the “betrayal by Judas” was “about the Scroll (-as the Gospels)” 

 
[16jan2025] 
[memo theme — to be worked out further] 
[reason : linked to current “Peter’s denial”] 
 

 
  why the theme “Judas Iscariot betraying Jesus” makes No Sense
 
  however – that “there was a type betrayal” is very probable : just not this
 
– everybody knew Him , recognizing Him from a mile distance 
– even when He ‘was dressed similarly to the disciples’ He would have stood out     —
    there are examples in history of persons that had (as if-) ‘a bright aura surrounding them’
    [like the German emperor Otto III who for this reason dined separately]  :
    then how much more with Him ?
– even if “it was dark in the night of betrayal” the above remains solid 
– yet the main problem is ,
    and that is serious : ‘what would this betrayal of the person itself add to the event .. ?’
    or rephrased : even if there wás “a Satan telling that figure to betray Him — now”
    whát then was ‘the betrayal’ since He knew the cross was waiting ever since he left heaven ?
    you see please ? “betrayed” but of “what” ? 
 
  there wás a certain “tipping point” — and possibly related to ‘betrayal’ 
 
– the Jews [=Pharisees]  had always wanted to arrest Him
– but they could not until He would allow them — that’s very important
– so what was that moment ?
    and indeed that could have happened while in the room (“Peter’s denial”)
– if He allowed it (-at that point in Time) then “something must have been finished” 
– which cannot be ‘the cross’ — since that was upcoming ,
    so the only thing that could have been finished was ‘the message He had conveyed’       <<<<
 
  therefore “a betrayal concerning the Scroll” makes much more Sense :
 
– disciples wrote down what they saw and heard from Him
– at least ‘a number of them did’, say “four” (-the four gospels)
– they “could not wait a couple of days before writing things down that happened” 
    or they surely would forget key aspects and words & phrases
    [let alone if they waited with that ‘a few years’ !]  
– so where did their notes stay ?
– perhaps “one of the disciples took care of storaging of the documents” 
    and they went to him each time ‘to receive their own document’ to add events
– like in OT ,
    where “a certain priest was over the Scroll” — compare the Baalam story
– but in this case “the keeper of the documents” became a sell-out ?
– because the jews [=Pharisees]  made a deal with him ?
    or “were to : at that very moment” ?
    was this “the moment that this figure decided to be the sell-out and act to it”.. ?
– was this figure called “Iscariot” ?
    no one thought of the etymology hebrew (-sheqer) “deception , falsehood” 
    but knowing Esau it can have been a deflection of “the keeper of the writings” 
    (the hebrew -sepher ‘scroll’ mutilated into -sheqer ? what’s in a villain’s mind ?)
– was it that easy ?  :
    IF this figure kept the originals , as the *only* originals , 
    what was more easy as hand them over to the Jews at a certain point of time ?
    in order for them to corrupt the papars , then bring them back into circulation .. ?
 
  … and in our case – considered the current theme of ‘the garden of Gethsemane’ ,
  would the theme of his prayer — as restored — not be ‘a proper closing of the above’ ?
  in the sense of “one last time pleading God that you & we would understand everything” 
  as a colour that was in the text while restoring her .. ?
 
sub :
… one last aspect can also link to the above ,
namely “the possible betrayal of one of the 12 tribes – to be replaced with another tribe” 
as in the case of “(the tribe of-) Dan” which appears to be replaced by another and see
the book Revelation ;
we don’t know yet IF this is true (-for the sheer amount of corruptions)  
but this appears to support “that one of the twelve became to be a traitor” 
 

[ongoing theme — will be added]