[again we got some theme on our hands — incredibly enough , the whole crystal-floor theme seems to contain one more subject linked to him providing “golden essences” as creational aspects for the Eden ground and also for our beautiful Originals … this subject about ‘wheat and tares’ is not always easy , hoping the text is readable

                                                                                          wheat vs barley
 

 
 
                                                                                         theme
 
   … because grain had been introduced in Mesopotamia some ten thousand years ago 
   but áfter the season that Eden had fallen , we always held that grain must have been 
   God’s provision for Jacob even though at that time he still was a rather small family ,
   but from this context we cannot make sure whether grain itself was an eden-concept 
   or if He may have ordered the matrix to devise it upon this earth for sustaining Jacob 
 
   however , with the previous Sumerian pages the problem only deepened  —
   why did they call their new year in their first month of Nisan ‘Akîtu’ meaning ‘barley’ ? 
   and if God seemed to ask for barley in that same month then did the original year of
   Eden start at the same time as the matrix one — or was some inversion in play here ?
   and even more strange ,
   searching for the ‘grain theme’ in the Egyptian Spells it showed that , though written
   in their typical evasive manner , that the matrix stole ‘an eden-type grain’ causing
   a number of creational advantages [-still in progress but will be posted soon]  yet also
   very clear lines that their grain-god causes (!) the start of their new year !                                        [sic] 
   how does that link back to the Akîtu ? what is going on here … ?
 
   though we want to keep this page as much as possible about the Scroll
   we need a short Egypt paragraph — but only because the scroll has been so awfully
   corrupted that we cannot establish without a doubt the origin of ‘grain’ in her which is
   the first major aspect we need to have clear :
 
   [Egypt : real wheat – and a copy :] 
   … in the Spells definitely shows “the double one to carry-off” meaning ‘from Eden’ 
   and note the ‘double one’ if for now we maintain the idea of “twó sheaves” ; while at
   the other hand the matrix also introduced “their type grain” depicted below , in spite

of both objects looking more like trees as sheaves ;    these two stalks are their own type as copies ,    said as “fór those that are ferried-over” as the    eden-stalks which will serve their matrix realm    with the goal to create the ‘grain-god NEPER’    that we understand as “light-particles swirling    around in their sky” which they can command    by speech (-R) in order to create things with ;    now please ,    remember they wanted to cópy our Paradise    so that they stole ‘eden-concepts’ for reason    that their own means were far inferior (!) ,    is it then impossible that “also our Originals    had been created with these light-particles” ,    or at least were an attribute of them .. ?

 
   in Zechariah 4 “the two the·olive-trees (!)” are said “to provide oil for the lampstand”
   through a series of alleged ‘channels’ — but because the original text was about the
   seven Torches standing upon the crystal floor any ‘oil’ must be supplied unto them 
   [and remember the “gave her my oil and wheaten flour” mentioned in top]  ;
   but , apart from giving oil , what do “the·olive-trees” signify ?
   in fact “not much” while they bleaken next to the concept “the tree of life” that most
   certainly is no ‘olive tree’ — and considering the context so far , “sheaves of wheat”
   seems to be a much more appropriate candidate here ;
   on top of that ,
   there is also something like ‘wheat oil’ ! on earth it is praised as skin-balsam while
   as extracted essence it is like a “golden oil” – as the description in Zech 4 – that also
   fits the bill because the eden-star and our Originals are linked to ‘a golden glow’ !   
   and there is more : this oil ‘burns’ !
   though on earth this wheat oil does burn , having a flammable point of 90 degrees ,
   it is not an ideal fuel since it fumes rather strongly , it doesn’t mean that in the other
   reality this type oil could not be added to the seven Torches ?
   moreover , the Spells suggest “that the two eden sheaves are burned by them” in
   the sense of ‘a continual burning’ which seems to support the ‘used for oil’ aspect …   
 
                                     [please do see the closing of this section at the end of part I]
 

real wheat – and a copy : hebrew roots    the qualities of ‘wheat’ exceed those of ‘barley’    but perhaps the main difference is ‘in their use’    because where bread is made from wheat ,    the barley not only serves for soups and stews    but also “for beer” that has a negative context    because of the Spells where it represents the    now “purified light-particles (-by their grain)” ;    so that a similar difference can show in roots :

 
   for us moderns the ‘wheat’, ‘barley’, ‘grain’, ‘corn’, ’emmer’ and ‘spelt’ appear to be 
   somewhat relative as interchangeable concepts without a further idea behind them ,
   but – in spite of Esau’s corruptions – several clusters appear ,
   negative : ‘grain’ :
   for “grain” is used the root (-dagan) which is a Red flag for us because of “fish-god” 
   as the related root (-dagon) where Dagon was the leader of the Assyrian ‘Apukallu’
   that were “seven gods” having brought consciousness to their own people on earth 
   [and see the Gobleki Tepe theme page]  ,

where now it seems that depictions of ‘the handbag’    that the Apukallu are holding was about the ME that    we had identified as ‘base-10’ ! see upcoming page ;    in the scroll ,    this root ‘grain’ therefore can hardly be ‘coincidence’    but now it appears at illogical places suggesting that    Esau searched to disarm the intended meaning of it

           positive : ‘wheat’ :
           on the other hand the word for “wheat” (-chitta) has the “(eden-) life” root (-chi) 
           [and was inténded to represent ‘life’ , as opposed to words that were intended to
           denote “absence of life” by adding -TH or -L resulting in clusters “sick” and “sin”) ;
           and remained positive phrases are ,
          “make unleavened-bread of wheaten flour”                 [Ex.29:2]  [but 1x only] 
          “the first-fruits of the wheat harvest”                               [Ex.34:22] 
           as important for us since these indicate the month Nisan ,                      
           linked to both feasts ‘Firstfruits’ and especially ‘Unleavened’ that may be our date ;           <<<
   negative : ‘barley’ :
   actually a strange case ;
   though the root (-shora) ‘barley’ itsélf is not negative (in -shrth ‘remnant’ for example) 
   it definitely feels as if Esau on purpose obfuscated the difference with the ‘wheat’ in a 
   number of verses that would be quite important for our theme ;
   the word ‘barley’ shows rather late and then but a handful of times in books Ex-Deut ,
   while in prophets it seems to link to “numbers & quantities” (see the section below) ; 
   but then there is this :
 
   [Ex.9]  first Egypt plague : barley smitten but wheat was nót
   and this is interesting :
   we still hold that these plagues happened in matrix-Egypt (mystery-Babylon) where 
   at his own people came to this earth to urge Pharaoh to let the people Ishral go 
   or their entire region would cease to exist [-which it will , soon !]  ;
   in the other page we identified 4-5 plagues by imprisoned eden concepts ,
   and in this plague shows “a great hailstorm” (line 25) that has unexpected support :
   curiously in one of the NEPER show théir hailstorm attacking the dome of Eden as
   the hail they made bý the (same) stolen wheat stalks , but see the difference here :
        (31-32)
       “And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley [was]  in the ear, and the flax 
        [was]  bolled. But the wheat and the rie were not smitten: for they [were]  not grown up.”
   here ,
   whatever the corruptions in this moved (!) line we may be lucky and it originally DID
   intend to say ‘smitten barley but unharmed wheat’ — and please note the connection
   between “light-particles in the sky” and “hail-stones” in the wheat context !                                    <<< 
   [the upcoming CT 464 will reveal more about this …]  ;
 
   however , the rest of the lines is too corrupted to can restore what it said
   also because of the invented roots : 99% sure it never had ‘abib’ – also because that
   was not the concept here – and also the weird ‘spelt’ (-kussemeth)  ‘flax’ (-phishtah) 
   are Esau’s inventions as roots that interestingly will return in other sections we need
   and that appear to convey a pattern — see below ;
   where in this case Isaiah 42 ‘he will not quench a smoking flax’ is revealing since
   it very much connects to “the (burning and) smoking” (H’ETT) of stalks in the spells !                [sic] 
   
   [Ez.27]  mystery-Babylon and ‘wheat’ 
   now that we are 99% sure that the matrix ‘carried-off’ wheat we have this line ,
   where the context is about ‘listing all the crimes of the evil city’ in similar phrasing as
   in the book Revelation and elsewhere about her illegal ‘trading’ which she does with
   the demon-nations around her that dwell in the wider solar-plane (sic) ,
        (17)
       “Judah, and the land of Israel, they [were]  thy merchants : they traded in thy market 
        wheat of Minnith, and Pannag, and honey, and oil, and balm.”
        (17)
       “the Judah=nations (-of demons) and=in (?) the land Ishral=surrounding [+you]  (?)
        b
        were thy merchants ,                                                                             [a-b : as in Revelation and elsewhere] 
        c
        [for]  they=you traded [-with them]  in thy market wheat of Minnith=Eden (?) (mNth=odN)
        d
        [>> unknown :]  and Pannag. and honey. and oil, and balm.” 
   here ,
   ofcourse we would need more examples like this one but in the Scroll almost each one 
   of this type has been corrupted , implying this theme was important for Esau to conceal ;
   while a second aspect is this :
 
   [Is.17]  will ‘the wheat-stalks returned to Eden’ cause ‘the leanness of Jacob’ ?
   and this is a bit dangerous   —
   so ‘wheat upon earth’ has “an original image” in the other reality , yet if that image
   would return to Eden would it have consequences for ‘the earthly version’ growing here
   and by extension “have consequences for the physical body of Jacob”.. ?
   and the wheat on earth is a kind of deductive version from the concept now in the matrix ,
   would that have consequences for ‘the physical body’ of Jacob on earth ? so that when 
   the ‘image’ (of grain) disappears , in the other reality , it influences ‘grain on earth’ also ?
        (4-5)
       “And in that day it shall come to pass, [that]  the glory of Jacob shall be made thin, 
        and the fatness of his flesh shall wax lean.”
        followed by ,
       “And it shall be as when the harvestman gathereth the corn, and reapeth the ears 
        with his arm; and it shall be as he that gathereth ears in the valley of Rephaim.”
   here,
   the last line can have said the cáuse of that leanness , as a very corrupted form of the
   wheat stalks returning to Eden (-also because “in the Rephaim valley” is so bizarre) ;
   but the problem is this please     —
   the theme may overlap as having consequences for the demons AND for Jacob 
   but in many cases the specific subject has been obfuscated by Esau’s hateful work : 
        (Joel 1)
       “howl , ye farmers and vinedressers for the wheat and the barley ,
        because the harvest of the field is perished.” 
   now ,
   the “howl” is often said about the demons when they see another (!) stolen attribute 
   that is returning to eden just as they “howl” when the floor and eden-star will leave ;
   yet though the context of this Joel chapter must be ‘mystery-Babylon’ 
   in prophets quite a number of other sections with similar theme remain undecided .. 
   [just let’s hope that it won’t be too bad for Jacob for he will have enough problems]  
 
   [Mt.13]  ‘wheat and tares’ 
   to stay with the ‘remain undecided’ it really is that difficult :
   we know that Christ never told ‘parables’ which could be interpreted different ways 
   since He would not play with lives concerning the end-time theme (and see Esau’s 
   admission in his ‘quran’ that hé invented those exactly fór this playing purpose !) ;
   here ,
   we always kept that it was a corruption of “the corrupted Scroll” because God uses 
   the phrase “placing evil (ones) now standing between my words” much like in (25) ,
   where the “first gather the tares” (in 30) must be “the sons & daughters” ;
   so that any lines about ‘bread’ and ‘grain’ in NT must be very carefully scrutinized ;
   however ,
   the first ‘parable’ (in 3-8) cán be about ‘(stolen-) wheat’ , not only because of the 
   really ‘unbiblical’ addition “so that it brought forth fruit” which is Esau’s invention ,
   but espécially the weird addition ‘hundred-fold and thirty-fold’ at the closing (in 8)
   that must be part of the ‘1290 (days)’ theme corruption , below ;    
 
   so in ‘Nisan’ starts our new year – regardless ?
   as we understood it (but we aren’t farmers) ,
 both wheat and barley can be sown in the Fall before the winter rains so that they
   can be harvested somewhere in April , when they can be sown a second time so 
   that they can be harvested around the feast of Weeks (perhaps ‘of Declaring’) ;
   either way , April is good for us ,
   because where in a previous page we fought with the entire calendar because of
   the ‘inverted day and night’ and the ’14 days difference’ with the matrix-dimension
   now it seems that both Eden ánd the matrix “start their (type-) year in the Spring”                     <<<
   and the matrix becáuse she stole the wheat that she needs as her base ;
   where , in context ,
   the “offering to God of wafers of wheaten flour” at unleavened at this point in time
   seems to nót only have represented ‘the restored Scroll’ but also this very theme ..     
                                                                            

                                                                                                                                                      [continued from above :]
[‘barley light-particles’ BY the winged disk :] 
we found no other place to put it but here , for it is important ,
but first the above difference between wheat and grain had to be presented ;
because also “oil and flour is given to the daughter of tsiun” who brings forth
our Originals , and because her dwelling-place is “in the eden-star”, it follows
that our Originals in Eden “are nurtured by the star” right , as a constant
stream of light-particles (-of crystal , of God’s Life and of ‘the golden wheat’)
[such a struggle to express these concepts properly ….]  ;
the point is please ,
that the Originals “also can creáte personal things” in paradise , ofcourse in
context of the goal of Eden , just like the Spells love “existences to make” in
their ‘paradise by stolen aspects’ by the stolen concept ‘existence to make’ ;
where théir ‘grain light-particles’ are supplied by their ‘winged disk’ as

their evil copy óf the eden-star ; and we had this theme in the previous page where their ‘winged disk’ is the depicted “sistrum” . >> that ’emits grain-light-particles’ as the grain-god NEPER ‘for. this. great. god’ (Torus) as it says here ; while in the Assyrian version , in the ritual “placing the bull skin at the drum” where the drum became the same “winged disk”, they also had placed ’12 statues in it’ to ‘make base-12’ in order to have their 12-month year [-FROM base-10] ;

suggesting that indeed ‘by the wheat-particles are secondary-creations’                                   <<<
or as phrased previously “that variegated palette” which however the evil
realm used to re-divide an aspect of their space-Time into a ’12-month year’ ;

 
 
                                                                                           PART II
                                                                                              ‘1290’
                                                   ‘wheat’ and ‘high numbers’ : by base-10 ?
 
   wheat ‘multiplies base-10’ ?
   if we are right and ‘wheat’ is a creational aspect causing a variegated palette that
   is ‘added’ to base-10 (-the ten types crystal-light at the attribute of our Originals) ,
   and the base-7 (-as God’s number being Life as fire to combine with the former) ,.
   then could wheat form ‘other numbers’ or ‘manifolds’ ?
   here comes Rgveda in mind that boasts with ‘a hundred’ and even “a thousand” 
   that must have derived from their captured base-10 : they do have same nature 
   as the ‘original ten’ yet can be some ‘version’ of her but without “overruling it” ?
   with main argument ,
   that every Original has his or her own unique features , all of them of stunning 
   beauty yet all different , reflecting the ‘spectrum’ (so to speak) of God ?
 
   [Mt.13]  wheat + 100 & 30 & 60 , and [Ez.4]  wheat + 390 & 40 & 390                                                     [A] 
   starting with the same Matthew example ,
   though no subject is mentioned ‘[seeds]  are being devoured by birds’ (in line 4)
   which is not difficult to turn into ‘the matrix having stolen the wheat stalks’, right ;
   while (5) “some fell on stony places”
   immediately reminds us of the stalks “standing upon the [corner-]  stone [-floor] ”
   or from whére Esau got these ideas ? in next (7) “some fell among the thorns” 
   that per context well may be ‘the matrix barley stalks’ , while in (6) it even has 
   the idea of “the sun scorched them” — as being kindled by the matrix .. ?
   ofcourse Esau always loved ‘plausible deniability’ ,
   wherefore the discourse (starting at 19) was not “an explanation of the parable”  
   but a genuine message about ‘belief’ yet now distorted : for Esau just made up 
   the alleged parable to hide another theme beneath it ,
   which’ clue may be the “hundred- , sixty- and thirty-fold” in line 8 here                          [100 & ‘1000’]                      
   [and please keep these lines in mind when we go to the Revelation 11 section] 
   
   … our problem still is that we do not know ‘what description’ was given here  [100 & 1000-fold :] 
   that could describe the wheat — perhaps “a hundred-fold (Eden-) riches” in 
   form of “pure-oil and honey and fine-flour” akin to ‘the land of milk & honey’
   as the promise to old-Ishral ?
   then please look at this ,
        (Deut.4)
      “And thou shalt eat before the LORD thy God, in the place which he shall choose  
       to place his name there, the tithe (’10’!) of thy corn,                                                                                [sic !] 
       of thy wine, of thine oil, and the firstlings of thy herds and of thy flocks;”
       (Deut.12)
        Thou mayest not eat within thy gates the tithe of thy corn…”                                     [‘100’ & ‘1000’] 
   here ,
   clearly the base-10 (‘tithe’) theme is related to [=wheat]  while even the other 
   pleasant products to enjoy are added here ; we cannot prove it since these type
   lines were moved and corrupted , but how much is the chance that it said here
   how the wheat (‘returned to eden’?) will cause 100-fold even 1000-fold riches ?
 
   and then [Ez.4]  ,                                                                                                                                                                         [B] 
   wherein Ezekiel allegedly has to play-out ‘a judgment upon Jerusalem’ ,
   starting with the “taken [+away?]  stone” >> as the floor ! ,
   and “an iron pot” >> that hás to be “the gloomy cave” (!) he was imprisoned in ;
        then (9-10) 
      “Take thou also unto thee wheat, and barley, and beans, and lentiles, and millet, 
        and fitches [=spelt] , and put them in one vessel, and make thee bread thereof, 
        [according]  to the number of the days that thou shalt lie upon thy side , 
        three – hundred – and ninety – days shalt thou eat thereof.                                          [100 & ‘1000’] 
        And thy meat which thou shalt eat [shall be]  by weight, twenty shekels a day: 
        from time to time shalt thou eat it.”
   now ,
   considering the above examples do we potentially have a similar theme here ?
   [where the corrupt root ‘spelt’ came from the Exodus 9 lines about matrix-barley] 
 
                                                                                             II-b
   first we do one step back please
   because other themes with their specific phrases join this ‘wheat stalks’ theme ,
   and though it gets a bit messy now — considering the graph below how much is 
   the chance, realistically, that all of these were about one and the same theme ? :  
 

   the first key here is the “side” in the Ezekiel 4 version where he did not need to
   lay ‘390 days on his left side followed by 40 days on his right side’ but this was 
   the important theme of ‘the two – sides – of heaven’ : Behemoth & Leviathan !
   in the same way ,
   NO “two men stood at either [side]  of the river” in Daniel 12 but it was the same
   two sides of heaven – and not with “a (third-) man in the midst’ : but ‘Eden’ !
   however , Esau has mutilated sections and cut them apart :
 
   #1)  Dan 9   : base-10 and -7 & ‘the two halves’                                                          [the alleged ’70 weeks’] 
             Dan 12 : the wheat & the 100 and 1000-fold
   so we need to decide about that nasty ’70 weeks’ chapter :
   per every context so far that was about the stolen ‘base-10 and 7′ (as ’70’ now) 
   and that truly Infamous line (27) in KJV as “in the midst of the week” was about 
   the “(Eden ruling) in the midst of – the·seven=the heavens (shbo=shmim)”  —
   because (in 25) ,
   no “anointed one the governer seventy sevens and sevens sixty” showed
   but “the year as the ten months (-of the house of Eden)” theme however that
   was exáctly phrased in these grotesque corruptions ;
   then (in 26) the floor and sceptre and star return to the ‘sanctuary’ (shown) where
   next (27) has to read “then the covenant will be master=fulfilled” (when the 
   house of Eden will again be ruling) in the midst of the heavens” :
   since God’s covenant WAS about the two halves of heaven and Eden inbetween :                       [sic] 
   per the cut-in-half bull in Genesis 15 , as the covenant finally realized by now !  
   originally ‘the wheat theme’ followed (now chapter 12) ,
 or at least áfter the floor and sceptre have been re-installed since the stalks
 will again “be standing upon him” (still kind of remained in Zech.4 and Rev.11) ;
 followed by the ‘1000 (fold) , [200]  100 (fold) [90]  days=riches’ or however this                            <<<
 expression had been intended 
         [sub :
          in the Revelation 20-21 (-page) we knéw that the closing was corrupted
         but now we also know why and what theme originally had to follow there ..]  
 concerning the ‘prophecy’ :
 it is no loss that “the anointed the governer” that ‘should appear after 62 weeks’ 
 became a hoax now : anyway other prophets already foresaid that whereas the 
 alleged ‘perfect timing since the return from the exile’ is a combination of pure 
 coincidence (since ‘the decree for return’ is too vague) , magickal interpretation 
 and perhaps a whisper of Adam unto his sons when they corrupted this book   
 
   #2)  Zech 4   :  the wheat (but no 100 & 1000)
             Zech 14 : ‘the two halves’                                                                                             [‘the split Olive mount’] 
   but even more gruesomely cut-up as the book Daniel ;
   the return of the ‘stone – the corner’ is at the start of chapter 12 
   (it never said “Jerusalem as a burdensome stone” in 3) where he will return to
   eden and the ‘Torches’ (in 6) will set “fire” to the Orion gate that vexed them ;
   but you see what a gigantic puzzle it would be to stitch all the snippets together
 
   #3)  Ez 4 : the stone                                                                                                                                         [‘crystal floor’] 
                          iron pan                                                                                                                 [‘returning from the cave’] 
                         ‘left & right side’                                                                                                [‘eden rules in the middle’] 
                         ‘number days 300 & 90’                                                                          [‘year of 10 months of Eden’]  
                         ’40 iniquity of Judah’                                                                         [‘sold base-10 iniquity of Adam’] 
                          ‘wheat + 300 & 90’                                                                                [‘wheat & 100- and 1000-fold’] 
   yet also here Esau moved lines to fit his narrative ,
        (4)
       “Lie thou also upon thy left side, and lay the iniquity of the house of Israel upon it: 
        [according]  to the number of the days that thou shalt lie upon it thou shalt bear their iniquity.”
        (4)
        and [=he]  will lie=rule the on=two sides of – the·left (!) = the heavens (shmli=shmim)
        and in (5)
        the ‘number of (-the house of) days=eden’ ,
        [as]  [her]  three=year (shlsh=shna) of hundred=10 [..]  ninety=months (thsho=chodsh)‘
        [where Esau moved the ‘year’ into next line 6] 
        then we would need ‘the return of the sceptre and star also , 
        and (9-10) 
       “Take thou also unto thee wheat, and barley, and beans, and lentiles, and millet,
        and fitches [=spelt] , and put them in one vessel, and make thee bread thereof, 
        [according]  to the number of the days that thou shalt lie upon thy side , 
        three hundred and ninety days shalt thou eat thereof.                                                       [100 & ‘1000’] 
        And thy meat which thou shalt eat [shall be]  by weight, twenty shekels a day: 
        from time to time shalt thou eat it.”  
 
    #4)  Is 28
   the second half was glued to anóther theme as the first half
   [this happens very often in the very corrupted book]  ;
   here shows the same corrupt ‘spelt’ as in the Ex.9 ‘first plague upon Egypt’ one ;
   it has ‘corner stone’ (in 16) ‘covenant’ (and the floor ‘crossing over’) (in 18) ,
,  then ‘spelt & sesame’ instead of ‘wheat (that was ‘beaten’) & barley’ as the
   same difference in Exodus 9 ; a late ‘sceptre’ (in 27) and even ‘hail’ ! (in 17) so
   that it definitely “will hail in the matrix when the wheat returns” ;  
   and though no numbers appear — because all moved / deleted by Esau — again
   this confirms how all of these themes belong together                                                                                   <<<
 
   #5)  Rev 11    [upcoming] 
 

 
 
for you Majesty
we do listen to you and do want to understand what we need to
and you tell us please if we did this one right also