… at first we feared that we would yet have to understand yet another mystery
until step by step the theme starts to unfold — and as we speak we’re still chewing
the text of chapters 23-24 though we did work out the first 22 (see next page) ,
and one thing is sure :  ‘Balaam’ was not “some seer brought in to curse Ishral” ;
 
the reason for chasing this story is because we saw she links to Unleavened 
and can. not. have. our. date. blocked. , right , hence this one needed attention ,
while several phrases also relate to (the feast of-) Firstfruits ; and the several
times mentioned “altar offering” were too close to the “strange fire” theme ;
but the first problem to tackle was “whó were these enemies” in reality ?
and as it looks now it was not “the Moabites” since they are nowhere related to  
such important Attributes – hence the stárt (of 22) already is corrupted ;
but as we went we saw that Esau even went a step further , because where he
brings up “the Amalekites” as the nation particularly hostile to 1200 BC Ishral , 
it is Esau’s re-naming of ‘the Ammonites’in order to cover up their nature ,
since everywhere in the scroll the very concept “Ammon” stole our attributes !
 
firstfruits : the strange lines :  
Deut.26:1-10 is about Firstfruits , the “first born” theme , where the candidate says
strange things about “my father was a Syrian” followed by the theme how God has
freed us from Egypt , and a similar ‘Syria’ quote appears in this Num.22-24 ;
actually this was the first Red flag ,
because 5-6 of Deut.26 show corruption (-apart from being incomprehensible !) ,
and because we know how Esau moves sections it was no surprise that a totally
contextless section at the end of previous chapter 25 could be a clue : mentioned
there are “the Amalekites – whom God hates forever” while they are related to the
promised inheritance , which by context is ‘Eden’ …. so – what’s going on here ?
[the attempt to the Deuteronomy text herself will be in a later page] 
 
no Moabites – but ‘Amalekites’ :
… having established that it’s very unlikely that ‘the Moabites’ are the subject in 22
we should be able to verify that through the location of old-Ishral at that moment :
the KJV chapter opens with “Ishral camping on the east side of the Jordan river

at the height of Jericho situated at the other side of her”      >> when “the evil king of Moab decides to go curse the people” ; yet in previous chapter 21 they already subdued all of Moab ! and though ofcourse theoretically it is possible that they still were at Moabite territory , all the cóntext pleads against that : apart from the map showing that it is highly unlikely . and that the real subject here was ‘the Ammonites’ !  for Esau it was a simple step from AMmonites to AMelekites while we chose this former term to denote “the Ammon people upon this earth” , not to be confused with “the sóns of Ammon” as the monsters that dwell with Adam in the other reality    — where the Ammonites were their offspring as we shall see

           
                                                               the Ammonites  (‘Amalekites’) 
 
 problem in the KJV is “that nowhere shows their crime” as réason for being hated by God , 
 except for a line “because they cruelly attacked your weak ones during your Exodus journey” ,
 but that’s no valid reason : so that we have to search for what reason Esau corrupted this ;
 while our first problem now is “understanding the enemies & their attributes” at the Exodus ,
 though both of these are not always clear-cut because of overlapping :
 
 leaving Egypt (‘Adam’) (and the sons of Ammon) :
 … where God’s war against Pharaoh was “about us leaving this earth” the main opponent
 ofcourse was Pharaoh himself since he represented ‘Adam’ , and hence the main attribute 
 here was “God winning back our birth right from Pharaoh (-from Adam)” as represented by 
 Moses’s “staff of God” aka the Eden sceptre that he carried during the journey ;  
 now , in the literal situation of Egypt the people that wrote the Spells were (incarnated-) sons 
 of Ammon , as the sons on earth of Adam , that often addressed their birth-sceptre glyph AMS 
 which originally belonged to ús , as the Eden-tablet which Adam stole and brought to the North 
 (see pages) ; but in the prophetic layout ‘everyone of Ammon’ was linked to ‘the land Ammon’
 as depicted on the map above ;
 
 (Edom and-) Moab :
 … in prophets ‘Edom’ typically represents ‘Esau’ : Jacob’s enemy as the corrupt-soul having
 this type human body just like Jacob , as a general description of the nature of Jacob’s enemy  
 [that is why we used the term “Esau corrupted …” etc since we have to give the thing a name]  ;
 so that not much is said about Edom while the people crossed it during their journey (see map) ;
 however — “Moab” is a complicated story ,
 and for several reasons we think she represented “the heathen (-people)” , understood as 
 the “animalistic souls álso having this body but with a strong phallic aspect” ; just imagine the
 species of Neanderthals whose DNA shows in our body , and you get the idea of ‘Moab’ ;
                [!]   however , in prophets “the phallic nature of this body is called “the Amorite” ;
                and whatever may have been written about ‘Moab’ is too completely corrupted 
                [though we’ve made attempts to link Moab with proto-humanoids upon earth]  ;
 
                considered that last point ,
                it is póssible that “the breed of Amorites had conquered the region of Moab” (Num.21)
                if that conquering was interpreted as some “replacing the previous people”, right ;
                but the nature of both groups still must have been “the animalistic type soul” as a class
                in the category ‘corrupt-type souls of Esau / Ammon’ but lower as these ;
                [so that we have four types of souls in total now … and interestingly the Spells contain 
                a line about “4 type bloods”, SENEF IV , while murals show the fair-skinned (‘white’)
                people called “Libyans” , of the Black race south of Egypt , themselves as Egyptians
                and of the Semites whom they hated since those represented Jacob ; see mural below ; 
 
Ammon : the Ammonites (‘Amalekites’) :
… per Exodus 17 the Amalekites (Ammonites) attacked the people Ishral in the desert                        [Ex.17] 
but it’s unlikely that this happened so close to mt. Horeb as suggested in the KJV ,
so that we can not rule out that also this section was moved by Esau to disarm the theme ;
for context suggests that they warred Ishral after the Balaam event , on their own plains ,
and see below why that is probable ; 
either way , that battle itself is described in Exodus 17 : while the ‘Amalekites’ attacked                                 

Moses stood upon the hill with raised staff yet that action is nowhere proper explained —  but if you remember the birth right theme it makes total Sense if those of Ammon were the attacking ones ! while “the act of raising the staff” as like at  Firstfruits the heave-offering of the sheaf as the first-ripe (‘firstborn’) barley ! so : how was this linked in Dt.26:1-10 ?

 
then 17 has : “And the LORD said unto Moses, Write this [for]  a memorial in [=the scroll] , and rehearse [it]  
in the ears of Joshua: for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.” (in 14) ,
but the “place it in the ears of Joshua” is ofcourse corrupt :
one “writes a scroll” because a future generation in the end has to know about it , right ,
confirmed in 16 “the LORD [will have]  war with Amalek from generation to generation.” ;
… so it may have said :
           “(write it-) and=so that – the in=sons (b=bn) of ears=Ishral (ani=ishral)
            (in-) the joshua=end (?) – (will) place=defeat [+them]  (‘Ammonites’ !)” ,
            or a version close to this — as long it will be lógical , no ; 
            but either way it could show that this is about a theme you & we have to understand ,
            while He may have given the subject here already : ‘the scroll’ ! 
            [He did not say “some scroll” but THE scroll as the first books by the hand of Moses]  ;
… then KJV 15 has : “And Moses built an altar, and called the name of it Jehovahnissi” ,
but writing “IEUE – (is) my flag” (banner , standard) ,
which also is about us : since “we are to raise the flag” in prophets , that is “the restored scroll” ,
factually as a second clue for us “that victory will become through the banner” , even linking to
the ‘fire theme’ because of the altar set up by Moses ; and though the chapter gives no link to 
the final feast of Unleavened (-unless Esau deleted things) , it must be about this !
 
now – this chapter also shows a relation of the scroll “with Amelek” (the Ammonites) ,
and THIS is the reason why “the king” in ‘the Balaam chapters’ must have been ‘of Ammon’ ! 
because in those Numbers 22-24 chapters “an altar” and “a curse” shows , together with roots
which suspiciously appear to be ‘scroll’ corruptions   —
we think that not “some foreign seer called Balaam was hired by Baleq to curse the people Ishral”
but that “Balaq and his men tricked one of Ishral’s own priests to play the Mole” !
… and the question is now ofcourse “what was the original text” ;
               [considered this Exodus 17 :
               there is a *very slight* chance that next Ex.18 allegedly about “Moses’ father in law Jethro
               visiting Moses telling him to install rulers over the people” is totally corrupt since it all sounds
               so alien , and is but another Esau vérsion of the “Baalam” chapters per KJV ,
               but as long we have no hook into that we’ve to leave it for now]  
  
… ‘Amalek’ then appears in Numbers 13 , as side-issue ,                                                                                      [Num.13] 
and we think that Ex.17 was the odd one out as moved there by Esau since the búlk of the 
Amalek theme only starts from this 13 , which makes sense for they are approaching the Ammon land :
(29) “[and the two spies that just brought back the huge vine-cluster said :] 
           The Amalekites dwell in the land of the south: and the Hittites, and the Jebusites, 
           and the Amorites, dwell in the mountains” ;
           however agáin Esau is trying to hide something because his “south” (the·Negev) shows corrupt ,
           though a problem is that the entire line has been doctored and runs very crippled now ;
           interesting then is the end of prévious line to this one :
           (28) “and the cities are very great , and we saw the children of Anak there ;”       [why as ‘addition’ ?] 
           (29) “The Amalekites dwell in the land of the south:  [etc] ” ;
                   what if the weird addition in 28 was the proper START of 29 ? 
                   not only would the theme run but also the syntax of 29 now : 
                  “and we saw – the offspring (‘sons’?) of – Anaq – there ,
                   [+AS]  Amalek (‘the Ammonites’) – dwelling – in the land of – (the east / north / Ammon)”   ? 
… now ,
though we’d need to study this whole theme some more , but what about this context ,
as “Amalek : the Ammonites (offspring of Anaq) as the children óf the sons of Ammon”   (?) ,
– where “the Ammon sons” are in their Field of Reeds , with Adam ,
– these are the sons that came to earth , Gen.6 ,                                                         [see Ez. ‘Ammon sons’ chapter] 
– and procreated with women
– birthing the race of sub-giants on earth 
    [for the sake of argument say “1 ft taller than the Ishraelites” – so not as Bizarre heights
    for otherwise “the tricking of Balaam” would not have succeeded by “posing as their friends“]  ;
– as the class of “Libyans” shown in the mural ,
– after their fathers (the réal giants) had been slain in the eden region (compare Enoch text) ,
    [hence the Ammon sons retried it on earth ?]  ,
– and the forefather of the Ammonites was ‘Anaq’ 
– while in a distant past , the fáthers of the
     Ammonites build the Giza pyramid ,                                     [the later Ammon-Egyptians just repossessed it] 
– but right now in 1200 BC
    they just witnesses Adam giving back their (!) (stolen-) birthright , through Pharaoh ,
    and Adam taking revenge through the fire-ritual at mt. Horeb ,
– so that now it was their turn :
    by attempting to get Legal right to the Scroll since théy would corrupt her later !
    [following the order in prophets : Adam is the boss , they are his helpers] 
    which is what the ‘Balaam story’ is about ;
– only AFTER they succeeded to get that Legal right they thought to annihilate Ishral (Ex.17)
    but were beaten because through the same birth-right which they just lost ;
    until they were destroyed during the time of Joshua ,
– while , finally , 
     the whole breed of sub-giants vanished – on purpose ! – to never give Jacob any clue
     about strange things that could upset his materialistic view concerning ‘earth’ ,
     and the Esau souls went completely underground assuming a total similar body like him
 
                                                                        … how does this sound to you ?
              per the above , what did Deut.26:1-10 and ‘the Balaam story’ in Num.22-24 réally say … ?
 

                Egyptian mural of “the four types of people” ; we don’t know why ‘the Libyans’
                are shown as “four” themselves but likely to depict their superiority , also shown
                by their feather-headdress and embroidered clothes ;
                their root is from the THEH’EN cluster “crystal , ice” that may refer to ‘white’ 
                but in our opinion also to “the Crystalline-like body” which is not unlike the goal
                of the WEF searching transhumanism through their graphene (crystal!) clot-shots