also this ’10-theme’ has it’s own specific phrasings
like “the (one) half .. the (other) half” referring to the
dimensional-monsters Behemoth and Leviathan ,
as both realms that will be separated from eachother
when God will restore Eden inbetween them again 
so that she will rule both realms from there ;
in fact ,
this theme is so important for Him that the context 
of He “making a covenant” (literally ‘cutting’) shows
in Gen.15 as “both halves of the sacrificial animal”
representing ‘Behemoth and Leviathan’ !
however ,
then this theme completely dissapears in the scroll ,
or better : the word “half” (as root -qts) then shows
only in suspiciously bizarre phrases ….  

 
                                                                                   theme 
 
… looking at how the word “half” (-qts) develops after it appeared in Genesis 15 in
context of the Covenant , the word shows in phrases that get weirder by the minute :
— “half eaten flesh” (Numbers) ,
— “half a hin”   (Numbers) ,
       then this ,
— “the [sons]  of Gad and the [sons]  of Reuben and the half the tribe of Manasseh” ,
       about 28 times ! , 
after which it morphs into other strange examples ;
Esau clearly invented themes to can hide the (-qts) root in yet the “half-tribe” clearly
is the most bizarre one while nobody has any idea what it means  
 
the “halve – tribe of – Manasseh” : about ‘Behemoth and Leviathan’  
looking at that strange phrase ,
the first example show in Numbers 32:33 ,
   “And Moses gave unto them, [even]  to the [=sons]  of Gad, and to the [=sons]  of Reuben, 
   and unto half the tribe of Manasseh the son of Joseph, the kingdom of Sihon king of the 
   Amorites, and the kingdom of Og king of Bashan, the land, 
   with the cities thereof in the coasts, [even]  the cities of the country round about.”
ofcourse it makes No sense ,
for why would these two tribes + a half one be singled out and linked to two kings ? 
but previous 32 is about “crossing over .. into the land Canaan our inheritance” ,
yet what if it said “canaan=Eden (knon=odn)” ? so that the conext is NOT about 
entering that land on earth wherefore “Gad and Reuben” must be something else !
 
rather consistently those “two kings” or “two kingdoms” show in this phrase
and even in the Joshua 2 chapter that is about the Eden-star — but if the word ‘half’
is linked to ‘realm’ can ‘the two kingdoms’ be ‘Behemoth and Leviathan’ ?
suppose , in above line ,
that “half – tribe of – Manasseh” was “half – two – heavens” ? 
which then reads as “the two – halves of – the heavens” ?
a “the halves – tribe=two (shbt=shn) of – the manasseh=heavens (mnshe-shmm)“
feels solid so that now they must be idéntified : as the kingdoms of Sihon and Og !
however , because Esau used “real-time names” like Sihon and Og the roots will
not match ‘Behemoth and Leviathan’ ofcourse  
 
yet the first part of the line is more problematic :
what was the action befóre ‘the two halves of heaven’ as “giving – land” ?
“And Moses gave unto them, [even]  to the children of Gad, and to the children of Reuben”
“and the cities thereof, gave I unto the Reubenites and to the Gadites.”
“their land, and gave it for an inheritance unto the Reubenites, and to the Gadites,
and to the half tribe of Manasseh.”
“And Moses the servant of the LORD gave it [for]  a possession unto the Reubenites, 
and the Gadites, and the half tribe of Manasseh.”
hm ..
not ‘Moses’ can ‘give’ anything so it’s another subject , while it is unsure if the 
phrase was ‘Reubenites’ or ‘sons of – Reuben’ that could make a great difference 
like the sequence : “Reubenites and Gadites” seem the most frequent ;
however ,
it must be the condition fór ‘inheriting the land’ for in Joshua 12 follows the proper
“which Joshua gave unto the tribes of Israel [for]  a possession […]  ;”
what is with the dualistic realm ? — they are “ruled” by Eden .. by “10 months” ?
      [Joshua 12:] 
      [=when]  – he=you gave=declare +
      b
      the moses=months (mSHe=chdSH) – servant=10 (ObED=chODEsh) – (to) IEUE 
      c
      [as]  the tenancy=number (irshe=mspht) of      +
      d
      [..]  the reubenite=house (rBEn=BEth) of – gadite=Eden (gaD=oDn)
      e
      [=for]  [+to rule]  (?) (‘was always left out by Esau?’) – the two – halves of – heaven 
      [Josh.2:] 
      f
      [=as]  the two – kings=monsters of – the·Amorite = the sea (‘dimension’) (AMr-i=i-AM) 
      g
      (that are) the king=monster – Sihon=Leviathan (shoN-luthN)
      h
      and the king=monster – Og=Behemoth (Og=bmOth) ,
      [by context:] 
      i
      he=I (will make) [+you]  to give=cross over – (to) [+your]  inheritance (‘Eden’) :
how does that sound please .. ?
and because the prophetic chapter Joshua 2 links to this theme while it is the intro
to the actual crossing-over into the land as foreshadowing of coming to Eden
with the blatant theme of “crossing over through water” — ‘dimension’ in our case ,
per definition linked to Behemoth and Leviathan , the content above must be valid ! 
 
only here God’s covenant is fulfilled !     
and that importance can not be underestimated  —
because everything that had to happen , including Christ coming to earth and the
declaration of the Scroll , would lead up to this point where God will actually be 
restoring Eden in her function of ruling both realms ;
this same theme *must* have shown in Genesis 15 where Abraham prepares the
two halves of the animal , but sadly the entire chapter is in-cre-dibly corrupted :
(17)
“a stove of – smoke – and torch of – fire – [..]  passed – between – the·severed-parts” ,
suppose ,
      smoke=ten (oshn=oshr !) (adj.) – stove=lamps (than-nur=ner ‘lamp’ 48x)
      b
      and=as – torches (or ‘[gem-]  stones’?) of – fire , 
here ,
a “torches” would be very confusing because of “the 7 female Eden torches”
yet because this is about Eden-rule it’s unlikely that His sacred number ‘7’ showed
but rather the ’10’ of Eden since she will be “the middle region” as between both 
halves Behemoth and Leviathan , in order to rule them 
[and for the “stones of fire” option please see upcoming page]  ; 
 
only in Jeremiah 34 shows the similar word ,
(18)
“And I will give the men that have transgressed my covenant, which have not performed 
the words of the covenant which they had made [=they cut]  before me ,
when they cut the calf in twain , and passed between the parts thereof,”
here ,
it cannot be “cut – to (in) two” but ‘two’ must be the súbject that is passing through , 
      18
      … the words=months (Dbr=chDsh) of – the·covenant –the the=house (e-beth) of Eden
      d
      which=according to – the·calf (‘w/ moved’) – (that was) cut – before me 
      e
      (and) [..]  the two=ten (shnim=oshr) – cut=lamps (kRth=nR)
      f
      [..]  passed – between – the severed parts of him ;     
but this and the surrounding lines are só corrupt that this theme here is Lost ;
 
back to Abraham (Gen.15) ;
lines 12-14 having “the people that will be in Egypt and oppressed 400 years”  
most likely is untrue — though some have tried ‘to historically prove that time frame’ ,
simply because this was never the theme of the Covenant : the suspicious phrase is 
per Deuteronomy 4 the “to serve”, there as “Jacob serving Earth’s 12-month year” :
(13)
“And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land 
[that is]  not theirs, and shall serve them ; and they shall afflict them four hundred years;”
      13
      know of a surety – that – your seed – (will) be – sojourner=deceived (?) 
      and they (will) serve – the year (‘moved’) of      +
      b
      [..]  afflict=months (On=chOdsh) – [..]  – four=two – (and) hundred=ten ;