#1
… after the “Aaron consecrated during the 40 days until Atonement” (-see page)
there may yet be anóther factor that can confirm this concept : related to the very
reason of ‘being sanctified’ namely “the soul dying to her own flesh (‘own body’)”
which is as we often saw by now is the posed condition to be part of the 144,000
this aspect was hidden by Esau in his “sanctify the firstborn ones to Me” [Ex.13]
which is a bit of a mindf*ck since that was NOT God’s intention , not like that !
after Exodus 12 ,
the lengthy – because important – Passover chapter , when the people left Egypt
in this 13 He immediately starts with “but when the sons will be sánctified in the
end days (-then I will bring you to the real promised land – Eden)” !
so the ‘sanctify’ is the keyword here – not ‘firstborn’ – and therefore the strange
Esau line in his theme as “all that openeth the womb (is mine)” is suspicious ,
even though ‘scholars’ explain it as ‘everything that first comes out of the womb’ ,
(Ex.13:2)
“Sanctify unto me all the firstborn, whatsoever openeth the womb among the
[=sons] of Israel, [both] of man and of beast : it [is] mine.” ;
if that is unreadable it gets worse :
(13)
“And every firstling of an ass thou shalt redeem with a lamb ; [wut ?]
and if thou wilt not redeem it, then thou shalt break his neck : [wut ?]
and all the firstborn of man among thy [=sons] shalt thou redeem.”
here ,
you can féel that “the sons – redeemed” IS about that ‘sanctification’ in line 1 !
and could “the flockling” (‘lamb’) be “the Passover-flockling” after chapter 12 ?
so that there is a connection between Passover ‘and being redeemed’ here ?
then that weird phrase :
in the “opening-of womb” pheter rechem the (-PHeteR) shows first time here
but ‘our redeeming needs an áction’ : ‘make atonement’ (-khaPHaR) ? if true
we would have a direct link with ‘Atonement’ as the 40-days theme !
make atonement for what ? – this flesh (-basher) , and though not a full match
Esau’s ‘opening’ (invented root anyway !) would néed some ‘womb’ option ;
so that we get the context ,
those that (will) open=make atonement – (for) [+their] womb=flesh
b
(will be) sanctified – (as) the sons – (that) I (will) redeem ;
how does that sound please ?
likely this was a similar type corruption as ‘the thigh (of the animal-offering)’
that was “the awful idol” as ‘this body’ , see previous posted ;
but most important is that God asks this dying in order to be sanctified ,
as a dying only possible because of Passover ! that is the connection here !
the verb ‘made atonement’ is important :
… it’s true that usually ‘what was the root (-word)’ is a guess while ‘pay back’
is quite a different one — yet either way we need the context of that which
our Christ did was an atonement , so we are to do the same ;
which is also the key of “the 40 day trial of the 144” : those that did die have
nothing to fear since only those that didn’t will be removed ! (and interestingly
this same weird ‘open – womb’ will return at thát same theme – see below) ;
as a reminder ,
this atonement as dying to flesh is NOT asked ‘of Jacob’ — when the 40th day
has come they will make their atonement by losing their flesh … because that
evil KJV is telling him that his ugly flesh ‘is a sacred temple’ …
[sub :]
after the book Numbers the phrase “open – the womb” disappears [=erased]
from the Scroll save for Ezekiel 20 which looks like this same theme though
insanely corrupted (-also showing the ‘seal / sign (on the 144 !)’ phrase that
álso belongs to this page’s theme but too complicated to get into now]
this (alleged-) ‘open – the womb’ shows in interesting context
… counting with the deep corruptions and possible cut & pasted sections ,
she appears at least in three instances as this as very useful for our context :
[Ex.13] [Ex.34] [Num.3]
explaining Passover Moses’ second 40 days (!) the trial (-of the 144)
so that “because of Passover” we have “a 40 day period of atonement” as
ending at the day of Atonement “in which the 144 will be sanctified” with the
promise that then “they will go forth to canaan=eden (knon=odn)” [in Ex.13] ;
this buildup makes very much sense ,
and that it shows in all these three interlinked examples is important ;
true , Esau may have fooled us and just have inserted the phrase randomly
ofcourse but somehow it feels like a rather logical and solid context
EXAMPLES
… first Numbers 9 showing an identifiable “two (priestly) groups” in a kind of
contest setting (that doesn’t end well for one group) followed by a description
akin to “the 144,000 collected from each of the twelve tribes” —
[skipping all notes here to keep the page readable]
in this case Esau turned ‘the Levites’ into ‘the firstborn ones’ :
Numbers 3
lines 1-4 , intro : very corrupt ,
it shows “the sons […] that will be sanctifed” and “strange fire” (in 4)
which even for Ésau is a weird theme to begin with — but not for us ;
so that likely “we must have found the strange fire by now”
and the time frame as “at the day of Weeks” [-when the forty days start] ;
lines 5-10 : ‘two groups’ are presented , [= the trial of the 144 ]
for one [=group] with negative outcome (10)
12
[=for] [..] – behold ! , I (will) take away – the·Levites = the unrighteous ones +
b
(out-) from the midst of – the sons (‘remnant’) of – Ishral +
c
instead=as – all – the firstborn=souls +
d
(that will have made) open=atonement – (for-) [+their] (own-) womb=flesh , [< that phrase]
e
[…………….] [goto 13-b below :]
13
b
… (and-) I (will have) sanctified – [=unto] me – all – the firstborns=righteous ones of +
c
in·Israel = the in=sons (e=ben) of Ishral +
d
[probably swapped 1x :]
–
from=that – (will) become – the adm-man=remnant of – [..] the beast=people , I=says – IEUE ;
[next section : ‘the 144,000 composed’ ! :]
14
[=then] – IEUE – speaks – to – Moses – [=about] the wilderness=remnant of – sinai=Ishral ,
b
saying :
15
(these-) levi=righteous (adj.) – sons – (will be) number=added (PHqd=iashPH) +
b
to the house=remnant of – fathers=Ishral ,
c
(as-) to=from the families of – every – male=tribe of – son=Ishral +
d
month=ten – and upward=two – number=thousand (phqd=alph) ; [‘12,000 from tribes’]
[next 16-21 : from the 12 tribe names we need Esau made into +40 weird ones]
22
[+so that] [..] the number (sic) of – all of – the males=remnant
b
[=as] the sons of – the month=tribes – (that will have been) numbere=added
c
[swapped :]
–
(will) number=be – hundred – seven=forty – and five=four – thousand ;
[next 23-51 : perhaps wholly ghostwritten – nothing jumps out & can be anything] xxxx
