadnessar virtually embódied his master Thoth and the Egyptian Pharaoh 
        represented Adam , likewise all nations surrounding old-Ishral were not only hér enemies 
        but also God’s enemies through the link with their deities !
        how in the world nobody has ever observed this of those that have dissected ‘Jonah’ …?
 
        the Legal reason for the axing
        … whatever Esau had in mind when ghostwriting this book , our care is to see which
        aspect or entity could benefit from believers giving their consent to this story (-simply by
        believing it is true) and therewith supporting that aspect or entity – which is basically the
        core idea of any Occult Ritual ,
        and ‘Adam’ comes to mind through his title in prophets “the king of Assyria” where he ,
        because of the end of this book , “has repented” and “will not be judged by God”   —
        it is very póssible that he claimed the attribute “Assyria” here if you remember how he
        also  ‘claimed the statue that the people made at mt. Horeb’ making the above possible
        and hence our interest here : to have any connection no longer Valid , starting today
 
        [to not complicate things – though they are : also ‘Nineveh’ is involved in this theme as the
        place where the 7 (eden-) Torches are being held hostage , who are supplied by the fire
        in Adam’s matrix gate ; please see relevant pages in pinned section] 
 
                                                                                         ‘Jonah’
 
        origins :
        … most agree that it has been written some time after the Babylonian exile (500 BC) ,
        and our educated guess is “shortly before or during 250 BC” when the Samaritan 
        Jews started to doctor the Scroll in Alexandria — that the text contains many Aramaic
        phrases does NOT imply “that therefore it was written in Babylon shortly after the exile
        had officially ended (-say ‘in 400 BC’)” since the Alexandrian Jews were Samaritans 
        having been important from their home region Babylon into the land of Judah before
        they had moved to Alexandria to do their job – so their native tongue wás Aramaic ,
        while many corrupted sections in the Scroll also show those type phrasings ,
        therefore it is most probable that this same club wrote their ‘book Jonah’ in 250 BC
        containing more Aramaic for the simple reason that they themsélves had made it up ; 
 
        the link with the REAL Jonah in 2 Kings 14 :
        … Esau simply picked a random subject to create his hoax around :
        and because the three lines in 2 Kings are álso corrupted it supports his book ‘Jonah’ 
        having been written in Alexandria itself – or a bit earlier after which they got the book  
        into their possession and consequently modified the lines in Kings to give it credence ;
        by the below lines the real Jonah is rehabilitated from now on since nobody ever cared
        what 25 réally may have said – nor the next two lines following that :
2 Kings 14 : 25-27
(25)     
he   +                                                                                                     [=the evil king Jeroboam of the northern kingdom Ishral] 
he-restored boundary-of ishral from·to·to-enter-of Hamath as-far-as sea-of the·gorge
as·word-of ieue Elohim-of ishral which he-spoke in·hand-of servant-of·him Jonah 
[son-of Amittai the·prophet who from·Gath-the-Hepher]                                                                            [m·gth~echphr]  
… here ,
a) that line SCREAMS corruption :
b) allegedly God told this evil king to restore some region north of the territory of Ishral ,
c) while “a prophet lived in Hepher” where “scroll” is just too close (hach-epher = sepher !)  :
      immediately “Baalam that lived at the Euphrates” comes to mind , where PHRS was SPHR ,
      so how large is the chance that Esau did the same here ?
d) but how to identify “Gath~the-Hepher” ?
      can it have been “keeper of + the scroll” akin to the Baalam story ? ,
      but that causes a problem concerning the scroll which Jeremiah copied ,
      for ‘keeper of the scroll’ implies “that móre copies of the scroll existed” – or perhaps ‘sections’ only ?
      and in this case the prophets unto the northern kingdom “knew the scroll by heart” (-only) ?
      so – what can 25 have said ? :
(24) “[Jeroboam]  made Israel to sin ,
(25) “He restored the coast of Israel from the entering of Hamath unto the sea of the plain, 
            according to the word of the LORD God of Israel, which he spake by the hand of his servant Jonah, 
            the son of Amittai, the prophet, which [was]  of Gathhepher.”
           “he made Ishral to sin , 
            [HOW he “made them to sin”..? by what action ? :] 
           “by restoring=closing (!) + the border + of Ishral                                                      [indeed they were at enmity !] 
           for the sea=people + to [-not]  go + to hamath=Jerusalem (?)   +
           to learn of (?) + the gorge=scroll (=taampered) of + the words of + IEUE + the deity of + (eden-)Ishral  ,
           so that he spoke [-to them]  + through his servant + Jonah , son of + Amittai (‘truth’) ,
           as the prophet + who knew (?) + the hepher=scroll + by Gath=heart (?) ; 
           how does that sound please ?
           does not “the sealed off border” juxtaposes beautifully with “Jonah knowing the scroll by heart” ?
           continued :
(26) “for=but + IEUE + saw + the affliction=pride of + Ishral                                  [26 : this’d bring them into exile !] 
           [=as]  – the ones restrained=rejecting – [+his]  only=scroll (aphs=sphr)
           and – forsaking – [+his]  only=words [+unto them]  ,
           [=so that]  [+he]  (would) not – be a helper – [=unto]  Ishral ;                                           [conclusion : next 27-a :] 
(27) “and not=although + the LORD + said    +
           (that) [+he]  (would) [+not]  + blot out + the name of + Israel + from under + heaven ,                           [=exile]  
           he (completely-) saved=gave them      +
           by=into the hand of + Jeroboam + the son of + Joash.”                                                               [read : to their doom]  
         end of section –
         now all the lines DO make Sense !
         but Esau also had to corrupt 26-27 because if people would understand that (the real-) Jonah
         was prophesying unto the Northern Kingdom but that the people Ishral rejected everything , 
         causing themsélves to go into exile (-into Assyria) , then they would say :
         “now hold on a minute : then WHY did Jonah preach forgiveness to Assyria their enemies..?” 
 
                                                                            conclusion : Esau’s deceit :
 
         please remember the section above and you will see what he did here :
         he turned the real Jonah that had incredible Legal authority because of the Scroll  
         into some “house & kitchen prophet” by connecting him to trivialities – to Nonsense ,
         so that he is still recognizable as ‘a prophet’ — whom Esau needed for his ‘book Jonah’ ;
         then had ‘his Jonah’ proclaim ‘forgiveness’ to the Attribute ‘Assyria’ : in the name of God ! , 
         supported by the incredible Legal authority of the now masked réal Jonah ,
         where only 1 figure can benefit from this deceit : Adam … 
  
         and in order to gét to that main goal Esau had to invent a backup story where his childish mind
         came up with a Moby Dick idea completely unrelated to the story itself , inventing a second ‘miracle’
         in the form of some tree that grew overnight to “prove” that everything was instigated by God    —
         then this ugly Samaritan Jew sitting at his scribal desk in Alexandria rolled up his scroll ,
         comfortably leaning back upon his chair , proud of the service he just did unto his father Adam . 
 

for you Sir .