..also here Esau corrupted the
text beyond any full restoration ,
yet the remained buildup with
key phrases reveal “the floor”
was the intended main theme ,
as valuable confirmation for us
 

 
                                                                                   
                                                                                      theme
 
   …we saw how chapter 2 was not about ‘Rachab’ but about ‘the sceptre and his star’ 
   where the very Ark that the people carried represented the star , as the explanation
   of the prophetic nature of the people crossing the Jordan : how the stolen Attributes 
   in the other reality would — together with the sons of Ishral — return to Eden 
   [though perhaps this prophetic aspect was shown to Joshua only]  ;
   while after the actual crossing the ten tribes had to build an altar of ten large stones 
   which together represented “the restored base-10 crystal floor of the Sanctuary”  — 
   yet the explanation of this floor theme was very heavily corrupted by Esau ,
   making it this ‘chapter 10’ in which he completely pulled apart the original narrative 
   and produced another romanticized toddler-story to cover up the real theme
 
   ofcourse our first question is ‘why did he make so much trouble’ :
   does it indeed imply “that Adam dies when the floor returns” as the reason why 
   he consistently and systematically corrupted the floor theme throughout the Scroll ?
   we keep asking ourselves this question ,
   because — bluntly said — ‘we need Adam to die , finally’ for it is him or us now ,
   yet that will only happen when we establish his weak spot (or ‘greatest crime’) that
   more and more seems to be the stealing of the floor itself as the ultimate base-10 
   which is powered by the sacred ‘7’ in the form of the seven Torches 
   [where his other ‘Strange Fire’ crime was only to perpetuate that steal]  ,
   combined with the Spells – Esau’s own sayings – that , apart from the stolen sceptre
   and his star , ascribe an important role to the SET-stone powering their Torus realm
 
   no ‘sun standing still’ 
   wherefore also this alleged “sun and moon standing still” is another toddler-story ,
   and it is baffling how poor gullible Jacob for 2000 years has believed this fairy-tale 
   fired on by the willfully-fanatical-blind ‘church fathers’ and the busloads of ‘scholars’
   that confirmed unto him exactly what Esau had intended to convey unto him ;
   where our curse is “endlessly having to separate his chaff from the real wheat”    —
   here ,
   apart from being a physical impossibility ofcourse it does not even serve any goal in  
   Esau’s story itsélf : after (in line 11) the entire army of the enemy was destroyed by 
   great stones (sic !) that were cast down from heaven , next – yet for no reason at all – 
   now “the sun and moon are commanded stand still” (in 12-13) ,
   not only sounding like a made-up quasi-spiritual miracle but it was made-up :
   because we know that Esau must have concealed an important theme also here ,
   and the first possibility is “this sun going Dark when the stone will return to Eden” 
   — yet there is a catch here :
 
   in fact ‘the sun going dark’ must show further on (in 27) while here was explained
   how “the corner stone is ruling the both heavens as Behemoth and Leviathan” that
   are to the north and the south of Eden ,
   so that it must have said here “(the rule of Eden-) in the midst of the·heavens”
   or alternatively “of the two sides (qtsi=qts) of the two heavens” as the expression
   in other chapters about this theme which intends to say the same thing ;
   while after this “both námes of the two heavens” were revealed 
   and not some “local stand-still of the sun in some vale and above some city” 
   but as “the sun=heaven (shmsh=shmim !) of gibeon=Behemoth (gBOn=BmOth)”
   and as “the valley=heaven (oMq=shMim) of ailun=Leviathan (a-iLUN=LUithN)” ;
   knowing Esau especially the ‘Leviathan’ (ailun=luithn) is a very strong case ,
   and as important for us because it confirms the phrasing of the Covenant-theme 
 
   where the stone (as ‘dimensional-anchor’) *must* appear in the context of the two
   heavens which he rules , wherefore it is so important that these two names show ,
   as actually the only explanation why Esau needed to drag in ‘Gibeon’ and ‘Aialon’
   which makes no sense even according to his own narrative ;
   yet busloads switch into the automatic-spiritual overdrive like Matthew Henry ,
         “Joshua acted on this occasion by impulse on his mind from the Spirit of God.
            It was not necessary that Joshua should speak, or the miracle be recorded , 
            according to the modern terms of astronomy. The sun appeared to the Israelites 
            over Gibeon, and the moon over the valley of Ajalon, and there they appeared to 
            be stopped on their course for one whole day. Is any thing too hard for the Lord ? 
            forms a sufficient answer to ten thousand difficulties, which objectors have in 
            every age started against the truth of God as revealed in his written word.” 
   SMH
   aye , ten thousand difficulties in the word of God that was re-written by Esau ….
 

   next ,
   also the line “is that not written in the scroll of the·upright (‘Jasher’)” is suspect (in 13) 
   because of “the scroll=number (sphr=msphr) the·upright=10 (ishr=oishr)” needing 
   however the addition still “.. of the house of Eden” ,
   and also the clarification how this number relates to her ’10 month year’ ;
   so that maximum the reasoning can have been ,
            “the great stone (in 11) rules the Behemoth & Leviathan heavens (in 12) 
             through the (eden binary as-) sun and moon (in 13) directed by the stone 
             giving them the ten months as the Eden year for the two halves of heaven” ,
   like in the Revelation 21 chapter ;
   does that sound palpable please .. ?
   after this explanation “the cave” theme follows (from 16 onwards) as the gloomy 
   place in the matrix wherein the Locusts will have imprisoned the floor    —    
 
   the ‘great stone[s]  in a cave’ 
   the fact that Esau was obsessed by ‘great stones’ (16-18,27) tells you what the 
   original theme was that he saw , where in (18) no “roll great stones” showed 
   but probably “you=they roll=plastered the great stone” as elsewhere , that is
   the stolen floor in “the mud-pit or gloomy place (-at Orion)” ,
   where the addition “guarding them=him” should be original ;
   perhaps ,
   in (21) “the sons of Ishral” (you & we) will understand the Scroll ,
   so that (in 22) “the cave will be opened” and not five kings come out of it but 
   the corner-stone will be set free — 
   then , only (in 27) the stone factually escapes from his prison because of Esau’s
   weird addition ‘the sun going down’ yet likely as “the sun going dark” (‘close !’) 
 
   Adam dies
   though he everywhere carefully corrupted the fate of his father (!) Adam ,
   line 28 has “someone dying that same day” with a suddenly changed subject
   that has a root (MAqqDah) too close to ‘Adam’ (ADM) to ignore ,
   and knowing Esau’s play with roots most likely ‘Adam’ has shown here which he
   disguised as the stooge “the king of Maqqadah that is slain” , 
   while “that same day” is irrelevant IF the subject now is a wholly unrelated one !
   it cannot prove , but strongly suggests ,
   that the (real) subject in question was directly linked to ‘the stone and the cave’
   [and not because it was “the cave at Maqqadah” (16) , that is nonsense]  ;
 
   elsewhere in the Scroll is said ,
   how the remnant that is brought to tsiun will see the slain body of Adam ,
   and next (29) has “then Joshua passed from Makkedah, and all Israel with him ..”
   which cannot be proof because too corrupted yet it suggests this idea 
 
   the ‘five kings’ (‘Locusts’)
   now we can also identify these (in 5) , as ‘the locusts and their king Abaddon’ in
   the Rev.21 chapter [‘Horus and his four sons’]  aka the five serpents that obtained
   an Eden body which turned into ‘a locust’ because of their evil nature ,
   and like in the Revelation chapter also here they must have stolen the floor and
   hence they link to “the cave” (in 16-18 and later) yet not ‘to hide themselves’ but
   hide the stone in the cave ;
   these four / five kings is the same corruption as in Genesis 14 that originally told
   the same narrative about the Locusts , and Esau recycled his own concept here ;
   while probably this chapter started with “now they steal the floor” 
   because chapter 2 must have explained what happened before that :
   how ‘five serpents’ (not ‘two – spies’) ‘entered Eden’ (not ‘Jericho’) and they went
   to ‘the virgin of tsiun’ (not ‘Rachab’) etcetera ;
   wherefore in this chapter “king Adoni-zedek that invited the other five kings” can 
   only be ‘Adam’ (ad-ni=ad-m) who swore his revenge upon Eden , asking them
   locusts (in 4) “to help smite gibeon=Eden (gbON=OdN)”  
   [where the adni-zedek looks like melki-zedek [‘Horus’]  in the Gen.14 corruption] 
 
   and finally ,
   it can have said “how the Locusts will be slain just like Adam” 
   in a line (30) “…. (smote-) the king thereof as he did unto the king of Jericho.”
   but though the context is correct – that they will be judged also – there is no way
   it can be confirmed by this specific currupted chapter
 
                                                                                 conclusion
 
   … building the case of ‘Adam & the floor’ (and the locusts) , also this chapter ,
   no matter how corrupted , supports the conviction that “the floor” is an important 
   theme and showed a lot more as we initially thought ,
   and though sadly the full text cannot be restored and several aspects simply are
   unrecognizable in this story (like ‘the seven Torches’) because completely erased
   the exercise here was of value for it supports that Adam dies if the stone returns