please make sure you get to the PuruSa section ,
the “sacrificed 1000-fold (Eden-) male image” 
that may have ‘stood upon the Eden-star – representing us’ ..
 

 
 
                                                                          theme
 
      … though we developed a healthy dose of skepticism throughout the years 
      questioning everything Esau may have changed , certain basic themes had  
      no reason to be questioned because considered ‘to be a given’ , is it not ,
      and two years ago while keeping “the twelve tribes” in mind we even looked 
      at the correlation between the numbers ‘12’ and ‘7’ , then deciding that the 
      number ‘10’ was the odd one out as the hostile non-Eden number ;
      yet now appears the possibility that ‘our own 12’ may have been wrong ,
      and worse , may have been a planted Mole to keep us away from Eden …
 

      the first question is “is that possible , a wrong number on purpose ?” ,
      and sadly the answer is affirmative : we put nothing past Esau , especially
      when knowing he tampered with the Fall feasts dates ,
      yet this one is very tough to accept : not because we don’t dare to question ,
      but because it undermines the foundation of thinking and leaves one drifting
      in chaos when realizing that there is no decisive factor available telling you
      the right number of tribes : they may have been ‘7’ or ‘10’ or ‘12’ or even ‘70’
      or ‘6’ for that matter if ‘man was created on the sixth day’ —
      where we only have our own logic to decide which one it may have been … 
 
      because searching the Scroll for the origin of ‘12’ she only shows corruption
      at the place of “Jacob getting his twelve sons” where we get the idea from :
      we knew that in Genesis Esau hid several themes by corrupting a chapter
      then writing his version in a néxt one (-therewith corrupting a second theme)
      and likewise “Jacob getting sons’ is written ‘twice’ ,
      but as usual it is very difficult to see what he did there ;
      however , searching back further ‘12’ seems no Eden number which must
      be an important argument for us in deciding whether ‘12’ can be valid or not ,
      and worse – it always is – 
      what dóes show is ‘12 princes of Ishmael (Esau)’ as a huge Red flag for us
 
      the point please is not that the KJV has “12 disciples” etcetera because that 
      proves nothing whatsoever : we need the origin of that number ‘12’ which is 
      consistently almost systematically corrupted in the first five books :
      if you look at ‘two’ (in Strong’s) certain key words keep appearing in sections
      containing ‘numbers’ but very smartly hidden in fake ‘genealogical records’ 
      or in alleged ‘temple equipment’ where it’s very difficult to see what Esau did 
 
                                                                 so where to start ?
 
      our greatest problem is “the relation to the four cherubim” 
      where one of them showed as ‘human’ (us) and the other three as the images
      of all Eden type animals (the eagle , ox and lion cherubim) ,
      and that because of their possible combination 4 x 3 = 12 the overall attribute
      may be ‘12’ as the same base of ‘the 12 tribes’ as to cover this aspect ,
      but something is Off as a theme we cannot put our finger upon yet    —
 
      two days ago dear Anna had a sleep paralysis — first a long dream about
      endlessly searching her journal but ending in two huge demons holding back 
      both of her hands , where the experience made no sense — until now ;
      because as simple souls we can only ask simple questions ,
      where we cannot even know whether we deal with a ‘pure’ matrix-aspect or
      if it was an Eden-aspect “that had to follow a matrix-aspect to conquer it” ; 
      — for example a “12 months in a year” :
            it seems inherent to the Dualistic realm but did Eden follow that ?
            but if so , why would He have used ‘seven months’ for his feasts ?
      —  or the 12 signs of the Zodiac ?
            in Sumerian lore ‘Marduk installed the zodiac’ but what is the origin ?

—  10 or 12 fingers ?             now this is interesting (and note her dream) ;             records do show ‘beings with 2 x 6 fingers’             (if we keep out the Scroll that can be corrupted)             yet that would link us to ‘10’ rather than ‘12’ ;       —  the ‘10 kings’ (Revelation)             what was that about ?             though it can be ánything (thanks to Esau)             it describes ‘some war’ — as this theme ?

            did it say “we are not 12 tribes — but 10” ?
 
      more difficult ,
      the ‘12’ is a triple of ‘three’ as their three-fold realm ,
      which seems contrived but may be important : we learned how the eden star had
      (will have) ‘three animal-forms’ against their three-fold realm (‘Trita’ in Rg-Veda)  
      and that base (‘3’) multiplied *may* account for “12” ,
      where their ‘tripling’ may have occurred áfter they stole Eden 
      (since they had no power nor Legal right to do anything like this before that) ;
      and this is important in so far ,
      that you could imagine the reason why Esau may have suggested us ‘12 tribes’ ,
      because we would have supported the matrix realm by believing this ; 
      and in fact , the “tripling into 12” as above is a very strong argument for this case
 
      we discussed how the Dualistic realm , infused with Satan’s west-dimension ,
      is the base of their Trita ; and though outwardly God is ‘a trinity’ also personwise ,
      the relation is a different one (‘female inside male’) ,
      so that — as it looks now — God would not “triple” things or concepts 
      (also because Christ being ‘three days in the grave’ suggests a counter-action) ;
      but He may “double” his ‘7’ ,
      as the important “14th day” ,
      or even double fully — as the “7 x 7” of the Jubilee time
 
      so that we came to the problem of “the 70 years for (mystery-) Babylon” (if true)
      and “the 70 years exile” (if true)  as well as “70 sons or elders or disciples” (if true)  ;
      where does the component ‘10’ come from ?
 
      the 72 enemies of Osiris
      though still investigating mentioning it here   —
      we know that Sumerian lore was very proud on having stolen God’s ‘7’ and this 
      seems to be a similar theme (and don’t be deceived by Budge’s word ‘enemies’ :
      usually that are “stolen things of Eden” which ‘Egyptologists’ don’t understand) ;
      the base can be a 6 x 12 again suggesting that ‘12’ could be THEIR number as 
      now glued to the ‘7’ in order to keep constraining it ,
      yet – if true – coming very close to a round ‘70’ of the Babylon years :
      was the difference this little ?
      and did Esau know this , hiding this little — but vital — difference ?
      so that he used a base-12 for “144,000” instead of *perhaps* our number ‘10’ ?
      then how can we find that impossible small but crucial difference ? 
 
 
                                      PuruSa – the sacrificed 1000-fold (male) image 
 
      this Rg-Veda chapter is debated ,
      some saying “that it appears rather late” and therefore they cannot place it ,
      but for us this chapter makes very much Sense   —
      it talks about “a sacrificed 1000-fold blueprint” related to ‘10’ which has
      virtually engendered all of their realm , suggesting that the (sacrificed male-) 
      figure — and shall we say “firstborn” ? — must have represented “the universe”
      so to speak , as exactly what God would have made to represent in male ! 
 
      until now we had “the daughter of tsiun dwelling in her star” ,
      but what if “a depiction of Eden-male stood upon the star” ? as banner ?
      or perhaps even “with his gorgeously beautiful female inside him” ?
      would that not be THE defeat of all of them demon-nations , to see that ? 
 
      the point is please that we need a background for this chapter ,
      or we will not understand what this hateful serpent wanted to express in it ;
      and though it may sound tedious to you we first need to look at the roots of 
      this subject called ‘PuruSa’ even before going to the text    —
          – puruSAd ‘eating or destroying man’ RV                                          [a rakSas RA , that is ‘an Eden construct’] 
          – puruScandara ‘much shining’ RV [‘moon’]                                        [also linked to garuda = vulture = eagle] 
          – puruSI ‘female’ RV                                                                                                                                                      [see above ?] 
          – puruspRh ‘much desired’ RV                                                                                                      [probable vowel change] 
          – puru [root]  ‘much, many, etc’
          – purubhojas ‘greatly nourishing’ RV
          – purudrapsa ‘abounding in [dew-]  drops’ [said of maruts]  RV                                         [‘image of human’ ?] 
          – purudruh ‘injuring greatly’ RV                                                                                                         [because Eden’s one] 
          – puruhûta ‘much invoked or invoked by many’ RV
          – purajâta ‘variously manifesting or appearing’ RV                                                                       [‘in many forms’ ?] 
          – purumantu ‘full of wisdom’ RV                                                                      [‘because of the many type images’?] 
          – puruniHSid ‘repelling many [foes]’  RV                                                                   [‘repelling the foes of Osiris’ ?] 
          – puruputra ‘having many sons or children’ RV                                                                               [‘that image has’ ?] 
          – pururûpa ‘multiform’ RV                                                                                                                               [‘of that image’ ?] 
                                                                        
      interesting here is the combination :
      would not ‘an Eden male stand upon the star giving him that image’ ? 
      or rephrased : a male in 1000 created forms , but read “innumerable ones” ,
      as all the same pretty yet all different , because God never creates uniformity 
      but always unique beings that however are part of the same family .. ?
      did this serpent intended to describe that concept ?
 
      in this context -purudrapsa “abounding in [dew-]  drops” said of the Maruts is
      important for us since the Maruts are the Locusts , and from there the whole
      cluster seems to describe ‘some blueprint of possible images’ even though as
      usual the Rg-veda is very evasive ; yet the text (see breakdown below) shows
      a theme that almost overrules the matrix , 
      suggesting a most important attribute that was stolen in order to furnish them :
 
  [X 90 , Griffith :] 
  1 A THOUSAND heads hath Puruṣa, a thousand eyes, a thousand feet .
      On every side pervading earth he fills a space ten fingers wide. 
  2 This Puruṣa is all that yet hath been and all that is to be; 
      The Lord of Immortality which waxes greater still by food. 
  3 So mighty is his greatness; yea, greater than this is Puruṣa. 
      All creatures are one-fourth of him, three-fourths eternal life in heaven. 
  4 With three-fourths Puruṣa went up: one-fourth of him again was here. 
      Thence he strode out to every side over what cats not and what cats. 
  5 From him Virāj was born; again Puruṣa from Virāj was born. 
      As soon as he was born he spread eastward and westward o’er the earth. 
  6 When Gods prepared the sacrifice with Puruṣa as their offering, 
       Its oil was spring, the holy gift was autumn; summer was the wood.                                                                    [Trita]  
  7 They balmed as victim on the grass Puruṣa born in earliest time. 
       With him the Deities and all Sādhyas and Ṛṣis sacrificed. 
  8 From that great general sacrifice the dripping fat was gathered up. 
      He formed the creatures of-the air, and animals both wild and tame. 
  9 From that great general sacrifice Ṛcas and Sāma-hymns were born: 
      Therefrom were spells and charms produced; the Yajus had its birth from it. 
10 From it were horses born, from it all cattle with two rows of teeth (‘sic’ , compare giants) : 
       From it were generated kine, from it the goats and sheep were born. 
11 When they divided Puruṣa how many portions did they make? 
        What do they call his mouth, his arms? What do they call his thighs and feet? 
12 The Brahman was his mouth, of both his arms was the Rājanya made. 
        His thighs became the Vaiśya, from his feet the Śūdra was produced. 
13 The Moon was gendered from his mind, and from his eye the Sun had birth; 
        Indra and Agni from his mouth were born, and Vāyu from his breath. 
14 Forth from his navel came mid-air the sky was fashioned from his head 
       Earth from his feet, and from his car the regions. Thus they formed the worlds. 
15 Seven fencing-sticks had he, thrice seven layers of fuel were prepared, 
        When the Gods, offering sacrifice, bound, as their victim, Puruṣa. 
16 Gods, sacrificing, sacrificed the victim these were the earliest holy ordinances. 
        The Mighty Ones attained the height of heaven, there where the Sādhyas, Gods of old, are dwelling.      
 
     so many things to say about this ,
     but curiously – or not – Esau hid this theme in his alleged ‘genealogical records’
     as we said earlier , which would be a perfect cover-up for explaining the image 
     over the Star that would contain every image of Eden male ! 
     you please see how incredibly difficult this is .. ?
     would not God be incredible proud – and rightly so ! – describing in lyrical phrases
     all of the beauties of His own people (our Originals) which then was subsequently 
     concealed by hateful Esau in totally irrelevant ‘genealogical records’ constantly 
     going on about “coming forth from the thighs (not ‘loins’ !) of this one and that one” 
     (and see line 12 above) 
     to completely hide this theme from us ?  
 
    why would He make such a point saying to us “contend for your mother !” by which
    He means the virgin in her star , if it wasn’t for the manifold images of all the sons 
    and daughters all in their unique appearance that she brought forth ?
    she even is so connected to them “that she searched them when they left her” 
    so why is “a many-fold image of them standing upon her own star” impossible ? 
    as both cherubim , male and female , upon the Ark which IS her star ?                                                                      <<<
 
    in the above mantra ,
    note the “one fourth” versus “the three fourth” ,
    suggesting that the triple is theirs and that they was added “a fourth” ,
    namely “the fourth cherub as the living-animal with the human-like face” , 
    which they needed to have as blueprint for all the appearances they stole ; 
    taking us back to the ‘12’ ,
    because now they had the ‘four’ as multiplying their own dimensional ‘three’ .. 
    [what about ‘the image + your star’ the Isaiah line ?] 
 
1. Purusa. who has a thousand heads, a thousand eyes, a thousand feet, 
     investing the earth in all directions, exceeds (it by a space) measuring ten fingers.”
     PuruSa [with]  a thousand heads , a thousand eyes , a thousand feet ,
     completely covers (?, vR) this (matrix-) world (bhuma) ,
     stood (?, sthâ ; imperfect Verb) [with]  ten fingers ; 
     this is a crucial line ,
     and the “ten fingers” cóuld show ‘our 10’ ;
     curiously Spells have TCHBÂ “finger” numerical “10,000” ,
     where the first  ‘eden-willpower’ suggests an Eden-origin also ;
     next ,
2. Purusa is verily all this (visible world), all that is, and all that is to be; he is also the lord of 
     immortality; for he mounts beyond (his own condition) for the food (of living beings).”    
     … he is the immortal governing quality
     when ascending (ruh) as nourishment ;
     both lines sound strange ,
     but perhaps “because it’s stolen daily” each time the image is renewed ?
3. “Such is his greatness; and Purusa is greater even than this; all beings are one-fourth of him; 
      his other three-fourths, (being) immortal, (abide) in heaven.”
     such [is]  his greatness and even better [is]  PeruSa ,
     all (matrix-) beings [are]  one-fourth of him ,
    and three-fourth of his immortality [is]  in the (matrix-) sky ;
     here ,
     this sounds like the matrix-beings made from the image of the ‘human-cherub’
     while they also obtained the (other) three animal-cherubs through the captured eden-star
     [but how can this image stay behind ?
     or is this “the young Horus in his red sun” (see page)
     while some basic idea stayed below ?]  ;
4, “Three-fourths of Purusa ascended; the other fourth that remained in this world proceeds repeatedly,
      and, diversified in various forms, went to all animate and inanimate creation.”
     three-fourth of Purusa ascended upwards ,
     one-fourth remained below ,
     continuing to go (‘radiate’?) in all directions ,
     [for the one fasting and the one eating]                                                                                                       (?) (unclear intent)
5. “From him was born Virāt. and from Virāt Purusa; he, as soon as born, became manifested, 
      and afterwards (created) the earth (and) then corporeal forms.”
     from him (matrix-) eminence was born 
     [being ?]  the (now matrix-) Purusa-image born [as?]  (matrix-) eminence ,
     liberated (’emptied’) for the West (matrix-) world from the East ;                                                                                   (?)
     this sounds like the Spells ,
     where ’eminence’ is SÂH’ (from ‘Orion’ SAH)
     and they also use the matrix-West versus the East (read , ultimately ‘Heaven’) ; 
6. “When the gods performed the sacrifice with Purusa as the offering, 
      then Spring was its ghī, Summer the fuel, and Autumn the oblation.”
      when the (matrix-) gods performed (or ‘spread’) the sacrifice with Purusa as the offering ,
      the spring became by (?) the clarified butter (a now matrix-dimensional-quality ?) ,
      the summer by (?) the fuel (-for the sacred fire) ,
      [and]  the autumn by (?) the burnt offering (-of whatever aspect) ; 
      this also is mysterious  —
      the phrasing suggests that they had no ‘spring and autumn’ — but does Eden ?
      the ‘fire’ references must point to the 7 stolen fires of the altar 
      but here powering a ‘three fold concept’ ?
7. “They immolated as the victim upon the sacred grass Purusa, born before (creation); 
      with him the deities who were Sâdhyas and those who were Ṛṣis sacrificed.”
      they scattered Purusa the sacrificial victim born earlier as (at?) the sacred grass ,
      and him the Sâdhya (‘invoking’) deities that are (?) the RSis sacrifice ; 
      here ,
      we still don’t know “what is the sacred grass that the deities sit upon” ;
      but “the invoking deities” may be “the sons of Ammon” – like they do in the Spells
      (because this was written by a serpent-soul the ‘brothers’ of the Ammon sons)
      in similar way how he calls them ‘the Kava’ the priests sacrificing our Originals ; 
      either way this seems to point to “a constant invocation”
      implying that this image is ‘below’ and is ‘constantly renewed’ 
      (and therefore must be ‘constantly stolen’) ;  
8.  “From that victim, in whom the universal oblation was offered, 
      the mixture of curds and butter was produced, (then) he made those animals over whom Vâyu presides, 
      those that are wild, and those that are tame.”
       from that entire sacrifice the clotted dripping butter was gathered up ,
       having formed the animals of the air and the wild and domestic ones ;                            [Eden & non-Eden !] 
       here ,
       now he must talk again about ‘the other 3 cherubim’ (eagle , ox and lion) 
       also because he’s using a different word ‘the fat’ now ;
       compare how Noah rescued ‘only the clean and not the unclean animals’ 
       suggesting indeed that sóme animals here are based upon Eden images ! ;
       yet also implying that not only the “male image” (PuruSa) is the blueprint of humans
       but that the other three animal-cherubs are the blueprints of all Eden-animals …
9. “From that victim, in whom the universal oblation was offered, the ṛccas and sâmans
      were produced; from him the metres were born; from him the yajus. was born.”
       from that entire sacrifice the Rcas and sâmya-hymns were born ,                                                 [some Sorcery] 
       from it the enchantments ensued ,
       from it the yajus were born ;
       in this case the ‘vedas’ (as in Rg-Veda) IS PURE ‘sorcery’ 
       (so that you realize whát we’re doing and investigating here please !) ;
       however the exact nature of the different type “enchantments” is difficult to catch :
       yajus : “a sacrificial prayer or formula (technical term for particular mantra-s muttered (sic)
       in a peculiar manner at a sacrifice ; they were properly in prose and distinguished from the
       Rc- and -sâman (-prayers)” according to Monier-Williams ;
       but then again ,
       who knows “invoking the different (cherub-) animal-images” needed ‘different prayers’ ,
       we are so. completely. simple. that we need to fight to even understánd these themes …
       (and the serpents that composed the Rg-veda knew that — and said that !) ; 
10. [missing :] 
       tasmād aśvā ajāyanta ye ke cobhayādataḥ | gāvo ha jajñire tasmāt tasmāj jātā ajāvayaḥ ||
       [Griffith has :] 
     10 From it were horses born, from it all cattle with two rows of teeth (sic – giants !) :
           From it were generated kine, from it the goats and sheep were born.
           but something smells here   —
           because the ‘horse’ (horses) can refer to ‘Satan’ (“the horse-head” elsewhere) 
           and because these are his descendants they could call themselves ‘horses’ ,
           namely “having devoured the cattle” (our Originals)  
           shown in cobhayādataḥ ‘devour + cattle’ 
           by which they becáme “a goat” (aja) and “an ewe” (avi)  both roots linking to Eden ,
           but here as copied images with the power of ‘a horse’ (Satan) ; 
           wherefore Griffith’s “two rows of teeth” is invented 
           because “the both (types) of Eden cattle” (male & female) were devoured by them ! 
11.  “When they immolated Purusa, into how many portions did they divide him? 
           What was his mouth called, what his arms, what his thighs, what were his feet called?”
            when they took apart (?) Purusa ,
            in how many portions did they recompose (?) (-him) ?
            what were his mouth , his arms , his thighs , his feet called ?
            here ,
            is this about ‘the matrix-giant standing upon the (eden-) south land ?
            whose ‘head’ is the Torus [-of mystery Babylon]   with ‘the mouth’ as her gate (Adam’s one) ,
            the arm the Orion region (‘shoulder’) and the ‘thighs’ down into eden ?
 12. “His mouth became the Brâhmana, his arms became the Râjanya, 
           his thighs became the Vaisya, the Sûdra was born from his feet.”
           his mouth became the Brahman ,                                                                                                         [‘sacred knowledge’] 
           his arm (singular now) the râjanya constituted ,                                                 [‘royal’ as SAH’ (Orion) ‘royal’ ?] 
           his thighs became the vaisya ,
           and his feet the shudra ;
           the śūdra (tbut has that eden -s) as singular like next one ,
           vaiśya , even less clear (from ‘to settle’ ?) ;
13. “The moon was born from his mind; the sun was born from his eye; 
          Indra and Agni were born from his mouth, Vāyu from his breath.”
          from his mind was born the moon                                                                                                          [‘their Torus’ here ?] 
          and from his eye was born the sun ,                                                                                                                                       [Râ ?] 
          Indra and Agni were born from his mouth
          and Vâyu (‘wind’) from his breath ; 
14. “From his navel came the firmament, from his head the heaven was produced, 
         the earth from his feet,the quarters of space from his ear, so they constituted the world.”
          [at ?]  his navel exists (?) (diff.verb) the middle-sky (-region) ,                                            [‘of mystery-Babylon’] 
          [and]  [over ?]  his head revolves the firmament (‘space’) ;                                                                [‘head’ = ‘Torus’] 
          the land [under ?]  his feet ,                                                                                                                                [‘the south-land’] 
          [and]  the regions at his ear ,                                                                                                                    [‘wider solar-plane’ ?] 
          so were the worlds created ; 
          we didn’t do so bad  —
          the picture of ‘a giant figure standing on the southland’ seems to be correct 
          whare at the height of his navel starts ‘the (now moved) middle-region’ 
          (as the middle-register in Amduat) and the solar-plane-land surrounding Babylon ;
          where next line 15 must tell that it was infused (enlarged) by stolen fire ;
          but , if he started with “1000 from 10” in line 1 
          then our potential ’10’ was tripled (because they have their Trita triple realm) ? :
15. “Seven were the enclosures of the sacrifice, thrice seven logs of fuel were prepared, 
          when the gods,celebrating the rite, bound Puruṣa as the victim.”     
           [by ?]  the seven became the [three-fold-]  enclosures                   (?)
           [Behemoth & Leviathan & middle-region ?]  ,
           thrice-seven fuel (-fires) (‘of the Sanctuary’ !) were made (or ‘duplicated’) (kR) (-by the matrix) ,
           when the gods spread the sacrifice
           binding PuruSa the sacrificial animal ; 
           this is difficult –
           they made ’21 fires’ [from the original 7]  as tripling them ?
           is this important for us ? 7 x 7 = 49 as Jubilee year , 7 x 7 x 7 [or 7 x 49]  = 343 ;
           Exodus 12:40 has ‘Ishral 430 years in Egypt’ based on Gen.15:13 ‘400 years’ ,
           but interestingly that follows upon ‘making a covenant’ with ‘animals cut in half’ 
           [in fact 3 animals – if not corrupted , and their parts laid against eachother , 
           – a goat (Behemoth?)
           – a ram (Leviathan?)                                                                [wait – is that ‘the goat and the sheep above in 10 ?] 
           – and a bull (the Eden realm?) ;
           now — the covenant is consistently phrased as “to cut” (-krth , hebrew) ,
           then was the covenant about the 3-fold realm — as here ??
           though the continuation of that Genesis section is corrupted this idea may be genuine ,
           the ‘torch [+es?]  passing through both (animal-) halves’ fits the theme here also , 
           perhaps as (line 17) ‘torches of – fire – which=seven (ashr=shbo)‘ (‘seven – torches’) ?