content : … “ten plagues” did happen — but not ‘in Egypt’ and not exactly in the same way as KJV tells  — but as having occurred in “their Field of Reeds”  which is their ‘paradise’ in their other dimension  [-so that the interpreted chapter 5 was right !]  ; don;t worry for the real version is much prettier as the rather dull and uninspired KJV narrative , in fact , each plague there lasted ‘for a couple of days’ as foreshadowing of the same full plagues that will destroy their world in the latter days : now !

7th plague : their own protective ‘dome of hail’ collapses upon them

   
   
                                                                             theme
 
    … we’re going extremely well      —
    mercilessly dissecting Esau’s text , keeping in mind “how Pharaoh’s brothers
    came to him fróm their Field of Reeds , shouting at him : let those people go ,
    or you will kill us all !” , all the plagues happened ‘in their dimension’ linked to
    the corner-stone , our Originals , the seven Torches , etcetera ;
    where the set stage is such ,
    that Moses acts in Egypt , causing plagues in the Field of Reeds that in
    all prophets similarly is called ‘Egypt’ – as the Spells do – since earthly Egypt 
    was but their projection upon this earth of their dimensional land  
    [the Scroll also calls their paradise ‘Mystery-Babylon’ but it’s the same region]  
 
    it also saves us headaches like “if three days darkness then why not recorded
    in other sources” or “having to match the time of a volcanic explosion in Italy”
    in order to explain the swarms of locusts and flies — the ‘Noah conundrum’ —
    while in truth we don’t ‘but relocate the problem’ :
    for the entire introducing context , especially both signs given to Moses (in 4)
    shóut that this will be “a subject concerning the dimensional other reality” !
 
    the plagues as foreshadowing
    … because of that “you kill us all” coupled with the restored text the plagues
    lasted ‘a couple of days’ but will come into full power only in the latter days ,
    that is when God’s scroll is restored (-see end of chapter 5) ,
    and now we know whát to look for in the strange buildup :
    several times a plague is described followed by “it will happen tomorrow”
    (-machar) that made no sense – except if “the end-time” was intended as
    the root (-acharith) instead of (-machar) !
    so that the closing of chapter 5 was true : though the demons lost this round
    they still have the birthright and will deeply corrupt the Scroll so that the full
    force of the plagues will NOT happen in the latter days !
 
    this also has consequences for the buildup in the book Revelation     —
    Esau saw the danger and ‘invented a different number of plagues’ so that 
    none would go investigate “a relation between the plagues of Egypt and the
    ones in Revelation” — yet the latter are the closing (fulfilling) of the former !
    problem however is “how many plagues happened ?” ;
    for we – and rightly so – questioned the Revelation “plague buildup” but what is  
    the original sequence that will also link back to Egypt .. ?
 
    the ’10’ (or ‘7’ ?) plagues
    … because the problem is the following please    —
    the KJV text suggests an interpretation as “10 plagues each of 7 days” yet
    though both numbers are a crucial ingredient of this whole event , question
    is ‘how would God have judged : by 10 plagues of 7 days or “by 7 judgments 
    judging the (number-) 10 (-as ‘days)” ? 
    this seems nitpicking but it is not , please ,
    since we already found that ‘the 10’ is “the number of Adam” that he had 
    obtained by that tree of good & evil , so that this whole plague thing MUST 
    be about “undoing that number 10 (-including ‘Adam’ himself)” .
    but if Adam’s number is “10” then how can God have “sent 10 plagues” …?
    would He not judge the evil 10 BY His ‘7’ ?
    as in a possible “seven plagues” that would judge “the evil 10” as subject ?
 
    curiously (-or not) ,
    when ploughing through Esau’s incredibly corrupted ’10 plagues’ chapters ,
    several made no Sense — until it showed that he cut them up , as the for 
    him dangerous ‘plagues’ that he distributed as “two separate plagues” !
    and since he did that at léast twice , the shown ’10 plagues’ already come 
    very close to originally having been ‘seven plagues’ ! 
    therefore “the divine number 7 judging the evil (Adam’s) number 10” is very
    important and MUST somehow appear back in Revelation , even we have
    no idea yet how this could be restored in the latter …
 
    the evil ’10’ – before Passover
    … at the end (sic !) of the ’10 plagues’ follows the Passover chapter 12 ,
    almost as ‘conclusion of the (previous) plagues’ explaining how in the
    first month at the 10th of it “a flockling has to be selected” that will
    represent the sacrifice — but we saw how at the final Passover Adam 
    will be sacrificed instead ,
    and if the “10” is clearly judged here would that not imply that instead of
    10 plagues there were ‘seven plagues’ (-perhaps each of 10 days)” ?   
    [sub :
    and becáuse of this context there never was a line about “you will smear
    blood on the doorposts and the lintel” since it follows after this selecting
    the sacrificial animal — so that per context it can only have been another
    devious Esau corruption (here) of the same ‘Adam will be chosen’ theme !
    is that not so discouraging to know — if we hadn’t a better version .. ?
    how many millions have believed this “put blood on the doorposts” while
    it was never true and in fact have been supporting ‘Adam’ ?] 
 
    [continued — mentioned ‘time frames’ in the text :] 
    … at “the intro miracle” , the famous “the staff turning into a serpent” a
    corrupted line shows that MUST be related to this major ‘7’ and ’10’ theme ,
    and please see the breakdown of the plagues , below ;
    but then also dúring (several-) plagues a time frame appears : the first one
    has the addition “it lasted seven days” while others (in a corrupted context)
    show “three + days” ,
    so that our question is “did God already anull the illegal composed number
    as the 70 [7 x 10]  time frame of mystery-Babylon (‘matrix-Egypt’)’ which is
    the “70 bulls theme” (see pages) , or at least initiated her destruction as the 
    start of these plagues (-upon her)” ?
    now please ,
    per context ‘these (’10’) plagues ended before the day of Passover’ ,
    since at Passover the people were delivered from the land of earthly-Egypt ,
    and they had to hurry to reach mt.Horeb before the day of Unleavened ;
    but ,
    like the old people were delivered at Passover to leave Egypt ,
    seven weeks later the 144,000 could be delivered at Weeks to leave Earth ,
    because these (’10’) plagues were the foreshadowing of the end-time ,
    so that the decisive plagues may happen now — at Weeks !
    namely “when my scroll is restored” (Ex.4 page and end of Ex.5) so that
    the full force of those plagues will be released upon their evil Field ! 
 
    espécially since during this next ‘7’ (as seven weeks until Pentecost) we 
    found the “40 days theme” – as the 40 days until Weeks – that was about
    the locusts having stolen the birthright through the eden-mother ,
    where these locusts – Horus & sons – will appear here as ‘the 8th plague’ 
    as the theme about ‘our birthright’ that He will return to us at Weeks 
    when he also sets free the eden-mother ! 
 
    viewed this way , the whole ‘plagues of Egypt’ event is much deeper since
    it already heralded the Tribulation – as God having initiated it in those days- 
    and therefore much more important as Esau’s rather flat story in the KJV … 
    moreover ,
    it gives us courage to also look at potentially ‘dangerous’ themes :
 
                          no ‘slaying the firstborn’ – because inverted idea
 
    … Esau was not stupid : after ‘the eighth plague of the locusts’ in chapter 11
    he mutilated the next one “as if a continuance of the locusts” and moved that
    concept to chapter 12 below the Passover ordinances ,
    so that instead of us winning the birth sceptre and slaying thém he made
    a tearjerking story about “poor Pharaoh and his people losing their firstborns” !  
 
    consequently : if there was NO ‘slaying the firstborn’ there was NO “angel that
    went from door to door” ! since the line was about “the sons (144) gathered as
    all that will BE the firstborn ones (here) ;
    yet from here on it becomes messy – but because of his corruption ,
    because the roots of the alleged “passing + the doors” suspiciously much look
    like they can have said “opening of + the mouth” as the locusts/mother theme ,
    yet this 12 is so corrupted – also as parts taken from 11 – that it will be a hell of
    a job to recompose her exact phrasings ….  
 
                                                     the ’10 plagues’ breakdown
 
   please , you do not háve to read this section , since it’s very Messy
   but only because of warring to unlock Esau’s deep corruptions while he probably
   even has cut-op ‘plagues’ as “inventing two plagues that originally were 1 theme” ;
   the interpretation of each plague is shown as [conclusion :]  line below each one
   as the concept that will be overlaid upon the plagues to get the restored text 
 
   intro : the ‘staff becoming a serpent’ sign
   … and right away we run into problems :
   the plagues seem to start with “the Nile becoming blood” as the first plague in
   chapter 7, but because Esau deeply mutilated the final three plagues perhaps
   the real first one was the famous ‘the staffs turning into serpents’ at the stárt of
   this chapter — but then we face another problem :
            (7)
            “And Moses [was]  fourscore years old, 
            and Aaron fourscore and three years old, when they spake unto Pharaoh.”
   as nonsense ,
   for it MUST be about the ‘7’ and ’10’ theme , as introduction , but it’s difficult to
   see what exactly was intended because it seems to be a moved line ;
   yet the event itself supports this interpretation :
   curiously it does not write ‘serpents’ but ‘sea monster’ as dimensional theme
   per the root used for Behemoth and Leviathan , so that the act makes sense :
   there must have been “two sorcerers of Pharaoh” that threw théir staffs to the
   ground which then turned into two sea-monsters – as Behemoth & Leviathan
   that depicted their Dualistic-realm which ruled (-again) instead of Eden !
   then ,
   the addition in 12 how “Aaron’s staff swallowed up their staff” should represent
   how restored Eden once more will rule the realm that turned into a dualistic one 
 
   [sub :] 
   that God would use a negative term as ‘sea monster’ is possible since first the
   staff had fallen (!) to the ground – and see chapter 4 – and the Egyptians knew
   it depicted their own ‘ÂPEP serpent’ in their spells represented ‘fallen Eden’ ;
   then ,
   unlikely this scene “represented the first plague” because the attributes are too
   large to be one ; instead it must show “the goal of the 10 plagues” resulting in
   the restoration of Eden ;
   [the problems we still have is why it writes “Aaron’s staff” , is that corrupt ? ;
   and for Legal Right : the whole scene cóuld have depicted ‘the axis theme’ for
   the matrix has several axis (-into Eden) but that may be too complicated while
   the sea-monster would not exactly ‘swallow up their multiple axis’ ; except of it
   said “and Aaron’s staff BROKE the others”] 
 
   the 10 plagues :
   after this hurdle indeed this seems to be ‘the first plague’ ;
   the breakdowns below may seem overdone but there’s very much information
   here while it is crucial that we also understand what was intended :
 

   1st   waters to blood            [long : 15-25]  [ch.7]                                                              [showing : ‘7 days’] 
   (#2) location : egypt ánd field of reeds ?                                                  [or enacted in egypt for field ?] 
             Moses’ location : the important 15 is very corrupted  —
             it’s possible that go ! – to meet (‘moved’) – Pharaoh – having gone to – (his?) [=tree]  
                                                   standing – at – the shore of – the Nile ,
             also because of “with your staff that turned into a serpent” (in ch.4) as if to further 
             hint that the subject is ‘the tree of good & evil’ (-and the serpent , Gen.3) since
             that is the place here it all went wrong !
             concept :
             after collecting the waters around that tree . the dimensional Nile starts there
             and brings the waters to their North ; because Eden partly feeds the tree it are
             mixed-waters which they can use (after stealing it) , but perhaps now it became
             ‘too much Eden-nature which is ruddiness’ as poison , ‘blood’ [=red]  , for them ?
             [sub :
             the eden-waters IN Eden bedewed the ground (-adme from -dm ‘ruddiness’) as
             the dust Asam (-adm) was made from so the relation seems valid]  
             yet the next lines are extremely tricky :
             attributes :
             19 has “streams & rivers & ponds – of the land” also said of ‘the Field of Reeds’ 
             in a prophets chapter , and compare its depiction in top of chapter 5 ; 
             foreshadowing theme :
             corrupted
              intended main theme :
             the whole point must be “that they will not again steal eden-waters” not even 
             as mixture now for the tree of good & evil itsélf will be destroyed ! therefore not
             their water became blood [‘red’]  but ‘they had no ruddish-water any longer’ !
             the Nile stopped ! and because all of them in their Field have stolen eden bodies
             that néed the ruddiness (though both in corrupt version) they will perish !
             in (19) must have been ‘that tree’,
             not as “.. and the·fish (!) that is in the river shall die, and the river shall stink” 
             but “the waters of the tree by which is the Nile will cease ,
                        and their flesh will perish”   
             [this explains why (the·Nile) shows as tampered everywhere – not because it isn’t 
             the theme but Esau garbled-up every line so the word is constant in wrong place]     
             conclusion :
             the eden-waters ‘of ruddiness’ they stole for their Field & bodies ceased 7 days ,
             while in the end-time it will wholly stop for the tree of good & evil will be destroyed
 

   2nd  frogs                        [long : 1-15]  [ch.8]                                                                      [shown : ‘tomorrow’] 
   (#3) location : unclear where                                                                                                [seems only in field] 
             Moses’ location : unclear
             problems : ‘frog’ (ts-ph-r-d) is a weird root [‘zipporah’ ts-ph-r-h in ch.4 was ‘scroll’] 
             but we can’t use that here ; after ‘blood’ [red]  now ‘white’ as ‘leprosy’ (ts-r-th) as
             in chapter 4 ? then we must have ‘the corner-stone theme’ ; yet the ‘leprosy’ can
             be Esau’s trap and the word was “silver” , see end ;
             next problem is 3 , “And the river shall bring forth frogs abundantly, which shall go up 
             and come into thine house, and into thy bed+chamber, and upon thy bed [……..] ” ;
             here ,
             the (-mtth) as ‘bed’ is the same as (-mtth) “staff” – but “as axis” ! ,
             but now the by us feared problem of “WHAT went up” also shows (hence ‘axis’) ,
             because – sorry for that – we still are not sure “exactly whére the stone is” ,
             so did ‘the leprosy go up’ (as cloud or something) or ‘the stone itself’ ?
             though it’s sure “that they cáptured the stone” ,
             but did they also ‘move it to their realm’ or is it “annexed within the eden-gate” ?
             if the latter then “the opening of the mouth (-ritual)” could be compared with
             ‘an open mouth blowing breath to above while the tongue is the stone” ?                    <<<<
             we fear the latter ,
             re : Moses’ location :
             so if a stone then what was the action of Moses ? 
             since 5 “stretch forth your hand (!) with your staff over the·streams and the·waterways 
             and the·ponds” doesn’t help us because all three are tampered while stretching it
             into some “over the stone in the gate” is nearly undoable (nerth – iarim – agmim) ,
             so where was moses and what did he do ?
             or was ‘the stone’ “his own hand” as in chapter 4 ? and therefore he didn’t need
             to ‘go’ somewhere ?
                           stretch=put – your hand – in your staff=bosom 
             while this is the third time that “to ascend” shows ; 
             the ‘white’ >> into ‘silver’ (-white) as ‘leprosy’ (-white , for the enemy) ?
             … this is a headache theme   —
             if the stone is “of crystal as ice” in Revelation and Ezekiel as ‘neutral white’ ,
             as “silver light-particles that dress up the (eden-) environment” [-while our
             Originals are dressed of gold-dust]  , and the evil realm wanted that aspect
             now as glyph H’ETCH “silver , to destroy (-eden) , and also silver-stone” ,
             so that they mutilated (they would say ‘purified’) those particles to can use ,
             then now the particles became as – for them deadly – eden-silver again ?
             but that makes no sense ?
             intended theme :
             … because the phrase “[the frogs-]  ascend” appears so often the simplest
             explanation is the something will NOT ‘ascend’ (-anymore) , which must be
             something ‘of the stone’ and the closest related root to ‘frog’ (ts-ph-r-d) can
             not be ‘leprosy (-white)’ (tsrth) for that is not defendable anymore
             but instead ‘silver’ (-white) (kh-s-PH) as ‘silver-particles by the stone’ ,
             perhaps also described as ‘crystal’ (-qerach) ;
             then there’s ‘snow’ (-sheleg) or “whiteness as snow” but the root                     [search word] 
             is untraceable ; it appeared in Ex.4 after Moses’ hand was leprous 
             [where probably we need to forget the entire ‘leprosy’ connection : perhaps
             it said “and behold ! it was – leprosy=white – as snow” which Esau immediately
             turned into ‘a leper theme’ ;
             so that 6 “.. and the·frogs ascended , and covered the land of Egypt” 
             must have been and – the frogs=silver-particles – (will) [+not]  ascend ,
                                                  and [+not]  cover (‘beautify’?) – [..]  the land – Egypt
             it’s not clear what consequence this has (because corrupted)
             but perhaps 13 said ‘[therefore-]  the Field – (is) die=desolate’ ;
             [conclusion :] 
             the by them annexated stone (‘still in the eden-gate’?) ceases to emit the
             silver-white-light-particles that they steal to beautify their Field with ,
             and will wholly stop when the eden-gate is restored
 

   3d  lice          [short : 15-19 , partly deleted ?]  [ch.8] 
   (#4) location : unclear                                                                                                   [per context ‘only in field’] 
             Moses’ location : unclear
             lice (k-n) what the hell can K-N have been ?
             intended theme :
             thing is that in the order of importance now “the matrix-gate of Adam” can follow
             where for the first time the root (-adm) (‘Adam’ or ‘man’) shows ;
             16 has “Stretch out thy rod, and smite the dust of the land, 
                              that it may become lice throughout all the land of Egypt.”
                    stretch out – your staff – and strike – the soil=gate (?) (OphR=shOR) – the·land=palace (?) ,
                    [=that]  it (will) become – [..]  lice=dark (?) (Kn=chshK) – in all of – the land
             this has several problems ,
             but the gate of the palace (‘egyptian city Ôn as mystery-Babylon’) is valid ,
             and though the 9th plague has ‘darkness’ perhaps Esau moved the theme
             and it said there something like “eternal desolation” ;
             after the waters and the silver-particles that are ‘purified’ then entering the Field
             through his gate , it is póssible that now “his gate as evil copy” was addressed ;
             perhaps telling is also ,
             that Esau suddenly deletes an entire paragraph – so we assume it was ‘Adam’ here 
             while the very short ‘darkness plague 9’ may have been the continuation
             foreshadowing :
             corrupted / deleted
             [conclusion :] 
             the copied ‘gate of Adam for mystery-Babylon’ ceased to work for a while so that
             the Field got darkened , where his gate will be destroyed in the latter days when
             this (their) sun will darken (-as 2nd half probably moved to be ‘plague 9’) 
 
   (now : #4th + #9th = 5 from 10 ?)
 
   4th  [fly]  mixture      [long : 20-32]   [ch.8]                                               [shown : ‘tomorrow’ + ‘3 days’] 
   (#5th or 6 from 10 ?)
             location : unclear                                                                                                                 [seems only in field] 
             Moses’ location : must be the ‘morning’ (éden-dawn’) (-bqr) theme ;
             tampered (-orb) “mixture [-of flies] ” is an invented meaning while similar (-arb) 
             is “evening” but can also be ‘it crosses over’ (-obr) ; 
              intended theme :
             perhaps after previous ‘now the eden-gate (for the eden-dawn) is restored’ ? ;
             remembering that “the eden-light is poisonous for them” ,
             21 has “… behold, I will send swarms [of flies]  upon thee, and upon thy servants , 
             and upon thy people, and into thy houses: … ….”
                       behold ! , I (will) send – the·mixture = the (eden-) dawn (oRB=BqR line 20) …
             next 22 has “my people” ,
             that should be “our imprisoned Originals” there (and not ‘in the land of – Goshen’) ,
             as “And I will sever in that day the land of Goshen, in which my people dwell , 
             that no swarms [of flies]  shall be there; […..] “ ,
                       and I (will) sever=deliver (phalah=phalath !) – in that – day 
                       my – which=sacred (ashr=qdsh) – people (‘Originals’) – [=from]  the land of – [=Egypt]  ,
                       (as) the stand=prisoners – [=in]  her     +
                       as-not=that – (are being) be=burned (?) (‘oppressed’?) – there (?)     +
                       (by) [+her]  mixture [-of flies] =(matrix-) dawn (-light) (oRb=shchR)
             where prophets contain a line ,
             about “them not being scorched anymore when they will be delivered” ; while the
             spells have their HRU-light (by Adam’s gate !) ‘that scorches eden’ and therefore
             very possibly also the imprisoned Originals ; 
             foreshadowing : shows 
             problem :
             lines      
             line 26 “And Moses said, It is not meet so to do ; for we shall sacrifice the abomination 
             of the Egyptians to the LORD our God: […..] ” ,
             utterly bizarre line that can only have been about ‘the Strange Fire’ that Adam placed 
             upon the altar (sic) of God in the eden-gate , directly relating to ‘dawn’ ! , since it was
             Adam’s back-up extortion to keep stealing from the eden gate ;
             and because this line shows after the ‘tomorrow’ [=Tribulation]  in 23 , this must be
             about that toxic Strange Fire being thrown out of the sanctuary :
                      the egyptians=strange (mtZRim=ZuR) – abomination=fire 
                     (upon-) the sacrifice=altar (zbch=mzbch !)     +
                     (in-) the deity=sanctuary (‘gate’) (‘no match’) (‘swapped’) of – [..]  IEUE ,
             and though the ‘strange fire’ abomination had not happened yet ,
             for Adam would only implement that at the event of the statue at mt.Horeb ,
             it so belongs to the theme that it MUST already have addressed this ;
             [conclusion :] 
             the Eden dimensional-dawn as light temporarily flooded their realm by which they
             were scorched , shown by ‘our imprisoned Originals’ there that are now scorched
             by the type light of the matrix dimensional-dawn ;
             while in the end days the eden-dawn will fúlly scorch the matrix also when the
             Strange Fire that Adam placed in the sanctuary (eden gate) will be removed  
 
   5th plague on cattle       [short : 1-7 , deleted but how ?]  [ch.9] 
   (#6th or 7 from 10 ?)
             location : unclear                                                                                                     [per context ‘in the field’] 
             Moses’ location : unclear
             problem /                                                                [shown : ‘appointed time’ (Weeks’?) + ‘tomorrow’] 
             possible intended theme :
             it shows a juxta as “the cattle of Egypt vs the cattle of Ishral” so that it can be a 
             moved theme about “the sons of Ishral (we) against the sons of Ammon (of Adam)” ,
             but if just ago plague 4 introduced ‘our Originals’ it can also be about thém   —
             line 3 , totally corrupted , shows “flock” (-tsan) often as ‘our Originals’ ,
             as 3 “….. and upon the sheep: [there shall be]  a very grievous murrain.” ,
                         [=as]  – the very – grievous – plague=oppression (‘torture’) – [=upon]  (my-) flock ,
             referring to them demons stealing their aspects ,
             where God uses the phrase ‘oppression’ to denote ‘torture’ ;
              problem #2 :
             it has (in 6) , said AFTER ‘tomorrow’ [=end days]  , “… and all the cattle of Egypt died ….”
             likely as all of the – cattle=horrible idols (‘stolen bodies’ !) (mQn=shQts) of
                          the Egyptians – (will) die=perish ,
             we lack the – deleted – midsection of “what happened to them demons in Moses’ time” ,
             yet perhaps it máy have continued in next ‘short plague 6’ about “boils” , and curiously
             also “a smelting-oven” (for Originals ?) is mentioned there ;
             oh wait : the ‘boils’ (next plague 6) was swapped as the intro here :
             their plague (in Moses’ time’) was ‘boils’ because of what they did to our Originals ,
             while in the latter end “their horrible idol will perish ;
 

   6th  boils          [short : 8-12 only , continued from 5 ?]   [ch.9] 
             location : unclear
             Moses’ location : unclear — was the intro to ‘plague 5’ above   ^^^
 
             [so that we have either “1 + 6 [but two cut-up ones]  of 10” = 1 + 4 plagues = 5 ,
             ór “an intro” (1) + 6 [but two cut-up ones]  of 10″                        = intro + 4 plagues = 4 ;
             so that the question now is ,
             were it “10 plagues x 7 days” or “7 plagues x 10 days” …? ; 
             where ofcourse “the result is the same” (and that’s important) but ‘the way to get there’
             is not the same : for it’s not the same “if a 7 judges a 10” or “a 10 the 7” , and slowly on
             because of the cutting-up by Esau it can indicate there were ‘seven plagues’ since we
             will run out of text before we get to ’10 of them’……] 
 
B)  the problem with ‘the 10th plague – the firstborns smitten’ :
 
       chapter 12 breaks the buildup-sequence because first ‘Passover is explained’ (1-11) ,
       but then :
       11 has “be ready to go” — because they had to journey to Horeb before Unleavened ,
       yet since Esau corrupted that theme (having posponed it 40 days) he now inserts
       a section as anóther reason for ‘to go’ , turning it into ‘the firstborn slain’ ! 
       KJV 12 has “I smite + all + the firstborn” (I-smite every-of firstborn)
       but it said “all + the firstborns (144) + will smite (the land=sons of + egypt=Adam) !
       as (they-shall-smite all-of firstborns) ;
   
only these two lines have ‘the actual slaying’ :
29-30
“And it came to pass, that at midnight the LORD smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt , 
from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne 
unto the firstborn of the captive that [was]  in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle .
And Pharaoh rose up in the night, he, and all his servants, and all the Egyptians ; 
and there was a great cry in Egypt; for [there was]  not a house where [there was]  not one dead.  
29
and it (will) happen – (that) [=from]  the midst of – the·night (=tampered) = the people (‘today’ !)
b
and=I IEUE – (will) smite=gather – all – the firstborn=sons (bkr=bn)      +
c
in=as the land=remnant (aRts=shRth) of – egypt=Ishral ,
d
from the firstborn=sons – (that will have) the·one-sitting = restored (ishb=shb) (‘swapped’)     + 
e
[+my]  pharaoh=scroll (PHRoe=sPHR) – […2x ?]      +                             [already mentioned in ch.4 !] 
f
until – the·captive = the many (?) – firstborn=sons    +                          [now we need a condition ? :] 
g
who – (will have become) house=humble of – the·cistern (=tampered) = heart (Br=lB) ,
h
[=as]  all of – the firstborn=remnant (bkR=shRth) of – beast=Ishral ;
 
    since this chapter contained “a conclusion of the plagues” ,
    not only of the temporal ones that would lead old-Ishral out of Egypt ,
    but also “the real plagues at the end of time when the 144 will leave Earth”
    the above interpretation looks good !
 
C) was there really ‘(blood to be put on-) doorposts’ ?
 
       as the next problem  —
       though the action seems possible it only appears in this chapter so that
       if it wére a genuine command it would show in Lev. Deut. and Numbers …
       first time it appears here in 12:7 , following “the choosing of a flockling for
       Passover” which is the ‘Christ or Adam’ theme for the latter days ,
       (7)
      “And they shall take of the blood, and strike [it]  on the two side posts 
       and on the upper door post of the houses, wherein they shall eat it.”
       now please ,
       if there is NO “slaying of the firstborn” and NO “angel passing the doors” ,
       then could this action be significant for anóther reason – or is it fake ?
       root ‘doorpost’ is the strange (-mezuzah) + tampered here ,
       and ‘lintel’ (mashqoph) + tampered and only here ;
       here , “the·lintel + the·houses” tampered as “e·mshquph + e·bthim” looks
       like Christ as “[My-]  anointed + servant” mshquph=mshchh + bth=obd ,                          [lev.14] 
       so that first half of the line can have been about ‘Adam’ ;
wait ,
because previous line was about “the 10th – the 14th day” this continues ? :
6
d
and=then (‘at the 14th’) – all of – the congregation of – Ishral – (will) slay – it (‘flockling’) ;
e
between=until – the·evenings (=tampered) = the passover (?) (‘no match’)    +                      [cont.:] 
7
[=when]  (‘at the final Passover’) – the·blood = the adm-man (‘Adam’) (dm=adm)     +
b
and=that give=obtained – two=TEN-fold – doorposts=strength (mezuzah=azaz)      +
c
(by-) the on=tree (?) (ol=ets) – (will be) take=sacrificed (lqch=zbch)
d
and=instead of – the·lintel = the anointed – [=as]  – the·houses = [+my]  servant
   e
   [dangerous :] 
   who – (will have) eat=given + himself + up – [=for]  them=you ;
 
    isn’t that beautiful ? ; )
    yes we already found that “the 10th at the final Passover was about Adam” 
    because of his “ten times eating the fruit” (-see pages) but this is a very solid
    text and directly following line 6 ;
    while here as confirmation that indeed “TEN plagues happened” ,
    moreover , it destroys the alleged ‘blood on the doorposts’ thing !